Nelly G. Adel

Immune-Related Adverse Events, Need for Systemic Immunosuppression, and Effects on Survival and Time to Treatment Failure in Patients With Melanoma Treated With Ipilimumab at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

PURPOSE Ipilimumab is a standard treatment for metastatic melanoma, but immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common and can be severe. We reviewed our large, contemporary experience with ipilimumab treatment outside of clinical trials to determine the frequency of use of systemic corticosteroid or anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) therapy and the effect of these therapies on overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF). PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed retrospectively the medical records of patients with melanoma who had received treatment between April 2011 and July 2013 with ipilimumab at the standard dose of 3 mg/kg. We collected data on patient demographics, previous and subsequent treatments, number of ipilimumab doses, irAEs and how they were treated, and overall survival. RESULTS Of the 298 patients, 254 (85%) experienced an irAE of any grade. Fifty-six patients (19%) discontinued therapy because of an irAE, most commonly diarrhea. Overall, 103 patients (35%) required systemic corticosteroid treatment for an irAE; 29 (10%) also required anti-TNFα therapy. Defining TTF as either starting a new treatment or death, estimated median TTF was 5.7 months. Twelve percent of patients experienced long-term disease control without receiving additional antimelanoma therapy. OS and TTF were not affected by the occurrence of irAEs or the need for systemic corticosteroids. CONCLUSION IrAEs are common in patients treated with ipilimumab. In our experience, approximately one-third of ipilimumab-treated patients required systemic corticosteroids, and almost one-third of those required further immune suppression with anti-TNFα therapy. Practitioners and patients should be prepared to treat irAEs and should understand that such treatment does not affect OS or TTF.

Administration of ATRA to newly diagnosed patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia is delayed contributing to early hemorrhagic death

We hypothesized that the high early death rate (EDR) due to bleeding in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is in part attributable to delays in all- trans retinoic acid (ATRA). We conducted a retrospective analysis of the timing of ATRA administration. 204 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed APL between 1992 and 2009 were identified. The EDR was 11%. 44% of early deaths occurred in the first week. Hemorrhage accounted for 61% of early deaths. ATRA was ordered the day APL was suspected in 31% of patients. Delays in ATRA administration led to increases in the percentage of early deaths from hemorrhage.

Modification of vincristine dosing during concomitant azole therapy in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

Objective. Vincristine is an important component in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is now the backbone of therapy in the induction and consolidation phases of this disease. Proper dosing of vincristine is required to maximize disease control while avoiding toxicity. The gastrointestinal toxicity of vincristine such as decreased peristalsis can potentially be increased if the CYP 3A4 enzyme is inhibited. This interaction may become more prevalent with increasing use of CYP 3A4 inhibitors such as the azole antifungals. Since azoles are increasingly being used for prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections in this patient population, an assessment of vincristine dosing and toxicity is the first step to constructing guidelines for the coadministration of these agents. Methods. ALL patients !18 years of age receiving vincristine-based therapy from August 2003 through December 2007 with or without azole therapy were included. Data was collected using electronic patient medical records and the pharmacy system (RxTFC). Information was entered into a database for this retrospective study. Patients were separated into two arms; vincristine with azoles and vincristine only. Patient demographic information, chemotherapy regimen, vincristine-induced symptoms, and concurrent strong CYP 3A4 inhibitors and inducers were collected. Results. A total of 50 patients received vincristine of which 29 (58%) had concurrent azole therapy. No patients received concurrent major CYP 3A4 inhibitors and the baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Vincristine dosing modifications were more common in the azole group (58.6 vs. 23.8%; p = 0.02). The mean dose reduction of vincristine when combined with an azole was 46.5%. Symptoms of decreased peristalsis were more common in patients receiving azoles (65.5 vs. 28.6%; p = 0.019) and on average occurred after the second vincristine dose. Symptoms occurred in 50, 75, and 66.6% of patients receiving fluconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole, respectively. Patients were more likely to have an incomplete course of vincristine when receiving azole therapy (48.3 vs. 9.5%; p = 0.004). Conclusion. Caution should be used with the coadministration of vincristine and azoles. It is recommended that institutional guidelines be developed to standardize care for patients receiving vincristine with azole therapy. Potential measures to avoid this interaction include revisiting azole prophylaxis in this patient group and being judicious in azole selection.

Factors impacting stem cell mobilization failure rate and efficiency in multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies: experience at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib have increasingly been incorporated in first-line induction therapies for multiple myeloma. Concerns regarding the impact of these agents, especially lenalidomide, on stem cell mobilization prompted us to re-evaluate the risk factors that impact mobilization, including exposure to novel induction regimens. Among 317 patients who proceeded to stem cell collection after induction therapy between 2000 and 2009, the rate of mobilization failure, defined as the inability to collect 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg following the first collection attempt, was 13%. By multivariate analysis, independent risk factors associated with mobilization failure included older age (P=0.04), lower platelet count (P=0.002) and use of single-agent G-CSF for mobilization (P<0.0001). When considering for outcome measurement stem cell collection efficiency measured by the number of CD34+ cells yielded per pheresis performed during first collection attempt, lower platelet count, use of single-agent G-CSF and older age were also associated with lower efficiency. In this population mobilized mostly with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF, the use of lenalidomide during induction was not associated with a lower stem cell collection efficiency by multivariate analysis. The data support the current International Multiple Myeloma Working Group guidelines recommending the use of cyclophosphamide and G-CSF based mobilization for patients previously exposed to lenalidomide.

Intensified Mycophenolate Mofetil Dosing and Higher Mycophenolic Acid Trough Levels Reduce Severe Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease after Double-Unit Cord Blood Transplantation.

Although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has replaced corticosteroids as immunosuppression in cord blood transplantation (CBT), optimal MMF dosing has yet to be established. We intensified MMF dosing from every 12 to every 8 hours to augment graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in double-unit cord blood transplantation (dCBT) and evaluated outcomes according to the total daily MMF dose/kg in 174 dCBT recipients (median age, 39 years; range, 1 to 71) who underwent transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Recipients of an MMF dose ≤ the median (36 mg/kg/day) had an increased day 100 grade III and IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) incidence compared with patients who received >36 mg/kg/day (24% versus 8%, P = .008). Recipients of ≤ the median dose who had highly HLA allele (1 to 3 of 6) mismatched dominant units had the highest day 100 grade III and IV aGVHD incidence of 37% (P = .009). This finding was confirmed in multivariate analysis (P = .053). In 83 patients evaluated for mycophenolic acid (MPA) troughs, those with a mean week 1 and 2 trough < .5 μg/mL had an increased day 100 grade III and IV aGVHD of 26% versus 9% (P = .063), and those who received a low total daily MMF dose and had a low mean week 1 and 2 MPA trough had a 40% incidence (P = .008). Higher MMF dosing or MPA troughs had no impact on engraftment after myeloablation. This analysis supports intensified MMF dosing in milligram per kilogram per day and MPA trough level monitoring early after transplantation in dCBT recipients.

Retrospective comparison of the effects of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim on the pace of engraftment in auto-SCT patients

The high doses of chemotherapy used for the preparatory regimens before autologous blood or marrow stem cell transplantation leave patients at risk for neutropenic complications. The administration of filgrastim post transplant reduces the time to neutrophil recovery and therefore has become a standard practice at many institutions. In 2006, we implemented a practice change from filgrastim to pegfilgrastim. We present data on 164 consecutive patients (82 patients who received filgrastim compared with 82 patients who received pegfilgrastim) who received an auto-SCT between January 2006 and November 2007. Patients who received pegfilgrastim had faster engraftment (9.6 days compared with 10.9 days, P<0.0001), a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia (59% compared with 78%, P=0.015), as well as shorter hospital stay, fewer days of treatment with i.v. antibiotics (6.3 days compared with 9.6 days, P=0.006), and fewer radiographic tests, which translated to an estimated total cost savings of over

Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study

8000 per patient. Overall, there were no differences in toxicity with these two agents. We conclude that a single dose of pegfilgrastim is a safe and efficacious alternative to daily injections of filgrastim and can be a cost-effective approach in auto-SCT patients.

Safety of voriconazole and sirolimus coadministration after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF (C+G-CSF) is one of the most widely used stem cell (SC) mobilization regimens for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Plerixafor plus G-CSF (P+G-CSF) has demonstrated superior SC mobilization efficacy when compared with G-CSF alone and has been shown to rescue patients who fail mobilization with G-CSF or C+G-CSF. Despite the proven efficacy of P+G-CSF in upfront SC mobilization, its use has been limited, mostly due to concerns of high price of the drug. However, a comprehensive comparison of the efficacy and cost effectiveness of SC mobilization using C+G-CSF versus P+G-CSF is not available. In this study, we compared 111 patients receiving C+G-CSF to 112 patients receiving P+G-CSF. The use of P+G-CSF was associated with a higher success rate of SC collection defined as ⩾5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (94 versus 83%, P=0.013) and less toxicities. Thirteen patients in the C+G-CSF arm were hospitalized owing to complications while none in the P+G-CSF group. C+G-CSF was associated with higher financial burden as assessed using institutional-specific costs and charges (P<0.001) as well as using Medicare reimbursement rates (P=0.27). Higher rate of hospitalization, increased need for salvage mobilization, and increased G-CSF use account for these differences.

Upfront use of plerixafor and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: efficacy and analysis of risk factors associated with poor stem cell collection efficiency.

Antifungal prophylaxis with azoles is considered standard in allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT). Although sirolimus is being used increasingly for the prevention of GVHD, it is a substrate of CYP3A4, which is inhibited by voriconazole, and concurrent administration can lead to significantly increased exposure to sirolimus. We identified 67 patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent allo-HSCT with sirolimus, tacrolimus and low-dose MTX and received concomitant voriconazole prophylaxis from April 2008 to June 2011. All patients underwent a non-myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioned allo-HSCT. Patients received sirolimus and voriconazole concurrently for a median of 113 days. The median daily dose reduction of sirolimus at the start of coadministration was 90%. The median serum sirolimus trough levels before and at steady state of coadministration were 5.8 ng/mL (range: 0–47.6) and 6.1 ng/mL (range: 1–14.2) (P=0.45), respectively. One patient with an average sirolimus level of 6 ng/mL developed sirolimus-related thrombotic microangiopathy that resolved after sirolimus discontinuation. No sinusoidal obstructive syndrome was reported. Seventeen patients (25%) prematurely discontinued voriconazole because of the adverse events. Only two patients (3%) presented with possible invasive fungal infections at day 100. We demonstrate that sirolimus and voriconazole coadministration with an empiric 90% sirolimus dose reduction and close monitoring of sirolimus trough levels is safe and well tolerated.

Reply to A. Indini et al

Abstract Plerixafor (P), an agent that selectively and reversibly binds to the chemokine receptor CXCR4, has been approved in combination with G-CSF (P + G-CSF) for stem cell (SC) mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The goal of this study was to determine the SC collection success rate of P + G-CSF using a clinically relevant outcome defined as the ability to collect at least 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg to allow safely two transplants, and identify risk factors impacting SC mobilization. One hundred and thirty-eight patients were mobilized with P + G-CSF upfront following induction. The SC collection success rate was 92.8%. We identified exposure to lenalidomide alone (p = .038), WBC count <4 × 103/mcL prior to mobilization (p = .01) and non-African American race (p = .019), as risk factors for low efficiency by multivariate analysis. This study demonstrates that P + G-CSF is highly efficient in MM patients and provides strong support for its upfront use in SC collection for MM patients.