Nikhil Tandon
AIIMS, New Delhi
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nikhil Tandon.
Social Science & Medicine | 2012
Emily Mendenhall; Roopa Shivashankar; Nikhil Tandon; Mohammed K. Ali; K.M. Venkat Narayan; Dorairaj Prabhakaran
Type 2 diabetes has escalated in urban India in the past two decades. Historically a disease of the affluent, recent epidemiological evidence indicates rising diabetes incidence and prevalence in urban Indias middle class and working poor. Although there is substantial qualitative data about people with diabetes from high-income countries, scant resources provide insight into diabetes experiences among those in India, and lower-income groups specifically. In this article, we use individual-level analysis of illness narratives to understand how people experience and understand diabetes across income groups in Delhi, India. We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews and administered the Hopkins Symptoms Check-List (HSCL-25) to evaluate depression among 59 people with diabetes in northeast Delhi between December 2011 and February 2012. We analyzed their responses to: 1) what caused your diabetes?; 2) what do you find most stressful in your daily life?; and 3) where do you seek diabetes care? We found few people held diabetes beliefs that were congruent with socio-spiritual or biomedical explanatory models, and higher income participants commonly cited tension as a contributor to diabetes. Stress associated with childrens futures, financial security, and family dynamics were most commonly reported, but how these subjective stresses were realized in peoples lives varied across income groups. Depression was most common among the poorest income group (55%) but was also reported among middle- (38%) and high-income (29%) participants. One-quarter of respondents reported diabetes distress, but only those from the low-income community reported co-occurring depression and these respondents often revealed poor access to diabetes care. These data suggest that lower-income populations not only have higher rates of depression but also may be more likely to delay health care and therefore develop diabetes complications. This research has many implications for public health care in India as diabetes prevalence shifts to affect lower income groups who concurrently experience higher rates of depression and poorer access to medical care.
Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2014
Ariacherry C Ammini; Nikhil Tandon; Nandita Gupta; Ashu Seith Bhalla; Kandaswamy Devasenaspathy; Guresh Kumar; Jaiprakash P Sahoo; Sachin Chittawar; Jim Philip; Manas P Baruah; Cs Dwarakanath; Sudhir Tripathi
Background: There is little published literature on the profile of patients with Cushings syndrome (CS) from India. The aim of this study was to compile data of CS patients treated at this hospital. Materials and Methods: Patients referred to the endocrine services of this hospital for diagnosis/treatment of CS from January 1985 to July 2012 were the subjects for this study. All patients had detailed medical history, physical examination and biochemical and hormonal assays (which changed with availability of tests and changing views). Assays for plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) (late 90s), salivary cortisol estimation, IJV sampling for ACTH and corticotrophin releasing hormone stimulation tests were added on later. Imaging included computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (since the late 80s) and 68Ga DOTA-TOC/FDG PET-CT (2008). Results: Three hundred sixty-four patients (250 females, 114 males, age 6 months to 65 years, mean 28 years + 12 years) were diagnosed to have CS during this period. Two hundred and ninety-three patients (80.5%) were ACTH dependent (CD 215, ectopic ACTH syndrome 22, occult ACTH source 56) while 71 (19.5%) were ACTH independent (adrenal carcinoma 36, adenoma 30, primary pigmented nodular adrenal disease 4, AIMAH 1). Pituitary macro adenoma was seen in 14% of the CD cases. The most common presenting complaints were hypertension and diabetes mellitus. A total of 63% patients complained of weight gain while 15% had lost weight. Myopathy, infections, skeletal fractures and psychiatric problems were the other common observations in our patients. Conclusion: The clinical spectrum was broad. CD was the most common cause for CS.
Anthropology & Medicine | 2016
Emily Mendenhall; H. Stowe McMurry; Roopa Shivashankar; K.M. Venkat Narayan; Nikhil Tandon; Dorairaj Prabhakaran
ABSTRACT The Type 2 diabetes epidemic in India poses challenges to the health system. Yet little is known about how urban Indians view treatment and self-care. Such views are important within the pluralistic healthcare landscape of India, bringing together allopathic and non-allopathic (or traditional) paradigms and practices. We used in-depth qualitative interviews to examine how people living with diabetes in India selectively engage with allopathic and non-allopathic Indian care paradigms. We propose a ‘discourse marketplace’ model that demonstrates competing ways in which people frame diabetes care-seeking in Indias medical pluralism, which includes allopathic and traditional systems of care. Four major domains emerged from grounded theory analysis: (1) normalization of diabetes in social interactions; (2) stigma; (3) stress; and (4) decision-making with regard to diabetes treatment. We found that participants selectively engaged with aspects of allopathic and non-allopathic Indian illness paradigms to build personalized illness meanings and care plans that served psychological, physical, and social needs. Participants constructed illness narratives that emphasized the social-communal experience of diabetes and, as a result, reported less stigma and stress due to diabetes. These data suggest that the pro-social construction of diabetes in India is both helpful and harmful for patients – it provides psychological comfort, but also lessens the impetus for prevention and self-care. Clarifying the social constructions of diabetes and chronic disease in India and other medically pluralistic contexts is a crucial first step to designing locally situated treatment schemes.
Indian Pediatrics | 2017
Raman K. Marwaha; Mk Garg; Kuntal Bhadra; Namita Mahalle; Ambrish Mithal; Nikhil Tandon
ObjectiveTo prepare percentile charts of lean body mass (LBM) among Indian urban children and adolescents; and to evaluate gender differences in LBM, and its relation with pubertal status.DesignSecondary data analysis.SettingSchool in city of Delhi, India.Participants1403 apparently healthy children and adolescents (826 boys) with mean (SD) age 13.2 (2.7) years.Outcome measuresLean body mass assessed by dual energy absorptiometry.ResultsTotal and regional lean mass were greater in older age groups in both sexes. LBM showed rising trends up to the age of 18 years in boys, whereas it plateaued after the age of 15 years in girls. The age-associated increase in LBM was significantly higher in boys (130%) compared to girls (83%) (P<0.001). Total and regional lean mass increased with progression of pubertal staging in both genders. During pubertal development, LBM almost doubled (100% increase) from stage-2 to stage-5 in boys, as opposed to a 73% rise in girls (P<0.001). Total and regional lean mass and Appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) was positively correlated with age, body mass index (BMI), serum 25(OH)D, total fat mass, and bone mineral content (BMC). Relation between LBM and BMC remained significant even after adjusting for age, fat mass and various biochemical parameters.ConclusionTotal and regional LBM rise with age and pubertal maturation in both genders, but more so in boys when compared to girls. LBM has direct bearing on BMC even after adjusting for age, fat mass and biochemical parameters.
The National Medical Journal of India | 2003
Nikhil Tandon; R. K. Marwaha; S. Kalra; Nandita Gupta; A. Dudha; Narayana Kochupillai
Archive | 2017
Mohammed K. Ali; Karen R. Siegel; Eeshwar K. Chandrasekar; Nikhil Tandon; Pablo Aschner Montoya; Jean Claude Mbanya; Juliana Chan; Ping Zhang; K.M. Venkat Narayan
Global heart | 2018
A. Garg; Roopa Shivashankar; K.S. Vora; Mohammed K. Ali; Viswanathan Mohan; Deepa Mohan; Muhammad Masood Kadir; Nikhil Tandon; K.M. Venkat Narayan; Dorairaj Prabhakaran
Global heart | 2018
S.G. Yoo; Kalpana Singh; Roopa Shivashankar; Mark D. Huffman; Muhammad Masood Kadir; Mohammed K. Ali; Viswanathan Mohan; K. Narayan; Nikhil Tandon; Dorairaj Prabhakaran
World Congress on Clinical Trials in Diabetes | 2016
Devraj Jindal; Dilip Jha; Priti Gupta; Ajay S. Vamadevan; Ambuj Roy; Vidya Venugopal; David Prieto-Merino; Pablo Perel; Nikhil Tandon; Vikram Patel; Dorairaj Prabhakaran
Archive | 2016
Rajesh Khadgawat; Nikhil Tandon; Vishwanath S; Sudipto Saha; Sunil Chumber