Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nicole Johnson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nicole Johnson.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2015

The outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children managed with contemporary treatments: results from the ReACCh-Out cohort

Jaime Guzman; Kiem Oen; Lori B. Tucker; Adam M. Huber; Natalie J. Shiff; Gilles Boire; Rosie Scuccimarri; Roberta A. Berard; Shirley M. L. Tse; Kimberly Morishita; Elizabeth Stringer; Nicole Johnson; Deborah M. Levy; Karen Watanabe Duffy; David A. Cabral; Alan M. Rosenberg; Maggie Larché; Paul Dancey; Ross E. Petty; Ronald M. Laxer; Earl D. Silverman; Paivi Miettunen; Anne-Laure Chetaille; Elie Haddad; Kristin Houghton; Lynn Spiegel; Stuart E. Turvey; Heinrike Schmeling; Bianca Lang; Janet Ellsworth

Objective To describe clinical outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in a prospective inception cohort of children managed with contemporary treatments. Methods Children newly diagnosed with JIA at 16 Canadian paediatric rheumatology centres from 2005 to 2010 were included. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for each JIA category were used to estimate probability of ever attaining an active joint count of 0, inactive disease (no active joints, no extraarticular manifestations and a physician global assessment of disease activity <10 mm), disease remission (inactive disease >12 months after discontinuing treatment) and of receiving specific treatments. Results In a cohort of 1104 children, the probabilities of attaining an active joint count of 0 exceeded 78% within 2 years in all JIA categories. The probability of attaining inactive disease exceeded 70% within 2 years in all categories, except for RF-positive polyarthritis (48%). The probability of discontinuing treatment at least once was 67% within 5 years. The probability of attaining remission within 5 years was 46–57% across JIA categories except for polyarthritis (0% RF-positive, 14% RF-negative). Initial treatment included joint injections and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for oligoarthritis, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for polyarthritis and systemic corticosteroids for systemic JIA. Conclusions Most children with JIA managed with contemporary treatments attain inactive disease within 2 years of diagnosis and many are able to discontinue treatment. The probability of attaining remission within 5 years of diagnosis is about 50%, except for children with polyarthritis.


Arthritis Care and Research | 2010

Early outcomes and improvement of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis enrolled in a Canadian multicenter inception cohort

Kiem Oen; Ciarán M. Duffy; Shirley M. L. Tse; Suzanne Ramsey; Janet Ellsworth; Gaëlle Chédeville; Anne-Laure Chetaille; Claire Saint-Cyr; David A. Cabral; Lynn Spiegel; Rayfel Schneider; Bianca Lang; Adam M. Huber; Paul Dancey; Earl D. Silverman; Alan M. Rosenberg; Bonnie Cameron; Nicole Johnson; Jean Dorval; Rosie Scuccimarri; Sarah Campillo; Ross E. Petty; Karen Watanabe Duffy; Gilles Boire; Elie Haddad; Kristin Houghton; Ronald M. Laxer; Stuart E. Turvey; Paivi Miettunen; Katherine Gross

To determine early outcomes and early improvements in a prospective inception cohort of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treated with current standard therapies.


Arthritis Care and Research | 2009

Predictors of early inactive disease in a juvenile idiopathic arthritis cohort: Results of a Canadian multicenter, prospective inception cohort study

Kiem Oen; Lori B. Tucker; Adam M. Huber; Paivi Miettunen; Rosie Scuccimarri; Sarah Campillo; David A. Cabral; Brian M. Feldman; Shirley M. L. Tse; Gaëlle Chédeville; Lynn Spiegel; Rayfel Schneider; Bianca Lang; Janet Ellsworth; Suzanne Ramsey; Paul Dancey; Earl D. Silverman; Anne-Laure Chetaille; Bonnie Cameron; Nicole Johnson; Jean Dorval; Ross E. Petty; Karen Watanabe Duffy; Gilles Boire; Elie Haddad; Kristin Houghton; Claire Saint-Cyr; Stuart E. Turvey; Susanne M. Benseler; Mary Cheang

OBJECTIVE To determine early predictors of 6-month outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS Patients selected were those enrolled in an inception cohort study of JIA, the Research in Arthritis in Canadian Children Emphasizing Outcomes Study, within 6 months after diagnosis. The juvenile rheumatoid arthritis core criteria set and quality of life measures were collected at enrollment and 6 months later. Outcomes evaluated included inactive disease, Juvenile Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JAQQ) scores, and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ) scores at 6 months. RESULTS Thirty-three percent of patients had inactive disease at 6 months. Onset subtype and most baseline core criteria set measures correlated with all 3 outcomes. Relative to oligoarticular JIA, the risks of inactive disease were lower for enthesitis-related arthritis, polyarthritis rheumatoid factor (RF)-negative JIA, and polyarthritis RF-positive JIA, and were similar for psoriatic arthritis. In multiple regression analyses, the baseline JAQQ score was an independent predictor of all 3 outcomes. Other independent baseline predictors included polyarthritis RF-negative and systemic JIA for inactive disease; C-HAQ score and polyarthritis RF-positive JIA for the 6-month C-HAQ score; and active joint count, pain, and time to diagnosis for the 6-month JAQQ score. CONCLUSION Clinical measures soon after diagnosis predict short-term outcomes for patients with JIA. The JAQQ is a predictor of multiple outcomes. Time to diagnosis affects quality of life in the short term.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2016

The risk and nature of flares in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the ReACCh-Out cohort

Jaime Guzman; Kiem Oen; Adam M. Huber; Karen Watanabe Duffy; Gilles Boire; Natalie J. Shiff; Roberta A. Berard; Deborah M. Levy; Elizabeth Stringer; Rosie Scuccimarri; Kimberly Morishita; Nicole Johnson; David A. Cabral; Alan M. Rosenberg; Maggie Larché; Paul Dancey; Ross E. Petty; Ronald M. Laxer; Earl D. Silverman; Paivi Miettunen; Anne-Laure Chetaille; Elie Haddad; Kristin Houghton; Lynn Spiegel; Stuart E. Turvey; Heinrike Schmeling; Bianca Lang; Janet Ellsworth; Suzanne Ramsey; Alessandra Bruns

Objective To describe probabilities and characteristics of disease flares in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and to identify clinical features associated with an increased risk of flare. Methods We studied children in the Research in Arthritis in Canadian Children emphasizing Outcomes (ReACCh-Out) prospective inception cohort. A flare was defined as a recurrence of disease manifestations after attaining inactive disease and was called significant if it required intensification of treatment. Probability of first flare was calculated with Kaplan–Meier methods, and associated features were identified using Cox regression. Results 1146 children were followed up a median of 24 months after attaining inactive disease. We observed 627 first flares (54.7% of patients) with median active joint count of 1, physician global assessment (PGA) of 12 mm and duration of 27 weeks. Within a year after attaining inactive disease, the probability of flare was 42.5% (95% CI 39% to 46%) for any flare and 26.6% (24% to 30%) for a significant flare. Within a year after stopping treatment, it was 31.7% (28% to 36%) and 25.0% (21% to 29%), respectively. A maximum PGA >30 mm, maximum active joint count >4, rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive polyarthritis, antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biological agents before attaining inactive disease were associated with increased risk of flare. Systemic JIA was associated with the lowest risk of flare. Conclusions In this real-practice JIA cohort, flares were frequent, usually involved a few swollen joints for an average of 6 months and 60% led to treatment intensification. Children with a severe disease course had an increased risk of flare.


The Journal of Rheumatology | 2012

Access to Biologic Therapies in Canada for Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Claire LeBlanc; Bianca Lang; Alma Bencivenga; Anne-Laure Chetaille; Paul Dancey; Peter B. Dent; Paivi Miettunen; Kiem Oen; Alan M. Rosenberg; J. Roth; Rosie Scuccimarri; Shirley M. L. Tse; Susanne M. Benseler; David A. Cabral; Sarah Campillo; Gaëlle Chédeville; Ciarán M. Duffy; Karen Watanabe Duffy; Elie Haddad; Adam M. Huber; Ronald M. Laxer; Deborah M. Levy; Nicole Johnson; Suzanne Ramsey; Natalie J. Shiff; Heinrike Schmeling; Rayfel Schneider; Elizabeth Stringer; Rae S. M. Yeung; Lori B. Tucker

Objective. To compare access to biologic therapies for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) across Canada, and to identify differences in provincial regulations and criteria for access. Methods. Between June and August 2010, we compiled the provincial guidelines for reimbursement of biologic drugs for children with JIA and conducted a multicenter Canada-wide survey of pediatric rheumatologists to determine their experience with accessing biologic therapies for their patients. Results. There were significant difficulties accessing biologic treatments other than etanercept and abatacept for children. There were large discrepancies in the access criteria and coverage of biologic agents across provinces, notably with age restrictions for younger children. Conclusion. Canadian children with JIA may not receive optimal internationally recognized “standard” care because pediatric coverage for biologic drugs through provincial formularies is limited and inconsistent across the country. There is urgent need for public policy to improve access to biologic therapies for these children to ensure optimal short-term and longterm health outcomes.


Pain | 2018

Trajectories of pain severity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the Research in Arthritis in Canadian Children Emphasizing Outcomes cohort

Natalie J. Shiff; Susan Tupper; Kiem Oen; Jaime Guzman; Hyun J. Lim; Chel Hee Lee; Rhonda Bryce; Adam M. Huber; Gilles Boire; Paul Dancey; Brian M. Feldman; Ronald M. Laxer; Paivi Miettunen; Heinrike Schmeling; Karen Watanabe Duffy; Deborah M. Levy; Stuart E. Turvey; Roxana Bolaria; Alessandra Bruns; David A. Cabral; Sarah Campillo; Gaëlle Chédeville; Debbie Ehrmann Feldman; Elie Haddad; Kristin Houghton; Nicole Johnson; Roman Jurencak; Bianca Lang; Maggie Larché; Kimberly Morishita

Abstract We studied children enrolled within 90 days of juvenile idiopathic arthritis diagnosis in the Research in Arthritis in Canadian Children Emphasizing Outcomes (ReACCh-Out) prospective inception cohort to identify longitudinal trajectories of pain severity and features that may predict pain trajectory at diagnosis. A total of 1062 participants were followed a median of 24.3 months (interquartile range = 16.0-37.1 months). Latent trajectory analysis of pain severity, measured in a 100-mm visual analogue scale, identified 5 distinct trajectories: (1) mild-decreasing pain (56.2% of the cohort); (2) moderate-decreasing pain (28.6%); (3) chronically moderate pain (7.4%); (4) minimal pain (4.0%); and (5) mild-increasing pain (3.7%). Mean disability and quality of life scores roughly paralleled the pain severity trajectories. At baseline, children with chronically moderate pain, compared to those with moderate-decreasing pain, were older (mean 10.0 vs 8.5 years, P = 0.01) and had higher active joint counts (mean 10.0 vs 7.2 joints, P = 0.06). Children with mild-increasing pain had lower joint counts than children with mild-decreasing pain (2.3 vs 5.2 joints, P < 0.001). Although most children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in this cohort had mild or moderate initial levels of pain that decreased quickly, about 1 in 10 children had concerning pain trajectories (chronically moderate pain and mild-increasing pain). Systematic periodic assessment of pain severity in the months after diagnosis may help identify these concerning pain trajectories early and lay out appropriate pain management plans. Focused research into the factors leading to these concerning trajectories may help prevent them.


Pediatric Rheumatology | 2012

Predictors of 2 year outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a multicenter Canadian cohort: the ReACCh out experience

Natalie J. Shiff; Kiem Oen; Jaime Guzman; Nicole Johnson; Adam M. Huber; Shirley M. L. Tse; Lori B. Tucker; Rae S. M. Yeung; Ciarán M. Duffy

Purpose The ability to predict which children with Juvenile idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) are likely to have worse outcomes would allow a more targeted aggressive approach to initial therapy. We used data from the Research on Arthritis in Canadian Children Emphasizing Outcomes (ReACCh Out), a 16-centre prospective inception cohort of children with newly diagnosed JIA, to identify predictors of 2-year outcomes present during the first 6 months after enrollment. Methods Data was available on 223 to 291 children depending on the analysis. The 2-year clinical outcomes were remission, a Childhood Health Assessment questionnaire (CHAQ) score of ≥0.75, and the Juvenile Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JAQQ) score. Remission was defined according to Wallace criteria (without ESR or CRP), and combined patients on and off medication. The candidate predictors listed in Table 1 were selected for their clinical relevance and forced in a stepwise manner into regression models. They underwent natural logarithmic transformation (Ln) if not normally distributed. Logistic regression was used for prediction of remission and CHAQ outcomes, and linear regression for the JAQQ score.


Pediatric Rheumatology | 2008

Review of the success of a transition clinic for young adults with rheumatic diseases.

N LaBrie; K Kiefer; Paivi Miettunen; N Fahlman; Nicole Johnson; Am Crawford; T Lupton


Pediatric Rheumatology | 2017

Growth and Weight Gain in Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: results from the ReACCh-Out cohort.

Jaime Guzman; Tristan Kerr; Leanne Ward; Jinhui Ma; Kiem Oen; Alan M. Rosenberg; Brian M. Feldman; Gilles Boire; Kristin Houghton; Paul Dancey; Rosie Scuccimarri; Alessandra Bruns; Adam M. Huber; Karen Watanabe Duffy; Natalie J. Shiff; Roberta A. Berard; Deborah M. Levy; Elizabeth Stringer; Kimberly Morishita; Nicole Johnson; David A. Cabral; Maggie Larché; Ross E. Petty; Ronald M. Laxer; Earl D. Silverman; Paivi Miettunen; Anne-Laure Chetaille; Elie Haddad; Lynn Spiegel; Stuart E. Turvey


Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2017

Feasibility Testing of An Internet-Based Psycho-Educational Game for Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Their Parents

Jennifer Stinson; Mark Connelly; Adam M. Huber; Nadia Luca; Lynn Spiegel; Argerie Tsimicalis; Stephanie Luca; Naweed Tajuddin; Roberta A. Berard; Julie Barsalou; Sarah Campillo; Brian M. Feldman; Shirley M. L. Tse; Paul Dancey; Ciarán M. Duffy; Nicole Johnson; Patrick J. McGrath; Natalie J. Shiff; Lori B. Tucker; J. Charles Victor

Collaboration


Dive into the Nicole Johnson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kiem Oen

University of Manitoba

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David A. Cabral

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elie Haddad

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen Watanabe Duffy

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Natalie J. Shiff

University of Saskatchewan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge