Nello Blaser
University of Bern
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nello Blaser.
AIDS | 2012
Celina Wettstein; Catrina Mugglin; Matthias Egger; Nello Blaser; Luisa Salazar Vizcaya; Janne Estill; Nicole Bender; Mary-Ann Davies; Gilles Wandeler; Olivia Keiser
Objectives:To determine magnitude and reasons of loss to program and poor antiretroviral prophylaxis coverage in prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programs in sub-Saharan Africa. Design:Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods:We searched PubMed and Embase databases for PMTCT studies in sub-Saharan Africa published between January 2002 and March 2012. Outcomes were the percentage of pregnant women tested for HIV, initiating antiretroviral prophylaxis, having a CD4 cell count measured, and initiating antiretroviral combination therapy (cART) if eligible. In children outcomes were early infant diagnosis for HIV, and cART initiation. We combined data using random-effects meta-analysis and identified predictors of uptake of interventions. Results:Forty-four studies from 15 countries including 75 172 HIV-infected pregnant women were analyzed. HIV-testing uptake at antenatal care services was 94% [95% confidence intervals (CIs) 92–95%] for opt-out and 58% (95% CI 40–75%) for opt-in testing. Coverage with any antiretroviral prophylaxis was 70% (95% CI 64–76%) and 62% (95% CI 50–73%) of pregnant women eligible for cART received treatment. Sixty-four percent (95% CI 48–81%) of HIV exposed infants had early diagnosis performed and 55% (95% CI 36–74%) were tested between 12 and 18 months. Uptake of PMTCT interventions was improved if cART was provided at the antenatal clinic and if the male partner was involved. Conclusion:In sub-Saharan Africa, uptake of PMTCT interventions and early infant diagnosis is unsatisfactory. An integrated family-centered approach seems to improve retention.
The Lancet Global Health | 2014
Daniel Keebler; Paul Revill; Scott Braithwaite; Andrew N. Phillips; Nello Blaser; Annick Borquez; Valentina Cambiano; Andrea Ciaranello; Janne Estill; Richard Gray; Andrew Hill; Olivia Keiser; Jason Kessler; Nicolas A. Menzies; Kimberly Nucifora; Luisa Salazar Vizcaya; Simon Walker; Alex Welte; Philippa Easterbrook; Meg Doherty; Gottfried Hirnschall; Timothy B. Hallett
BACKGROUND WHOs 2013 revisions to its Consolidated Guidelines on antiretroviral drugs recommend routine viral load monitoring, rather than clinical or immunological monitoring, as the preferred monitoring approach on the basis of clinical evidence. However, HIV programmes in resource-limited settings require guidance on the most cost-effective use of resources in view of other competing priorities such as expansion of antiretroviral therapy coverage. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of alternative patient monitoring strategies. METHODS We evaluated a range of monitoring strategies, including clinical, CD4 cell count, and viral load monitoring, alone and together, at different frequencies and with different criteria for switching to second-line therapies. We used three independently constructed and validated models simultaneously. We estimated costs on the basis of resource use projected in the models and associated unit costs; we quantified impact as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted. We compared alternatives using incremental cost-effectiveness analysis. FINDINGS All models show that clinical monitoring delivers significant benefit compared with a hypothetical baseline scenario with no monitoring or switching. Regular CD4 cell count monitoring confers a benefit over clinical monitoring alone, at an incremental cost that makes it affordable in more settings than viral load monitoring, which is currently more expensive. Viral load monitoring without CD4 cell count every 6-12 months provides the greatest reductions in morbidity and mortality, but incurs a high cost per DALY averted, resulting in lost opportunities to generate health gains if implemented instead of increasing antiretroviral therapy coverage or expanding antiretroviral therapy eligibility. INTERPRETATION The priority for HIV programmes should be to expand antiretroviral therapy coverage, firstly at CD4 cell count lower than 350 cells per μL, and then at a CD4 cell count lower than 500 cells per μL, using lower-cost clinical or CD4 monitoring. At current costs, viral load monitoring should be considered only after high antiretroviral therapy coverage has been achieved. Point-of-care technologies and other factors reducing costs might make viral load monitoring more affordable in future. FUNDING Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, WHO.
AIDS | 2013
Janne Estill; Matthias Egger; Nello Blaser; Luisa Salazar Vizcaya; Daniela Garone; Robin Wood; Jennifer H. Campbell; Timothy B. Hallett; Olivia Keiser
Background:Monitoring of HIV viral load in patients on combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) is not generally available in resource-limited settings. We examined the cost-effectiveness of qualitative point-of-care viral load tests (POC-VL) in sub-Saharan Africa. Design:Mathematical model based on longitudinal data from the Gugulethu and Khayelitsha township ART programmes in Cape Town, South Africa. Methods:Cohorts of patients on ART monitored by POC-VL, CD4 cell count or clinically were simulated. Scenario A considered the more accurate detection of treatment failure with POC-VL only, and scenario B also considered the effect on HIV transmission. Scenario C further assumed that the risk of virologic failure is halved with POC-VL due to improved adherence. We estimated the change in costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, ICERs) of POC-VL compared with CD4 and clinical monitoring. Results:POC-VL tests with detection limits less than 1000 copies/ml increased costs due to unnecessary switches to second-line ART, without improving survival. Assuming POC-VL unit costs between US
Journal of causal inference | 2014
Maya L. Petersen; Joshua Schwab; Susan Gruber; Nello Blaser; Michael Schomaker; Mark J. van der Laan
5 and US
The Lancet HIV | 2016
Janne Estill; Nathan Ford; Luisa Salazar-Vizcaya; Andreas D Haas; Nello Blaser; Vincent Habiyambere; Olivia Keiser
20 and detection limits between 1000 and 10 000 copies/ml, the ICER of POC-VL was US
AIDS | 2014
Nello Blaser; Celina Wettstein; Janne Estill; Luisa Salazar Vizcaya; Gilles Wandeler; Matthias Egger; Olivia Keiser
4010–US
Archive | 2014
Nello Blaser; Celina Wettstein; Janne Estill; Luisa Salazar Vizcaya; Gilles Wandeler; Matthias Egger; Olivia Keiser
9230 compared with clinical and US
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | 2014
Janne Estill; Hannock Tweya; Matthias Egger; Gilles Wandeler; Caryl Feldacker; Leigh F. Johnson; Nello Blaser; Luisa Salazar Vizcaya; Sam Phiri; Olivia Keiser
5960–US
Epidemics | 2016
Nello Blaser; Cindy Zahnd; Sabine Hermans; Luisa Salazar-Vizcaya; Janne Estill; Carl Morrow; Matthias Egger; Olivia Keiser; Robin Wood
25540 compared with CD4 cell count monitoring. In Scenario B, the corresponding ICERs were US
PLOS ONE | 2015
Janne Estill; Luisa Salazar-Vizcaya; Nello Blaser; Matthias Egger; Olivia Keiser
2450–US