Nelly Oliver

Oncologists' and Cancer Patients' Views on Whole-Exome Sequencing and Incidental Findings: Results from The CanSeq Study

Purpose:Although targeted sequencing improves outcomes for many cancer patients, it remains uncertain how somatic and germ-line whole-exome sequencing (WES) will integrate into care.Methods:We conducted surveys and interviews within a study of WES integration at an academic center to determine oncologists’ attitudes about WES and to identify lung and colorectal cancer patients’ preferences for learning WES findings.Results:One-hundred sixty-seven patients (85% white, 58% female, mean age 60) and 27 oncologists (22% female) participated. Although oncologists had extensive experience ordering somatic tests (median 100/year), they had little experience ordering germ-line tests. Oncologists intended to disclose most WES results to patients but anticipated numerous challenges in using WES. Patients had moderately low levels of genetic knowledge (mean 4 correct out of 7). Most patients chose to learn results that could help select a clinical trial, pharmacogenetic and positive prognostic results, and results suggesting inherited predisposition to cancer and treatable noncancer conditions (all ≥95%). Fewer chose to receive negative prognostic results (84%) and results suggesting predisposition to untreatable noncancer conditions (85%).Conclusion:The majority of patients want most cancer-related and incidental WES results. Patients’ low levels of genetic knowledge and oncologists’ inexperience with large-scale sequencing present challenges to implementing paired WES in practice.Genet Med 18 10, 1011–1019.

The impact of tumor profiling approaches and genomic data strategies for cancer precision medicine

BackgroundThe diversity of clinical tumor profiling approaches (small panels to whole exomes with matched or unmatched germline analysis) may engender uncertainty about their benefits and liabilities, particularly in light of reported germline false positives in tumor-only profiling and use of global mutational and/or neoantigen data. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of genomic analysis strategies on error rates and data interpretation across contexts and ancestries.MethodsWe modeled common tumor profiling modalities—large (n = 300 genes), medium (n = 48 genes), and small (n = 15 genes) panels—using clinical whole exomes (WES) from 157 patients with lung or colon adenocarcinoma. We created a tumor-only analysis algorithm to assess germline false positive rates, the impact of patient ancestry on tumor-only results, and neoantigen detection.ResultsAfter optimizing a germline filtering strategy, the germline false positive rate with tumor-only large panel sequencing was 14 % (144/1012 variants). For patients whose tumor-only results underwent molecular pathologist review (n = 91), 50/54 (93 %) false positives were correctly interpreted as uncertain variants. Increased germline false positives were observed in tumor-only sequencing of non-European compared with European ancestry patients (p < 0.001; Fisher’s exact) when basic germline filtering approaches were used; however, the ExAC database (60,706 germline exomes) mitigated this disparity (p = 0.53). Matched and unmatched large panel mutational load correlated with WES mutational load (r2 = 0.99 and 0.93, respectively; p < 0.001). Neoantigen load also correlated (r2 = 0.80; p < 0.001), though WES identified a broader spectrum of neoantigens. Small panels did not predict mutational or neoantigen load.ConclusionsLarge tumor-only targeted panels are sufficient for most somatic variant identification and mutational load prediction if paired with expanded germline analysis strategies and molecular pathologist review. Paired germline sequencing reduced overall false positive mutation calls and WES provided the most neoantigens. Without patient-matched germline data, large germline databases are needed to minimize false positive mutation calling and mitigate ethnic disparities.

Scalable whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA reveals high concordance with metastatic tumors

Whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) could enable comprehensive profiling of tumors from blood but the genome-wide concordance between cfDNA and tumor biopsies is uncertain. Here we report ichorCNA, software that quantifies tumor content in cfDNA from 0.1× coverage whole-genome sequencing data without prior knowledge of tumor mutations. We apply ichorCNA to 1439 blood samples from 520 patients with metastatic prostate or breast cancers. In the earliest tested sample for each patient, 34% of patients have ≥10% tumor-derived cfDNA, sufficient for standard coverage whole-exome sequencing. Using whole-exome sequencing, we validate the concordance of clonal somatic mutations (88%), copy number alterations (80%), mutational signatures, and neoantigens between cfDNA and matched tumor biopsies from 41 patients with ≥10% cfDNA tumor content. In summary, we provide methods to identify patients eligible for comprehensive cfDNA profiling, revealing its applicability to many patients, and demonstrate high concordance of cfDNA and metastatic tumor whole-exome sequencing.Identifying the mutational landscape of tumours from cell-free DNA in the blood could help diagnostics in cancer. Here, the authors present ichorCNA, software that quantifies tumour content in cell free DNA, and they demonstrate that cell-free DNA whole-exome sequencing is concordant with metastatic tumour whole-exome sequencing.

Assigning clinical meaning to somatic and germ-line whole-exome sequencing data in a prospective cancer precision medicine study

Purpose:Implementing cancer precision medicine in the clinic requires assessing the therapeutic relevance of genomic alterations. A main challenge is the systematic interpretation of whole-exome sequencing (WES) data for clinical care.Methods:One hundred sixty-five adults with metastatic colorectal and lung adenocarcinomas were prospectively enrolled in the CanSeq study. WES was performed on DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor biopsy samples and matched blood samples. Somatic and germ-line alterations were ranked according to therapeutic or clinical relevance. Results were interpreted using an integrated somatic and germ-line framework and returned in accordance with patient preferences.Results:At the time of this analysis, WES had been performed and results returned to the clinical team for 165 participants. Of 768 curated somatic alterations, only 31% were associated with clinical evidence and 69% with preclinical or inferential evidence. Of 806 curated germ-line variants, 5% were clinically relevant and 56% were classified as variants of unknown significance. The variant review and decision-making processes were effective when the process was changed from that of a Molecular Tumor Board to a protocol-based approach.Conclusion:The development of novel interpretive and decision-support tools that draw from scientific and clinical evidence will be crucial for the success of cancer precision medicine in WES studies.Genet Med advance online publication 26 January 2017

Real-time Genomic Characterization of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer to Enable Precision Medicine

Clinically relevant subtypes exist for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but molecular characterization is not yet standard in clinical care. We implemented a biopsy protocol to perform time-sensitive whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing for patients with advanced PDAC. Therapeutically relevant genomic alterations were identified in 48% (34/71) and pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline alterations in 18% (13/71) of patients. Overall, 30% (21/71) of enrolled patients experienced a change in clinical management as a result of genomic data. Twenty-six patients had germline and/or somatic alterations in DNA-damage repair genes, and 5 additional patients had mutational signatures of homologous recombination deficiency but no identified causal genomic alteration. Two patients had oncogenic in-frame BRAF deletions, and we report the first clinical evidence that this alteration confers sensitivity to MAPK pathway inhibition. Moreover, we identified tumor/stroma gene expression signatures with clinical relevance. Collectively, these data demonstrate the feasibility and value of real-time genomic characterization of advanced PDAC.Significance: Molecular analyses of metastatic PDAC tumors are challenging due to the heterogeneous cellular composition of biopsy specimens and rapid progression of the disease. Using an integrated multidisciplinary biopsy program, we demonstrate that real-time genomic characterization of advanced PDAC can identify clinically relevant alterations that inform management of this difficult disease. Cancer Discov; 8(9); 1096-111. ©2018 AACR.See related commentary by Collisson, p. 1062This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1047.

The fuzzy world of precision medicine: deliberations of a precision medicine tumor board

Aim: To understand how a cancer precision medicine tumor board (CPM-TB) made choices about return of results. Materials & methods: Observed CPM-TB deliberations and completed in-depth interviews with committee members. Results: Responding to complex evidence of ambiguous significance, deliberations of the CPM-TB were predicated on analytic validity and clinical utility. Members had concerns both about potential harms due to returning results based on weak evidence and about withholding potentially meaningful results. Group dynamics and the clinical experiences of individual committee members shaped their work. Conclusion: Both scientific evidence and the social context surrounding deliberations of a CPM-TB influenced decisions about return of results. Subjective elements, while present in any scientific endeavor, may carry more weight in the face of ambiguous findings.

Abstract S1-01: Whole exome and transcriptome sequencing of resistant ER+ metastatic breast cancer

Background: While great strides have been made in the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), therapeutic resistance invariably occurs. A better understanding of the underlying resistance mechanisms is critical to enable durable control of this disease. Methods: We performed whole exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) on metastatic tumor biopsies from 88 patients with ER+ MBC who had developed resistance to one or more ER-directed therapies. For 27 of these patients, we sequenced the treatment-naive primary tumors for comparison to the resistant specimens. Tumors were analyzed for point mutations, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations, translocations, and gene expression. Detailed clinicopathologic data was collected for each patient and linked to the genomic information. Results: WES of all metastatic samples demonstrated several recurrently altered genes whose incidence differed significantly from primary, treatment-naive ER+ breast cancers sequenced in the TCGA study (TCGA). These include ESR1 mutations (n=17, 19.3%; 32.86 fold enrichment, q.value Comparing to matched primary samples from the same patient, many alterations were found to be acquired in several cases, including for ESR1, ERBB2, PIK3CA, PTEN, RB1, AKT1, and others. Initial analysis of RNA-seq data from metastatic samples (n=59) allowed classification of individual resistance mechanisms into broader resistance modes based on the observed transcriptional state. Conclusions: We present a genomic landscape of resistant ER+ MBC using WES and RNA-seq. Multiple genes were recurrently altered in these tumors at significantly higher rates than in ER+ primary breast cancer. When compared with matched primary tumors from the same patient, alterations in these and other genes were often found to be acquired after treatment, suggesting a role in resistance to ER-directed therapies and/or metastasis. Potential resistance mechanisms appear to fall into several categories; integrating RNA-seq data may enhance the ability to identify these categories even when genomic alterations are not identified. Multiple clinically relevant genomic and molecular alterations are identified in metastatic biopsies– with implications for choice of next therapy, clinical trial eligibility, and novel drug targets. Citation Format: Cohen O, Kim D, Oh C, Waks A, Oliver N, Helvie K, Marini L, Rotem A, Lloyd M, Stover D, Adalsteinsson V, Freeman S, Ha G, Cibulskis C, Anderka K, Tamayo P, Johannessen C, Krop I, Garraway L, Winer E, Lin N, Wagle N. Whole exome and transcriptome sequencing of resistant ER+ metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S1-01.

Interactive or static reports to guide clinical interpretation of cancer genomics

Abstract Objective Misinterpretation of complex genomic data presents a major challenge in the implementation of precision oncology. We sought to determine whether interactive genomic reports with embedded clinician education and optimized data visualization improved genomic data interpretation. Materials and Methods We conducted a randomized, vignette-based survey study to determine whether exposure to interactive reports for a somatic gene panel, as compared to static reports, improves physicians’ genomic comprehension and report-related satisfaction (overall scores calculated across 3 vignettes, range 0–18 and 1–4, respectively, higher score corresponding with improved endpoints). Results One hundred and five physicians at a tertiary cancer center participated (29% participation rate): 67% medical, 20% pediatric, 7% radiation, and 7% surgical oncology; 37% female. Prior to viewing the case-based vignettes, 34% of the physicians reported difficulty making treatment recommendations based on the standard static report. After vignette/report exposure, physicians’ overall comprehension scores did not differ by report type (mean score: interactive 11.6 vs static 10.5, difference = 1.1, 95% CI, −0.3, 2.5, P = .13). However, physicians exposed to the interactive report were more likely to correctly assess sequencing quality (P < .001) and understand when reports needed to be interpreted with caution (eg, low tumor purity; P = .02). Overall satisfaction scores were higher in the interactive group (mean score 2.5 vs 2.1, difference = 0.4, 95% CI, 0.2-0.7, P = .001). Discussion and Conclusion Interactive genomic reports may improve physicians’ ability to accurately assess genomic data and increase report-related satisfaction. Additional research in users’ genomic needs and efforts to integrate interactive reports into electronic health records may facilitate the implementation of precision oncology.

Abstract LB-136: High concordance of whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA and matched biopsies enables genomic discovery in metastatic cancer

Background: Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has largely been used to monitor blood for specific tumor mutations, but genome-wide discovery from cfDNA has not been well established. Here, we establish a scalable approach for whole-exome sequencing (WES) of cfDNA, making it possible to perform comprehensive genomic characterization of metastatic cancer in a routine and minimally-invasive manner. Comprehensive genomic characterization of metastatic cancer stands to uncover novel alterations of clinical significance. A major challenge is that metastatic tumors are infrequently biopsied. Cell-free DNA is shed abundantly into the bloodstream from metastatic tumors, presenting an opportunity for genomic discovery in advanced cancers that are rarely biopsied in routine clinical care. We report an efficient process to qualify and sequence whole-exomes from cfDNA at scale and systematically compare the somatic mutations, indels, and copy number alterations detected in WES of cfDNA to WES of matched tumor biopsies. Methods: We consented 86 patients with metastatic breast or prostate cancers for blood collection. We isolated cfDNA and germline DNA from blood and performed low coverage sequencing to estimate tumor content based on genome-wide copy number. We screened patient blood samples and prioritized those with higher tumor fractions for WES. In parallel, we analyzed cfDNA and germline DNA from healthy donors to calibrate our methods and assess false positive rate for genomic alterations. Results: We found the vast majority of patients with metastatic prostate or breast cancer to have detectable tumor-derived cfDNA. WES of cfDNA from healthy donors revealed very low false positive rates for somatic mutations, indels and copy number alterations (SCNAs). By analyzing WES of cfDNA and tumor biopsies from dozens of patients with metastatic breast or prostate cancers, we established guidelines for the coverage and tumor fraction required for mutation discovery in WES of cfDNA. We found WES of cfDNA to uncover 91% of the clonal mutations, 59% of the subclonal mutations, and 75% of the SCNAs detected in WES of matched tumor biopsies. In several cases, we observed mutations exclusive to cfDNA that were confirmed in later blood draws, suggesting that cfDNA-exclusive mutations may be derived from unsampled metastases. In some cases, cfDNA revealed clinically actionable mutations that were not detected in matched tumor biopsies. Conclusions: WES of cfDNA uncovers the majority of somatic mutations, indels, and SCNAs found in matched tumor biopsies of metastatic cancer. The high degree of concordance suggests that comprehensive sequencing of cfDNA can be leveraged for genomic discovery in settings where conventional biopsies are difficult to access. Furthermore, the detection of mutations in cfDNA that are not detected in concurrent biopsies suggests that cfDNA may be complementary to tumor biopsies for both translational studies and precision cancer medicine. Citation Format: Viktor A. Adalsteinsson, Gavin Ha, Sam Freeman, Atish D. Choudhury, Daniel G. Stover, Heather A. Parsons, Gregory Gydush, Sarah Reed, Denis Loginov, Dimitri Livitz, Daniel Rosebrock, Ignat Leshchiner, Ofir Cohen, Coyin Oh, Jaegil Kim, Chip Stewart, Mara Rosenberg, Huiming Ding, Maxwell R. Lloyd, Sairah Mahmud, Karla E. Helvie, Margaret S. Merrill, Rebecca A. Santiago, Edward P. O’Connor, Seong H. Jeong, Joseph F. Kramkowski, Jens G. Lohr, Laura Polacek, Nelly Oliver, Lori Marini, Joshua Francis, Lauren C. Harshman, Eliezer M. Van Allen, Eric P. Winer, Nancy U. Lin, Mari Nakabayashi, Mary-Ellen Taplin, Levi A. Garraway, Todd R. Golub, Jesse S. Boehm, Nikhil Wagle, Gad Getz, Matthew Meyerson, Christopher J. Love. High concordance of whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA and matched biopsies enables genomic discovery in metastatic cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-136.