Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nicolas Ajkay is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nicolas Ajkay.


Surgery | 2015

Occult metastases in node-negative breast cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-based analysis.

Charles W. Kimbrough; Kelly M. McMasters; Amy R. Quillo; Nicolas Ajkay

INTRODUCTION The role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for detecting occult lymph node disease in patients initially found to be node-negative by routine pathology is controversial. In this study, we evaluated trends associated with overall survival in node-negative breast cancer patients staged by IHC. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for all patients with invasive breast adenocarcinoma and negative lymph nodes on routine pathology between 2004 and 2011 who underwent IHC to evaluate for occult nodal disease. Overall survival stratified by N-stage was compared with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Overall, 93,070 patients were identified, including 4,657 patients with isolated tumor cells (<0.2 mm diameter or <200 cells) and 6,720 patients with micrometastases (0.2-2 mm diameter). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a difference in overall survival across all groups (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, micrometastases remained an independent predictor for survival compared with IHC-negative patients (hazard ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.28-1.53), whereas isolated tumor cells were not a significant predictor (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.20). CONCLUSION Patients with occult micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes found via IHC demonstrated a significant overall survival difference, but isolated tumor cells have no prognostic significance.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2018

Multigene Signature Panels and Breast Cancer Therapy: Patterns of Use and Impact on Clinical Decision Making

Neal Bhutiani; Michael E. Egger; Nicolas Ajkay; Charles R. Scoggins; Robert C.G. Martin; Kelly M. McMasters

BACKGROUND A growing body of evidence supports the use of multigene signature panels (MSPs) in predicting recurrence risk in patients with invasive breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate trends in MSP use over time and the effect of MSPs on administration of postoperative chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN The National Cancer Database was queried for all women with invasive breast cancer who underwent resection between 2011 and 2014 and had information about performance of an MSP, hormone receptor status, and receipt of chemotherapy. Multigene signature panel use over time was evaluated, and patterns of use of Oncotype DX (ODX) and MammaPrint (MP) were compared. RESULTS In a total of 476,128 patients, an MSP was obtained in 153,782 (30.2%). Multigene signature panel use increased over time and was associated with a decreased rate of chemotherapy administration (24.6% MSP vs 37.2% no MSP; p < 0.001). Oncotype DX remained the most common MSP used throughout the study period. Oncotype DX was used more commonly in stage I disease than MP, and MP was used more commonly in stage II and III disease. MammaPrint was more commonly used in hormone receptor-negative patients, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive patients, and patients with positive lymph nodes. Postoperative chemotherapy was administered to a higher proportion of patients assessed with MP than with ODX (41.3% vs 23.4%, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Use of MSPs among patients with breast cancer has increased over time and is associated with a decreased use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Oncotype DX continues to be the most widely used MSP, although MP use has increased over time. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimal use of these MSPs in risk assessment and postoperative decision making.


Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2018

Calculation of breast volumes from mammogram: Comparison of four separate equations relative to mastectomy specimen volumes

Jack W. Rostas; Neal Bhutiani; Morgan Crigger; Stacey Crawford; Reiss B. Hollenbach; Samantha R. Heidrich; Robert C.G. Martin; Kelly M. McMasters; Nicolas Ajkay

Accurately assessing breast volume (BV) relative to the volume of breast tissue to be removed could help objectively determine the optimal surgical candidates for breast conserving surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal mammography‐based method of BV estimation.


Breast Journal | 2018

Breast abscess after intravenous methamphetamine injection into the breast

Amanda M. Kistler; Nicolas Ajkay

Intravenous drug use is a problem plaguing our society. We present a case of a young female who injected methamphetamine into her mammary vein, resulting in the formation of a breast abscess. This case demonstrates a rare but dangerous complication of intravenous drug use and a possible differential diagnosis in a patient presenting with a breast abscess.


American Journal of Surgery | 2018

Ductal carcinoma in situ current trends, controversies, and review of literature

Young Hong; Kelly M. McMasters; Michael E. Egger; Nicolas Ajkay

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor, non-invasive malignancy confined within the basement membrane of the breast ductal system. There is a wide variation in the natural history of DCIS with an estimated incidence of progression to invasive ductal carcinoma being at least 13%-50% over a range of 10 or more years after initial diagnosis. Regardless of the treatment strategy, long-term survival is excellent. The controversy surrounding DCIS relates to preventing under-treatment, while also avoiding unnecessary treatments. In this article, we review the incidence, presentation, management options and surveillance of DCIS. Furthermore, we address several current controversies related to the management of DCIS, including margin status, sentinel node biopsy, hormonal therapy, the role of radiation in breast conservation surgery, and various risk stratification schemes.


American Journal of Surgery | 2018

Differences between palpable and nonpalpable tumors in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

Stephanie L. Warren; Neal Bhutiani; Steven C. Agle; Robert C.G. Martin; Kelly M. McMasters; Nicolas Ajkay

BACKGROUND We compared characteristics and outcomes of palpable versus nonpalpable, hormone-sensitive, early-stage breast cancers. METHODS Patients from the North American Fareston vs. Tamoxifen Adjuvant (NAFTA) trial were divided into palpable (n = 513) and nonpalpable (n = 1063) tumor groups. Differences in pathological features, loco-regional therapy, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS Patients with palpable tumors were older, had larger tumors, and higher rates of lymph-node involvement. The tumors were more likely to be poorly differentiated, of high nuclear grade, and display lymphovascular invasion. After mean followup of 59 months, DFS and OS were significantly lower for palpable than nonpalpable tumors (DFS 93.5% vs. 98.4%, p < 0.001, OS 88.5% vs. 95.6%, p < 0.001). Controlling for age, size and nodal status, palpability was an independent factor for DFS (OR = 2.56; 95%CI, 1.37-4.79, p = 0.003) and OS (OR = 2.12; 95%CI, 1.38-3.28, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In a group of hormone-sensitive, mostly postmenopausal early-stage breast cancer patients, palpable tumors were more likely to have more aggressive features and metastatic potential, which translated in to a higher incidence of breast cancer-related events and worse overall survival.


Surgery | 2015

Fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of patients with radiographically occult, palpable breast abnormalities.

Nicolas Ajkay; Erica V. Bloomquist; Robert C.G. Martin; Thomas G. Frazier; Andrea V. Barrio

BACKGROUND Patients who present with occult, palpable breast abnormalities on radiographs represent a diagnostic challenge. We hypothesized that fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) would be an accurate method for diagnosing and excluding malignancy in these patients. METHODS The records of all patients undergoing FNAC at our institution between 2010 and 2012 were queried; 173 patients with 175 palpable breast masses without an imaging correlate were included. RESULTS Of 175 FNAC performed, 2 (1%) were malignant, 16 (9%) were suspicious, and 157 (90%) were benign (n = 75) or nondiagnostic (n = 82). All 16 suspicious FNAC underwent an additional biopsy, of which 4 were malignant. FNAC led to the identification of 6 (3.4%) occult malignancies. At a median follow-up of 16.3 months, 1 patient within the benign cohort was found to have an incidental 2.5 mm cancer identified on reduction mammaplasty, which was unrelated to the index mass. The negative predictive value of FNAC in benign patients was 100%. CONCLUSION FNAC detected malignancy in a small but significant percentage of patients with a palpable mass and negative breast imaging while excluding carcinoma in the remaining patients. FNAC may be included in the evaluation of patients with occult, palpable breast masses demonstrated on radiography.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2017

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Compared to Unilateral Mastectomy with Routine Surveillance for Unilateral, Sporadic Breast Cancer

Robert C. Keskey; A. Scott LaJoie; Brad Sutton; In K. Kim; William G. Cheadle; Kelly M. McMasters; Nicolas Ajkay


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2018

Identifying Factors Influencing Delays in Breast Cancer Treatment in Kentucky

Neal Bhutiani; Bin Huang; Quan Chen; Thomas C. Tucker; Kelly M. McMasters; Nicolas Ajkay


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2018

Evaluating the Effect of Margin Consensus Guideline Publication on Operative Patterns and Financial Impact of Breast Cancer Operation

Neal Bhutiani; Megan K. Mercer; Katelynn C. Bachman; Samantha R. Heidrich; Robert C.G. Martin; Charles R. Scoggins; Kelly M. McMasters; Nicolas Ajkay

Collaboration


Dive into the Nicolas Ajkay's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neal Bhutiani

University of Louisville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bin Huang

University of Kentucky

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brad Sutton

University of Louisville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

In K. Kim

University of Louisville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Quan Chen

University of Kentucky

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge