Neil Clayton Bodick

Xanomeline: A selective muscarinic agonist for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

Xanomeline is a novel muscarinic receptor agonist relatively devoid of parasympathomimetic side effects. Xanomeline had high affinity for muscarinic receptors and much lower affinity for a variety of other neuronal receptors in radioligand binding assays. Functional studies in cell lines transfected with the muscarinic receptor subtypes demonstrated that xanomeline had higher potency and efficacy for m1 and m4 receptors than m2, m3, and m5 receptor subtypes. Similarly, in isolated tissue studies, xanomeline had higher potency and efficacy for M1 receptors in rabbit vas deferens than at M2 receptors in guinea pig atria or M3 receptors in guinea pig bladder. Secretion of soluble amyloid precursor protein from m1 cell lines was potently stimulated by xanomeline. In vivo, xanomeline robustly stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in brain, consistent with m1 agonism. Xanomeline produced modest increases in brain acetylcholine levels and did not produce bradycardia, suggesting little, if any, m2 agonist activity in vivo. Additionally, xanomeline did not induce nonselective cholinergic agonist side effects such as tremor, hypothermia and salivation. In animal behavior studies, xanomeline reduced locomotion and blocked memory deficits that were induced by a muscarinic antagonist in a passive avoidance paradigm. Xanomeline was found to be safe and reasonably well tolerated in safety studies in humans. In a placebo controlled double blind clinical trial of 6 months duration, xanomeline halted cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimers disease. Furthermore, behavioral symptoms associated with Alzheimers disease such as hallucinations, delusions and vocal outbursts were significantly decreased by xanomeline treatment. Additional clinical trials are under way to assess the novel therapeutic effects of xanomeline. Drug Dev. Res. 40:158–170, 1997.

Efficacy of xanomeline in Alzheimer disease: cognitive improvement measured using the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

The cognitive efficacy of the M1-selective muscarinic agonist xanomeline in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (AD) was measured using the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) and the Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) in this 17-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Three hundred forty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive 25, 50, or 75 mg xanomeline tartrate or placebo three times daily (t.i.d.) for 24 weeks, followed by placebo for 4 weeks in a single-blind washout phase. Cognitive function was assessed at randomization and after 4, 8, 12, 24, and 28 weeks. Three hundred nineteen patients were included in an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis; 209 completers had evaluable data at week 24. ITT analysis showed a significant (p < or = 0.05) dose-response trend and a significant (p < or = 0.05) between-group comparison favoring 75 mg t.i.d. over placebo for the CNTB summary score but not for the ADAS-cog. In the completer analysis, however, the ADAS-cog showed a significant (p < or = 0.05) dose-response trend and between-group comparison, whereas the CNTB Summary Score did not. The ADAS-cog was less sensitive to treatment effects in mildly impaired patients (ADAS-cog < 21) than in moderately impaired patients (ADAS-cog > or = 21), whereas the CNTB was sensitive in the entire study population (mean ADAS-cog = 22.5+/-9.6). Significant (p < or = 0.05) beneficial treatment effects were seen in measures of simple reaction time and delayed verbal recall, which are included in the CNTB but not in the ADAS-cog. During the single-blind placebo washout period, the ADAS-cog score of the placebo group worsened dramatically (change of 2.63 points; p < or = 0.001), whereas the CNTB score remained stable (change of 1.04 points; p=0.694). Thus, the CNTB appears to be more objective than the ADAS-cog.