Nevil J. Singh

IL-2 Secretion by CD4+ T Cells In Vivo Is Rapid, Transient, and Influenced by TCR-Specific Competition

The secretion of IL-2 is a critical and early landmark in the activation program of CD4+ T cells in vitro, but the lack of sensitive assays has limited its application for studying T cell activation in vivo. Using a mouse cytokine capture assay we were able to detect the rapid secretion of IL-2 after an in vivo stimulus by 1–2 h in naive T cells and as early as 30 min in memory T cells. Maximal secretion was achieved within 1–2 h for memory cells or 6–8 h for naive T cells. Surprisingly IL-2 production terminated quickly in vivo and secretion was undetectable by 20–24 h in either cell type. We further demonstrated that this short duration of secretion can be influenced by cellular competition between Ag-specific CD4+ T cells. The consequences of competition were mimicked by reducing the strength of the antigenic stimulus. These data argue that early competition between T cells influences both the eventual frequency of IL-2 producers in the population and also the duration of their secretion, potentially by altering the strength or duration of the stimulus available to each T cell.

The Strength of Persistent Antigenic Stimulation Modulates Adaptive Tolerance in Peripheral CD4+ T Cells

The quantitative adaptation of receptor thresholds allows cells to tailor their responses to changes in ambient ligand concentration in many biological systems. Such a cell-intrinsic calibration of T cell receptor (TCR) sensitivity could be involved in regulating responses to autoantigens, but this has never been demonstrated for peripheral T cells. We examined the ability of monoclonal naive T cells to modulate their responsiveness differentially after exposure to fourfold different levels of persistent antigen stimulation in vivo. T cells expanded and entered a tolerant state with different kinetics in response to the two levels of stimulation, but eventually adjusted to a similar slow rate of turnover. In vivo restimulation revealed a greater impairment in the proliferative ability of T cells resident in a higher antigen presentation environment. We also observed subtle differences in TCR signaling and in vitro cytokine production consistent with differential adaptation. Unexpectedly, the system failed to similarly compensate to the persistent stimulus in vivo at the level of CD69 expression and actin polymerization. This greater responsiveness of T cells residing in a host with a lower level of antigen presentation allows us to demonstrate for the first time an intrinsic tuning process in mature T lymphocytes, albeit one more complex than current theories predict.

T‐cell Control of IL‐12p75 Production

It is currently thought that IL‐12, produced by dendritic cells (DC) early after stimulation by bacterial pathogens or lipopolysaccharide (LPS), acts as a pro‐inflammatory cytokine bridging the innate and adaptive immune responses. We found, however, that it is only the p40 subunit and not the IL‐12p75 heterodimer that is secreted early in copious amounts in response to LPS. Neither naïve T cells, nor a variety of microbial products, were able to induce IL‐12p75 production unless the DC were conditioned by the presence of interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ) or by encounter with previously activated T cells. The inability of naïve T cells or of bacterial products to induce IL‐12 argues against its early role as the initiator of innate and adaptive immune responses.

Primer: mechanisms of immunologic tolerance

Successful adaptive immunity against a broad range of pathogens depends on the diversity of randomly generated T-lymphocyte and B-lymphocyte receptors. A subset of these receptors will be self-reactive and must be regulated to prevent autoimmunity. The process of immunologic tolerance addresses this problem by either purging autoreactive receptors from the system or tuning down their reactivity sufficiently to prevent disease. Immature lymphocytes generate a novel receptor during development in the thymus or bone marrow. Engagement of self antigens by these nascent receptors leads to their purging, either by the apoptotic death of the lymphocyte or by the initiation of receptor editing, a process in which the autoreactive receptor is replaced. If the lymphocytes mature further, the activation threshold of autoreactive cells can be tuned by the co-expression of inhibitory receptors or negative signaling molecules, allowing the persistence of the receptor without an increased risk of autoimmunity. T-cell and B-cell receptors that escape these checkpoints can still be regulated in the peripheral immune system by both purging and tuning mechanisms. A separate set of mechanisms, mediated by various regulatory cells, also operates to tune peripheral receptors in a cell-extrinsic fashion. The combined action of these processes ensures that the organism does not suffer autoimmune pathology, even if autoreactive receptors are generated and maintained in the immune system.

Lipopolysaccharide-Activated Dendritic Cells: “Exhausted” or Alert and Waiting?

LPS-activated dendritic cells (DCs) are thought to follow a set program in which they secrete inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-12) and then become refractory to further stimulation (i.e., “exhausted”). In this study, we show that mouse DCs do indeed lose their responsiveness to LPS, but nevertheless remain perfectly capable of making inflammatory cytokines in response to signals from activated T cells and to CD40-ligand and soluble T cell-derived signals. Furthermore, far from being rigidly programmed by the original activating stimulus, the DCs retained sufficient plasticity to respond differentially to interactions with Th0, Th1, Th2, and Th17 T cells. These data suggest that LPS activation does not exhaust DCs but rather primes them for subsequent signals from T cells.

The impact of T cell intrinsic antigen adaptation on peripheral immune tolerance.

Overlapping roles have been ascribed for T cell anergy, clonal deletion, and regulation in the maintenance of peripheral immunological tolerance. A measurement of the individual and additive impacts of each of these processes on systemic tolerance is often lacking. In this report we have used adoptive transfer strategies to tease out the unique contribution of T cell intrinsic receptor calibration (adaptation) in the maintenance of tolerance to a systemic self-antigen. Adoptively transferred naïve T cells stably calibrated their responsiveness to a persistent self-antigen in both lymphopenic and T cell–replete hosts. In the former, this state was not accompanied by deletion or suppression, allowing us to examine the unique contribution of adaptation to systemic tolerance. Surprisingly, adapting T cells could chronically help antigen-expressing B cells, leading to polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia and pathology, in the form of mild arthritis. The helper activity mediated by CD40L and cytokines was evident even if the B cells were introduced after extended adaptation of the T cells. In contrast, in the T cell–replete host, neither arthritis nor autoantibodies were induced. The containment of systemic pathology required host T cell–mediated extrinsic regulatory mechanisms to synergize with the cell intrinsic adaptation process. These extrinsic mechanisms prevented the effector differentiation of the autoreactive T cells and reduced their precursor frequency, in vivo.

Subsets of Nonclonal Neighboring CD4+ T Cells Specifically Regulate the Frequency of Individual Antigen-Reactive T Cells

After an immune response, the expanded population of antigen-specific CD4(+) T cells contract to steady state levels. We have found that the contraction is neither cell-autonomous nor mediated by competition for generic trophic factors, but regulated by relatively rare subsets of neighboring CD4(+) T cells not necessarily of a conventional regulatory T cell lineage. These regulators, referred to as deletors, specifically limit the frequency of particular antigen-specific T cells even though they are not reactive to the same agonist as their targets. Instead, an isolated deletor could outcompete the target for recognition of a shared, nonstimulatory endogenous peptide-MHC ligand. This mechanism was sufficient to prevent even agonist-driven autoimmune disease in a lymphopenic environment. Such a targeted regulation of homeostasis within narrow colonies of T cells with related TCR specificities for subthreshold ligands might help to prevent the loss of unrelated TCRs during multiple responses, preserving the valuable diversity of the repertoire.

TLR Ligands Differentially Modulate T Cell Responses to Acute and Chronic Antigen Presentation

The outcome of peripheral T cell activation is thought to be largely determined by the context in which the cognate Ag is initially presented. In this framework, microbial products that can activate APCs via TLRs are considered critical in converting an otherwise tolerogenic context to an immunogenic one. We examine this idea using a model system where naive T cells are stimulated in the periphery by a persistent self Ag. The addition of multiple TLR ligands to this context, acutely or chronically, failed to significantly alter the tolerogenic phenotype in the responding T cells. This contrasts with the ability of such adjuvants to improve T cell responses to soluble peptide immunizations. We reconcile this difference by revealing a hitherto poorly appreciated property of TLR ligands, which extends the duration of soluble Ag presentation in vivo by an additional two to three days. Finally, we could replace the requirement for TLR-mediated APC activation in soluble-Ag-induced T cell expansion and differentiation, by maintaining the Ag depot in vivo using repeated immunizations. These data suggest a novel process by which TLR ligands modulate T cell responses to acute Ags, without disrupting the induction of tolerance to persistent self Ags.

Antigen-activated T cells induce IL-12p75 production from Dendritic cells in an IFN-γ-independent manner

The addition of IL‐12p75 to naïve CD4+ T cells promotes their differentiation towards a TH1‐type cytokine pattern. Dendritic cells stimulated by LPS generate IL‐12p75, but only if the environment also contains IFN‐γ. Thus, it appears that IFN‐γ is needed to start the response that will result in further production of IFN‐γ. We previously reported that paradoxically DCs produce IL‐12p75 only after engaging primed, but not naïve T cells. This study examines the mechanism by which primed T cells trigger IL‐12p75 secretion and asks whether this induction is also dependent on the presence of IFN‐γ. Here, we show that, in contrast to LPS, primed T cells induce IL‐12p75 in an IFN‐γ‐independent manner. Addition of rIFN‐γ to cocultures of naïve T cells with DCs did not induce IL‐12p75. Moreover, antigen‐activated CD4+ T cells from wild type or IFN‐γ‐deficient mice both initiated IL‐12p75 production from DCs. Surprisingly, we found that synergies between three T‐cell‐derived factors – CD40 Ligand, IL‐4 and GM‐CSF – were necessary and sufficient for IL‐12p75 production. These results suggest that there are at least two distinct pathways for IL‐12p75 production in vivo. Furthermore, the T‐cell‐dependent pathway of IL‐12p75 production employs molecules that are not classically associated with a TH1‐type response.

Development and tolerization of hyperacute rejection in a transgenic mouse graft versus host model.

Background The hyperacute rejection mediated by preexisting antibodies is a major impediment to the success of transplants across allogeneic and xenogeneic barriers. We report a new mouse model that allows us to not only monitor the sensitization of B cells mediating the hyperacute response but also validate therapeutic strategies for tolerizing them. Model The new model system uses 5C.C7,RAG2−/− T-cell receptor transgenic T cells and B10.S(9R),CD3[Latin Small Letter Open E]−/− hosts for adoptive transfer experiments. Results and Conclusions In the allogeneic hosts, transgenic T cells expanded briefly before being chronically deleted. Once the deletion was initiated, a second graft of donor cells was used to assess a hyperacute response. The rapid rejection of the second cohort correlated with the appearance of donor-specific antibodies in the serum. Interestingly, chronically stimulated T cells were relatively resistant to hyperacute rejection, suggesting an explanation for the slower rejection kinetics of the first cohort even as the second cohort of identical donor cells was being hyperacutely rejected. Finally, we could tolerize the potential for a hyperacute response, by pretreating recipients with a single infusion of naive donor B cells before the first T-cell transfer. This treatment not only abrogated the development of a hyperacute response but also allowed the primary graft to survive in vivo for extended periods.