Neville Jackson

Effects of sildenafil citrate on human hemodynamics

Nitric oxide (NO) induces the formation of intracellular cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) by guanylate cyclase. Sildenafil, which selectively inhibits phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) found predominantly in the corpora cavernosa of the penis, effectively blocks the degradation of cGMP and enhances erectile function in men with erectile dysfunction. The NO-cGMP pathway also plays an important role in mediating blood pressure. It is, therefore, possible that the therapeutic doses of sildenafil used to treat erectile dysfunction may have clinically significant effects on human hemodynamics. Three studies were undertaken to assess the effects of intravenously, intra-arterially, and orally administered doses of sildenafil on blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, and forearm blood flow and venous compliance in healthy men. A fourth study evaluated the hemodynamic effects of intravenous sildenafil in men with stable ischemic heart disease. In healthy men, significant (p <0.01) decreases in supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures were observed with intravenous sildenafil (20, 40, and 80 mg) at the end of the infusion period when plasma levels of sildenafil were highest (mean decreases from baseline of 7.0/6.9 and 9.2/6.7 mm Hg, for the 40- and 80-mg doses, respectively). These changes were transient and not dose related. Modest reductions in systemic vascular resistance also were observed (maximum decrease 16%), although heart rate was not affected by sildenafil administration when compared with placebo. Single oral doses of sildenafil (100, 150, and 200 mg) produced no significant changes in cardiac index from 1-12 hours postdose between placebo- and sildenafil-treated subjects. The approved dosage strengths of sildenafil citrate are 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg. The 80-mg intravenous dose and the 200-mg oral dose of sildenafil produced comparable plasma levels at twice the maximum therapeutic dose (recommended range, 25-100 mg). After brachial artery infusion of sildenafil (up to 300 microg/min), there was a modest vasodilation of resistance arteries and a reversal of norepinephrine-induced preconstriction of forearm veins. These hemodynamic effects were similar to but smaller in magnitude than those of nitrates. In a small pilot study of men with ischemic heart disease, decreases from baseline in pulmonary arterial pressure (-27% at rest and -19% during exercise) and cardiac output (-7% at rest and -11% during exercise) were observed after 40-mg intravenous doses of sildenafil. Sildenafil was well tolerated by subjects and patients in all studies, with headache and other symptoms of vasodilation the most commonly reported adverse effects of treatment. Modest, transient hemodynamic changes were observed in healthy men after single intravenous or oral doses of sildenafil even at supratherapeutic doses. In men with stable ischemic heart disease, sildenafil produced modest effects on hemodynamic parameters at rest and during exercise.

Renal response to candoxatrilat in patients with heart failure

OBJECTIVES Our primary objective was to compare the effects of three different doses of candoxatrilat with the effects of placebo on urinary volume in patients with moderately severe heart failure. The effects of candoxatrilat on urinary composition, neuroendocrine indexes and renal hemodynamic function were also studied. BACKGROUND Candoxatrilat, a neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, reduces degradation of atrial natriuretic peptide and provokes diuresis in patients with mild heart failure, but the renal effects have not been studied in patients with moderately severe heart failure in a placebo-controlled study. METHODS In a double-blind crossover trial, the effects of intravenous boluses of saline vehicle (placebo) and 50, 100 and 200 mg of candoxatrilat were compared on separate days in 12 patients with heart failure. Urinary output and composition were measured for 8 h. Renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate were determined by radionuclide techniques. Blood was withdrawn for the measurement of hormones before and 3 h after dosing. RESULTS All doses of candoxatrilat increased urinary volume (e.g., [mean +/- SEM] 263 +/- 53 to 490 +/- 82 ml for saline solution and the 200-mg dose, respectively, p < 0.01) and sodium content (14 +/- 4 to 37 +/- 11 mmol, p < 0.001) in the 1st 4 h after dosing. Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide increased (140 +/- 26 to 279 +/- 37 pg/ml, p < 0.01), whereas aldosterone decreased (178 +/- 41 to 125 +/- 35 pg/ml, p < 0.01), and renin activity was unchanged (10 +/- 2 to 12 +/- 3 ng/ml per h). CONCLUSIONS Candoxatrilat given acutely causes diuresis, even in patients with moderately severe heart failure.

Improving clinical trials for cardiovascular diseases: a position paper from the Cardiovascular Round Table of the European Society of Cardiology

AIMS Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of mortality and morbidity in the world, but the pharmaceutical industrys willingness to invest in this field has declined because of the many challenges involved with bringing new cardiovascular drugs to market, including late-stage failures, escalating regulatory requirements, bureaucracy of the clinical trial business enterprise, and limited patient access after approval. This contrasts with the remaining burden of cardiovascular disease in Europe and in the world. Thus, clinical cardiovascular research needs to adapt to address the impact of these challenges in order to ensure development of new cardiovascular medicines. METHODS AND RESULTS The present paper is the outcome of a two-day workshop held by the Cardiovascular Round Table of the European Society of Cardiology. We propose strategies to improve development of effective new cardiovascular therapies. These can include (i) the use of biomarkers to describe patients who will benefit from new therapies more precisely, achieving better human target validation; (ii) targeted, mechanism-based approaches to drug development for defined populations; (iii) the use of information technology to simplify data collection and follow-up in clinical trials; (iv) streamlining adverse event collection and reducing monitoring; (v) extended patent protection or limited rapid approval of new agents to motivate investment in early phase development; and (vi) collecting data needed for health technology assessment continuously throughout the drug development process (before and after approval) to minimize delays in patient access. Collaboration across industry, academia, regulators, and payers will be necessary to enact change and to unlock the existing potential for cardiovascular clinical drug development. CONCLUSIONS A coordinated effort involving academia, regulators, industry, and payors will help to foster better and more effective conduct of clinical cardiovascular trials, supporting earlier availability of innovative therapies and better management of cardiovascular diseases.

Intravenous amrinone in left ventricular failure complicated by acute myocardial infarction

Hemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous amrinone were studied in 22 male patients aged 38 to 62 years with left ventricular failure occurring within 18 hours of acute myocardial infarction. After hemodynamic confirmation of a raised left-sided cardiac filling pressure--pulmonary artery occluded pressure greater than 20 mm Hg--patients were randomized to either low-dose infusion of amrinone (200 micrograms/kg/hr for 30 minutes, 400 micrograms/kg/hr for 30 minutes and then 800 micrograms/kg/hr for 30 minutes) or high-dose infusion of the drug (800, 1,600 and 3,200 micrograms/kg/hr sequentially, each for 30 minutes). Hemodynamic measurements were obtained at 1 hour before amrinone and at the end of each infusion step. Low-dose infusion of amrinone resulted in a progressive increase in cardiac output (p less than 0.05) and stroke volume (p less than 0.05) and progressive reductions in pulmonary artery occluded pressure (p less than 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance (p less than 0.05). Systemic blood pressure and heart rate were unchanged. High-dose infusion resulted in a similar increase in cardiac output (p less than 0.05) but no change in stroke volume owing to associated tachycardia (p less than 0.01). There was a significantly greater decrease in pulmonary artery occluded pressure compared with the low-dose infusion (p less than 0.05), and systemic arterial diastolic and mean pressures were also decreased (p less than 0.05). The decrease in systemic vascular resistance was of a similar order to that induced by the low-dose infusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A four-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel dose-response study of amlodipine in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris

During exercise testing, amlodipine increased the total exercise time at all three doses. The time to onset of angina was also increased at all these dose levels. These findings were noted at 6 and 24 hours after dose. Although exercise parameters appeared to show greater improvement at 6 hours after dose than at 24 hours after dose, analysis revealed that these differences were nonsignificant. The evaluation of the symptomatic profile of patients with angina by the investigator showed that amlodipine had significantly greater efficacy compared with placebo (p = 0.03). There were no severe adverse reactions to amlodipine compared with placebo. In conclusion, once-daily treatment of chronic stable angina with amlodipine is effective, and the drug is well tolerated.

Haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous amrinone in left ventricular failure complicating acute myocardial infarction

Summary: The haemodynamic dose–response effects of intravenous amrinone were measured in 16 male patients, aged 40–65 years, with radiographic and haemodynamic evidence of left ventricular failure 4–18 h after acute myocardial infarction. After a 1-h control period to confirm stable haemodynamic baseline variables, patients were randomised to either low-dose (200–400–800 μg/kg/h) or high-dose (800–1600–3200 μg/kg/h) intravenous amrinone. Each of the three infusions was given consecutively over 30 min (total infusion time 90 min) in each group, and haemodynamic measurements were made at the end of each infusion step. No arrhythmias or other untoward side effects, including haematological changes, were observed during the infusions. In both groups, intravenous amrinone reduced the pulmonary artery–occluded pressure (PAOP) (p < 0.01), increased the cardiac output (p < 0.05), and reduced the systemic vascular resistance (p < 0.05). The reductions in PAOP and systemic arterial diastolic pressure and the increase in heart rate were directly dose-related, but the changes in cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance were not. These results suggest that peripheral vasodilatation, particularly of venous capacitance vessels, as well as positive inotropic stimulation, may play a role in the haemodynamic changes induced by intravenous amrinone in acute ischaemic left ventricular failure.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel dose-response study of amlodipine in stable exertional angina pectoris.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-response study of amlodipine (1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg once daily) was carried out in 136 patients with stable exertional angina pectoris. Improvements in total exercise tolerance, time to onset of angina during exercise, ST-segment deviation at maximum common load, frequency of angina attacks, and nitroglycerin consumption were greater following amlodipine than placebo. The maximum improvement in exercise parameters occurred with the highest dose of amlodipine. All doses produced significant reductions in angina attack frequency and the rate of nitroglycerin consumption. Amlodipine was well tolerated and no patients were withdrawn due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities.

Nifedipine following acute myocardial infarction--dependence of response on baseline haemodynamic status.

The haemodynamic effects of nifedipine (20 mg sublingually) were studied in 40 patients with acute myocardial infarction within 18 h of the onset of symptoms. To determine the influence of preload and afterload on the haemodynamic response to nifedipine, patients were prospectively stratified equally into four groups of 10 patients based on systemic blood pressure level (< or > 160/100 mm Hg) and level of left ventricular filling pressure [pulmonary artery-occluded pressure (PAOP) < or >18 mm Hg]. In all groups, nifedipine reduced systemic arterial pressure (p < 0.01) and vascular resistance index (p < 0.01); heart rate (p < 0.01) and cardiac index (p < 0.01) were increased. PAOP was reduced by nifedipine only in those hypertensive patients in whom it was initially raised; in these patients cardiac stroke volume index also increased (p < 0.01). In hypertensive patients with normal PAOP the cardiac stroke work index was reduced. In patients with normal systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, nifedipine had no beneficial effects on cardiac function. These data suggested that haemodynamic criteria may allow selection of patients for nifedipine therapy following myocardial infarction; clear advantages were evident only in hypertensive patients in both the presence and the absence of left ventricular failure.

Haemodynamic Dose–Response Effects of Intravenous Indoramin in Acute Heart Failure Complicating Myocardial Infarction

The haemodynamic dose–response effects of intravenous indoramin were evaluated in 12 patients with acute heart failure (pulmonary artery occluded pressure of >20 mm Hg) complicating a recent myocardial infarction. Following a 1-h control period with confirmed stable haemodynamics, the effects of three intravenous bolus doses of indoramin (0.125, 0.125, and 0.25 mg/kg at 15-min intervals) were determined in the 10− to 15-min period following each intravenous injection. Plasma drug concentrations rose with the administered dose and were in the previously established therapeutic range. Ten patients tolerated all three doses of the drug; two patients were withdrawn following the second dose owing to clinically evident hypotension (systolic blood pressure of <100 mm Hg). Indoramin resulted in progressive falls in systolic, diastolic, and mean systemic arterial pressures (p < 0.01) without change in cardiac index. There was a dose-related reduction in the heart rate (0.5 mg/kg; –7 beats/min; p < 0.01). The left ventricular filling pressure showed a significant and quadratic reduction over the dose range (0.5 mg/kg. –5 mm Hg: p < 0.01). The systemic vascular resistance index was reduced (– 333 dynes · s · · cm−5 · m2; p < 0.001) and the stroke volume index increased (+ 3 ml/m2; p < 0.05) following the maximum cumulative dosage. These data established the therapeutic safety of indoramin (0.125–0.5 mg/kg) in acute heart failure following myocardial infarction. An improvement in cardiac performance in these patients was compatible with circulatory actions on both cardiac preload and afterload.

How does posture influence the haemodynamic assessment of a cardiovascular drug ? Experience with nicardipine

Summary: The extent to which posture altered the haemodynamic response to the slow calcium channel blocker nicardipine was evaluated in 22 male patients with angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease. Patients were randomly allocated to supine or upright posture and an otherwise identical protocol performed in each group. At rest, following a control saline period, four doses of the drug (log cumulative dosage: 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg) were administered by i.v. infusion over a total period of 40 min; haemodynamic indices were recorded during the 3–5 min following each 5 min infusion. The exercise effects of the drug, in each posture, were determined by comparison of a control predrug exercise with observations at the same workload following the maximal cumulative dose. Nicardipine reduced resting mean blood pressure (MBP) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) in both postures, the decrease being more pronounced when upright (MBP, −12%, −18%; p < 0.01: SVRI, −30%, − 46%; p < 0.01). The increases in cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume index (SVI) were higher when upright (29 and 54% vs. 10 and 27%; p < 0.01). Pulmonary artery occluded pressure (PAOP) increased by 29% when upright, without change when supine. On exercise, the effects for HR, MBP, CI, SI, and SVRI responses were independent of posture; however, a qualitative difference was apparent for PAOP (−17% vs. +14%; p < 0.05). Thus, although the actions of nicardipine were qualitatively similar, quantitative differences related to posture were confirmed. These differences appeared to relate to posture-related baseline haemodynamic differences between the groups but with similar postnicardipine absolute values.