Nening Dennis
Institute of Cancer Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nening Dennis.
Nature Genetics | 2015
Colin S. Cooper; Rosalind Eeles; David C. Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Gunes Gundem; Ludmil B. Alexandrov; Barbara Kremeyer; Adam Butler; Andy G. Lynch; Niedzica Camacho; Charlie E. Massie; Jonathan Kay; Hayley Luxton; Sandra Edwards; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Nening Dennis; Sue Merson; Daniel Leongamornlert; Jorge Zamora; Cathy Corbishley; Sarah Thomas; Serena Nik-Zainal; Manasa Ramakrishna; Sarah O'Meara; Lucy Matthews; Jeremy Clark; Rachel Hurst; Richard Mithen; Robert G. Bristow; Paul C. Boutros
Genome-wide DNA sequencing was used to decrypt the phylogeny of multiple samples from distinct areas of cancer and morphologically normal tissue taken from the prostates of three men. Mutations were present at high levels in morphologically normal tissue distant from the cancer, reflecting clonal expansions, and the underlying mutational processes at work in morphologically normal tissue were also at work in cancer. Our observations demonstrate the existence of ongoing abnormal mutational processes, consistent with field effects, underlying carcinogenesis. This mechanism gives rise to extensive branching evolution and cancer clone mixing, as exemplified by the coexistence of multiple cancer lineages harboring distinct ERG fusions within a single cancer nodule. Subsets of mutations were shared either by morphologically normal and malignant tissues or between different ERG lineages, indicating earlier or separate clonal cell expansions. Our observations inform on the origin of multifocal disease and have implications for prostate cancer therapy in individual cases.
Oncogene | 2004
Christopher S. Foster; Alison Falconer; Andrew Dodson; Andrew R. Norman; Nening Dennis; Anne Fletcher; Christine Southgate; Anna Dowe; David P. Dearnaley; Sameer Jhavar; Rosalind Eeles; Andrew Feber; Colin S. Cooper
E2F transcription factors, including E2F3, directly modulate expression of EZH2. Recently, overexpression of the EZH2 gene has been implicated in the development of human prostate cancer. In tissue microrarray studies we now show that expression of high levels of nuclear E2F3 occurs in a high proportion (98/147, 67%) of human prostate cancers, but is a rare event in non-neoplastic prostatic epithelium suggesting a role for E2F3 overexpression in prostate carcinogenesis. Patients with prostate cancer exhibiting immunohistochemically detectable nuclear E2F3 expression have poorer overall survival (P=0.0022) and cause-specific survival (P=0.0047) than patients without detectable E2F3 expression. When patients are stratified according to the maximum percentage of E2F3-positive nuclei identified within their prostate cancers (up to 20, 21–40%, etc.), there is an increasingly significant association between E2F3 staining and risk of death both for overall survival (P=0.0014) and for cause-specific survival (P=0.0004). Multivariate analyses select E2F3 expression as an independent factor predicting overall survival (unstratified P=0.0103, stratified P=0.0086) and cause-specific survival (unstratified P=0.0288, stratified P=0.0072). When these results are considered together with published data on EZH2 and on the E2F3 control protein pRB, we conclude that the pRB–E2F3–EZH2 control axis may have a critical role in modulating aggressiveness of individual human prostate cancer.
Oncogene | 2004
Andrew Feber; Jeremy Clark; Graham H. Goodwin; Andrew Dodson; Paul H. Smith; Anne Fletcher; Sandra Edwards; Penny Flohr; Alison Falconer; Toby Roe; Gyula Kovacs; Nening Dennis; Cyril Fisher; Richard Wooster; Robert Huddart; Christopher S. Foster; Colin S. Cooper
We demonstrate that, in human bladder cancer, amplification of the E2F3 gene, located at 6p22, is associated with overexpression of its encoded mRNA transcripts and high levels of expression of E2F3 protein. Immunohistochemical analyses of E2F3 protein levels have established that around one-third (33/101) of primary transitional cell carcinomas of the bladder overexpress nuclear E2F3 protein, with the proportion of tumours containing overexpressed nuclear E2F3 increasing with tumour stage and grade. When considered together with the established role of E2F3 in cell cycle progression, these results suggest that the E2F3 gene represents a candidate bladder cancer oncogene that is activated by DNA amplification and overexpression.
Cancer Research | 2005
Alan McIntyre; Brenda Summersgill; Beata Grygalewicz; Ad Gillis; J. Stoop; Ruud J. H. L. M. van Gurp; Nening Dennis; Cyril Fisher; Robert Huddart; Colin S. Cooper; Jeremy Clark; J. Wolter Oosterhuis; Leendert Looijenga; Janet Shipley
We have previously identified amplification at 4q12 in testicular germ cell tumors of adolescents and adults centered around the KIT gene encoding a tyrosine kinase transmembrane receptor. Analysis of primary testicular germ cell tumors totaling 190 cases revealed 21% of the seminoma subtype with an increased copy number of KIT whereas this change was rarely found in the nonseminomas. In most cases, gain of KIT did not include the immediately flanking noncoding DNA or the flanking genes KDR and PDGFRA. Increased copy number of KIT was not found in the putative precursor lesion, carcinoma in situ (CIS), adjacent to tumor with this change. KIT overexpression was found independent of gain and KIT immunostaining was stronger in selected cases with gain of KIT compared to those without. Taken together with activating mutations of KIT in exon 17 identified in 13% of seminomas, this suggests that the KIT gene product plays a role in the progression of CIS towards seminoma, the further understanding of which may lead to novel less toxic therapeutic approaches.
The Journal of Pathology | 2008
Hans Stoop; Friedemann Honecker; Gjm van de Geijn; A. J. M. Gillis; Martine Cools; M de Boer; Carsten Bokemeyer; Kp Wolffenbuttel; Sls Drop; R.R. de Krijger; Nening Dennis; Brenda Summersgill; Alan McIntyre; Janet Shipley; Jw Oosterhuis; L. H. J. Looijenga
Carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the testis is the pre‐invasive stage of type II testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) of adolescents and adults. These tumours are the most frequently diagnosed cancer in Caucasian adolescents and young adults. In dysgenetic gonads, the precursor of type II GCTs can be either CIS or a lesion known as gonadoblastoma (GB). CIS/GB originates from a primordial germ cell (PGC)/gonocyte, ie an embryonic cell. CIS can be cured by local low‐dose irradiation, with limited side effects on hormonal function. Therefore, strategies for early diagnosis of CIS are essential. Various markers are informative to diagnose CIS in adult testis by immunohistochemistry, including c‐KIT, PLAP, AP‐2γ, NANOG, and POU5F1 (OCT3/4). OCT3/4 is the most informative and consistent in presence and expression level, resulting in intense nuclear staining. In the case of maturational delay of germ cells, frequently present in gonads of individuals at risk for type II (T)GCTs, use of these markers can result in overdiagnosis of malignant germ cells. This demonstrates the need for a more specific diagnostic marker to distinguish malignant germ cells from germ cells showing maturation delay. Here we report the novel finding that immunohistochemical detection of stem cell factor (SCF), the c‐KIT ligand, is informative in this context. This was demonstrated in over 400 cases of normal (fetal, neonatal, infantile, and adult) and pathological gonads, as well as TGCT‐derived cell lines, specifically in cases of CIS and GB. Both membrane‐bound and soluble SCF were expressed, suggestive of an autocrine loop. SCF immunohistochemistry can be a valuable diagnostic tool, in addition to OCT3/4, to screen for precursor lesions of TGCTs, especially in patients with germ cell maturation delay. Copyright
Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2005
Sameer Jhavar; Cyril Fisher; Andrew Jackson; Stefan A. Reinsberg; Nening Dennis; Alison Falconer; David P. Dearnaley; S Edwards; S M Edwards; Martin O. Leach; Craig Cummings; Timothy Christmas; Alastair M. Thompson; Christopher Woodhouse; Shahneen Sandhu; Colin S. Cooper; Rosalind Eeles
Aims: To develop a method of processing non-formalin fixed prostate specimens removed at radical prostatectomy to obtain fresh tissue for research and for correlating diagnostic and molecular results with preoperative imaging. Methods/Results: The method involves a prostate slicing apparatus comprising a tissue slicer with a series of juxtaposed planar stainless steel blades linked to a support, and a cradle adapted to grip the tissue sample and receive the blades. The fresh prostate gland is held in the cradle and the blades are moved through the cradle slits to produce multiple 4 mm slices of the gland in a plane perpendicular to its posterior surface. One of the resulting slices is preserved in RNAlaterTM. The areas comprising tumour and normal glands within this preserved slice can be identified by matching it to the haematoxylin and eosin stained sections of the adjacent slices that are formalin fixed and paraffin wax embedded. Intact RNA can be extracted from the identified tumour and normal glands within the RNAlater preserved slice. Preoperative imaging studies are acquired with the angulation of axial images chosen to be similar to the slicing axis, such that stained sections from the formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded slices match their counterparts on imaging. Conclusions: A novel method of sampling fresh prostate removed at radical prostatectomy that allows tissue samples to be used both for diagnosis and molecular analysis is described. This method also allows the integration of preoperative imaging data with histopathological and molecular data obtained from the prostate tissue slices.
Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2009
Frank McCarthy; A Fletcher; Nening Dennis; C Cummings; H O'Donnell; Jeremy Clark; Penny Flohr; Roy Vergis; Sameer Jhavar; Chris Parker; Colin S. Cooper
Background: Prostate cancer diagnosis is routinely made by the histopathological examination of formalin fixed needle biopsy specimens. Frequently this is the only cancer tissue available from the patient for the analysis of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. There is, therefore, an urgent need for methods that allow the high-throughput analysis of these biopsy samples using immunohistochemical (IHC) markers and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis based markers. Methods: A method that allows the construction of tissue microarrays (TMAs) from diagnostic prostate needle biopsy cores has previously been reported. However, the technique only allows the production of low-density biopsy TMAs with a maximum of 20 cores per TMA. Here two methods are presented that allow the rapid and uniform production of biopsy TMAs containing between 54 and 72 biopsy cores. IHC and FISH techniques were used to detect biomarker status. Results: Biopsy TMAs were constructed from prostate needle biopsy specimens taken from 102 patients entered into an active surveillance trial and 201 patients in a radiotherapy trial. The detection rate for cancer in slices of these biopsy TMAs was 66% and 79% respectively. Slices of a biopsy TMA prepared from biopsies from active surveillance patients were used to detect multiple IHC markers and to score TMPRSS2-ERG fusion status in a FISH-based assay. Conclusions: The construction of biopsy TMAs provides an effective method for the multiplex analysis of IHC and FISH markers and for their assessment as prognostic biomarkers in the context of clinical trials.
PLOS Genetics | 2017
Niedzica Camacho; Peter Van Loo; S Edwards; Jonathan Kay; Lucy Matthews; Kerstin Haase; Jeremy Clark; Nening Dennis; Sarah Thomas; Barbara Kremeyer; Jorge Zamora; Adam Butler; Gunes Gundem; Sue Merson; Hayley Luxton; Steve Hawkins; Mohammed J. R. Ghori; Luke Marsden; Adam Lambert; Katalin Karaszi; Gill Pelvender; Charlie E. Massie; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Keiran Raine; David Jones; William J. Howat; Steven Hazell; Naomi Livni; Cyril Fisher; Christopher Ogden
A variety of models have been proposed to explain regions of recurrent somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) in human cancer. Our study employs Whole Genome DNA Sequence (WGS) data from tumor samples (n = 103) to comprehensively assess the role of the Knudson two hit genetic model in SCNA generation in prostate cancer. 64 recurrent regions of loss and gain were detected, of which 28 were novel, including regions of loss with more than 15% frequency at Chr4p15.2-p15.1 (15.53%), Chr6q27 (16.50%) and Chr18q12.3 (17.48%). Comprehensive mutation screens of genes, lincRNA encoding sequences, control regions and conserved domains within SCNAs demonstrated that a two-hit genetic model was supported in only a minor proportion of recurrent SCNA losses examined (15/40). We found that recurrent breakpoints and regions of inversion often occur within Knudson model SCNAs, leading to the identification of ZNF292 as a target gene for the deletion at 6q14.3-q15 and NKX3.1 as a two-hit target at 8p21.3-p21.2. The importance of alterations of lincRNA sequences was illustrated by the identification of a novel mutational hotspot at the KCCAT42, FENDRR, CAT1886 and STCAT2 loci at the 16q23.1-q24.3 loss. Our data confirm that the burden of SCNAs is predictive of biochemical recurrence, define nine individual regions that are associated with relapse, and highlight the possible importance of ion channel and G-protein coupled-receptor (GPCR) pathways in cancer development. We concluded that a two-hit genetic model accounts for about one third of SCNA indicating that mechanisms, such haploinsufficiency and epigenetic inactivation, account for the remaining SCNA losses.
European urology focus | 2017
Bogdan-Alexandru Luca; Daniel Brewer; Dylan R. Edwards; S Edwards; Hayley C. Whitaker; Sue Merson; Nening Dennis; Rosalin A. Cooper; Steven Hazell; Anne Warren; Rosalind Eeles; Andy G. Lynch; Helen Ross-Adams; Alastair D. Lamb; David E. Neal; Krishna Sethia; Rob Mills; Richard Y. Ball; Helen Curley; Jeremy Clark; Vincent Moulton; Colin S. Cooper
BACKGROUND A critical problem in the clinical management of prostate cancer is that it is highly heterogeneous. Accurate prediction of individual cancer behaviour is therefore not achievable at the time of diagnosis leading to substantial overtreatment. It remains an enigma that, in contrast to breast cancer, unsupervised analyses of global expression profiles have not currently defined robust categories of prostate cancer with distinct clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE To devise a novel classification framework for human prostate cancer based on unsupervised mathematical approaches. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Our analyses are based on the hypothesis that previous attempts to classify prostate cancer have been unsuccessful because individual samples of prostate cancer frequently have heterogeneous compositions. To address this issue, we applied an unsupervised Bayesian procedure called Latent Process Decomposition to four independent prostate cancer transcriptome datasets obtained using samples from prostatectomy patients and containing between 78 and 182 participants. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Biochemical failure was assessed using log-rank analysis and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Application of Latent Process Decomposition identified a common process in all four independent datasets examined. Cancers assigned to this process (designated DESNT cancers) are characterized by low expression of a core set of 45 genes, many encoding proteins involved in the cytoskeleton machinery, ion transport, and cell adhesion. For the three datasets with linked prostate-specific antigen failure data following prostatectomy, patients with DESNT cancer exhibited poor outcome relative to other patients (p=2.65×10-5, p=4.28×10-5, and p=2.98×10-8). When these three datasets were combined the independent predictive value of DESNT membership was p=1.61×10-7 compared with p=1.00×10-5 for Gleason sum. A limitation of the study is that only prediction of prostate-specific antigen failure was examined. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate the existence of a novel poor prognosis category of human prostate cancer and will assist in the targeting of therapy, helping avoid treatment-associated morbidity in men with indolent disease. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate cancer, unlike breast cancer, does not have a robust classification framework. We propose that this failure has occurred because prostate cancer samples selected for analysis frequently have heterozygous compositions (individual samples are made up of many different parts that each have different characteristics). Applying a mathematical approach that can overcome this problem we identify a novel poor prognosis category of human prostate cancer called DESNT.
Nature Genetics | 2015
Colin S. Cooper; Rosalind Eeles; David C. Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Gunes Gundem; Ludmil B. Alexandrov; Barbara Kremeyer; Adam Butler; Andy G. Lynch; Niedzica Camacho; Charlie E. Massie; Jonathan Kay; Hayley Luxton; Sandra Edwards; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Nening Dennis; Sue Merson; Daniel Leongamornlert; Jorge Zamora; Cathy Corbishley; Sarah Thomas; Serena Nik-Zainal; Manasa Ramakrishna; Sarah O'Meara; Lucy Matthews; Jeremy Clark; Rachel Hurst; Richard Mithen; Robert G. Bristow; Paul C. Boutros
In the version of this article initially published, the following two sentences were omitted from the Acknowledgments: “Sequencing was carried out at the Millard and Muriel Jacobs Genome Facility at the California Institute of Technology. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grants to P.W.S. (GM084389) and to R.V.A. (AI056189), by Cornell University salary and start-up funds to E.M.S. and by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute to P.W.S.” The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.