Nikolaos Ziras

A multicenter phase III trial comparing irinotecan-gemcitabine (IG) with gemcitabine (G) monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

Our purpose was to determine the response rate and median and overall survival of gemcitabine as monotherapy versus gemcitabine plus irinotecan in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma who were chemotherapy and radiotherapy naive were enrolled. Patients were centrally randomised at a one-to-one ratio to receive either gemcitabine monotherapy (900 mg m−2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (arm G), or gemcitabine (days 1 and 8) plus irinotecan (300 mg m−2 on day 8) (arm IG), repeated every 3 weeks. The total number of cycles administered was 255 in the IG arm and 245 in the G arm; the median number of cycles was 3. In all, 145 patients (71 in arm IG and 74 in arm G) were enrolled; 60 and 70 patients from arms IG and G, respectively, were evaluable. A complete clinical response was achieved in three (4.3%) arm G patients; nine (15%) patients in arm IG and four (5.7%) in arm G achieved a partial response. The overall response rate was: arm IG 15% and arm G 10% (95% CI 5.96–24.04 and 95% CI 2.97–17.03, respectively; P=0.387). The median time to tumour progression was 2.8 months and 2.9 months and median survival time was 6.4 and 6.5 months for the IG and G arms, respectively. One-year survival was 24.3% for the IG arm and 21.8% for the G arm. No statistically significant difference was observed comparing gemcitabine monotherapy versus gemcitabine plus irinotecan in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, with respect to overall and 1-year survival.

Oxaliplatin for Pretreated Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Phase II Study

A phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Eighteen patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 i.v. every 21 days. Patients were treated until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. No objective response was observed among the 18 treated patients. Three (16.7%) patients had stable disease for > 2 months. A clinical benefit response was observed in five (27.7%) patients. Toxicity was mild. Oxaliplatin as second-line treatment for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer is well tolerated and associated with improvement of tumor-related symptoms despite its failure to induce objective responses. LOHP merits further investigation in combination with other drugs as palliative treatment of pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Six versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with dose-dense chemotherapy for women with HER2-positive breast cancer: a multicenter randomized study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

BACKGROUND Adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy improves survival of women with HER2-positive early breast cancer. In this study, we compared 12 versus 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS Axillary node-positive or high-risk node-negative women with HER2-positive early breast cancer were randomized to receive 12 or 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab concurrently with dose-dense, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-supported docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) every 14 days for four cycles). All patients received upfront dose-dense, G-CSF-supported FEC (5-fluorouracil 700 mg/m(2), epirubicin 75 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 700 mg/m(2) every 14 days for four cycles). Randomization was carried out before commence of chemotherapy. The primary end point was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS A total of 481 patients were randomized to receive 12 months (n = 241) or 6 months (n = 240) of adjuvant trastuzumab. Chemotherapy was completed in 99% and 98% of patients, while trastuzumab therapy in 100% and 96% of patients in the 12- and 6-month groups, respectively. After 47 and 51 months of median follow-up, there were 17 (7.1%) and 28 (11.7%) disease relapses in the 12- and 6-month groups (P = 0.08). The 3-year DFS was 95.7% versus 93.3% in favor of the 12-month treatment group (hazard ratio = 1.57; 95% confidence interval 0.86-2.10; P = 0.137). There was no difference in terms of overall survival and cardiac toxicity between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study failed to show noninferiority for the 6-month arm. The results further support the current standard of care that is administration of adjuvant trastuzumab for 12 months.

Randomized phase III trial comparing docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine combinations as front-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer (ABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Previously untreated patients with ABC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) plus epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) (DE) on day 1 or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus capecitabine 950 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-14 (DC) in 21-day cycles. Previous anthracycline-based (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if completed >1 year before enrollment. The primary objective of the study was to compare time to disease progression (TTP). RESULTS One hundred and thirty-six women were treated on each arm and median TTP was 10.6 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.7), for DE and DC, respectively. According to RECIST criteria we observed 15 (11%) versus 11 (8%) complete responses and 55 (40%) versus 61 (45%) partial responses (P = 0.8), with DE and DC, respectively. Severe toxicity included grade 3-4 neutropenia (57% versus 46%; P = 0.07), febrile neutropenia (11% versus 8%; P = 0.4), hand-foot syndrome (0% versus 4%; P = 0.02), grade 2-3 anemia (20% versus 7%; P = 0.001) and asthenia (12% versus 6%; P = 0.09) with DE and DC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The DE and DC regimens have similar efficacy but different toxicity. Either regimen can be used as front-line treatment of ABC.

Oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in inoperable biliary tract carcinoma: a multicenter phase II study.

Background: A multicenter phase II study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract. Patients and Methods: Twenty-nine chemo-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract carcinoma received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 i.v. every 21 days. Patients were treated until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: An objective response (3 complete responses, 3 partial responses) was achieved in 6 patients (20.6%, 95% CI 5.95–35.4). Disease control (complete response, partial response and stable disease) was observed in 14 patients (48.2%). The median time to tumor progression was 3 months (range 0.7–39) and the median overall survival was 7 months (range 1–39). The 1-year survival rate was 32%. Toxicity was mild. Conclusion: Oxaliplatin is an active agent against biliary tract carcinoma and therefore should be further investigated in combination with other cytotoxic drugs.

KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations in Greek and Romanian patients with colorectal cancer: a cohort study

Objectives Treatment decision-making in colorectal cancer is often guided by tumour tissue molecular analysis. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a high-resolution melting (HRM) method for the detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations in Greek and Romanian patients with colorectal cancer and determination of the frequency of these mutations in the respective populations. Setting Diagnostic molecular laboratory located in Athens, Greece. Participants 2425 patients with colorectal cancer participated in the study. Primary and secondary outcome measures 2071 patients with colorectal cancer (1699 of Greek and 372 of Romanian origin) were analysed for KRAS exon 2 mutations. In addition, 354 tumours from consecutive patients (196 Greek and 161 Romanian) were subjected to full KRAS (exons 2, 3 and 4), NRAS (exons 2, 3 and 4) and BRAF (exon 15) analysis. KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation detection was performed by a newly designed HRM analysis protocol, followed by Sanger sequencing. Results KRAS exon 2 mutations (codons 12/13) were detected in 702 of the 1699 Greek patients with colorectal carcinoma analysed (41.3%) and in 39.2% (146/372) of the Romanian patients. Among the 354 patients who were subjected to full KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis, 40.96% had KRAS exon 2 mutations (codons 12/13). Among the KRAS exon 2 wild-type patients 15.31% harboured additional RAS mutations and 12.44% BRAF mutations. The newly designed HRM method used showed a higher sensitivity compared with the sequencing method. Conclusions The HRM method developed was shown to be a reliable method for KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation detection. Furthermore, no difference in the mutation frequency of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF was observed between Greek and Romanian patients with colorectal cancer.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin (GEMOX) as Second-Line Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients Pretreated with 5-Fluorouracil plus Irinotecan

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the gemcitabine/oxaliplatin (GEMOX) combination as second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) pretreated with an irinotecan (CPT-11)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) regimen. Patients and Methods: Patients with documented disease progression during or after first-line treatment with CPT-11 and 5-FU/LV were enrolled. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2 day 1) were administered every 3 weeks. Results: Partialresponses were observed in 6 of the 34 (17.7%) patients enrolled (intention-to-treat analysis; overall response rate: 17.7%; 95% confidence interval 4.8–30.5%). Eight (23.5%) patients experienced disease stabilization and 20 (59%) disease progression (tumor growth control rate = 41.2%). The median duration of response was 5.5 months, and the median time to tumor progression 2.7 months. The median overall survival was 9.1 months (1-year survival rate: 44.0%). Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 and 15% of the patients, respectively. Other severe non-hematologic toxicities were rare. Conclusion: The interesting tumor growth control rate and the favorable toxicity profile of the GEMOX regimen in pretreated patients with advanced CRC strongly suggest that this regimen may provide an alternative therapeutic option for this group of patients.

A multicenter phase II trial with irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment for inoperable/metastatic cancer of the biliary tract.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) as first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed nonresectable biliary adenocarcinoma were treated with oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) and irinotecan (200 mg/m2) every 3 weeks.Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled between May 2005 and March 2009. The overall objective response rate was 17.9% with an additional 21.4% of patients with stable disease (disease control rate 39.3%). The median overall survival time was 9.2 months (95% CI 5.8–12.5) and the median progression-free survival time 2.7 months (95% CI 2.2–3.2). Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 1 (3.6%) and 4 (14.3%) patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia in 3 (10.7%). Grade 3–4 diarrhea was observed in 2 (7.1%) patients and grade 3 asthenia in 1 (6%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: The combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan has a modest antitumor activity with manageable toxicity as first-line treatment in metastatic cancer of the biliary tract and therefore it cannot be recommended as front-line treatment for unresectable biliary tract cancer.

Docetaxel plus gemcitabine as front-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with lung adenocarcinomas: A multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND The docetaxel/gemcitabine (DG) combination is an active and well-tolerated regimen against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A phase II study was conducted in order to evaluate its efficacy in elderly patients with lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS Chemotherapy-naive patients, aged > or =70 years, with locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinomas and performance status (PS) < or =2 (ECOG) received gemcitabine 1100 mg/m(2) (days 1+8) and docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) (day 8) with rhG-CSF support. RESULTS Seventy-seven patients were enrolled. One (1.3%) complete and 23 (29.9%) partial responses were achieved (intention to treat analysis: ORR 31.2%; 95% CI 20.82-41.51%) whereas tumor growth control was achieved in 53.3% of patients. The median TTP was 4.1 months, the median overall survival 9.4 months and the 1- and 2-year survival rate 37.9% and 10.7%, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 18.2% and febrile neutropenia in 3 (3.9%) patients. Non-haematological toxicity was mild with grade 2-3 asthenia occurring in 22.1% patients. CONCLUSIONS The DG regimen is an active and well-tolerated front-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with lung adenocarcinomas and merits further evaluation in prospective randomized trials.

Dose-dense FEC followed by Docetaxel versus Docetaxel plus Cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with HER2-negative, axillary lymph node-positive early breast cancer: A multicenter randomized study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

BACKGROUND Sequential administration of anthracycline and taxane is the current standard of care adjuvant regimen for node-positive early breast cancer. Due to long-term toxicity concerns, anthracycline-free regimens have been developed. We compared a sequential dose-dense anthracycline and taxane regimen with the anthracycline-free regimen of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized, non-inferiority, phase III trial, women with HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and at least one positive axillary lymph node were randomized to receive either epirubicin (75 mg/m(2)), 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks for four cycles, followed by four cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks with prophylactic G-CSF support (FEC → D) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) every 21 days for six cycles (TC). The primary end point of the study was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate. RESULTS Six hundred and fifty women were randomized to either FEC → D (n = 326) or TC (n = 324). After a median follow-up of 46 and 47 months, the 3-year DFS rate was 89.5% and 91.1% for the FEC → D and TC arm, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.147, 95% confidence interval 0.716-1.839, P = 0.568). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was higher in the TC arm (32.4% versus 10.5%, P = 0.0001). The incidence of neutropenic fever was low (<1%). Nausea, vomiting, hand-foot syndrome and fatigue (grade 3-4) were more common with FEC → D. Acute cardiotoxicity was rare (1 event in each group). There were no toxic deaths. CONCLUSIONS This trial did not clearly demonstrate that TC is non-inferior to dose-dense FEC → D. However, 3-year DFS rates were excellent in both arms for women with node-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NCT01985724.