Nergiz Dagoglu
Istanbul University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nergiz Dagoglu.
Journal of Cancer | 2015
Anand Mahadevan; Nergiz Dagoglu; Joseph D. Mancias; Kristin Raven; Khalid Khwaja; Jennifer F. Tseng; Kimmie Ng; Peter C. Enzinger; Rebecca A. Miksad; Andrea J. Bullock; Amy Evenson
Background: Unresectable intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinomas carry a dismal prognosis. Systemic chemotherapy and conventional external beam radiation and brachytherapy have been used with limited success. We explored the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for these patients. Methods: Patients with unresectable intrahepatic or hilar cholangiocarcinoma or those with positive margins were included in this study. Systemic therapy was used at the discretion of the medical oncologist. The CyberknifeTM stereotactic body radiotherapy system used to treat these patients. Patients were treated with three daily fractions. Clinical and radiological follow-up were performed every three months. Results: 34 patients (16 male and 18 female) with 42 lesions were included in this study. There were 32 unresectable tumors and two patients with resected tumors with positive margins. The median SBRT dose was 30Gy in three fractions. The median follow-up was 38 months (range 8-71 months). The actuarial local control rate was 79%. The median overall survival was 17 months and the median progression free survival was ten months. There were four Grade III toxicities (12%), including duodenal ulceration, cholangitis and liver abscess. Conclusions: SBRT is an effective and reasonably safe local therapy option for unresectable intrahepatic or hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2009
Adalet Demir; Mehmet Zeki Gunluoglu; Nergiz Dagoglu; Akif Turna; Yavuz Dizdar; Kamil Kaynak; Sukru Dilege; Nil Molinas Mandel; Dilek Yilmazbayhan; Seyyit Ibrahim Dincer; Atilla Gürses
Introduction: Primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) are rare, rapidly progressive, small- round cell tumors with a poor prognosis despite multimodal therapy, including surgery and chemoradiotherapy. The treatment of choice was unknown since no clinical series with surgical therapy had been reported. We evaluated the impact of multimodal treatment in patients with PNETs located in the thoracic region. Methods: Between 1998 and 2006, 25 patients with PNETs in the thoracic region were treated in 3 tertiary-care hospitals. The patients consisted of 15 males and 10 females with a mean age of 27.2 years (range, 6-60). The tumor was in the chest wall in 20 (involving the costovertebral junction in 9), the lung in four, and the heart in one patient. Twelve patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (54.5%), and 22 of 25 patients underwent surgery. Results: In patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, the mean regression rate was 65.4% (range, 30-100%). Eighteen (82%) patients underwent chest wall resection, while 7 (32%) had vertebral resections, and the remaining 4 (16%) had pulmonary resections. A complete resection was possible in 18 of 22 patients (82%). Patients with incomplete and complete resections had 25% and 56% 5-year survival rates, respectively (p = 0.13). The progression-free 3-year survival rate was 36% and the median survival time was 13 months. The complete resection rate was significantly higher in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.027). The 5-year survival rate of the patients with or without neoadjuvant therapy was 77% and 37%, respectively (p = 0.22) although it prolonged the disease-free survival (p = 0.01). The 5-year survival rate of patients without costovertebral junction involvement was 66%, whereas patients with PNETs involving the costovertebral junction had a 21% 3-year survival. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The 5-year progression-free survival rate of patients without costovertebral junction involvement was 58%, whereas patients with PNETs involving the costovertebral junction had a 14% 1-year progression-free survival (p = 0.004). Conclusions: PNET is an aggressive malignancy that often requires multimodal therapy. Induction chemotherapy leads to a greater complete resection rate and better disease-free survival, while involvement of the costovertebral junction indicates a poorer survival.
Journal of Cancer | 2016
Nergiz Dagoglu; Mark P. Callery; James Moser; Jennifer F. Tseng; Tara S. Kent; Andrea J. Bullock; Rebecca A. Miksad; Joseph D. Mancias; Anand Mahadevan
Objectives: After adjuvant or definitive radiation for pancreas cancer, there are limited conventional treatment options for recurrent pancreas cancer. We explored the role of (Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy) SBRT for reirradiation of recurrent pancreas Cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients reirradiated with SBRT for recurrent pancreas cancer. All patients were deemed unresectable and treated with systemic therapy. Fiducial gold markers were used. CT simulation was performed with oral and IV contrast and patients were treated with respiratory motion tracking in the CyberknifeTM system. Results: 30 patients (17 men and 13 women) with a median age of 67 years were included in the study. The median target volume was 41.29cc. The median prescription dose was 25Gy (24-36Gy) in a median of 5 fractions prescribed to a mean 78% isodose line. The median overall survival was 14 months. The 1 and 2 year local control was 78%. The worst toxicity included 3/30(10%) Grade III acute toxicity for pain, bleeding and vomiting. There was 2/30 (7%) Grade III long-term bowel obstructions. Conclusions: SBRT can be a useful and tolerable option for patients with recurrent pancreas cancer after prior radiation.
Oncology | 2011
Faruk Tas; Serkan Keskin; Ahmet Karadeniz; Nergiz Dagoglu; Fatma Sen; Leyla Kilic; Ibrahim Yildiz
Objective: Compared to the cutaneous melanoma, noncutaneous melanomas are relatively rare and have a distinct pattern of behavior. We performed this study to define the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with noncutaneous melanomas and emphasize how they differ from cutaneous melanomas. Methods: 216 patients who were diagnosed with noncutaneous melanoma were assessed and their medical records between 2000 and 2010 were retrieved from the cancer registry. 475 patients with cutaneous melanoma were used for comparison. Results: Of the 216 noncutaneous melanoma patients, 83 had mucosal melanoma, 101 had ocular melanoma and 32 had unknown primaries. For mucosal melanoma, the head and neck was the most common anatomic site (53%), followed by the gastrointestinal tract (37%), female genital (6%) and urinary tract (4%). The majority of the ocular melanomas (94%) originated in the uvea. 32 patients demonstrated a primary unknown disease with regional metastasis as the dominant behavior (72%). Age was found to be statistically significantly different among melanoma patients (p < 0.001). Younger patients had more cutaneous and unknown primary melanomas, whereas older patients had more ocular and mucosal melanoma. In subset analyses, we found significant differences between cutaneous and ocular (p = 0.038) or mucosal (p < 0.001) melanomas. The ratios of metastasis on admission were higher in patients with mucosal (27.7%) and unknown primary (28.1%) melanomas, and lower for ocular (3%) melanomas (p < 0.001). Patients with cutaneous melanoma had an intermediate (12%) ratio. Patients with ocular melanoma had better outcome than patients with other melanoma sites (p < 0.05). While overall survival for cutaneous melanoma was significantly negatively correlated with male gender (p < 0.001), advanced stages (p < 0.001) and old age (p = 0.005), stage IV disease was the only independent prognostic factor in patients with ocular melanoma (p = 0.006). No prognostic factor for outcome was found for either mucosal or unknown primary melanomas. Conclusion: The clinical presentations and prognoses of different primary sites of melanoma are distinctive. Therefore, approaches to these melanomas should be different.
Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2015
Nergiz Dagoglu; Anand Mahadevan; Elena Nedea; Vitaly Poylin; Deborah Nagle
When surgery is not adequate or feasible, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) reirradiation has been used for recurrent cancers. We report the outcomes of a series of patients with pelvic recurrences from colorectal cancer reirradiated with SBRT.
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology | 2016
Nergiz Dagoglu; Elena Nedea; Vitaliy Poylin; Deborah Nagle; Anand Mahadevan
BACKGROUND The incidence of positive margins after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and adequate surgery is very low. However, when patients do present with positive or close margins, they are at a risk of local failure and local therapy options are limited. We evaluated the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with positive or close margins after induction chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. METHODS This is a retrospective evaluation of patients treated with SBRT after induction chemoradiation and surgery for positive or close margins. Seven evaluable patients were included. Fiducial seeds were place at surgery. The Cyberknife(TM) system was used for planning and treatment. Patients were followed 1 month after treatment and 3-6 months thereafter. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meir method was used to repot the findings. RESULTS Seven patients (3 men and 4 women) were included in the study with a median follow-up of 23.5 months. The median initial radiation dose was 5,040 cGy (in 28 fractions) and the median SBRT dose was 2,500 cGy (in 5 fractions). The local control at 2 years was 100%. The overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 100% and 71% respectively. There was no Grade III or IV toxicity. CONCLUSIONS SBRT reirradiation is an effective and safe method to address positive or close margins after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery for rectal cancer.
Cureus | 2015
Anand Mahadevan; Nergiz Dagoglu; Jennifer F. Tseng; Khalid Khawaja; Amy Evenson
Surgical treatment remains the only curative treatment for gallbladder cancer. However, even after liver resection, locoregional failure seems to be a significant problem. While there is no Level I evidence, multiple studies have shown benefit for adjuvant radiation in high-risk patients. After extensive liver resection, tolerance to conventional chemoradiation may be limited by potential liver toxicity. Stereotactic body radiotherapy has been used safely and effectively in hepatobiliary malignancies. We present a case report, highlighting the potential therapeutic role of adjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for gallbladder cancer.
Archive | 2015
Nergiz Dagoglu; Anand Mahadevan
With tremendous strides in loco regional and systemic therapy many cancer patients present with limited metastatic disease. Just like the precedence of surgical metatstatectomy providing significant numbers of long term survivors, other evolving locoregional therapies can potentially achieve similar results, particularly when surgery is not an option or undesirable. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is becoming an increasingly valuable tool in the armamentarium against oligometastatic cancer. Future clinical trials are needed to solidify its role in the setting of systemic, targeted, immune and biological therapies.
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy | 2017
Cigdem Usul Afsar; Mehmet Karabulut; Senem Karabulut; Halil Alış; Nergiz Dagoglu; Murat Serilmez; Faruk Tas
Medical journal of Bakirköy | 2016
Senem Karabulut; Mehmet Karabulut; Halil Alış; Nergiz Dagoglu; Makbule Tambas; Selin Kapan; Ebru Oran; Hilal Oguz; Faruk Tas