Niall Dillon

Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms.

Cohesins mediate sister chromatid cohesion, which is essential for chromosome segregation and postreplicative DNA repair. In addition, cohesins appear to regulate gene expression and enhancer-promoter interactions. These noncanonical functions remained unexplained because knowledge of cohesin-binding sites and functional interactors in metazoans was lacking. We show that the distribution of cohesins on mammalian chromosome arms is not driven by transcriptional activity, in contrast to S. cerevisiae. Instead, mammalian cohesins occupy a subset of DNase I hypersensitive sites, many of which contain sequence motifs resembling the consensus for CTCF, a DNA-binding protein with enhancer blocking function and boundary-element activity. We find cohesins at most CTCF sites and show that CTCF is required for cohesin localization to these sites. Recruitment by CTCF suggests a rationale for noncanonical cohesin functions and, because CTCF binding is sensitive to DNA methylation, allows cohesin positioning to integrate DNA sequence and epigenetic state.

Unravelling heterochromatin: competition between positive and negative factors regulates accessibility

Heterochromatin mediates many diverse functions in the cell nucleus, including centromere function, gene silencing and nuclear organization. The condensed structure of pericentromeric heterochromatin is associated with the presence of a regular arrangement of nucleosomes, which might be due in part to the underlying sequence of the satellite repeats. Recent studies identified methylation of the histone H3 tail as an epigenetic mark that affects acetylation and phosphorylation of histone tail residues and also acts as a recognition signal for binding of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1). The decision to silence or activate heterochromatic genes appears to be the result of a balance between negative factors that promote the formation of condensed higher-order chromatin structure, and positively acting transcription factors that bind to regulatory sequences and activate gene expression.

Nonequivalent nuclear location of immunoglobulin alleles in B lymphocytes

Individual B lymphocytes normally express immunoglobulin (Ig) proteins derived from single Ig heavy chain (H) and light chain (L) alleles. Allelic exclusion ensures monoallelic expression of Ig genes by each B cell to maintain single receptor specificity. Here we provide evidence that at later stages of B cell development, additional mechanisms may contribute to prioritizing expression of single IgH and IgL alleles. Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of primary splenic B cells isolated from normal and genetically manipulated mice showed that endogenous IgH, κ and λ alleles localized to different subnuclear environments after activation and had differential expression patterns. However, this differential recruitment and expression of Ig alleles was not typically seen among transformed B cell lines. These data raise the possibility that epigenetic factors help maintain the monoallelic expression of Ig.

The effect of distance on long-range chromatin interactions.

We have used gene competition to distinguish between possible mechanisms of transcriptional activation of the genes of the human beta-globin locus. The insertion of a second beta-globin gene at different points in the locus shows that the more proximal beta gene competes more effectively for activation by the locus control region (LCR). Reducing the relative distance between the genes and the LCR reduces the competitive advantage of the proximal gene, a result that supports activation by direct interaction between the LCR and the genes. Visualization of the primary transcripts shows that the level of transcription is proportional to the frequency of transcriptional periods and that such periods last approximately 8 min in vivo. We also find that the position of the beta-globin gene in the locus is important for correct developmental regulation.

Three-dimensional genome architecture: players and mechanisms

The different cell types of an organism share the same DNA, but during cell differentiation their genomes undergo diverse structural and organizational changes that affect gene expression and other cellular functions. These can range from large-scale folding of whole chromosomes or of smaller genomic regions, to the re-organization of local interactions between enhancers and promoters, mediated by the binding of transcription factors and chromatin looping. The higher-order organization of chromatin is also influenced by the specificity of the contacts that it makes with nuclear structures such as the lamina. Sophisticated methods for mapping chromatin contacts are generating genome-wide data that provide deep insights into the formation of chromatin interactions, and into their roles in the organization and function of the eukaryotic cell nucleus.

Binding of Ikaros to the λ5 promoter silences transcription through a mechanism that does not require heterochromatin formation

The Ikaros family of proteins are DNA binding factors required for correct development of B and T lymphocytes. Cytogenetic studies have shown that these proteins form complexes with pericentromeric heterochromatin in B cells, and the colocalization of transcriptionally silent genes with these complexes suggests that Ikaros could silence transcription by recruiting genes to heterochromatin. Here we show that a site in the λ5 promoter that binds Ikaros and Aiolos is required for silencing of λ5 expression in activated mature B cells. Analysis of methylation and nuclease accessibility indicates that the silenced λ5 gene is not heterochromatinized in B cells, despite being associated with pericentromeric heterochromatin clusters. We also found that a promoter mutation, which affects Ikaros‐mediated silencing of λ5 expression, is not rescued in a transgenic line that has the gene integrated into pericentromeric heterochromatin. Our results indicate that the Ikaros proteins initiate silencing of λ5 expression through a direct effect on the promoter with localization to pericentromeric heterochromatin likely to affect the action of Ikaros on regulatory sequences rather than causing heterochromatinization of the gene.

Variant histone H3.3 marks promoters of transcriptionally active genes during mammalian cell division

Variant histone H3.3 is incorporated into nucleosomes by a mechanism that does not require DNA replication and has also been implicated as a potential mediator of epigenetic memory of active transcriptional states. In this study, we have used chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis to show that H3.3 is found mainly at the promoters of transcriptionally active genes. We also show that H3.3 combines with H3 acetylation and K4 methylation to form a stable mark that persists during mitosis. Our results suggest that H3.3 is deposited principally through the action of chromatin‐remodelling complexes associated with transcriptional initiation, with deposition mediated by RNA polymerase II elongation having only a minor role.

MicroRNA Regulation of Cbx7 Mediates a Switch of Polycomb Orthologs during ESC Differentiation

Summary The Polycomb Group (PcG) of chromatin modifiers regulates pluripotency and differentiation. Mammalian genomes encode multiple homologs of the Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) components, including five orthologs of the Drosophila Polycomb protein (Cbx2, Cbx4, Cbx6, Cbx7, and Cbx8). We have identified Cbx7 as the primary Polycomb ortholog of PRC1 complexes in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). The expression of Cbx7 is downregulated during ESC differentiation, preceding the upregulation of Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx8, which are directly repressed by Cbx7. Ectopic expression of Cbx7 inhibits differentiation and X chromosome inactivation and enhances ESC self-renewal. Conversely, Cbx7 knockdown induces differentiation and derepresses lineage-specific markers. In a functional screen, we identified the miR-125 and miR-181 families as regulators of Cbx7 that are induced during ESC differentiation. Ectopic expression of these miRNAs accelerates ESC differentiation via regulation of Cbx7. These observations establish a critical role for Cbx7 and its regulatory miRNAs in determining pluripotency.

Formation of an Active Tissue-Specific Chromatin Domain Initiated by Epigenetic Marking at the Embryonic Stem Cell Stage

ABSTRACT The differentiation potential of stem cells is determined by the ability of these cells to establish and maintain developmentally regulated gene expression programs that are specific to different lineages. Although transcriptionally potentiated epigenetic states of genes have been described for haematopoietic progenitors, the developmental stage at which the formation of lineage-specific gene expression domains is initiated remains unclear. In this study, we show that an intergenic cis-acting element in the mouse λ5-VpreB1 locus is marked by histone H3 acetylation and histone H3 lysine 4 methylation at a discrete site in embryonic stem (ES) cells. The epigenetic modifications spread from this site toward the VpreB1 and λ5 genes at later stages of B-cell development, and a large, active chromatin domain is established in pre-B cells when the genes are fully expressed. In early B-cell progenitors, the binding of haematopoietic factor PU.1 coincides with the expansion of the marked region, and the region becomes a center for the recruitment of general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II. In pre-B cells, E2A also binds to the locus, and general transcription factors are distributed across the active domain, including the gene promoters and the intergenic region. These results suggest that localized epigenetic marking is important for establishing the transcriptional competence of the λ5 and VpreB1 genes as early as the pluripotent ES cell stage.

Heterochromatin structure and function

Abstract Although heterochromatin has long been used as a model for studying chromatin condensation and heritable gene silencing, it is only relatively recently that detailed information has become available on the mechanisms that underlie its structure. Current evidence suggests that these operate on at least three different levels. A regular nucleosome array may facilitate packaging of the chromatin into a highly condensed configuration. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 and lysine 27 generates heterochromatin marks that are recognised through binding of heterochromatin proteins such as HP1. Finally, very recent studies using genetic and biochemical approaches have indicated that the RNAi machinery plays an important role in the formation of heterochromatin.