Nicolas V. Jaumard

Spinal Facet Joint Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Normal, Injury and Degenerative Conditions

The facet joint is a crucial anatomic region of the spine owing to its biomechanical role in facilitating articulation of the vertebrae of the spinal column. It is a diarthrodial joint with opposing articular cartilage surfaces that provide a low friction environment and a ligamentous capsule that encloses the joint space. Together with the disc, the bilateral facet joints transfer loads and guide and constrain motions in the spine due to their geometry and mechanical function. Although a great deal of research has focused on defining the biomechanics of the spine and the form and function of the disc, the facet joint has only recently become the focus of experimental, computational and clinical studies. This mechanical behavior ensures the normal health and function of the spine during physiologic loading but can also lead to its dysfunction when the tissues of the facet joint are altered either by injury, degeneration or as a result of surgical modification of the spine. The anatomical, biomechanical and physiological characteristics of the facet joints in the cervical and lumbar spines have become the focus of increased attention recently with the advent of surgical procedures of the spine, such as disc repair and replacement, which may impact facet responses. Accordingly, this review summarizes the relevant anatomy and biomechanics of the facet joint and the individual tissues that comprise it. In order to better understand the physiological implications of tissue loading in all conditions, a review of mechanotransduction pathways in the cartilage, ligament and bone is also presented ranging from the tissue-level scale to cellular modifications. With this context, experimental studies are summarized as they relate to the most common modifications that alter the biomechanics and health of the spine-injury and degeneration. In addition, many computational and finite element models have been developed that enable more-detailed and specific investigations of the facet joint and its tissues than are provided by experimental approaches and also that expand their utility for the field of biomechanics. These are also reviewed to provide a more complete summary of the current knowledge of facet joint mechanics. Overall, the goal of this review is to present a comprehensive review of the breadth and depth of knowledge regarding the mechanical and adaptive responses of the facet joint and its tissues across a variety of relevant size scales.

ProDisc cervical arthroplasty does not alter facet joint contact pressure during lateral bending or axial torsion.

Study Design. A biomechanical study of facet joint pressure after total disc replacement using cadaveric human cervical spines during lateral bending and axial torsion. Objective. The goal was to measure the contact pressure in the facet joint in cadaveric human cervical spines subjected to physiologic lateral bending and axial torsion before and after implantation of a ProDisc-C implant. Summary of Background Data. Changes in facet biomechanics can damage the articular cartilage in the joint, potentially leading to degeneration and painful arthritis. Few cadaveric and computational studies have evaluated the changes in facet joint loading during spinal loading with an artificial disc implanted. Computational models have predicted that the design and placement of the implant influence facet joint loading, but limited cadaveric studies document changes in facet forces and pressures during nonsagittal bending after implantation of a ProDisc. As such, little is known about the local facet joint mechanics for these complicated loading scenarios in the cervical spine. Methods. Seven osteoligamentous C2–T1 cadaveric cervical spines were instrumented with a transducer to measure the C5–C6 facet pressure profiles during physiological lateral bending and axial torsion, before and after implantation of a ProDisc-C at that level. Rotations at that level and global cervical spine motions and loads were also quantified. Results. Global and segmental rotations were not altered by the disc implantation. Facet contact pressure increased after implantation during ipsilateral lateral bending and contralateral torsion, but that increase was not significant compared with the intact condition. Conclusion. Implantation of a ProDisc-C does not significantly modify the kinematics and facet pressure at the index level in cadaveric specimens during lateral bending and axial torsion. However, changes in facet contact pressures after disc arthroplasty may have long-term effects on spinal loading and cartilage degeneration and should be monitored in vivo.

Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine.

The facet joint contributes to the normal biomechanical function of the spine by transmitting loads and limiting motions via articular contact. However, little is known about the contact pressure response for this joint. Such information can provide a quantitative measure of the facet joints local environment. The objective of this study was to measure facet pressure during physiologic bending in the cervical spine, using a joint capsule-sparing technique. Flexion and extension bending moments were applied to six human cadaveric cervical spines. Global motions (C2-T1) were defined using infra-red cameras to track markers on each vertebra. Contact pressure in the C5-C6 facet was also measured using a tip-mounted pressure transducer inserted into the joint space through a hole in the postero-inferior region of the C5 lateral mass. Facet contact pressure increased by 67.6 ± 26.9 kPa under a 2.4 Nm extension moment and decreased by 10.3 ± 9.7 kPa under a 2.7 Nm flexion moment. The mean rotation of the overall cervical specimen motion segments was 9.6 ± 0.8° and was 1.6 ± 0.7° for the C5-C6 joint, respectively, for extension. The change in pressure during extension was linearly related to both the change in moment (51.4 ± 42.6 kPa/Nm) and the change in C5-C6 angle (18.0 ± 108.9 kPa/deg). Contact pressure in the inferior region of the cervical facet joint increases during extension as the articular surfaces come in contact, and decreases in flexion as the joint opens, similar to reports in the lumbar spine despite the difference in facet orientation in those spinal regions. Joint contact pressure is linearly related to both sagittal moment and spinal rotation. Cartilage degeneration and the presence of meniscoids may account for the variation in the pressure profiles measured during physiologic sagittal bending. This study shows that cervical facet contact pressure can be directly measured with minimal disruption to the joint and is the first to provide local pressure values for the cervical joint in a cadaveric model.

Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Total disc arthroplasty is a motion-preserving spinal procedure that has been investigated for its impact on spinal motions and adjacent-level degeneration. However, the effects of disc arthroplasty on facet joint biomechanics remain undefined despite the critical role of these posterior elements on guiding and limiting spinal motion. PURPOSE The goal was to measure the pressure in the facet joint in cadaveric human cervical spines subjected to sagittal bending before and after implantation of the ProDisc-C (Synthes Spine Company, L.P, West Chester, PA, USA). STUDY DESIGN A biomechanical study was performed using cadaveric human cervical spines during sagittal bending in the intact and implanted conditions. METHODS Seven C2-T1 osteoligamentous cadaveric cervical spines were instrumented with a transducer to measure the C5-C6 facet pressure profiles during physiological sagittal bending, before and after implantation of a ProDisc-C at that level. Rotations of the index segment and global cervical spine were also quantified. RESULTS The mean C5-C6 range of motion significantly increased (p=.009) from 9.6°±5.1° in the intact condition to 16.2°±3.6° after implantation. However, despite such changes in rotation, there was no significant difference in the facet contact pressure during extension between the intact (64±30 kPa) and implanted (44±55 kPa) conditions. Similarly, there was no difference in facet pressure developed during flexion. CONCLUSIONS Although implantation of a ProDisc-C arthroplasty device at the C5-C6 level increases angular rotations, it does not significantly alter the local facet pressure at the index level in flexion or extension. Using a technique that preserves the capsular ligament, this study provides the first direct measurement of cervical facet pressure in a disc arthroplasty condition.

Pressure Measurement in the Cervical Spinal Facet Joint : Considerations for Maintaining Joint Anatomy and an Intact Capsule

Study Design. A novel noninvasive approach to measure facet joint pressure in the cervical spine was investigated using a tip-mounted transducer that can be inserted through a hole in the bony lateral mass. This technique is advantageous because it does not require resection of the joint capsule, but there are potential issues regarding its applicability that are addressed. Objective. The objective was to evaluate the effect of a tip-mounted pressure probes position and orientation on contact pressure measurements in biomechanical experiments. Summary of Background Data. Measurements of direct contact pressure in the facet joint of cadaveric spines have been obtained via pressure-sensitive films. However, that method requires the resection of the facet capsule, which can alter the overall joints mechanical behavior and can affect the measured contact pressures. Methods. Influence of position and orientation on probe measurements was evaluated in companion surrogate and cadaveric investigations. The probe was placed in the facet of an anatomic vertebral C4/5 surrogate undergoing sagittal bending moments. Pressure-sensitive paper was used to map contact regions in the joint of the surrogate and cadaveric cervical segments (n = 3) during extension. The probe also underwent uniaxial compression in cadaveric facets to evaluate the effect of orientation relative to the contact surface on the probe signal. Results. Although experimental and theoretical pressure profiles followed the same trends, measured maximum pressures were half of the theoretical ones. In the orientation study, maximum pressures were not different for probe orientations of 0° and 5°, but no signal was recorded at orientations greater than 15°. Conclusion. This approach to measure pressure was selected to provide a minimally-invasive method to quantify facet joint pressures during clinically relevant applications. Both the position and orientation of the probe are critical factors in monitoring local pressure profiles in this mobile synovial joint.

Biomechanical Comparison of Contact Pressure in the Cervical Facet Joint During Bending Using a Probe and Pressure-Sensitive Paper

Non-physiologic loading of the facet joint is a potential cause of facet joint pain in the cervical spine [1]. When the local biomechanical environment of the facet joint is altered, like with trauma or after surgery [2], the cartilaginous articular surfaces of the facets can also be damaged. Defining articular contact pressure can provide a metric of altered joint mechanics and the local mechanical environment of the cartilage in the facet joint. However, accessing the articular surface to make such measurements without altering the overall mechanics of the joint remains a substantial challenge.Copyright

Kinematic magnetic resonance imaging to define the cervical facet joint space for the spine in neutral and torsion.

Study Design. Prospectively acquire magnetic resonance images of the neck in normal subjects and patients with radiculopathy to measure and compare measures of the facet joint space thickness and volume. Objective. The goal was to determine whether there is any difference in facet joint architecture between the 2 populations with the head in each of neutral and pain-eliciting rotation. Summary of Background Data. Degeneration and altered mechanics of the facet joint can result in pathological nerve root compression and pain. Although lumbar facet joint space thinning has been reported in the context of low back pain, few studies have quantified the cervical facet joint space, especially in the context of pain. Methods. The cervical spine of 8 symptomatic and 10 asymptomatic subjects was imaged in the sagittal plane in a 3T magnetic resonance scanner, using a T2-pulse sequence optimized for bone imaging. The facet joint space was identified and segmented in the acquired images. The thickness and volume of the facet joint space, and their changes between positions, were computed from the 3-dimensional representation for all cervical levels on both sides. Results. Generally, the facet joint space thickness and volume were smaller in the symptomatic subjects than in the asymptomatic subjects. The differences were more robust on the left, especially in neutral and left torsion. The changes in both volume and thickness from neutral to torsion were also different in sign and magnitude at isolated joint levels between the 2 populations. Conclusion. Quantification of the facet joint space architecture in the cervical spine of patients with radiculopathy is feasible using standard magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Measurements of the facet space thickness and volume, and their changes, from both pain-free and painful positions, can provide context for localizing potential sources of painful tissue loading. Level of Evidence: 3

Relevant Anatomic and Morphological Measurements of the Rat Spine Considerations for Rodent Models of Human Spine Trauma

Study Design. Basic science study measuring anatomical features of the cervical and lumbar spine in rat with normalized comparison with the human. Objective. The goal of this study is to comprehensively compare the rat and human cervical and lumbar spines to investigate whether the rat is an appropriate model for spine biomechanics investigations. Summary of Background Data. Animal models have been used for a long time to investigate the effects of trauma, degenerative changes, and mechanical loading on the structure and function of the spine. Comparative studies have reported some mechanical properties and/or anatomical dimensions of the spine to be similar between various species. However, those studies are largely limited to the lumbar spine, and a comprehensive comparison of the rat and human spines is lacking. Methods. Spines were harvested from male Holtzman rats (n = 5) and were scanned using micro– computed tomography and digitally rendered in 3 dimensions to quantify the spinal bony anatomy, including the lateral width and anteroposterior depth of the vertebra, vertebral body, and spinal canal, as well as the vertebral body and intervertebral disc heights. Normalized measurements of the vertebra, vertebral body, and spinal canal of the rat were computed and compared with corresponding measurements from the literature for the human in the cervical and lumbar spinal regions. Results. The vertebral dimensions of the rat spine vary more between spinal levels than in humans. Rat vertebrae are more slender than human vertebrae, but the width-to-depth axial aspect ratios are very similar in both species in both the cervical and lumbar regions, especially for the spinal canal. Conclusion. The similar spinal morphology in the axial plane between rats and humans supports using the rat spine as an appropriate surrogate for modeling axial and shear loading of the human spine. Level of Evidence: N/A

Three-dimensional kinematic stress magnetic resonance image analysis shows promise for detecting altered anatomical relationships of tissues in the cervical spine associated with painful radiculopathy

For some patients with radiculopathy a source of nerve root compression cannot be identified despite positive electromyography (EMG) evidence. This discrepancy hampers the effective clinical management for these individuals. Although it has been well-established that tissues in the cervical spine move in a three-dimensional (3D) manner, the 3D motions of the neural elements and their relationship to the bones surrounding them are largely unknown even for asymptomatic normal subjects. We hypothesize that abnormal mechanical loading of cervical nerve roots during pain-provoking head positioning may be responsible for radicular pain in those cases in which there is no evidence of nerve root compression on conventional cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the neck in the neutral position. This biomechanical imaging proof-of-concept study focused on quantitatively defining the architectural relationships between the neural and bony structures in the cervical spine using measurements derived from 3D MR images acquired in neutral and pain-provoking neck positions for subjects: (1) with radicular symptoms and evidence of root compression by conventional MRI and positive EMG, (2) with radicular symptoms and no evidence of root compression by MRI but positive EMG, and (3) asymptomatic age-matched controls. Function and pain scores were measured, along with neck range of motion, for all subjects. MR imaging was performed in both a neutral position and a pain-provoking position. Anatomical architectural data derived from analysis of the 3D MR images were compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, and the symptomatic groups with and without imaging evidence of root compression. Several differences in the architectural relationships between the bone and neural tissues were identified between the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. In addition, changes in architectural relationships were also detected between the symptomatic groups with and without imaging evidence of nerve root compression. As demonstrated in the data and a case study the 3D stress MR imaging approach provides utility to identify biomechanical relationships between hard and soft tissues that are otherwise undetected by standard clinical imaging methods. This technique offers a promising approach to detect the source of radiculopathy to inform clinical management for this pathology.

Upper Cervical Spine Loading Simulating a Dynamic Low-Speed Collision Significantly Increases the Risk of Pain Compared to Quasi-Static Loading With Equivalent Neck Kinematics

Dynamic cervical spine loading can produce facet capsule injury. Despite a large proportion of neck pain being attributable to the C2/C3 facet capsule, potential mechanisms are not understood. This study replicated low-speed frontal and rear-end traffic collisions in occiput-C3 human cadaveric cervical spine specimens and used kinematic and full-field strain analyses to assess injury. Specimens were loaded quasi-statically in flexion and extension before and after dynamic rotation of C3 at 100 deg/s. Global kinematics in the sagittal plane were tracked at 1 kHz, and C2/C3 facet capsule full-field strains were measured. Dynamic loading did not alter the kinematics from those during quasi-static (QS) loading, but maximum principal strain (MPS) and shear strain (SS) were significantly higher (p = 0.028) in dynamic flexion than for the same quasi-static conditions. The full-field strain analysis demonstrated that capsule strain was inhomogeneous, and that the peak MPS generally occurred in the anterior aspect and along the line of the C2/C3 facet joint. The strain magnitude in dynamic flexion continued to rise after the rotation of C3 had stopped, with a peak MPS of 12.52 ± 4.59% and a maximum SS of 5.34 ± 1.60%. The peak MPS in loading representative of rear-end collisions approached magnitudes previously shown to induce pain in vivo, whereas strain analysis using linear approaches across the facet joint was lower and may underestimate injury risk compared to full-field analysis. The time at which peak MPS occurred suggests that the deceleration following a collision is critical in relation to the production of injurious strains within the facet capsule.