Nicola Modugno

Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man

Abstract The technique of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) allows cortical motor areas to be activated by trains of magnetic stimuli at different frequencies and intensities. In this paper, we studied long-term neurophysiological effects of rTMS delivered to the motor cortex at 5 Hz with an intensity of 120% of motor threshold. Each stimulus of the train produced muscle-evoked potentials (MEPs) in hand and forearm muscles, which gradually increased in size from the first to the last shock. After the end of the train, the response to a single-test stimulus remained enhanced for 600–900 ms. In contrast, the train had no effect on the size of the MEPs evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation, while it suppressed H-reflexes in forearm muscles for 900 ms. We conclude that rTMS of these parameters increases the excitability of the motor cortex and that this effect outlasts the train for almost 1 s. At the spinal level, rTMS may increase presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferent fibers responsible for the H-reflex.

Effects of botulinum toxin type A on intracortical inhibition in patients with dystonia.

To find out whether botulinum toxin alters the excitability of cortical motor areas, we studied intracortical inhibition with transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with upper limb dystonia before, 1 month after, and 3 months after the injection of botulinum toxin type A in the affected muscles. Eleven normal subjects and 12 patients with dystonia involving the upper limbs (7 with generalized dystonia, 2 with segmental dystonia, and 3 with focal dystonia) were studied. Patients were assessed clinically with the Dystonia Movement Scale. Paired magnetic stimuli were delivered by two Magstim 200 magnetic stimulators connected through a Bistim module to a figure‐of‐eight coil placed over the motor area of the forearm muscles. Paired stimulation was given at rest. A subthreshold (80% of motor threshold) conditioning stimulus was delivered 3 and 5 msec before the suprathreshold (120% of motor threshold) test stimulus. Electromyographic signals were recorded over the flexor or extensor muscles of the forearm on the affected side. We measured the amplitude of the test motor evoked potential (expressed as a percentage of the unconditioned motor evoked potential). All results were compared using ANOVA. In all patients, a botulinum toxin type A injection (50–100 mouse units) reduced dystonic movements in the arm. In normal subjects, electromyographic recordings showed significant inhibition of the test response. Before botulinum toxin injection, patients had less test response inhibition than normal subjects. One month after injection, patients had test response inhibition similar to that of normal subjects. At 3 months after injection, they again had less inhibition than normal subjects or patients at 1 month after injection. In conclusion, our data suggest that botulinum toxin can transiently alter the excitability of the cortical motor areas by reorganizing the inhibitory and excitatory intracortical circuits. The cortical changes probably originate through peripheral mechanisms. Ann Neurol 2000;48:20–26

Transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques in clinical investigation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a technique that can activate cortical motor areas and the corticospinal tract without causing the subject discomfort. Since TMS was introduced, numerous applications of the technique have been developed for the evaluation of neurologic diseases. Standard TMS applications (central motor conduction time, threshold and amplitude of motor evoked potentials) allow the evaluation of motor conduction in the CNS. Conduction studies provide specific information in neurologic conditions characterized by clinical and subclinical upper motor neuron involvement. In addition, they have proved useful in monitoring motor abnormalities and the recovery of motor function. TMS also gives information on the pathophysiology of the processes underlying the various clinical conditions. More complex TMS applications (paired-pulse stimulation, silent period, ipsilateral silent period, input-output curve, and evaluation of central fatigue) allow investigation into the mechanisms of diseases causing changes in the excitability of cortical motor areas. These techniques are also useful in monitoring the effects of neurotrophic drugs on cortical activity. TMS applications have an important place among the investigative tools to study patients with motor disorders.

Shaping the excitability of human motor cortex with premotor rTMS

Recent studies have shown that low‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsal premotor cortex has a lasting influence on the excitability of specific neuronal subpopulations in the ipsilateral primary motor hand area (M1HAND). Here we asked how these premotor to motor interactions are shaped by the intensity and frequency of rTMS and the orientation of the stimulating coil. We confirmed that premotor rTMS at 1 Hz and an intensity of 90% active motor threshold (AMT) produced a lasting decrease in corticospinal excitability probed with single‐pulse TMS over the left M1HAND. Reducing the intensity to 80% AMT increased paired‐pulse excitability at an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 7 ms. Opposite effects occurred if rTMS was given at 5 Hz: at 90% AMT, corticospinal excitability increased; at 80% AMT, paired‐pulse excitability at ISI = 7 ms decreased. No effects were seen if rTMS was applied at the same intensities to prefrontal or primary motor cortices. These findings indicate that the intensity of premotor rTMS determines the net effect of conditioning on distinct populations of neurones in the ipsilateral M1HAND, but it is the frequency of rTMS that determines the direction of the induced change. By selecting the appropriate intensity and frequency, premotor rTMS allows to induce a predictable up‐ or down‐regulation of the excitability in distinct neuronal circuits of human M1HAND.

Impairment of individual finger movements in Parkinson's disease

By analyzing the kinematics of repetitive, constant‐amplitude, finger oppositions, we compared the impairment of individual and nonindividual finger movements in patients with Parkinsons disease. In one task, subjects tapped only the index finger against the thumb (individual oppositions); in the other task, they tapped all four fingers together against the thumb pad (nonindividual oppositions). We used an optoelectronic motion analysis system to record movements in three‐dimensional space and recorded three 5‐second trials for each task. We counted how many finger oppositions subjects performed during each trial and measured the duration and amplitude of the flexions and extensions. We also calculated the duration of the pauses after flexion and extension. We assessed the deterioration of motor performance in patients by investigating the changes in speed and amplitude with task completion. During both tasks, normal subjects and patients performed finger flexions faster than extensions, and they invariably paused longer after flexion than after extension. Patients performed individual and nonindividual finger movements slowly and with reduced amplitude. Patients were disproportionately slow during flexion and in switching from flexion to extension. Movement slowness increased as finger oppositions progressed but predominantly when patients had to move fingers individually. In conclusion, in patients with Parkinsons disease, the motor performance deteriorated with task completion more during individual than during nonindividual finger movements. Parkinsons disease, therefore, impairs individual finger movements more than gross hand movements. This distinction reflects the finer cortical control needed to promote and sustain this highly fractionated type of motor output.

Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nuclei Affects Arm Response Inhibition In Parkinson’s Patients

The precise localizations of the neural substrates of voluntary inhibition are still debated. It has been hypothesized that, in humans, this executive function relies upon a right-lateralized pathway comprising the inferior frontal gyrus and the presupplementary motor area, which would control the neural processes for movement inhibition acting through the right subthalamic nucleus (STN). We assessed the role of the right STN, via a countermanding reaching task, in 10 Parkinsons patients receiving high-frequency electrical stimulation of the STN of both hemispheres (deep brain stimulation, DBS) and in 13 healthy subjects. We compared the performance of Parkinsons patients in 4 experimental conditions: DBS-ON, DBS-OFF, DBS-OFF right, and DBS-OFF left. We found that 1) inhibitory control is improved only when both DBS are active, that is, the reaction time to the stop signal is significantly shorter in the DBS-ON condition than in all the others, 2) bilateral stimulation of STN restores the inhibitory control to a near-normal level, and 3) DBS does not cause a general improvement in task-related motor function as it does not affect the length of the reaction times of arm movements, that is, in our experimental context, STN seems to play a selective role in response inhibition.

Plasticity of the motor cortex in Parkinson's disease patients on and off therapy

We used the paired associative stimulation (PAS) technique to investigate associative plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex in 16 Parkinsons disease (PD) patients off and on therapy and in 10 age‐matched controls. After PAS, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes increased more and the cortical silent period showed a reduced prolongation in patients off therapy than in controls. These changes lasted for at least 30 minutes. In addition, MEP amplitudes increased in a less focal manner in patients off therapy than in controls. After patients received dopaminergic therapy, these abnormalities normalized. The abnormal responsiveness of sensorimotor cortex neurons to PAS in PD patients off therapy probably reflects disordered plasticity within the motor cortex.

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation and somatosensory temporal discrimination in Parkinson’s disease

Whereas numerous studies document the effects of dopamine medication and deep brain stimulation on motor function in patients with Parkinsons disease, few have investigated deep brain stimulation-induced changes in sensory functions. In this study of 13 patients with Parkinsons disease, we tested the effects of deep brain stimulation on the somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold. To investigate whether deep brain stimulation and dopaminergic medication induce similar changes in somatosensory discrimination, somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values were acquired under four experimental conditions: (i) medication ON/deep brain stimulation on; (ii) medication ON/deep brain stimulation off; (iii) medication OFF/deep brain stimulation on; and (iv) medication OFF/deep brain stimulation off. Patients also underwent clinical and neuropsychological evaluations during each experimental session. Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values obtained in patients were compared with 13 age-matched healthy subjects. Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values were significantly higher in patients than in healthy subjects. In patients, somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values were significantly lower when patients were studied in medication ON than in medication OFF conditions. Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold values differed significantly between deep brain stimulation on and deep brain stimulation off conditions only when the patients were studied in the medication ON condition and were higher in the deep brain stimulation on/medication ON than in the deep brain stimulation off/medication ON condition. Dopamine but not subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation restores the altered somatosensory temporal discrimination in patients with Parkinsons disease. Deep brain stimulation degrades somatosensory temporal discrimination by modifying central somatosensory processing whereas dopamine restores the interplay between cortical and subcortical structures.

Botulinum toxin restores presynaptic inhibition of group Ia afferents in patients with essential tremor.

We studied the effect of botulinum toxin A injection on the abnormal presynaptic phase of reciprocal inhibition between forearm antagonist muscles in patients with essential tremor. Ten patients with essential tremor were investigated before and 1 month after botulinum injection. Reciprocal inhibition was studied by conditioning the H reflex in forearm flexors with a radial‐nerve stimulus delivered at a range of time intervals. Botulinum toxin produced a significant functional improvement in tremor (about 20%). Before botulinum toxin injection, patients had a reduced presynaptic phase of reciprocal inhibition. After botulinum toxin this phase was significantly more pronounced. The normal early disynaptic phase of reciprocal inhibition was normal before and after botulinum treatment. Although botulinum treatment reduced the size of the H reflex and the M wave to a similar extent, it left the H/M ratio unchanged. These findings show that botulinum toxin treatment restores presynaptic inhibition between forearm antagonist muscles. The results are also consistent with botulinum toxin having a beneficial effect in patients with essential tremor. Both effects probably depend upon the toxins concurrent action on the extrafusal and intrafusal motor end‐plates, the latter resulting in decreased spindle afferent input to the spinal cord.

The prolonged cortical silent period in patients with Huntington's disease

OBJECTIVES In a group of patients with Huntingtons disease and age-matched controls, we studied the cortical silent period (SP) elicited by single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses. METHODS We measured the area of the pre-stimulus electromyographic (EMG) activity, the area of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the duration of the SP induced by stimuli delivered at an intensity of 150% of motor threshold with a round coil placed over the vertex. We determined the cortical SP by sampling only the 5 traces containing the shortest SPs and by collecting 10 consecutive unselected traces without selecting trials. RESULTS Patients and controls had normal EMG background areas, and MEP latencies and areas. Whereas data measured from selected trials gave a normal duration of the SP (patients, 154+/-58 ms; controls, 166+/-22 ms), data from unselected trials yielded a significantly longer SP duration in patients than in controls (356+/-251 vs. 159+/-44 ms) and also a larger variance and range. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that in Huntingtons disease, an abnormal cortical SP is best sought by collecting unselected consecutive traces. We suggest that the prolonged SP in HD originates from a dysfunction of the mechanisms controlling the restart of voluntary movement after TMS.