Nicole Dumont

Investigator-initiated, open-label trial of ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis

Abstract Background: Palmoplantar psoriasis is a variant of psoriasis resistant to many forms of treatment. Methods: Twenty subjects with moderate-to-severe psoriasis of the palms and soles, 50% with pustules at baseline, were treated with ustekinumab at weeks 0, 4, and 16. All subjects had previously failed topical corticosteroids. Dosing was 45 mg subcutaneously for subjects weighing <100 kg and 90 mg for subjects weighing ≥100 kg. The primary endpoint was the percent of subjects achieving clinical clearance at week 16, defined as Palm–Sole Physicians Global Assessment ≤1. The study received Tufts Medical Center IRB approval. Results:After 16 weeks of treatment, 35% (7/20) of subjects achieved clinical clearance. Sixty percent (12/20) improved two or more points on the Palm–Sole Physicians Global Assessment scale. Sixty-seven percent (6/9) of those receiving the 90 mg ustekinumab dose achieved clinical clearance compared with nine percent (1/11) receiving 45 mg (p = 0.02). At 24 weeks, mean values showed 56% improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index, and 34% improvement in pain Visual Analogue Scale score (all p < 0.05). Limitations: Assessment tools for palmoplantar psoriasis are not yet validated. Five subjects withdrew or were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that ustekinumab dosed at 90 mg is effective in controlling signs and symptoms of palmoplantar psoriasis.

Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome in Children with Psoriatic Disease

Adults with psoriasis have a greater risk of developing metabolic syndrome (MetS) and cardiovascular disease (CVD), but few studies have investigated the prevalence of MetS and other risk factors for CVD in children with psoriasis. In an assessor‐blinded study, 20 children ages 9–17 years with a current or previously documented history of psoriasis involving 5% or more of their body surface area or psoriatic arthritis were compared with a cohort of age‐ and sex‐matched controls with benign nevi, warts, or acne. MetS, our primary endpoint, was defined by the presence of abnormal values in at least three of the following measures: triglycerides, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C), fasting blood glucose (FBG), waist circumference, and blood pressure. Secondary endpoints included high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP), total cholesterol (TC), and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C). Thirty percent (6/20) of children with psoriasis met the criteria for MetS, compared with 5% (1/20) of the control group (p < 0.05). Subjects with psoriasis had higher mean FBG (91.1 mg/dL) than the control group (82.9 mg/dL) (p = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in the other four components of MetS, BMI, BMI percentile, hs‐CRP, TC, or LDL‐C. The results of this trial demonstrate that children with psoriasis have higher rates of MetS than age‐ and sex‐matched controls. It may therefore be important to evaluate children with psoriasis for components of MetS to prevent future CVD morbidity and mortality.

CCL20 and IL22 Messenger RNA Expression After Adalimumab vs Methotrexate Treatment of Psoriasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE Methotrexate is a first-line systemic agent for treating of psoriasis, although its onset of effects is slower and overall it is less effective than tumor necrosis factor blockers. OBJECTIVE To differentiate the response of psoriatic disease to adalimumab and methotrexate sodium. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Single-center, randomized, assessor-blind, 2-arm clinical trial of 30 patients from the outpatient dermatology center of Tufts Medical Center, enrolled from August 18, 2009, to October 11, 2011. Patients aged 18 to 85 years with chronic plaque-type psoriasis, a minimum Physician Global Assessment score of 3 (higher scores indicate more severe disease), and a psoriatic plaque of at least 2 cm were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive subcutaneous adalimumab or oral methotrexate. Skin biopsy specimens obtained at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, and 16 were given a histologic grade by blinded assessors to evaluate treatment response. Analyses were conducted from April 16, 2013, to January 5, 2015. INTERVENTIONS A 16-week course of subcutaneous adalimumab (40 mg every 2 weeks after a loading dose) or low-dosage oral methotrexate sodium (7.5-25 mg/wk). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Changes in genomic, immunohistochemical, and messenger RNA (mRNA) profiles. RESULTS Methotrexate responders experienced significant downregulation of helper T-cell-related (T(H)1, T(H)17, and T(H)22) mRNA expression compared with methotrexate nonresponders. Comparisons among adalimumab-treated patients were limited by the number of nonresponders (n = 1). Between adalimumab and methotrexate responders, we found no significant differences in gene expression at any study point or in the expression of T-cell-related mRNA at week 16. Adalimumab responders demonstrated early downregulation of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 (CCL20) mRNA (mean [SE] at week 2, -1.83 [0.52], P < .001; week 16, -3.55 [0.54], P < .001) compared with late downregulation for methotrexate responders (week 2, 0.02 [0.51], P = .96; week 16, -2.96 [0.51], P < .001). Similar differences were observed with interleukin 22 (IL22) mRNA showing early downregulation for adalimumab responders (week 2, -3.17 [1.00], P < .001; week 16, -3.58 [1.00], P < .001) compared with late downregulation for methotrexate responders (week 2, -0.44 [0.68], P = .64; week 16, -5.14 [0.68], P < .001). Analysis of variance findings for key mRNA and immunohistochemical marker expression over the study course were significant only for CCL20 (P = .03) and IL22 (P = .006) mRNA comparing adalimumab and methotrexate responders. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Methotrexate is an immunomodulator with effects on helper T-cell signaling in psoriasis. Similar genomic and immunohistochemical response signatures and levels of mRNA downregulation at study completion among adalimumab and methotrexate responders suggest a disease-driven instead of therapeutic-driven pathway regulation. Adalimumab and methotrexate responses are differentiated by patterns of normalization of CCL20 and IL22 mRNA expression and may explain the varied onset and degree of clinical responses by each treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00932113.

Treatment of vitiligo with the topical Janus kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib

Background Existing therapies for vitiligo are limited in efficacy and can be associated with undesirable side effects. Topical Janus kinase inhibitors may offer a new therapeutic option for vitiligo. Objective We sought to assess the role of topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, a Janus kinase inhibitor, in vitiligo treatment. Methods This 20‐week, open‐label, proof‐of‐concept trial of twice‐daily topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream was conducted in 12 patients with a minimum of 1% affected body surface area of vitiligo. The primary outcome was percent improvement in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index from baseline to week 20. Results Of 12 patients screened, 11 were enrolled and 9 completed the study (54.5% men; mean age, 52 years). Four patients with significant facial involvement at baseline had a 76% improvement in facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index scores at week 20 (95% confidence interval, 53‐99%; P = .001). A 23% improvement in overall Vitiligo Area Scoring Index scores was observed in all enrolled patients at week 20 (95% confidence interval, 4‐43%; P = .02). Three of 8 patients responded on body surfaces and 1 of 8 patients responded on acral surfaces. Adverse events were minor, including erythema, hyperpigmentation, and transient acne. Limitations Limitations of the study include the small sample size and open‐label study design. Conclusions Topical ruxolitinib 1.5% cream provided significant repigmentation in facial vitiligo and may offer a valuable new treatment for vitiligo.

The Comparative Efficacy of Traditional Systemic, Biologic, and Combination Therapies in the Treatment of Psoriasis: An Expansion Study:

Background There is a lack of comparative effectiveness research, particularly in the clinical setting, guiding psoriasis therapy. Objective To compare the efficacies of the traditional systemic, biologic, and combination therapies. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed psoriasis patient visits to the Tufts Medical Center Department of Dermatology. The outcome measure used was the validated simple measure for assessing psoriasis activity (S-MAPA). Results Patients treated with biologic or combination therapies had a significantly larger improvement in S-MAPA than patients treated with a traditional systemic medication at 24 weeks (biologic: 62.69% vs. 36.20%, p=0.021; combination: 83.28% vs. 36.20%, p=0.011). Multivariate analysis demonstrated the superiority of biologics to traditional systemic therapy was independent of patient demographics and comorbidities. Conclusions In the clinical setting, the biologic and combination therapies are superior to the traditional systemic therapies in the treatment of psoriasis. Emphasis should be placed on future trials that compare current active therapies.