Neil A. Fine

A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction

Background: Human acellular dermal matrix has become an increasingly used adjunct to traditional submuscular tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction, but there is no strong consensus regarding complication outcomes. This study stratified outcomes based on a meta-analysis of complications. Methods: A query of the MEDLINE database for articles on human acellular dermal matrix and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction yielded 901 citations. Two levels of screening identified 48 relevant studies. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to perform the meta-analysis. Risk ratios and pooled complication rates were calculated for each outcome of interest. Results: Nineteen studies reporting human acellular dermal matrix (n = 2037) and 35 reporting submuscular outcomes (n = 12,847) were used to estimate complication rates. Rates were generally higher in acellular dermis patients: total complications, 15.4 versus 14.0 percent; seroma, 4.8 versus 3.5 percent; infection, 5.3 versus 4.7 percent; and flap necrosis, 6.9 versus 4.9 percent. Six studies reporting both acellular dermis and submuscular outcomes were used to estimate relative risks. There was an increased risk of total complications (relative risk, 2.05; 95 percent CI, 1.55 to 2.70), seroma (relative risk, 2.73; 95 percent CI, 1.67 to 4.46), infection (relative risk, 2.47; 95 percent CI, 1.71 to 3.57), and reconstructive failure (relative risk, 2.80; 95 percent CI, 1.76 to 4.45) in acellular dermis patients. Conclusions: The meta-analysis suggests that the use of human acellular dermal matrix increases complication rates vis-à-vis submuscular expander/implant reconstruction. This must be weighed against its reported advantages in enhancing cosmesis and ameliorating contracture. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Early clinical experience in endoscopic-assisted muscle flap harvest

Two cases of endoscopic-assisted muscle harvest for lower extremity reconstruction are presented. Each case involved resurfacing the distal leg and dorsum of the foot with a split-thickness skin graft over a latissimus dorsi free flap. An endoscope with a video monitor and modified thoracoscopic instruments were used to assist in the muscle harvest. The principles of endoscopic muscle harvest include an incision long enough to remove the muscle, placed in the least conspicuous area that is within the reach of the instrumentation; retraction to optimize the optical cavity or visual working area; and use of video monitors to allow for coordinated assistance. The decrease in visible scarring is dramatic and represents the primary advantage over open techniques. We believe that the role of endoscopy will continue to expand as our experience increases and technology improves.

A Retrospective Analysis of Patient Satisfaction with Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Comparison of Three Common Procedures

Background: The authors aimed to quantify overall patient satisfaction with three breast reconstruction techniques and identify factors that have influenced satisfaction. Methods: Two hundred sixty-eight questionnaires were mailed at least 6 months after immediate breast reconstruction to consecutive breast reconstruction patients over a 3-year period. A second questionnaire was sent out 9 months later to the tissue expander/implant group of patients. Results: The initial questionnaire demonstrated that overall satisfaction was significantly greater in the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap patients as compared with the tissue expander/implant patients (p < 0.05). However, the number of patients willing to repeat the procedure and recommend their procedure to a friend was similar among all three reconstructive techniques. A significantly greater number of tissue expander/implant patients as compared with TRAM flap patients felt they had not received sufficient information to make an educated decision (p < 0.05). This finding correlated with the lower satisfaction rate among the tissue expander/implant patients. The second questionnaire sent only to the tissue expander/implant patients revealed that the majority felt uninformed about the final aesthetic outcome and the frequency and pain associated with the expansion process. Conclusions: All three groups may claim to be satisfied with their own personal choices. Many patients will continue to choose tissue expander/implant reconstruction in an effort to avoid scars and more extensive surgery. Being less satisfied is not wrong or bad, provided it is known. Tissue expander/implant patients should be thoroughly informed in the preoperative setting about the final aesthetic outcomes and the immediate perioperative expansion period, which may involve a considerable amount of patient commitment and discomfort in some women.

Autologous Options for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes Based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

BACKGROUND The postmastectomy patient faces a plethora of choices when opting for autologous breast reconstruction; however, multi-institutional data comparing the available techniques are lacking. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database provides a robust patient cohort for comparing outcomes and determining independent predictors of complications for each autologous method. STUDY DESIGN The NSQIP database was retrospectively reviewed from 2006 to 2010, identifying 3,296 autologous breast reconstruction patients. Univariate analyses compared complication and reoperation rates. Multivariable logistic regression analyses of 4 cohorts (free flaps, pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaeous (TRAM) flaps, latissimus, and all flaps in aggregate) determined complication rates and independent risk factors for complications and specific outcomes of interest (surgical site infection [SSI], flap failure, reoperation) in all flap types. RESULTS American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ 3, body mass index > 30 kg/m(2), recent surgery, delayed reconstruction, and prolonged operative times are significant predictors of increased complications in autologous reconstructions. Rates of complications, flap failure, and reoperation were highest in the free tissue transfer group (p < 0.001). Latissimus flaps showed significantly lower rates of complications than other autologous methods (p < 0.001). Pedicled TRAM patients had the highest incidences of venous thromboembolic disease and SSI. CONCLUSIONS This large-scale, multicenter evaluation of outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction found that free flaps have the highest captured 30-day complication and reoperation rates of any autologous reconstructive method; complications in latissimus flaps were surprisingly few. Pedicled TRAM and latissimus flaps remain the most commonly used autologous reconstructive methods. In addition to providing statistically robust outcomes data, this study contributes significantly to patient education and preoperative planning discussions.

The outcome of abdominoplasty performed under conscious sedation: six-year experience in 153 consecutive cases.

The use of conscious sedation is rapidly gaining acceptance and popularity in plastic surgery. At the present time, many procedures are performed using intravenous sedation and local anesthesia. The purpose of this article was to examine the safety and outcome of full abdominoplasties performed under conscious sedation at the authors’ institution. Over a 6-year period from 1997 to 2002, 266 abdominoplasties were performed by the two senior authors. One hundred thirteen of these (42 percent) were performed under a general or regional anesthetic because a concurrent procedure was performed that precluded the use of conscious sedation (64 hysterectomies, 18 hernia repairs, six urogynecologic procedures, 10 breast reductions, and one laparoscopic cholecystectomy) or because of patient and surgeon preference (14 cases). One hundred fifty-three abdominoplasties (58 percent) were performed under conscious sedation using intravenous midazolam and fentanyl along with a local anesthetic. No patients had an unplanned conversion to deep sedation or general anesthesia. Eighty percent of these cases were performed with a concurrent procedure (80 liposuctions, 19 breast augmentations, 20 mastopexies, three capsulotomies, and 13 varied facial aesthetic procedures). In addition, 12 patients had concurrent hernia repairs (five ventral and seven umbilical) under conscious sedation. Mean follow-up was 10 months (range, 1 to 56 months). There were no intraoperative complications and no major postoperative complications. The minor complication rate was 11.1 percent (10 seromas requiring needle aspiration in the office, three superficial wound infections, two cases of marginal skin necrosis, one stitch abscess, and one pseudobursa requiring reexcision). Seven revisions were performed for suboptimal scars (5 percent). The results of this study demonstrate that abdominoplasties can be performed under conscious sedation in a safe and cost-effective manner for almost all patients. This type of procedure is well tolerated, has a low complication rate, and has high patient satisfaction. Increasing experience and small modifications in local anesthesia and surgical technique have strengthened the authors’ conviction that conscious sedation is the preferred method of anesthesia for most patients undergoing abdominoplasty.

Outcomes of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction in the setting of prereconstruction radiation.

Background: Although the effects of postoperative radiation on tissue expander breast reconstruction are well documented, few data exist regarding the effects of prereconstruction radiation. This study evaluates the outcomes of tissue expander breast reconstruction in women with prereconstruction radiation. Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated two treatments: (1) mastectomy without reconstruction followed by postoperative radiation and delayed reconstruction (10 patients) and (2) failed breast-conserving therapy (lumpectomy plus radiotherapy) necessitating mastectomy and immediate reconstruction (66 patients). Procedures were performed at Northwestern Memorial Hospital between August of 1999 and July of 2008. Average follow-up was 35 months. Results: In both groups, approximately 60 percent of patients successfully completed two stages of reconstruction. Overall complication rates, including major and minor complications, were 70 percent per reconstruction (37 percent first stage, 45 percent second stage) for immediate reconstruction and 50 percent per reconstruction (20 percent first stage, 38 percent second stage) for delayed reconstruction. No differences in complication rates were observed based on age, smoking status, body mass index, or timing between radiation and surgery (p > 0.05). Conclusions: When discussing expander/implant reconstruction with patients who have a history of prior breast radiotherapy, a frank discussion of the risks, benefits, and alternatives should occur. If a 40 percent total explantation or conversion to flap rate is truly understood by the patient, and if immediate autologous breast reconstruction is to be avoided, then the patient may proceed with tissue expander breast reconstruction. For patients who wish to avoid additional scars or more invasive procedures, however, this study demonstrates that they have a 60 percent chance of success. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Utility of acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation: a comparative analysis.

Background: The role of acellular dermis in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction remains unclear, particularly within a radiated field. The authors evaluated and compare outcomes following reconstruction with and without acellular dermis, and analyzed patients exposed to radiation therapy. Methods: Retrospective review of 417 consecutive patients (592 breasts) treated from January of 2006 to October of 2008 at one institution was performed. Relevant patient characteristics and follow-up were recorded. Complications were categorized by type and end outcome, including nonoperative, operative, or explantation. Both groups had comparable follow-up (acellular dermis, 23.2 ± 8.9 months; no acellular dermis, 24.4 ± 12.7 months; p = 0.23). Appropriate statistical analyses, including multiple regression, were performed. Results: Acellular dermis patients (n = 199 breasts) had larger body mass indexes (p = 0.0001) and more nipple-sparing mastectomies (p = 0.04) than non–acellular dermis patients (n = 393 breasts). Breasts with acellular dermis had larger intraoperative fill volumes (p < 0.0001) and decreased postoperative expansions (p = 0.02), but no decrease in time to implant exchange. There were no significant differences in complication profiles between acellular dermis and non–acellular dermis breasts, after adjusting for other relevant patient variables on regression analysis. After stratifying patients by exposure to radiation, acellular dermis breasts had a decreased risk of all complications related to radiation as compared with non–acellular dermis breasts. Conclusions: This study suggests that acellular dermis does not adversely affect complication rates following prosthetic breast reconstruction. It may be advantageous, however, in select patients, particularly those undergoing postoperative radiation therapy. Therefore, the choice to use acellular dermis does not compromise outcomes but should be individualized to each patient. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Human Acellular Dermis versus Submuscular Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Multivariate Analysis of Short-Term Complications

Background Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allografts and their putative benefits have been increasingly described in prosthesis based breast reconstruction. There have been a myriad of analyses outlining ADM complication profiles, but few large-scale, multi-institutional studies exploring these outcomes. In this study, complication rates of acellular dermis-assisted tissue expander breast reconstruction were compared with traditional submuscular methods by evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry. Methods Patients who underwent immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction from 2006-2010 were identified using surgical procedure codes. Two hundred forty tracked variables from over 250 participating sites were extracted for patients undergoing acellular dermis-assisted versus submuscular tissue expander reconstruction. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes and captured risk factors for complications were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 9,159 patients underwent tissue expander breast reconstruction; 1,717 using acellular dermis and 7,442 with submuscular expander placement. Total complications and reconstruction related complications were similar in both cohorts (5.5% vs. 5.3%, P=0.68 and 4.7% vs. 4.3%, P=0.39, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression revealed body mass index and smoking as independent risk factors for reconstructive complications in both cohorts (P<0.01). Conclusions The NSQIP database provides large-scale, multi-institutional, independent outcomes for acellular dermis and submuscular breast reconstruction. Both thirty-day complication profiles and risk factors for post operative morbidity are similar between these two reconstructive approaches.

The efficacy of continuous local anesthetic infiltration in breast surgery: reduction mammaplasty and reconstruction.

BACKGROUND Pain control after reduction mammaplasty and breast reconstruction with tissue expanders often requires intravenous narcotic analgesia and inpatient hospitalization. Regional and local anesthetic techniques are increasing in popularity because they decrease the use of intravenous analgesic medications and offer comparable pain relief without the systemic side effects. METHODS This study examined the use of indwelling catheters for the continuous infiltration of local anesthetic (bupivacaine) in 74 consecutive breast reduction and 74 consecutive tissue expander breast reconstruction patients. Patients entering the study before February of 2003 had conventional methods of analgesia (39 patients for each group), whereas those entering afterwards received the infusion pumps (35 patients for each group). RESULTS The number of hospital admissions among the breast reduction patients with infusion pumps was significantly less than that for those without pumps (p < 0.01). Pain, measured on a verbal response scale of 0 to 10, while in the recovery room was significantly less in the pain pump group than in the comparison group (p < 0.01), as were cumulative amounts of pain medications (p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of complications or in the rate of nausea or vomiting. The number of inpatient days among the tissue expander reconstruction patients with infusion pumps was not significantly different from that for those without pumps; the average pain score was significantly lower (p < 0.01). The cumulative amounts of pain medication in patients receiving the infusion pump were significantly lower than those in patients without the pumps (p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of complications or in the rate of nausea or vomiting. There were no tissue expander infections in patients with the indwelling catheters adjacent to the implant. CONCLUSIONS The continuous infiltration of local anesthetic with an infusion pump represents another tool for pain management in surgical patients.

The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: A multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients

BACKGROUND The comparative safety of breast reconstruction in obese patients remains to be clearly defined. This study utilized multi-institutional data to characterize the effect of body mass index (BMI) on breast reconstruction outcomes. METHODS Utilizing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, patients undergoing tissue expander, pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, latissimus dorsi flap, and free flap breast reconstruction were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified as obese (BMI ≥ 30) and non-obese (BMI < 30). Overall postoperative morbidity, flap complications, non-flap complications, and reoperation rates were compared among the groups. RESULTS Of 12,986 patients who underwent breast reconstruction, 3636 (28.0%) were obese. Overall morbidity was significantly elevated in obese patients across all forms of reconstruction (p < 0.05). BMI was correlated with increased surgical complications for tissue expander, pedicled TRAM, and free flap reconstructions (OR = 1.09, OR = 1.05, OR = 1.10, respectively; p < 0.05). Medical complications were higher in obese patients undergoing tissue expander and pedicled TRAM reconstructions (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in latissimus and free flap reconstruction patients. Compared with obese tissue expander recipients, obese patients reconstructed using autologous tissue had higher rates of reoperations (12.8% versus 9.1%), overall morbidity (18.0% versus 9.5%), surgical (12.7% versus 8.3%), and medical complications (9.0% versus 2.2%). CONCLUSIONS The NSQIP database allows for evaluation and comparison of reconstructive outcomes in the obese population. Increased BMI was associated with higher morbidity in autologous reconstruction than tissue expander reconstruction. Among autologous procedures, latissimus flaps experienced the lowest captured 30 day morbidity.