Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nicolas Fischer.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series | 2013
Loïc Coquelin; Nicolas Fischer; Charles Motzkus; Tatiana Macé; François Gensdarmes; L. Le Brusquet; Gilles Fleury
Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) is a high resolution nanoparticle sizing system that has long been hailed as the researchers choice for airborne nanoparticle size characterization for nano applications including nanotechnology research and development. SMPS is widely used as the standard method to measure airborne particle size distributions below 1 m. It is composed of two devices: a Dierential Mobility Analyzer (DMA) selects particle sizes thanks to their electrical mobility and a Condensation Particle Counter (CPC) enlarges particles to make them detectable by common optical counters. System raw data represent the number of particles counted over several classes of mobility diameters. Then, common inversion procedures lead to the estimation of the aerosol size distribution. In this paper, we develop a methodology to compute the uncertainties associated with the estimation of the size distribution when several experiences have been carried out. The requirement to repeat the measure ensures a realistic variability on the simulated data to be generated. The work we present consists in considering both the uncertainties coming from the experimental dispersion and the uncertainties induced by the lack of knowledge on physical phenomena. Experimental dispersion is quantied with the experimental data while the lack of knowledge is modelled via the existing physical theories and the judgements of experts in the eld of aerosol science. Thus, running Monte-Carlo simulations give an estimation of the size distribution and its corresponding condence region.
Metrologia | 2016
Alexandre Allard; Nicolas Fischer; Géraldine Ebrard; Bruno Hay; Peter M. Harris; Louise Wright; Denis Rochais; Jérémie Mattout
The determination of thermal diffusivity is at the heart of modern materials characterisation. The evaluation of the associated uncertainty is difficult because the determination is performed in an indirect way, in the sense that the thermal diffusivity cannot be measured directly. The well-known GUM uncertainty framework does not provide a reliable evaluation of measurement uncertainty for such inverse problems, because in that framework the underlying measurement model is supposed to be a direct relationship between the measurand (the quantity intended to be measured) and the input quantities on which the measurand depends. This paper is concerned with the development of a Bayesian approach to evaluate the measurement uncertainty associated with thermal diffusivity. A Bayesian model is first developed for a single thermogram and is then extended to the case of several thermograms obtained under repeatability and reproducibility conditions. This multi-thermogram based model is able to take into consideration a large set of influencing quantities that occur during the measurements and yields a more reliable uncertainty evaluation than the one obtained from a single thermogram. Different aspects of the Bayesian model are discussed, including the sensitivity to the choice of the prior distribution, the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm used for the inference and the convergence of the Markov chains.
Measurement Science and Technology | 2017
Paul Ceria; Sebastien Ducourtieux; Younes Boukellal; Alexandre Allard; Nicolas Fischer; Nicolas Feltin
In order to evaluate the uncertainty budget of the LNEs mAFM, a reference instrument dedicated to the calibration of nanoscale dimensional standards, a numerical model has been developed to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the metrology loop involved in the XYZ positioning of the tip relative to the sample. The objective of this model is to overcome difficulties experienced when trying to evaluate some uncertainty components which cannot be experimentally determined and more specifically, the one linked to the geometry of the metrology loop. The model is based on object-oriented programming and developed under Matlab. It integrates one hundred parameters that allow the control of the geometry of the metrology loop without using analytical formulae. The created objects, mainly the reference and the mobile prism and their mirrors, the interferometers and their laser beams, can be moved and deformed freely to take into account several error sources. The Monte Carlo method is then used to determine the positioning uncertainty of the instrument by randomly drawing the parameters according to their associated tolerances and their probability density functions (PDFs). The whole process follows Supplement 2 to The Guide to the Expression of the Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). Some advanced statistical tools like Morris design and Sobol indices are also used to provide a sensitivity analysis by identifying the most influential parameters and quantifying their contribution to the XYZ positioning uncertainty. The approach validated in the paper shows that the actual positioning uncertainty is about 6 nm. As the final objective is to reach 1 nm, we engage in a discussion to estimate the most effective way to reduce the uncertainty.
instrumentation and measurement technology conference | 2012
Loïc Coquelin; Nicolas Fischer; L. Le Brusquet; Gilles Fleury; Charles Motzkus; François Gensdarmes
A model to simulate SMPS (Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer) measurement and the associated uncertainty analysis when axial DMA (Differential Mobility Analyser) classifier operates under scanning mode conditions is described. Starting from simulated SMPS raw data, a fast estimation of aerosol size distribution measurement using regularization technique is performed. Then, global sensitivity analysis is used to discriminate significant parameters of the system and, as a preliminary result, a 95% confidence region is obtained by Monte Carlo simulations on an atmospheric aerosol size distribution.
Archive | 2008
Alexandre Allard; Nicolas Fischer
Powder Technology | 2014
Charles Motzkus; François Gaie-Levrel; P. Ausset; M. Maillé; Niki Baccile; S. Vaslin-Reimann; J. Idrac; D. Oster; Nicolas Fischer; Tatiana Macé
Journal de la Société Française de Statistique & revue de statistique appliquée | 2011
Alexandre Allard; Nicolas Fischer; Franck Didieux; Eric Guillaume; Bertrand Iooss
16th International Congress of Metrology | 2013
Clemens Elster; Katy Klauenberg; Markus Bär; Alexandre Allard; Nicolas Fischer; Gertjan Kok; Adriaan M H van der Veen; Peter M. Harris; Maurice G. Cox; I M Smith; Louise Wright; Simon Cowen; Philip Wilson; Stephen L. R. Ellison
Metrologia | 2018
Alexandre Allard; Nicolas Fischer
Measurement Science and Technology | 2018
Loïc Coquelin; Laurent Le Brusquet; Nicolas Fischer; François Gensdarmes; Charles Motzkus; Tatiana Macé; Gilles Fleury