Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Neil M. Nathanson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Neil M. Nathanson.


Nature Neuroscience | 2003

Selective cognitive dysfunction in acetylcholine M1 muscarinic receptor mutant mice

Stephan G. Anagnostaras; Geoffrey G. Murphy; Susan E. Hamilton; Scott L. Mitchell; Nancy P. Rahnama; Neil M. Nathanson; Alcino J. Silva

Blockade of cholinergic neurotransmission by muscarinic receptor antagonists produces profound deficits in attention and memory. However, the antagonists used in previous studies bind to more than one of the five muscarinic receptor subtypes. Here we examined memory in mice with a null mutation of the gene coding the M1 receptor, the most densely distributed muscarinic receptor in the hippocampus and forebrain. In contrast with previous studies using nonselective pharmacological antagonists, the M1 receptor deletion produced a selective phenotype that included both enhancements and deficits in memory. Long-term potentiation (LTP) in response to theta burst stimulation in the hippocampus was also reduced in mutant mice. M1 null mutant mice showed normal or enhanced memory for tasks that involved matching-to-sample problems, but they were severely impaired in non-matching-to-sample working memory as well as consolidation. Our results suggest that the M1 receptor is specifically involved in memory processes for which the cortex and hippocampus interact.


British Journal of Pharmacology | 2006

Muscarinic receptors: their distribution and function in body systems, and the implications for treating overactive bladder

Paul Abrams; Karl-Erik Andersson; Jerry J. Buccafusco; Christopher R. Chapple; William C. de Groat; Alison Fryer; Gary Kay; Alan M. Laties; Neil M. Nathanson; Pankaj J. Pasricha; Alan J. Wein

1 The effectiveness of antimuscarinic agents in the treatment of the overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is thought to arise through blockade of bladder muscarinic receptors located on detrusor smooth muscle cells, as well as on nondetrusor structures. 2 Muscarinic M3 receptors are primarily responsible for detrusor contraction. Limited evidence exists to suggest that M2 receptors may have a role in mediating indirect contractions and/or inhibition of detrusor relaxation. In addition, there is evidence that muscarinic receptors located in the urothelium/suburothelium and on afferent nerves may contribute to the pathophysiology of OAB. Blockade of these receptors may also contribute to the clinical efficacy of antimuscarinic agents. 3 Although the role of muscarinic receptors in the bladder, other than M3 receptors, remains unclear, their role in other body systems is becoming increasingly well established, with emerging evidence supporting a wide range of diverse functions. Blockade of these functions by muscarinic receptor antagonists can lead to similarly diverse adverse effects associated with antimuscarinic treatment, with the range of effects observed varying according to the different receptor subtypes affected. 4 This review explores the evolving understanding of muscarinic receptor functions throughout the body, with particular focus on the bladder, gastrointestinal tract, eye, heart, brain and salivary glands, and the implications for drugs used to treat OAB. The key factors that might determine the ideal antimuscarinic drug for treatment of OAB are also discussed. Further research is needed to show whether the M3 selective receptor antagonists have any advantage over less selective drugs, in leading to fewer adverse events.


Hippocampus | 2009

Neuronal activity rapidly induces transcription of the CREB-regulated microRNA-132, in vivo.

Aaron S. Nudelman; Derek P. DiRocco; Talley J. Lambert; Michael G. Garelick; Josh Le; Neil M. Nathanson; Daniel R. Storm

Activity‐dependent changes in gene‐expression are believed to underlie the molecular representation of memory. In this study, we report that in vivo activation of neurons rapidly induces the CREB‐regulated microRNA miR‐132. To determine if production of miR‐132 is regulated by neuronal activity its expression in mouse brain was monitored by quantitative RT‐PCR (RT‐qPCR). Pilocarpine‐induced seizures led to a robust, rapid, and transient increase in the primary transcript of miR‐132 (pri‐miR‐132) followed by a subsequent rise in mature microRNA (miR‐132). Activation of neurons in the hippocampus, olfactory bulb, and striatum by contextual fear conditioning, odor‐exposure, and cocaine‐injection, respectively, also increased pri‐miR‐132. Induction kinetics of pri‐miR‐132 were monitored and found to parallel those of immediate early genes, peaking at 45 min and returning to basal levels within 2 h of stimulation. Expression levels of primary and mature‐miR‐132 increased significantly between postnatal Days 10 and 24. We conclude that miR‐132 is an activity‐dependent microRNA in vivo, and may contribute to the long‐lasting proteomic changes required for experience‐dependent neuronal plasticity.


Nature Neuroscience | 2007

Cholinergic modulation of Kir2 channels selectively elevates dendritic excitability in striatopallidal neurons

Weixing Shen; Xinyong Tian; Michelle Day; Sasha Ulrich; Tatiana Tkatch; Neil M. Nathanson; D. James Surmeier

Dopamine-depleting lesions of the striatum that mimic Parkinsons disease induce a profound pruning of spines and glutamatergic synapses in striatopallidal medium spiny neurons, leaving striatonigral medium spiny neurons intact. The mechanisms that underlie this cell type–specific loss of connectivity are poorly understood. The Kir2 K+ channel is an important determinant of dendritic excitability in these cells. Here we show that opening of these channels is potently reduced by signaling through M1 muscarinic receptors in striatopallidal neurons, but not in striatonigral neurons. This asymmetry could be attributed to differences in the subunit composition of Kir2 channels. Dopamine depletion alters the subunit composition further, rendering Kir2 channels in striatopallidal neurons even more susceptible to modulation. Reduced opening of Kir2 channels enhances dendritic excitability and synaptic integration. This cell type–specific enhancement of dendritic excitability is an essential trigger for synaptic pruning after dopamine depletion, as pruning was prevented by genetic deletion of M1 muscarinic receptors.


The Journal of Neuroscience | 2005

Cholinergic Suppression of KCNQ Channel Currents Enhances Excitability of Striatal Medium Spiny Neurons

Weixing Shen; Susan E. Hamilton; Neil M. Nathanson; D. James Surmeier

In response to glutamatergic synaptic drive, striatal medium spiny neurons in vivo transition to a depolarized “up state” near spike threshold. In the up state, medium spiny neurons either depolarize enough to spike or remain below spike threshold and are silent before returning to the hyperpolarized “down state.” Previous work has suggested that subthreshold K+ channel currents were responsible for this dichotomous behavior, but the channels giving rise to the current and the factors determining its engagement have been a mystery. To move toward resolution of these questions, perforated-patch recordings from medium spiny neurons in tissue slices were performed. K+ channels with pharmacological and kinetic features of KCNQ channels potently regulated spiking at up-state potentials. Single-cell reverse transcriptase-PCR confirmed the expression of KCNQ2, KCNQ3, and KCNQ5 mRNAs in medium spiny neurons. KCNQ channel currents in these cells were potently reduced by M1 muscarinic receptors, because the effects of carbachol were blocked by M1 receptor antagonists and lost in neurons lacking M1 receptors. Reversal of the modulation was blocked by a phosphoinositol 4-kinase inhibitor, indicating a requirement for phosphotidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate resynthesis for recovery. Inhibition of protein kinase C reduced the efficacy of the muscarinic modulation. Finally, acceleration of cholinergic interneuron spiking with 4-aminopyridine mimicked the effects of exogenous agonist application. Together, these results show that KCNQ channels are potent regulators of the excitability of medium spiny neurons at up-state potentials, and they are modulated by intrastriatal cholinergic interneurons, providing a mechanistic explanation for variability in spiking during up states seen in vivo.


Neuron | 1988

Agonists that suppress M-current elicit phosphoinositide turnover and Ca2+ transients, but these events do not explain M-current suppression.

Paul J. Pfaffinger; Mark D. Leibowitz; Emily M. Subers; Neil M. Nathanson; Wolfhard Almers; Bertil Hille

The hypothesis that acetylcholine, substance P, and LHRH suppress M-current by activating phospholipase C was tested. Each agonist caused turnover of phosphoinositide, as measured by release of inositol phosphates, and a modest transient rise in intracellular free Ca2+ ([ Ca2+]i), as determined with fura-2. Active phorbol esters depressed M-current only 50% and did not prevent further suppression by LHRH. M-current, its control by agonists, and its depression by phorbol esters were not affected by adding inositol trisphosphate or Ca2+ buffers with high or low Ca2+ to the whole-cell, voltage-clamp pipette. We conclude that phospholipase C activation does occur but does not mediate the suppression of M-current by agonists. Caffeine produced large [Ca2+]i transients and acted as an agonist to suppress M-current.


European Journal of Neuroscience | 2003

Role of specific muscarinic receptor subtypes in cholinergic parasympathomimetic responses, in vivo phosphoinositide hydrolysis, and pilocarpine-induced seizure activity

Frank P. Bymaster; Petra A. Carter; Masahisa Yamada; Jesus Gomeza; Jürgen Wess; Susan E. Hamilton; Neil M. Nathanson; David L. McKinzie; Christian C. Felder

Muscarinic agonist‐induced parasympathomimetic effects, in vivo phosphoinositide hydrolysis and seizures were evaluated in wild‐type and muscarinic M1–M5 receptor knockout mice. The muscarinic agonist oxotremorine induced marked hypothermia in all the knockout mice, but the hypothermia was reduced in M2 and to a lesser extent in M3 knockout mice. Oxotremorine‐induced tremor was abolished only in the M2 knockout mice. Muscarinic agonist‐induced salivation was reduced to the greatest extent in M3 knockout mice, to a lesser degree in M1 and M4 knockout mice, and was not altered in M2 and M5 knockout mice. Pupil diameter under basal conditions was increased only in the M3 knockout mice. Pilocarpine‐induced increases in in vivo phosphoinositide hydrolysis were completely absent in hippocampus and cortex of M1 knockout mice, but in vivo phosphoinositide hydrolysis was unaltered in the M2–M5 knockout mice. A high dose of pilocarpine (300 mg/kg) caused seizures and lethality in wild‐type and M2–M5 knockout mice, but produced neither effect in the M1 knockout mice. These data demonstrate a major role for M2 and M3 muscarinic receptor subtypes in mediating parasympathomimetic effects. Muscarinic M1 receptors activate phosphoinositide hydrolysis in cortex and hippocampus of mice, consistent with the role of M1 receptors in cognition. Muscarinic M1 receptors appear to be the only muscarinic receptor subtype mediating seizures.


Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications | 1979

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor regulation by accelerated rate of receptor loss

William L. Klein; Neil M. Nathanson; Marshall W. Nirenberg

Sustained activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on neuron-like NG108-15 hybrid cells reduces the number of [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate binding sites per cell as much as 88%. The response occurs at concentrations of agonists commensurate with those needed to occupy receptors and inhibit adenylate cyclase. Decreases in steady-state receptor levels persist as long as activator remains present. Withdrawal of activator results in a slow increase in receptor levels that is blocked by cycloheximide. Activation shortens receptor half-life by a factor of nearly 4, indicating that regulation occurs at the level of receptor breakdown.


Life Sciences | 2001

Elucidating the role of muscarinic receptors in psychosis.

Christian C. Felder; Amy C. Porter; Tiffanie L. Skillman; Lu Zhang; Frank P. Bymaster; Neil M. Nathanson; Susan E. Hamilton; Jesus Gomeza; Jürgen Wess; David L. McKinzie

Muscarinic receptors have been implicated in the regulation of cognition and psychosis based on pharmacological evidence from pre-clinical and clinical studies. Muscarinic agonists have shown promise in the clinic in improving cognition and reducing psychotic episodes in Alzheimers patients. However, lack of selective muscarinic ligands has limited their use due to troublesome side effects observed at higher doses. Without selective ligands, it has been difficult to assign a specific muscarinic receptor subtype to these high order mental processes. Recent development of muscarinic receptor knockout mice has provided additional tools to investigate cognition and psychosis in behavioral assays and to determine the receptor subtypes associated with parasympathomimetic physiology. Biochemical studies indicate that the M1 receptor plays a significant role in regulating G alpha q-mediated signal transduction in the hippocampus and cortex. Behavioral studies suggest that the M4 receptor is involved in movement regulation and prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex, a measure of attention. These findings support a role for the development of M1 and M4 receptor agonists for diseases in which symptoms include cognitive impairment and psychotic behaviors.


Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience | 2001

M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors activate extracellular signal-regulated kinase in CA1 pyramidal neurons in mouse hippocampal slices.

Jennifer L. Berkeley; Jesus Gomeza; Jürgen Wess; Susan E. Hamilton; Neil M. Nathanson; Allan I. Levey

Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) is crucial for many neural functions, including learning, memory, and synaptic plasticity. As muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) modulate many of the same higher brain functions as ERK, we examined mAChR-mediated ERK activation in mouse hippocampal slices. The cholinergic agonist carbachol caused an atropine-sensitive ERK activation in the dendrites and somata CA1 pyramidal neurons. To determine the responsible mAChR subtype, we combined pharmacologic and genetic approaches. Pretreatment with M1 antagonists inhibited ERK activation. Furthermore, mAChR-induced ERK activation was absent in slices from M1 knockout mice. ERK activation was normal in slices derived from other mAChR subtype knockouts (M2, M3, and M4), although these other subtypes are expressed in many of the same neurons. Thus, we demonstrate divergent functions for the different mAChR subtypes. We conclude that M1 is responsible for mAChR-mediated ERK activation, providing a mechanism by which M1 may modulate learning and memory.

Collaboration


Dive into the Neil M. Nathanson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jürgen Wess

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc L. Rosoff

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bertil Hille

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge