Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nicola V. Y. Scarlett is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nicola V. Y. Scarlett.


Journal of Applied Crystallography | 2001

Outcomes of the International Union of Crystallography Commission on Powder Diffraction Round Robin on Quantitative Phase Analysis: samples 1a to 1h

Ian C. Madsen; Nicola V. Y. Scarlett; Lachlan M. D. Cranswick; Thaung Lwin

The International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) Commission on Powder Diffraction (CPD) has sponsored a round robin on the determination of quantitative phase abundance from diffraction data. Specifically, the aims of the round robin were (i) to document the methods and strategies commonly employed in quantitative phase analysis (QPA), especially those involving powder diffraction, (ii) to assess levels of accuracy, precision and lower limits of detection, (iii) to identify specific problem areas and develop practical solutions, (iv) to formulate recommended procedures for QPA using diffraction data, and (v) to create a standard set of samples for future reference. Some of the analytical issues which have been addressed include (a) the type of analysis (integrated intensities or full-profile, Rietveld or full-profile, database of observed patterns) and (b) the type of instrument used, including geometry and radiation (X-ray, neutron or synchrotron). While the samples used in the round robin covered a wide range of analytical complexity, this paper reports the results for only the sample 1 mixtures. Sample 1 is a simple three-phase system prepared with eight different compositions covering a wide range of abundance for each phase. The component phases were chosen to minimize sample-related problems, such as the degree of crystallinity, preferred orientation and microabsorption. However, these were still issues that needed to be addressed by the analysts. The results returned indicate a great deal of variation in the ability of the participating laboratories to perform QPA of this simple three-component system. These differences result from such problems as (i) use of unsuitable reference intensity ratios, (ii) errors in whole-pattern refinement software operation and in interpretation of results, (iii) operator errors in the use of the Rietveld method, often arising from a lack of crystallographic understanding, and (iv) application of excessive microabsorption correction. Another major area for concern is the calculation of errors in phase abundance determination, with wide variations in reported values between participants. Few details of methodology used to derive these errors were supplied and many participants provided no measure of error at all.


Powder Diffraction | 2006

Quantification of phases with partial or no known crystal structures

Nicola V. Y. Scarlett; Ian C. Madsen

Quantification of mixtures via the Rietveld method is generally restricted to crystalline phases for which structures are well known. Phases that have not been identified or fully characterized may be easily quantified as a group, along with any amorphous material in the sample, by the addition of an internal standard to the mixture. However, quantification of individual phases that have only partial or unknown structures is carried out less routinely. This paper presents methodology for quantification of such phases. It outlines the procedure for calibration of the method and gives detailed examples from both synthetic and mineralogical systems. While the method should, in principle, be generally applicable, its implementation in the TOPAS program from Bruker AXS is demonstrated here.


Journal of Applied Crystallography | 2002

Outcomes of the International Union of Crystallography Commission on Powder Diffraction Round Robin on Quantitative Phase Analysis: samples 2, 3, 4, synthetic bauxite, natural granodiorite and pharmaceuticals

Nicola V. Y. Scarlett; Ian C. Madsen; Lachlan M. D. Cranswick; Thaung Lwin; Edward G. Groleau; Gregory A. Stephenson; Mark G Aylmore; Nicki Agron-Olshina

The International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) Commission on Powder Diffraction (CPD) has sponsored a round robin on the determination of quantitative phase abundance from diffraction data. The aims of the round robin have been detailed by Madsen et al. [J. Appl. Cryst. (2001), 34, 409–426]. In summary, they were (i) to document the methods and strategies commonly employed in quantitative phases analysis (QPA), especially those involving powder diffraction, (ii) to assess levels of accuracy, precision and lower limits of detection, (iii) to identify specific problem areas and develop practical solutions, (iv) to formulate recommended procedures for QPA using diffraction data, and (v) to create a standard set of samples for future reference. The first paper (Madsen et al., 2001) covered the results of sample 1 (a simple three-phase mixture of corundum, fluorite and zincite). The remaining samples used in the round robin covered a wide range of analytical complexity, and presented a series of different problems to the analysts. These problems included preferred orientation (sample 2), the analysis of amorphous content (sample 3), microabsorption (sample 4), complex synthetic and natural mineral suites, along with pharmaceutical mixtures with and without an amorphous component. This paper forms the second part of the round-robin study and reports the results of samples 2 (corundum, fluorite, zincite, brucite), 3 (corundum, fluorite, zincite, silica flour) and 4 (corundum, magnetite, zircon), synthetic bauxite, natural granodiorite and the synthetic pharmaceutical mixtures (mannitol, nizatidine, valine, sucrose, starch). The outcomes of this second part of the round robin support the findings of the initial study. The presence of increased analytical problems within these samples has only served to exacerbate the difficulties experienced by many operators with the sample 1 suite. The major difficulties are caused by lack of operator expertise, which becomes more apparent with these more complex samples. Some of these samples also introduced the requirement for skill and judgement in sample preparation techniques. This second part of the round robin concluded that the greatest physical obstacle to accurate QPA for X-ray based methods is the presence of absorption contrast between phases (microabsorption), which may prove to be insurmountable in some circumstances.


Zeitschrift Fur Kristallographie | 2011

Description and survey of methodologies for the determination of amorphous content via X-ray powder diffraction

Ian C. Madsen; Nicola V. Y. Scarlett; Arndt Kern

Abstract The presence of amorphous materials in crystalline samples is an increasingly important issue for diffractionists. Traditional phase quantification via the Rietveld method fails to take into account the occurrence of amorphous material in the sample and without careful attention on behalf of the operator its presence would remain undetected. Awareness of this issue is increasing in importance with the advent of nanotechnology and the blurring of the boundaries between amorphous and crystalline species. The methodology of a number of different approaches to the determination of amorphous content via X-ray diffraction and an assessment of their performance, is described. Laboratory-based, X-ray diffraction data from a suite of synthetic samples, with amorphous content rangäing from 0.0 to 50 wt%, has been analysed using both direct (in which the contribution of the amorphous component to the pattern is used to obtain an estimate of concentration) and indirect (where the absolute abundances of the crystalline components are used to estimate the amorphous content by difference) methodologies. In addition, both single peak and whole pattern methodologies have been assessed. All methods produce reasonable results, however the study highlights some of the strengths, deficiencies and applicability of each of the approaches.


Powder Diffraction | 2001

On-line X-ray diffraction for quantitative phase analysis: Application in the Portland cement industry

Nicola V. Y. Scarlett; Ian C. Madsen; Con Manias; David Retallack

The aim of this work was to design, construct, install, and commission an on-line, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyzer capable of continuously monitoring phase abundances for use in process plant control. This has been achieved through a joint project between CSIRO Minerals and Fuel & Combustion Technology Pty. Ltd. with an instrument designed for use in a Portland cement manufacturing plant. Key factors in tailoring such an instrument to the cement industry were (i) the handling and presentation of a dry sample and (ii) the development of an analytical method suitable for the complex suite of phases contained within Portland cement. The instrument incorporates continuous flow of sample through the diffractometer using a purpose-built sample presentation stage. The XRD data are collected simultaneously using a wide range (120° 2θ) position sensitive detector, thus enabling rapid collection of the full diffraction pattern. The data are then analyzed using a Rietveld analysis method to obtain a quantitative estimate of each of the phases present. The instrument is controlled by a PC linked to the diffractometer through a purpose built interface. The phase abundance information is then transmitted to the central computer in the cement plant where it can be used for the control of mill parameters such as temperature and retention times as well as gypsum feed rate.


Archive | 2012

Quantitative Phase Analysis

Ian C. Madsen; Nicola V. Y. Scarlett; Nathan A. S. Webster

The most common use of powder diffraction in analytical science is the identification of crystalline components, or phases, present in a sample of interest. The near universal applicability of the method for this purpose is derived from the fact that a diffraction pattern is produced directly from the components’ crystal structure. However, for multi-phase samples, once the nature of phases present has been established, the next question usually asked of the diffractionist is “how much of each phase is there?” This chapter provides an overview of the basis and application of commonly used methods of quantitative phase abundance determination as well as references to the extensive literature on the subject.


Archive | 2008

Chapter 11:Quantitative Phase Analysis

Ian C. Madsen; Nicola V. Y. Scarlett

Measurement of the elemental composition of materials is a relatively mature art. In the natural world there are 92 elements with methods for their quantitative determination generally well established and, in many cases, the subject of internationally accepted standards. However, the physical prope...


American Mineralogist | 2010

Ordering of iron vacancies in monoclinic jarosites

Nicola V. Y. Scarlett; Ian E. Grey; Helen E. A. Brand

Abstract The results of in situ synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction experiments conducted during the synthesis of iron-deficient Na+/H3O+ and K+/H3O+ jarosites at temperatures in the range 80 to 120 °C are presented. They demonstrate that samples can be prepared in which the iron-site vacancies are ordered. The ordering is accompanied by a lowering of symmetry, from rhombohedral, space group R3̅m, to monoclinic, C2/m. The implications for magnetic properties are discussed.


Journal of Applied Crystallography | 2008

Time-resolved diffraction studies into the pressure acid leaching of nickel laterite ores: a comparison of laboratory and synchrotron X-ray experiments

Nicola V. Y. Scarlett; Ian C. Madsen; B.I. Whittington

This paper compares time-resolved diffraction experiments that have been performed using laboratory and synchrotron X-ray sources. The experiments investigated the mechanism and kinetics of pressure acid leaching of nickel laterite ores. The sample environment was a purpose-built capillary reaction vessel, and extensive method development was conducted in the laboratory using Mo Kα radiation prior to repeating and extending the experiments at the Daresbury Synchrotron Radiation Source, beamline MPW6.2. In general, the synchrotron results confirmed the findings from previously reported laboratory work and also confirmed the presence of a minor phase that had been ambiguous in the laboratory experiments, i.e. the formation of hematite in the pressure acid leaching of saprolite. The synchrotron measurements also extended the experimental programme to include poorly diffracting laterite components that could not be examined in the laboratory, e.g. nontronite. The results from these components supported the reaction mechanisms determined from ex-situ analyses conducted in larger scale autoclaves.


Review of Scientific Instruments | 2009

A flow cell for in situ synchrotron x-ray diffraction studies of scale formation under Bayer processing conditions

Nathan As Webster; Ian C. Madsen; Melissa J. Loan; Nicola V. Y. Scarlett; Kia S. Wallwork

The design, construction, and commissioning of a stainless steel flow cell for in situ synchrotron x-ray diffraction studies of scale formation under Bayer processing conditions is described. The use of the cell is demonstrated by a study of Al(OH)(3) scale formation on a mild steel substrate from synthetic Bayer liquor at 70 degrees C. The cell design allows for interchangeable parts and substrates and would be suitable for the study of scale formation in other industrial processes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Nicola V. Y. Scarlett's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian C. Madsen

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian E. Grey

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel P. Riley

Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew J. Urban

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Graeme A. Snook

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Styles

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katherine McGregor

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge