Niccolò Petrucciani

Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies

BackgroundThe current literature suggests that minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is associated with faster recovery and less morbidity than open surgery. However, most studies have been limited by a small sample size and a single-institution design. To overcome this problem, the first metaanalysis of studies comparing MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) has been performed.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies comparing MIDP and ODP. Perioperative outcomes (e.g., morbidity and mortality, pancreatic fistula rates, blood loss) constituted the study end points. Metaanalyses were performed using a random-effects model.ResultsFor the metaanalysis, 10 studies including 349 patients undergoing MIDP and 380 patients undergoing ODP were considered suitable. The patients in the two groups were similar with respect to age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, and indication for surgery. The rate of conversion from full laparoscopy to hand-assisted procedure was 37%, and that from minimally invasive to open procedure was 11%. Patients undergoing MIDP had less blood loss, a shorter time to oral intake, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. The mortality and reoperative rates did not differ between MIDP and ODP. The MIDP approach had fewer overall complications [odds ratio (OR), 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.27–0.89], major complications (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34–0.96), surgical-site infections (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19–0.53), and pancreatic fistulas (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47–0.98).ConclusionsThe MIDP procedure is feasible, safe, and associated with less blood loss and overall complications, shorter time to oral intake, and shorter postoperative hospital stay. Furthermore, the minimally invasive approach reduces the rate of pancreatic leaks and surgical-site infections after ODP.

Meta-analysis of trials comparing laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic adrenalectomies are being performed increasingly, either with transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approaches. Studies comparing the 2 approaches have not shown the superiority of either technique, but these studies are limited by small sample sizes and single-institution designs. To overcome these limitations, we performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. METHODS A systematic review of studies comparing lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy was conducted. Study endpoints included perioperative outcomes and measures of postoperative recovery. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, pooling variables evaluated by more than 3 studies. RESULTS Twenty-one studies comparing a total of 1,205 lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomies and 688 retroperitoneal adrenalectomies were suitable for meta-analysis. Patients in the 2 groups were similar in term of age, sex, body mass index, lesion size and location, and rates of malignancy. There were no statistically significant differences between lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy in terms of operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, time to oral intake, overall and major morbidity, and mortality. CONCLUSION Both lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy are associated with very low rates of perioperative complications. According to our meta-analysis, clinical outcomes after either technique are similar. For most adrenal lesions requiring operation, minimally invasive adrenalectomy can be performed safely and effectively with either transperitoneal or the retroperitoneal approach. Additional studies may be needed to analyze if any difference in long-term results exist.

Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Survival after surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is poor. Several prognostic factors such as the status of the resection margin, lymph node status, or tumour grading have been identified. The aims of the present study were to evaluate and compare the prognostic assessment of different lymph nodes staging methods: standard lymph node (pN) staging, metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in pancreatic cancer after pancreatic resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from 143 patients who had undergone R0 pancreatic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Survival curves (Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models), accuracy, and homogeneity of the 3 methods (LNR, LODDS, and pN) were compared to evaluate the prognostic effects. RESULTS Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LODDS and LNR were an independent prognostic factors, but not pN classification. The scatter plots of the relationship between LODDS and the LNR suggested that the LODDS stage had power to divide patients with the same ratio of node metastasis into different groups. For patients in each of the pN or LNR classifications, significant differences in survival could be observed among patients in different LODDS stages. CONCLUSION LODDS and LNR are more powerful predictors of survival than the lymph node status in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. LODDS allows better prognostic stratification comparing LNR in node negative patients.

Trends of bariatric surgery in France during the last 10 years: analysis of 267,466 procedures from 2005–2014

BACKGROUND During the past decade, the field of bariatric surgery has changed dramatically. OBJECTIVES The study aims to summarize and perform a periodic assessment of the current trends in the use of bariatric surgery in France and review findings on the long-term progression of bariatric surgery. The data were extracted from the national registry Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d׳Information from 2005 to 2014. SETTING National health system and private practice in France. METHODS We identified all hospitalizations during which a bariatric procedure was performed for the treatment of morbid obesity from 2005 to 2014 in France. Data were reviewed for patient characteristics and the number and types of bariatric procedures. We also analyzed the setting and the characteristics of the centers and the difference of the activity between the public and private sector. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2014, the number of bariatric operations increased fourfold. Sleeve gastrectomy became the most performed bariatric intervention, representing 60.7% of bariatric activity in 2014. There was a concomitant steep increase in sleeve gastrectomy, with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass increasing slightly overall and a substantial decrease in adjustable gastric banding. In 2014, 481 centers performed bariatric surgery. Among them, one third performed<30 operations/yr. We observed an overall in-hospital mortality ranging from .038% to .05% during the last 3 years. CONCLUSION Bariatric surgery is increasing in France, with a fourfold augmentation of interventions in the last 10 years. The number of sleeve gastrectomies has increased considerably. This activity is performed in numerous centers, one third of them performing<30 interventions/yr.

Duodenopancreatectomy: open or minimally invasive approach?

BACKGROUND Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is a complex procedure, offered to selected patients at institutions highly experienced with the procedure. It is still not clear if this approach may enhance patient recovery and reduce postoperative complications comparing to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD), as demonstrated for other abdominal procedures. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies comparing MIPD and OPD. Perioperative outcomes (e.g., morbidity and mortality, pancreatic fistula rates, blood loss) constituted the study end points. Metaanalyses were performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS For the metaanalysis, 8 studies including 204 patients undergoing MIPD and 419 patients undergoing OPD were considered suitable. The patients in the two groups were similar with respect to age, sex and histological diagnosis, and different with respect to tumor size, rate of pylorus preservation, and type of pancreatic anastomosis. There were no statistically significant differences between MIPD and OPD regarding development of delayed gastric emptying (DGE), pancreatic fistula, wound infection, or rates of reoperation and overall mortality. MIDP resulted in lower post-operative complication rates, less intra-operative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, lower blood transfusion rates, higher numbers of harvested lymph nodes, and improved negative margin status rates. However, MIPD was associated with longer operating times when compared to OPD. CONCLUSIONS The MIPD procedure is feasible, safe, and effective in selected patients. MIPD may have some potential advantages over OPD, and should be performed and further developed by use in selected patients at highly experienced medical centers.

Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes (LODDS): What Are Their Role in the Prognostic Assessment of Gastric Adenocarcinoma?

BackgroundNodal status is an important prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer. Log odds of positive nodes (LODDS) (log of the ratio between the number of positive nodes and the number of negative nodes) are a new effective indicator of prognosis. The aim of the study is to evaluate if LODDS are superior to N stage and lymph nodal ratio (LNR).MethodsPrognostic efficacy of pN, nodal ratio, and LODDS was analyzed and compared in a group of 177 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative gastrectomy.ResultspT, pN, LNR, and LODDS were all significantly correlated with 5-year survival. Multivariate analyses showed significant values as prognostic factor for pN, LNR, and LODDS. A Pearson test demonstrated no significant correlation between LODDS and retrieved nodes. In patients with less than 15 examined nodes, LODDS classification and pN were significantly correlated with survival, whereas LNR classification was not significantly related.ConclusionsLODDS are not correlated with the extension of the lymphadenectomy and are able to predict survival even if less than 15 nodes are examined. They permit an effective prognostic stratification of patients with a nodal ratio approaching 0 and 1. Further studies are needed to clarify their role and if they are capable of guaranteeing some advantages over pN and LNR.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastases: What is the evidence? Results of a systematic review of comparative studies

BACKGROUND The role of preoperative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastases is still highly controversial. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the current evidence on this topic. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies published from January 2003 up to and including January 2014 regarding patients with initially resectable colorectal liver metastases. Data were examined for information about indications, operation, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, perioperative results, and survival. RESULTS Fourteen retrospective studies published between 2003 and 2014 satisfied the inclusion criteria, including 1607 patients who underwent pre-operative chemotherapy and liver resection (NEO-CHT group), and 1785 patients submitted to hepatectomy with or without post-operative chemotherapy (SURG group). Postoperative mortality rates ranged from 0 to 5% in the NEO-CHT group and from 0 to 4% in SURG group. Complications ranged from 7 to 63% in both groups. Adopted pre-operative chemotherapy protocols were highly heterogeneous. The 5-year overall survival rates ranged from 38.9 to 74% in the NEO-CHT group and from 20.7 to 56% in the SURG group, with no significant difference in seven of eight studies. DISCUSSION This review shows that there is a lack of clear evidence on the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of resectable colorectal metastases in the literature. The majority of studies were retrospective and there was high heterogeneity among them in the treatment protocols. The EORTC 40983 trial and the majority of retrospective studies did not find any overall survival advantage in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Additional high-quality studies (randomized) are needed to shed light on this topic.

Diaphragmatic rupture with right colon and small intestine herniation after blunt trauma: a case report

IntroductionTraumatic diaphragmatic hernias are an unusual presentation of trauma, and are observed in about 10% of diaphragmatic injuries. The diagnosis is often missed because of non-specific clinical signs, and the absence of additional intra-abdominal and thoracic injuries.Case presentationWe report a case of a 59-year-old Italian man hospitalized for abdominal pain and vomiting. His medical history included a blunt trauma seven years previously. A chest X-ray showed right diaphragm elevation, and computed tomography revealed that the greater omentum, a portion of the colon and the small intestine had been transposed in the hemithorax through a diaphragm rupture. The patient underwent laparotomy, at which time the colon and small intestine were reduced back into the abdomen and the diaphragm was repaired.ConclusionsThis was a unusual case of traumatic right-sided diaphragmatic hernia. Diaphragmatic ruptures may be revealed many years after the initial trauma. The suspicion of diaphragmatic rupture in a patient with multiple traumas contributes to early diagnosis. Surgical repair remains the only curative treatment for diaphragmatic hernias. Prosthetic patches may be a good solution when the diaphragmatic defect is severe and too large for primary closure, whereas primary repair remains the gold standard for the closure of small to moderate sized diaphragmatic defects.

Retroperitoneal schwannomas: advantages of laparoscopic resection. Review of the literature and case presentation of a large paracaval benign schwannoma (with video)

Retroperitoneal schwannomas represent 0.5%–3% of all retroperitoneal tumors. Complete surgical removal is the treatment of choice because it permits a correct histological diagnosis and prevents eventual degeneration. Laparoscopic surgery has been reported as safe and effective by several authors. We present a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the role of laparoscopy in surgical resection of retroperitoneal schwannomas, and we present a case showing the technique (with video). Laparoscopic resection in experienced hands is safe and effective, and guarantees excellent postoperative results in terms of patient recovery.

BNP MEASUREMENT PRE- AND POST-NONCARDIAC SURGERY AS PROGNOSTIC FACTOR OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS: PP.12.460

Introduction: Cardiovascular events in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery are higher than other complications; they are associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality and represent the first cause of death post-surgery especially in hypertensive patients. This could be avoided identifying, before surgery, those patients at high risk for cardiac events. BNP is an optimal approach for cardiovascular pre-operatory risk stratification, and easy-to-use in this setting. Patients and Methods: 205 patients undergoing scheduled major non-cardiac surgery were recruited (M/F 91/114 mean age 64 yrs), and admitted in the general surgery department. We show only data of hypertensive patients (92 subjects). Preoperative data collection included: patient demographics, vital signs, routine blood samples including renal and hepatic function tests, plasma BNP level, 12-lead electrocardiogram. All clinical and biochemical data were examined by the consultant cardiologist and anesthetist for the evaluation of cardiovascular risk. A 30 days follow-up after discharge was made to investigate cardiovascular hospital re-admissions or death. Results: 92 out 205 (48 F and 44 M) (44,8%) studied patients were affected with hypertension (53 only hypertension, and 39 hypertension associated to other diseases); there was a significant difference (p < 0.005) between mean pre-surgery BNP values: 153.7 ± 359.1 pg/ml (median 42 pg/ml) vs mean post-surgery BNP: 271.6 ± 630.8 pg/ml (median 109 pg/ml). At 30 days follow-up 18/92 (19,5%) hypertensive patients had cardiovascular events (re-hospitalization, cardiological visit). Patients with events showed pre-surgery mean BNP levels: 476.5 ± 707 pg/ml (median 121.5 pg/ml) vs post-surgery mean BNP values: 690.8 ± 1131.6 pg/ml (median 356 pg/ml) without statistically significant difference (p = 0.06). Interestingly, patients with the higher degree of RCRI (III) had events in 43% of cases. Conclusions: BNP plays a relevant role in non-cardiac surgery hypertensive patients as prognostic factor for events at short term. Higher levels of BNP in these hypertensive patients who develop cardiovascular adverse outcomes at short term demonstrate the potential utility of this marker for a more accurate cardiological evaluation in subjects undergoing non-cardiac surgery.