Niels Grasmeijer
University of Groningen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Niels Grasmeijer.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta | 2013
Niels Grasmeijer; Milica Stanković; H. de Waard; Henderik W. Frijlink; Wouter L. J. Hinrichs
The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of the two main mechanisms used to explain the stabilization of proteins by sugar glasses during drying and subsequent storage: the vitrification and the water replacement theory. Although in literature protein stability is often attributed to either vitrification or water replacement, both mechanisms could play a role and they should be considered simultaneously. A model protein, alkaline phosphatase, was incorporated in either inulin or trehalose by spray drying. To study the storage stability at different glass transition temperatures, a buffer which acts as a plasticizer, ammediol, was incorporated in the sugar glasses. At low glass transition temperatures (<50°C), the enzymatic activity of the protein strongly decreased during storage at 60°C. Protein stability increased when the glass transition temperature was raised considerably above the storage temperature. This increased stability could be attributed to vitrification. A further increase of the glass transition temperature did not further improve stability. In conclusion, vitrification plays a dominant role in stabilization at glass transition temperatures up to 10 to 20°C above storage temperature, depending on whether trehalose or inulin is used. On the other hand, the water replacement mechanism predominantly determines stability at higher glass transition temperatures.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Niels Grasmeijer; Hans de Waard; Wouter L. J. Hinrichs; Henderik W. Frijlink
The aim of this study was to develop a user-friendly model for spray drying that can aid in the development of a pharmaceutical product, by shifting from a trial-and-error towards a quality-by-design approach. To achieve this, a spray dryer model was developed in commercial and open source spreadsheet software. The output of the model was first fitted to the experimental output of a Büchi B-290 spray dryer and subsequently validated. The predicted outlet temperatures of the spray dryer model matched the experimental values very well over the entire range of spray dryer settings that were tested. Finally, the model was applied to produce glassy sugars by spray drying, an often used excipient in formulations of biopharmaceuticals. For the production of glassy sugars, the model was extended to predict the relative humidity at the outlet, which is not measured in the spray dryer by default. This extended model was then successfully used to predict whether specific settings were suitable for producing glassy trehalose and inulin by spray drying. In conclusion, a spray dryer model was developed that is able to predict the output parameters of the spray drying process. The model can aid the development of spray dried pharmaceutical products by shifting from a trial-and-error towards a quality-by-design approach.
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics | 2018
Ari Kauppinen; Joep Broekhuis; Niels Grasmeijer; Wouter F. Tonnis; Jarkko Ketolainen; Henderik W. Frijlink; Wouter L. J. Hinrichs
Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available. Abstract To evaluate the feasibility of producing solid dispersions with 3‐fluid nozzle spray drying to improve the dissolution behavior of lipophilic drugs, 60 experiments were performed based on a Design of Experiment. Solid dispersions with mannitol as a hydrophilic matrix and diazepam as a model drug with a drug load of 20 wt‐% were produced. The variables of the experiments were the water/organic solvent ratio, liquid feed flow, total solid content, atomizing airflow and type of organic solvent (ethanol or ethyl acetate). The responses measured were dissolution rate, yield, actual drug load, particle size and crystallinity of diazepam and mannitol. Increasing water/organic solvent ratio was found to be the main factor for enhancing the dissolution rate. The total solid content of the solutions to be spray dried did not affect any of the responses, which means that processing solutions of high concentrations is possible. The choice of organic solvent did not affect the responses as well, i.e. both the fully water miscible solvent ethanol and the poorly water miscible solvent ethyl acetate could be used which makes this production method highly versatile.
PLOS ONE | 2018
Katie Amssoms; Philip A. Born; Max Beugeling; Ben De Clerck; Ellen Van Gulck; Wouter L. J. Hinrichs; Henderik W. Frijlink; Niels Grasmeijer; Guenter Kraus; Roger Sutmuller; Kenny Simmen; Lieven Baert
A single-injection vaccine formulation that provides for both a prime and a boost immunization would have various advantages over a multiple-injection regime. For such a vaccine formulation, it is essential that the booster dose is released after a certain, preferably adjustable, lag time. In this study we investigated whether a core-shell based implant, containing ovalbumin as core material and poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) of various monomer ratios as shell material can be used to obtain such a booster release. An in vitro release study showed that the lag time after which the ovalbumin was released from the core-shell implant increased with increasing lactic to glycolic acid ratio of the polymer and ranged from 3–6 weeks. Fluorescence spectroscopy showed minimal differences between native ovalbumin and ovalbumin from core-shell implants that were incubated until just before the observed in vitro release. In addition, mice immunized with a subcutaneous inserted core-shell implant containing ovalbumin showed an ovalbumin-specific IgG1 antibody response after a lag time of 4 or 6–8 weeks. Moreover, delayed release of ovalbumin caused higher IgG1 antibody titers than conventional subcutaneous vaccination with ovalbumin dissolved in PBS. Collectively, these findings could contribute to the further development of a single-injection vaccine, making multiple injections of the vaccine superfluous.
International Journal of Pharmaceutics | 2018
Max Beugeling; Niels Grasmeijer; Philip A. Born; Merel van der Meulen; Renée S. van der Kooij; Kevin Schwengle; Lieven Baert; Katie Amssoms; Henderik W. Frijlink; Wouter L. J. Hinrichs
Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available. ABSTRACT Successful immunization often requires a primer, and after a certain lag time, a booster administration of the antigen. To improve the vaccinees’ comfort and compliance, a single‐injection vaccine formulation with a biphasic pulsatile release would be preferable. Previous work has shown that such a release profile can be obtained with compacts prepared from physical mixtures of various poly(dl‐lactic(‐co‐glycolic) acid) types (Murakami et al., 2000). However, the mechanism behind this release profile is not fully understood. In the present study, the mechanism that leads to this biphasic pulsatile release was investigated by studying the effect of the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the polymer, the temperature of compaction, the compression force, the temperature of the release medium, and the molecular weight of the incorporated drug on the release behavior. Compaction resulted in a porous compact. Once immersed into release medium with a temperature above the Tg of the polymer, the drug was released by diffusion through the pores. Simultaneously, the polymer underwent a transition from the glassy state into the rubbery state. The pores were gradually closed by viscous flow of the polymer and further release was inhibited. After a certain period of time, the polymer matrix ruptured, possibly due to a build‐up in osmotic pressure, resulting in a pulsatile release of the remaining amount of drug. The compression force and the molecular weight of the incorporated drug did not influence the release profile. Understanding this mechanism could contribute to further develop single‐injection vaccines.
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences | 2009
Hans de Waard; Niels Grasmeijer; Wouter L. J. Hinrichs; Anko C. Eissens; Peter P.F. Pfaffenbach; Henderik W. Frijlink
Current Pharmaceutical Design | 2015
Floris Grasmeijer; Niels Grasmeijer; Paul Hagedoorn; Henderik W. Frijlink; Anne H. de Boer
Journal of Aerosol Science | 2016
Niels Grasmeijer; Henderik W. Frijlink; Wouter L. J. Hinrichs
Journal of Aerosol Science | 2016
Niels Grasmeijer; Henderik W. Frijlink; Wouter L. J. Hinrichs
Archive | 2016
Henderik W. Frijlink; Niels Grasmeijer; Wouter L. J. Hinrichs; Katie Amssoms; Lieven Baert