Nicole Lefrançois

Induction versus noninduction in renal transplant recipients with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction treatment with antithymocyte globulins (ATG) followed by tacrolimus therapy with immediate tacrolimus therapy in renal transplant recipients. Methods. This 12-month, open, prospective study was conducted in 15 centers in France and 1 center in Belgium; 309 patients were randomized to receive either induction therapy with ATG (n=151) followed by initiation of tacrolimus on day 9 or immediate tacrolimus-based triple therapy (n=158). In both study arms, the initial daily tacrolimus dose was 0.2 mg/kg. Steroid boluses were given in the first 2 days and tapered thereafter from 20 mg/day to 5 mg/day. Azathioprine was administered at 1–2 mg/kg per day. Results. At month 12, biopsy-confirmed acute rejections were reported for 15.2% (induction) and 30.4% (noninduction) of patients (P =0.001). The incidence of steroid-sensitive acute rejections was 7.9% (induction) and 22.2% (noninduction)(P =0.001). Steroid-resistant acute rejections were reported for 8.6% (induction) and 8.9% (noninduction) of patients. A total of nine patients died. Patient survival and graft survival at month 12 was similar in both treatment groups (97.4% vs. 96.8% and 92.1% vs. 91.1%, respectively). Statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were found for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (induction, 32.5% vs. noninduction, 19.0%, P =0.009), leukopenia (37.3% vs. 9.5%, P <0.001), fever (25.2% vs. 10.1%, P =0.001), herpes simplex (17.9% vs. 5.7%, P =0.001), and thrombocytopenia (11.3% vs. 3.2%, P =0.007). In the induction group, serum sickness was observed in 10.6% of patients. The incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus was 3.4% (induction) and 4.5% (noninduction). Conclusion. Low incidences of acute rejection were found in both treatment arms. Induction treatment with ATG has the advantage of a lower incidence of acute rejection, but it significantly increases adverse events, particularly CMV infection.

Subsequent skin cancers in kidney and heart transplant recipients after the first squamous cell carcinoma.

Background. The increased incidence of skin cancers in transplant patients is well documented; however, few data exist on the risk of subsequent skin tumors in a given patient after the first skin cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the individual rate of subsequent skin cancers in kidney (KTR) and heart transplant recipients (HTR) after the first squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and to assess risk factors for tumor multiplicity. Methods. In all, 188 patients (121 KTR/67 HTR) were studied for up to 5 years. The cumulative number of SCC, basal cell carcinomas, Bowen’s diseases, premalignant keratoses, and keratoacanthomas was recorded yearly after the first SCC. Results. Overall, 71% of patients developed 757 new skin tumors. At 5 years, 100% of HTR and 88% of KTR had presented new tumors. However, the mean number of all tumors was significantly higher in KTR (3.4 vs. 2.0, 4.8 vs. 2.6, 6.6 vs. 2.9, 8.5 vs. 3.5, and 9.7 vs. 4.6 at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively). Transplantation before 1984, multiple tumors at first consultation, eye and hair color, and skin type were predictive of multiple tumors. Early minimization of immunosuppression and of sun exposure tended to be associated with a reduced rate of all tumors and of SCC, respectively. Conclusions. Although the proportion of HTR developing new tumors is greater as compared with KTR, the mean number of tumors per patient is higher in KTR. This could be due to a longer immunosuppression in patients younger at transplantation.

Clinicopathologic monitoring of the skin and oral mucosa of the first human face allograft: Report on the first eight months

Background. The first human face allograft was performed in France on November 27, 2005. We report herein the clinicopathologic findings from the skin and oral mucosa of this allograft during the first eight months. Methods. Sequential biopsies were taken from the facial skin (n=3), oral mucosa (n=20), and sentinel skin graft (n=11) from day 3 to day 220 postgraft and examined (immuno)histologically, using a pathological score previously proposed for evaluation of rejection in composite tissue (hand) transplantation. Results. The patient developed clinically rejection episodes at day 20 and during the eighth month postgraft, manifesting with redness and edema of the facial skin, oral mucosa, and sentinel graft skin. Pathologically, changes suggestive of rejection grades 0, I, II, and III were seen in 1, 1, 1, and 0 biopsies of facial skin, 7, 2, 1, and 1 biopsies of sentinel skin graft and 3, 5, 8, and 4 biopsies of oral mucosa, respectively. Pathological changes were generally more severe in the oral mucosa than in facial and sentinel graft skin (mean scores 1.85, 0.64, and 1, respectively). Conclusions. As it happens with other composite tissue allografts, close clinicopathologic monitoring of the skin (and oral mucosa) seems to be the most reliable way to detect rejection in the setting of human facial tissue allotransplantation. Apart from these rejection episodes, the skin and mucosa maintained a normal microscopic structure, paralleling functional recovery.

Incidence of Delayed Graft Function and Wound Healing Complications After Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation Is not Affected by De Novo Everolimus

Background. Concerns about delayed graft function (DGF) and wound healing complications with sirolimus has led to suggestions that everolimus introduction could be delayed after transplantation. Methods. In a prospective, multicenter, open-label study, deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients at protocol-specified risk of DGF (defined as ≥1 dialysis session during the first week posttransplant excluding day 1) were randomized to start everolimus therapy on day 1 posttransplant (immediate everolimus [IE]), or from week 5 (delayed everolimus [DE]) with mycophenolic acid until everolimus was initiated. All patients received anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies, cyclosporine A, and corticosteroids. A planned 3-month analysis from this 12-month study is presented here. Results. One hundred and thirty-nine patients were randomized (IE 65, DE 74). The primary composite endpoint: biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, DGF, wound healing events, or lost to follow-up at month 3, occurred in 36 IE patients (55.4%) and 47 DE patients (63.5%, P=0.387). The incidence of DGF was similar between groups (IE 24.6%, DE 24.3%; n.s.). Wound healing events of any type occurred in 40.0% and 41.9% of IE and DE patients (n.s.); events relating to initial transplant surgery occurred in 36.9% IE patients and 37.8% DE patients (n.s.), most of which were fluid collections. Study drug was discontinued due to adverse events or graft loss in 13 IE (20.0%) and 17 DE patients (23.0%). Conclusions. Findings from this randomized, multicenter trial indicate that kidney function recovery, wound healing, efficacy, and tolerance are similar at 3 months posttransplant with immediate or DE in patients at protocol-specified risk of DGF.

First human double hand transplantation: efficacy of a conventional immunosuppressive protocol

Abstract: Based on the results achieved in single human hand transplantations, we decided to perform the first double hand transplantation with a conventional immunosuppressive protocol in a patient with a high potential for functional recovery. Two years after transplantation the efficacy and the safety of this immunosuppressive protocol are evaluated. The recipient was a 33‐yr‐old man suffering from a traumatic amputation of both hands in 1996. Five HLA‐A, ‐B, and ‐DR mismatches were present with the donor; T and B cell cross‐match was negative. Immunosuppressive protocol included tacrolimus, prednisone, mycophenolate mofetil and, for induction, antithymocyte globulins and then anti CD25 monoclonal antibody. Reconstitution of lymphocyte populations proceeded normally. Neither anti‐HLA antibodies nor chimerism in peripheral blood were detected. Two episodes of acute rejection characterized by maculopapular lesions occurred on days 53 and 82 after transplantation. Skin biopsies revealed a dermal lymphocytic infiltrate. Both episodes were completely and rapidly reversed by topical clobetasol and increased systemic corticosteroid therapy. The only side‐effects related to treatment were reversible serum sickness and hyperglycemia. No infectious complications and malignancies occurred. No signs of graft‐versus‐host disease have been detected. This case of double hand transplantation shows that conventional immunosuppression is effective and safe to ensure survival and functional recovery of the grafted limb.

Thymoglobulin induction and sirolimus versus tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and steroids.

Background. To define the role of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplantation, we compared efficacy and safety of two immunosuppressive regimens—a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen with depletive induction versus a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen. Methods. De novo renal allograft recipients were randomized before transplantation to receive sirolimus (SRL; n=71, group A) or tacrolimus (n=70, group B). All patients received mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. In group A, patients received rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction. In group B, antithymocyte globulin therapy could be given in case of delayed graft function. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (Nankivells formula) at month 12 was the primary endpoint. Results. GFR showed no significant difference at month 12, with 56.1 in group A versus 58.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 in group B. In functioning grafts, renal function was significantly better in the SRL group, with higher GFR values at months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9 (P<0.05). At month 12, patient survival and incidence of biopsy-proven rejection were not different between groups (95.8% vs. 97.1%, and 16.9% vs. 12.9%, respectively). However, proportion of graft loss was higher with SRL at months 6 and 12 (11.3% vs. 0.0%, P=0.004; 14.1% vs. 4.3%, P=0.044, respectively). Adverse events and premature withdrawals were more frequent with SRL (P<0.001 and P<0.05, respectively), whereas cytomegalovirus infections were more frequent with tacrolimus (P<0.001). Conclusion. Patients treated with induction plus SRL, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids may obtain good renal function but have a higher risk of adverse events, drug withdrawal, and graft loss.

Efficacy and safety of de novo or early everolimus with low cyclosporine in deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients at specified risk of delayed graft function: 12-month results of a randomized, multicenter trial

Immediate or early use of proliferation signal inhibitor (PSI)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor therapy can avoid high exposure to calcineurin inhibitors but concerns exist relating to the risk of delayed graft function (DGF) and impaired wound healing with the mTOR sirolimus. CALLISTO was a 12‐month, prospective, multicenter, open‐label study. Deceased‐donor kidney transplant patients at protocol‐specified risk of DGF were randomized to start everolimus on day 1 (immediate everolimus, IE; n = 65) or week 5 (delayed everolimus, DE; n = 74). Incidence of the primary endpoint (biopsy‐proven acute rejection, BPAR; graft loss, death, DGF, wound healing complications related to transplant surgery or loss to follow‐up) was 64.6% and 66.2% in the IE and DE groups, respectively, at month 12 (P = 0.860). The overall incidence of BPAR was 20.1%. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 48 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 49 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the IE and DE groups, respectively, at month 12. DGF and wound healing complications were similar between groups. Adverse events led to study drug discontinuation in 17 IE patients (26.2%) and 28 DE patients (37.8%) (NS). In conclusion, introduction of everolimus immediately or early posttransplant in DGF‐risk patients is associated with good efficacy, renal function and safety profile. There seems no benefit in delaying initiation of everolimus.

Acute thrombosis of renal transplant artery: graft salvage by means of intra-arterial fibrinolysis.

BACKGROUND Arterial thrombosis in a transplanted kidney is a serious complication that usually leads to graft loss. The purpose of our study was to evaluate intra-arterial fibrinolysis as a treatment of acute renal transplant artery thrombosis and to determine the maximum period of occlusion allowing a reasonable chance of graft salvage. METHODS AND RESULTS Four patients underwent intra-arterial fibrinolysis for acute transplant artery thrombosis. Transplantations had been performed 29 days to 10 years before the fibrinolysis. Fibrinolysis was carried out by using recombitant tissue plasminogen activator (n=1) or urokinase (n=3). In one patient, anuric for 13 hr at admittance, fibrinolysis could not revascularize the graft artery. In a second patient, anuric for 48 hr at admittance, fibrinolysis did revascularize the graft artery, but dialysis could not be discontinued. In the two remaining patients, anuric for 19 and 20 hr at admittance, the graft artery was successfully revascularized and dialysis could be discontinued 1 week later. One of these two patients returned to dialysis 71 months later because of chronic rejection. Thirty-four months after the acute episode, the remaining patient had a patent artery and did not require dialysis. CONCLUSIONS Fibrinolysis seems an efficient treatment that may save transplants after up to 24 hr of the arterial occlusion.

IGL‐1 solution in kidney transplantation: first multi‐center study

Abstract:  IGL‐1 solution is characterized by inversion of K+ and Na+ concentrations in the University Wisconsin (UW) solution and polyethylene glycol 35 (PEG 35) substitution for hydroxy ethyl starch. In this prospective study, 121 patients transplanted with kidneys preserved in IGL‐1 solution were compared to 102 patients grafted with kidneys preserved in UW solution. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance, delayed graft function (DGF) and rejection episodes, patient and graft survival were evaluated in the first post‐transplant year. Groups were comparable regarding to donor and recipient characteristics. Median creatinine levels were significantly lower in IGL‐1 group from day 6 to day 14 and it decreased more rapidly in the IGL‐1 group (from day 4 to day 15: p < 0.05). Creatinine clearance values were usually higher in the IGL‐1 group for the first 15 d. During the follow‐up period serum creatinine concentrations were lower in IGL‐1 group at one, three, six and 12 months after transplantation (p = 0.04; p = 0.06, p = 0.01 and p = 0.08, respectively) while creatinine clearance values were similar during the follow‐up. No significant difference in DGF and rejection rates as well as in patient and graft survival was shown between the two groups. Kidneys preserved in IGL‐1 solution showed to have the same function as kidneys preserved in UW solution.

Simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplantation: portal versus systemic venous drainage of the pancreas allografts

Simultaneous pancreas‐kidney (SPK) transplantation is considered a valid therapeutic option for patient with type I diabetes mellitus and end‐stage diabetic nephropathy. This study was performed to determine whether the technique of pancreas venous drainage affects patient survival as well as graft survival and function. From October 1996 to April 1999 34 uremic patients with type I diabetes mellitus were randomly assigned to two groups: the first group (SV group=17) received SPK transplantation with systemic venous drainage, and the second group (PV group=17) received pancreas allograft with portal drainage. A Roux‐en‐Y loop was performed in all the patients. Patient follow‐up included clinical course and metabolic studies. At 1 yr, patient survival rates were 88.2% in the SV group and 94.1% in the PV group while graft survival rate was 76.4% in both groups. Several surgical complications were attributed to the enteric drainage without any graft failure in both groups. One venous thrombosis occurred in each group. No significant differences have been evidenced in kidney and pancreas function. The preliminary results of this randomized trial did not evidence any significant differences between portal and systemic venous drainage of pancreas allograft.