Nicole L. Hoppman

Genetic testing for hearing loss in the United States should include deletion/duplication analysis for the deafness/infertility locus at 15q15.3

BackgroundHearing loss is the most common birth defect and the most prevalent sensorineural disorder in developed countries. More than 50% of prelingual deafness is genetic, most often autosomal recessive and nonsyndromic, of which 50% can be attributed to the disorder DFNB1, caused by mutations in GJB2 and GJB6. Sensorineural hearing loss and male infertility (Deafness-Infertility Syndrome; DIS) is a contiguous gene deletion syndrome resulting from homozygous deletion of the CATSPER2 and STRC genes on chromosome 15q15.3. Females with DIS have only hearing loss and are fertile. Until recently this syndrome has only been described in three consanguineous families and 2 nonconsanguineous families.ResultsWe recently indentified a patient with hearing loss and macrocephaly who was found to be homozygous for this deletion. Her nonconsanguineous parents are both carriers. We examined our database of patients tested by array CGH and determined that just over 1% of our patients are heterozygous for this deletion. If this number is representative of the general population, this implies a 1% carrier frequency and prevalence of DIS of 1 in 40,000 individuals.ConclusionWe propose that DIS is a greatly under-diagnosed cause of deafness and should be considered in children with hearing loss. Likewise, current molecular genetic testing panels for hearing loss in the United States should be expanded to include deletion/duplication analysis of this region.

Does parent of origin matter? Methylation studies should be performed on patients with multiple copies of the Prader–Willi/Angelman syndrome critical region

Deletion of 15q11.2‐q13 results in either Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) or Angelman syndrome (AS) depending on the parent of origin. Duplication of the PWS/AS critical region (PWASCR) has also been reported in association with developmental delay and autism, and it has been shown that they also show a parent‐of‐origin effect. It is generally accepted that maternal duplications are pathogenic. However, there is conflicting evidence as to the pathogenicity of paternal duplications. We have identified 35 patients with gain of the PWASCR using array comparative genomic hybridization. Methylation testing was performed to determine parent of origin of the extra copies. Of the 35 cases, 22 had a supernumerary marker chromosome 15 (SMC15), 12 had a tandem duplication, and 1 had a tandem triplication. Only one patient had a paternal duplication; this patient does not have features typical of patients with maternal duplication of the PWASCR. Three of the mothers had a tandem duplication (two were paternal and one was maternal origin). While one of the two mothers with paternal duplication was noted not to have autism, the other was noted to have learning disability and depression. Based on our data, we conclude that SMC15 are almost exclusively maternal in origin and result in an abnormal phenotype. Tandem duplications/triplications are generally of maternal origin when ascertained on the basis of abnormal phenotype; however, tandem duplications of paternal origin have also been identified. Therefore, we suggest that methylation testing be performed for cases of tandem duplications/triplications since the pathogenicity of paternal gains is uncertain.

CNKSR2 deletions: A novel cause of X-linked intellectual disability and seizures

X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) accounts for approximately 10% of intellectual disability in males and contributes to the excess of males in the intellectually disabled population (male to female ratio 1.3–1.4 to 1) [Ropers andHamel, 2005]. Underlying causes of XLID have been extensively studied in recent years, and as a result mutations causing XLID have been described in about 106 genes [Piton et al., 2013]. Recently, Houge et al. [2012] described a maternally inherited 234 kilobase deletion on the X chromosome, which removed themajority of theCNKSR2 gene (OMIM#300724; 21,375,312 – 21,609,484, genomebuild hg19; Fig. 1E) in amalewith developmental delay, epilepsy, and microcephaly. Since CNKSR2 gene is highly expressed only in the brain [Nagase et al., 1998], Houge et al. [2012] suggested that the phenotypic effects of loss of function mutations in the CNKSR2 gene may be restricted to the brain. They concluded that the CNKSR2 gene is a novel candidate gene for nonsyndromic X-linked intellectual disability. A recent report byPiton et al. [2013]onXLID-causingmutations reassessed the implications of 106 genes in their involvement in XLID and classified them into five groups: genes with known mutations, genes with questionable involvement, those that never been replicated, those awaiting replication, and some with likely involvement. The CNKSR2 gene was included in the awaiting replication category since its association with intellectual disability has not been replicated. We report on a deletion in the CNKSR2 gene in a boy with intellectual disability and seizures, therefore replicating the findings of Houge et al. [2012]. The proband was a 7-year-old boy who presented to the Neurology Department for a second opinion regarding his medically intractable focal seizures and developmental delay. He was the first child born to a 24-year-old mother. Aside from occasional alcoholic beverages (one to two drinks at a time at most twice aweek) and smokinguntil approximately fivemonths of gestation, the pregnancy was not complicated by maternal illnesses or exposure to other teratogens. The mother did not take any medications during gestation. Birth was at term and via spontaneous vaginal delivery without complications. Birth weight was 6 pounds, 14 ounces (3118 g, 25th centile), and no postnatal complications were reported. Concerns regarding the patient’s psychomotor development arose within the first year of life, particularly regarding his speech. The patient was slow in achievingmilestones but had no regression.

Patterns of homozygosity in patients with uniparental disomy: detection rate and suggested reporting thresholds for SNP microarrays

PurposeSingle-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays can easily identify whole-chromosome isodisomy but are unable to detect whole-chromosome heterodisomy. However, most cases of uniparental disomy (UPD) involve combinations of heterodisomy and isodisomy, visualized on SNP microarrays as long continuous stretches of homozygosity (LCSH). LCSH raise suspicion for, but are not diagnostic of, UPD, and reporting necessitates confirmatory testing. The goal of this study was to define optimal LCSH reporting standards.MethodsEighty-nine individuals with known UPD were analyzed using chromosomal microarray. The LCSH patterns were compared with those in a phenotypically normal population to predict the clinical impact of various reporting thresholds. False-positive and -negative rates were calculated at various LCSH thresholds.ResultsTwenty-seven of 84 cases with UPD had no significant LCSH on the involved chromosome. Fifty UPD-positive samples had LCSH of varying sizes: the average size of terminal LCSH was 11.0 megabases while the average size of interstitial LCSH was 24.1 megabases. LCSH in the normal population tended to be much smaller (average 4.3 megabases) and almost exclusively interstitial; however, overlap between the populations was noted.ConclusionWe hope that this work will aid clinical laboratories in the recognition and reporting of LCSH.

Copy number variant analysis using genome-wide mate-pair sequencing

Copy number variation (CNV) is a common form of structural variation detected in human genomes, occurring as both constitutional and somatic events. Cytogenetic techniques like chromosomal microarray (CMA) are widely used in analyzing CNVs. However, CMA techniques cannot resolve the full nature of these structural variations (i.e. the orientation and location of associated breakpoint junctions) and must be combined with other cytogenetic techniques, such as karyotyping or FISH, to do so. This makes the development of a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) approach capable of resolving both CNVs and breakpoint junctions desirable. Mate‐pair sequencing (MPseq) is a NGS technology designed to find large structural rearrangements across the entire genome. Here we present an algorithm capable of performing copy number analysis from mate‐pair sequencing data. The algorithm uses a step‐wise procedure involving normalization, segmentation, and classification of the sequencing data. The segmentation technique combines both read depth and discordant mate‐pair reads to increase the sensitivity and resolution of CNV calls. The method is particularly suited to MPseq, which is designed to detect breakpoint junctions at high resolution. This allows for the classification step to accurately calculate copy number levels at the relatively low read depth of MPseq. Here we compare results for a series of hematological cancer samples that were tested with CMA and MPseq. We demonstrate comparable sensitivity to the state‐of‐the‐art CMA technology, with the benefit of improved breakpoint resolution. The algorithm provides a powerful analytical tool for the analysis of MPseq results in cancer.

Cryptic ETV6–PDGFRB fusion in a highly complex rearrangement of chromosomes 1, 5, and 12 due to a chromothripsis-like event in a myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm

Myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are hematological malignancies characterized by simultaneous presence of both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features [1]. C...

Mate pair sequencing improves detection of genomic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be subtyped based on recurrent cytogenetic and molecular genetic abnormalities with diagnostic and prognostic significance. Although cytogenetic characterization classically involves conventional chromosome and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays, limitations of these techniques include poor resolution and the inability to precisely identify breakpoints.

Co-occurrence of a maternally inherited DNMT3A duplication and a paternally inherited pathogenic variant in EZH2 in a child with growth retardation and severe short stature: atypical Weaver syndrome or evidence of a DNMT3A dosage effect?

Overgrowth syndromes are a clinically heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by localized or generalized tissue overgrowth and varying degrees of developmental and intellectual disability. An expanding list of genes associated with overgrowth syndromes include the histone methyltransferase genes EZH2 and NSD1, which cause Weaver and Sotos syndrome, respectively, and the DNA methyltransferase (DNMT3A) gene that results in Tatton-Brown–Rahman syndrome (TBRS). Here, we describe a 5-year-old female with a paternally inherited pathogenic mutation in EZH2 (c.2050C>T, p.Arg684Cys) and a maternally inherited 505-kb duplication of uncertain significance at 2p23.3 (encompassing five genes, including DNMT3A) who presented with intrauterine growth restriction, slow postnatal growth, short stature, hypotonia, developmental delay, and neuroblastoma diagnosed at the age of 8 mo. Her father had tall stature, dysmorphic facial features, and intellectual disability consistent with Weaver syndrome, whereas her mother had short stature, cognitive delays, and chronic nonprogressive leukocytosis. It has been previously shown that EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation through physical association with DNMTs, including DNMT3A, with concomitant H3K27 methylation and CpG promoter methylation leading to repression of EZH2 target genes. Interestingly, NSD1 is involved in H3K36 methylation, a mark associated with transcriptional activation, and exhibits exquisite dosage sensitivity leading to overgrowth when deleted and severe undergrowth when duplicated in vivo. Although there is currently no evidence of dosage effects for DNMT3A, the co-occurrence of a duplication involving this gene and a pathogenic alteration in EZH2 in a patient with severe undergrowth is suggestive of a similar paradigm and further study is warranted.

The Utilization of Chromosomal Microarray Technologies for Hematologic Neoplasms

Objectives Chromosome (G-banding) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) serve as the primary methodologies utilized for detecting genetic aberrations in hematologic neoplasms. Chromosomal microarray can detect copy number aberrations (CNAs) with greater resolution when compared to G-banding and FISH, and can also identify copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH). The purpose of our review is to highlight a preselected group of hematologic neoplasms for which chromosomal microarray has the greatest clinical utility. Methods A case-based approach and review of the literature was performed to identify the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing chromosomal microarray for specific hematologic neoplasms. Results Chromosomal microarray identified CNAs and CN-LOH of clinical significance, and could be performed on fresh or paraffin-embedded tissue and liquid neoplasms. Microarray studies could not detect balanced rearrangements, low-level clones, or distinguish independent clones. Conclusions When utilized appropriately, chromosomal microarray can provide clinically significant information that complements traditional cytogenetic testing methodologies.

Novel t(5;11)(q32;q13.4) with NUMA1-PDGFRB fusion in a myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia with response to imatinib mesylate

We report a NUMA1-PDGFRB fusion in a myeloproliferative neoplasm with eosinophilia in a 61-year old man, with response to imatinib mesylate therapy. A t(5;11) chromosome translocation involving bands 5q32 and 11q13.4 was identified by metaphase chromosome analysis, and rearrangement of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRB) gene on 5q32 was demonstrated by FISH using a PDGFRB break-apart probe set. Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) FISH mapping of the PDGFRB fusion partner gene narrowed the breakpoint at 11q13.4 to a 150 kb genomic region containing three genes, including NUMA1. Mate pair sequencing analysis demonstrated NUMA1-PDGFRB fusion. The fusion protein includes coiled-coil domains of nuclear mitotic apparatus protein 1 (NuMA1, involved in protein homodimerization and heteroassociation) and tyrosine kinase domains of PDGFRB. Diverse rearrangements involving the PDGFRB gene have been identified in myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia, but rearrangement of the nuclear mitotic apparatus protein 1 (NUMA1) gene has previously been reported in a human malignancy in only one instance, a NUMA1-RARA fusion caused by a t(11;17) translocation in a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia. The NUMA1-PDGFRB fusion is the second instance of rearrangement of NUMA1, encoding an element of the mitotic apparatus, in human cancer.