Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nicholas Rhind is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nicholas Rhind.


Nature Biotechnology | 2011

Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome

Manfred Grabherr; Brian J. Haas; Moran Yassour; Joshua Z. Levin; Dawn Anne Thompson; Ido Amit; Xian Adiconis; Lin Fan; Raktima Raychowdhury; Qiandong Zeng; Zehua Chen; Evan Mauceli; Nir Hacohen; Andreas Gnirke; Nicholas Rhind; Federica Di Palma; Bruce Birren; Chad Nusbaum; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Nir Friedman; Aviv Regev

Massively parallel sequencing of cDNA has enabled deep and efficient probing of transcriptomes. Current approaches for transcript reconstruction from such data often rely on aligning reads to a reference genome, and are thus unsuitable for samples with a partial or missing reference genome. Here we present the Trinity method for de novo assembly of full-length transcripts and evaluate it on samples from fission yeast, mouse and whitefly, whose reference genome is not yet available. By efficiently constructing and analyzing sets of de Bruijn graphs, Trinity fully reconstructs a large fraction of transcripts, including alternatively spliced isoforms and transcripts from recently duplicated genes. Compared with other de novo transcriptome assemblers, Trinity recovers more full-length transcripts across a broad range of expression levels, with a sensitivity similar to methods that rely on genome alignments. Our approach provides a unified solution for transcriptome reconstruction in any sample, especially in the absence of a reference genome.Massively parallel sequencing of cDNA has enabled deep and efficient probing of transcriptomes. Current approaches for transcript reconstruction from such data often rely on aligning reads to a reference genome, and are thus unsuitable for samples with a partial or missing reference genome. Here we present the Trinity method for de novo assembly of full-length transcripts and evaluate it on samples from fission yeast, mouse and whitefly, whose reference genome is not yet available. By efficiently constructing and analyzing sets of de Bruijn graphs, Trinity fully reconstructs a large fraction of transcripts, including alternatively spliced isoforms and transcripts from recently duplicated genes. Compared with other de novo transcriptome assemblers, Trinity recovers more full-length transcripts across a broad range of expression levels, with a sensitivity similar to methods that rely on genome alignments. Our approach provides a unified solution for transcriptome reconstruction in any sample, especially in the absence of a reference genome.


Science | 2011

Comparative Functional Genomics of the Fission Yeasts

Nicholas Rhind; Zehua Chen; Moran Yassour; Dawn Anne Thompson; Brian J. Haas; Naomi Habib; Ilan Wapinski; Sushmita Roy; Michael F. Lin; David I. Heiman; Sarah K. Young; Kanji Furuya; Yabin Guo; Alison L. Pidoux; Huei Mei Chen; Barbara Robbertse; Jonathan M. Goldberg; Keita Aoki; Elizabeth H. Bayne; Aaron M. Berlin; Christopher A. Desjardins; Edward Dobbs; Livio Dukaj; Lin Fan; Michael Fitzgerald; Courtney French; Sharvari Gujja; Klavs Wörgler Hansen; Daniel Keifenheim; Joshua Z. Levin

A combined analysis of genome sequence, structure, and expression gives insights into fission yeast biology. The fission yeast clade—comprising Schizosaccharomyces pombe, S. octosporus, S. cryophilus, and S. japonicus—occupies the basal branch of Ascomycete fungi and is an important model of eukaryote biology. A comparative annotation of these genomes identified a near extinction of transposons and the associated innovation of transposon-free centromeres. Expression analysis established that meiotic genes are subject to antisense transcription during vegetative growth, which suggests a mechanism for their tight regulation. In addition, trans-acting regulators control new genes within the context of expanded functional modules for meiosis and stress response. Differences in gene content and regulation also explain why, unlike the budding yeast of Saccharomycotina, fission yeasts cannot use ethanol as a primary carbon source. These analyses elucidate the genome structure and gene regulation of fission yeast and provide tools for investigation across the Schizosaccharomyces clade.


Yeast | 2006

Basic methods for fission yeast

Susan L. Forsburg; Nicholas Rhind

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a popular model system, and has been particularly influential in studies of the cell cycle and chromosome dynamics. Despite its differences from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the tools and methods for fission yeast are conceptually similar to those used in budding yeast. Here, we present basic methods sufficient for a beginner in this system to carry out most required manipulations for genetic analysis or molecular biology. Copyright


Current Opinion in Cell Biology | 1998

MITOTIC DNA DAMAGE AND REPLICATION CHECKPOINTS IN YEAST

Nicholas Rhind; Paul Russell

Studies of the genetics of G2/M checkpoints in budding and fission yeasts have produced many of the defining concepts of checkpoint biology. Recent progress in the biochemistry of the checkpoint gene products is adding a mechanistic understanding to our models and identifying the components of the normal cell cycle machinery that are targeted by checkpoints.


Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology | 2013

DNA Replication Timing

Nicholas Rhind; David M. Gilbert

Patterns of replication within eukaryotic genomes correlate with gene expression, chromatin structure, and genome evolution. Recent advances in genome-scale mapping of replication kinetics have allowed these correlations to be explored in many species, cell types, and growth conditions, and these large data sets have allowed quantitative and computational analyses. One striking new correlation to emerge from these analyses is between replication timing and the three-dimensional structure of chromosomes. This correlation, which is significantly stronger than with any single histone modification or chromosome-binding protein, suggests that replication timing is controlled at the level of chromosomal domains. This conclusion dovetails with parallel work on the heterogeneity of origin firing and the competition between origins for limiting activators to suggest a model in which the stochastic probability of individual origin firing is modulated by chromosomal domain structure to produce patterns of replication. Whether these patterns have inherent biological functions or simply reflect higher-order genome structure is an open question.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 1998

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Cdc2 Is Required for the Replication Checkpoint in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Nicholas Rhind; Paul Russell

ABSTRACT The DNA replication checkpoint inhibits mitosis in cells that are unable to replicate their DNA, as when nucleotide biosynthesis is inhibited by hydroxyurea. In the fission yeastSchizosaccharomyces pombe, genetic evidence suggests that this checkpoint involves the inhibition of Cdc2 activity through the phosphorylation of tyrosine-15. On the contrary, a recent biochemical study indicated that Cdc2 is in an activated state during a replication checkpoint, suggesting that phosphorylation of Cdc2 on tyrosine-15 is not part of the replication checkpoint mechanism. We have undertaken biochemical and genetic studies to resolve this controversy. We report that the DNA replication checkpoint in S. pombe is abrogated in cells that carry the allele cdc2-Y15F, expressing an unphosphorylatable form of Cdc2. Furthermore, Cdc2 isolated from replication checkpoint-arrested cells can be activated in vitro by Cdc25, the tyrosine phosphatase responsible for dephosphorylating Cdc2 in vivo, to the same extent as Cdc2 isolated from cdc25ts-blocked cells, indicating that hydroxyurea treatment causes Cdc2 activity to be maintained at a low level that is insufficient to induce mitosis. These studies show that inhibitory tyrosine-15 phosphorylation of Cdc2 is essential for the DNA replication checkpoint and suggests that Cdc25, and/or one or both of Wee1 and Mik1, the tyrosine kinases that phosphorylate Cdc2, are regulated by the replication checkpoint.


Nature Cell Biology | 2006

DNA replication timing: random thoughts about origin firing.

Nicholas Rhind

Regions of metazoan genomes replicate at defined times within S phase. This observation suggests that replication origins fire with a defined timing pattern that remains the same from cycle to cycle. However, an alterative model based on the stochastic firing of origins may also explain replication timing. This model assumes varying origin efficiency instead of a strict origin-timing programme. Here, we discuss the evidence for both models.


Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology | 2012

Signaling Pathways that Regulate Cell Division

Nicholas Rhind; Paul Russell

Cell division requires careful orchestration of three major events: entry into mitosis, chromosomal segregation, and cytokinesis. Signaling within and between the molecules that control these events allows for their coordination via checkpoints, a specific class of signaling pathways that ensure the dependency of cell-cycle events on the successful completion of preceding events. Multiple positive- and negative-feedback loops ensure that a cell is fully committed to division and that the events occur in the proper order. Unlike other signaling pathways, which integrate external inputs to decide whether to execute a given process, signaling at cell division is largely dedicated to completing a decision made in G1 phase-to initiate and complete a round of mitotic cell division. Instead of deciding if the events of cell division will take place, these signaling pathways entrain these events to the activation of the cell-cycle kinase cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) and provide the opportunity for checkpoint proteins to arrest cell division if things go wrong.


Genome Biology | 2012

Genome-wide identification and characterization of replication origins by deep sequencing

Jia Xu; Yoshimi Yanagisawa; Alexander M. Tsankov; Christopher Hart; Keita Aoki; Naveen Kommajosyula; Kathleen E. Steinmann; James Bochicchio; Carsten Russ; Aviv Regev; Oliver J. Rando; Chad Nusbaum; Hironori Niki; Patrice M. Milos; Zhiping Weng; Nicholas Rhind

BackgroundDNA replication initiates at distinct origins in eukaryotic genomes, but the genomic features that define these sites are not well understood.ResultsWe have taken a combined experimental and bioinformatic approach to identify and characterize origins of replication in three distantly related fission yeasts: Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Schizosaccharomyces octosporus and Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Using single-molecule deep sequencing to construct amplification-free high-resolution replication profiles, we located origins and identified sequence motifs that predict origin function. We then mapped nucleosome occupancy by deep sequencing of mononucleosomal DNA from the corresponding species, finding that origins tend to occupy nucleosome-depleted regions.ConclusionsThe sequences that specify origins are evolutionarily plastic, with low complexity nucleosome-excluding sequences functioning in S. pombe and S. octosporus, and binding sites for trans-acting nucleosome-excluding proteins functioning in S. japonicus. Furthermore, chromosome-scale variation in replication timing is conserved independently of origin location and via a mechanism distinct from known heterochromatic effects on origin function. These results are consistent with a model in which origins are simply the nucleosome-depleted regions of the genome with the highest affinity for the origin recognition complex. This approach provides a general strategy for understanding the mechanisms that define DNA replication origins in eukaryotes.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2003

The Fission Yeast Rad32 (Mre11)-Rad50-Nbs1 Complex Is Required for the S-Phase DNA Damage Checkpoint

Charly Chahwan; Toru M. Nakamura; Sasirekha Sivakumar; Paul Russell; Nicholas Rhind

ABSTRACT Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1 form a conserved heterotrimeric complex that is involved in recombination and DNA damage checkpoints. Mutations in this complex disrupt the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint, the checkpoint which slows replication in response to DNA damage, and cause chromosome instability and cancer in humans. However, how these proteins function and specifically where they act in the checkpoint signaling pathway remain crucial questions. We identified fission yeast Nbs1 by using a comparative genomic approach and showed that the genes for human Nbs1 and fission yeast Nbs1 and that for their budding yeast counterpart, Xrs2, are members of an evolutionarily related but rapidly diverging gene family. Fission yeast Nbs1, Rad32 (the homolog of Mre11), and Rad50 are involved in DNA damage repair, telomere regulation, and the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint. However, they are not required for G2 DNA damage checkpoint. Our results suggest that a complex of Rad32, Rad50, and Nbs1 acts specifically in the S-phase branch of the DNA damage checkpoint and is not involved in general DNA damage recognition or signaling.

Collaboration


Dive into the Nicholas Rhind's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Russell

Scripps Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Divya Ramalingam Iyer

University of Massachusetts Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Keifenheim

University of Massachusetts Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicholas A. Willis

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Zhiping Weng

University of Massachusetts Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melissa J. Moore

University of Massachusetts Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Prasanta K. Patel

University of Massachusetts Medical School

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shankar P. Das

University of Massachusetts Medical School

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge