Nikolas Tsavaris

A comparative study of intraperitoneal carboplatin versus intravenous carboplatin with intravenous cyclophosphamide in both arms as initial chemotherapy for stage III ovarian cancer.

Cisplatin (C) or carboplatin (CBP) plus cyclophosphamide (CTX) was until recently considered standard chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Attempts to maximize platinum and its analog activity against OC include its administration directly into the peritoneal cavity. In the past we have shown that intraperitoneal (IP) CBP administration is a safe and effective treatment for OC [Polyzos et al: Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1990;31: 1120]. In the present study we aimed to compare the effectiveness and toxicity of CBP administration either intravenously (IV) or IP plus CTX IV. Since 1990, 90 evaluable patients with stage III OC were prospectively randomized to receive CBP 350 mg/m2 IV or IP plus CTX 600 mg/m2 IV (in both groups) every 3–4 weeks for six courses. The randomization incorporated stratification according to performance status and the amount of residual tumor (maximum diameter ≤2 or >2 cm). Clinical assessment was performed with abdominal CT and serum CA-125. Responses were observed in 33/46 = 72% (95/CI 56.5–84.0) of the IV group and in 33/44 = 75% (95/CI 59.7–86.8) of the IP group with 48 and 45% clinical complete responses, respectively. Times to progression were 19 months (8–62+) for the IV group and 18 (6–72+) for the IP group. Median survivals were: 25 months (6–80+) and 26 months (6–72+), respectively. Significantly more patients in the IV group than in the IP group had grade 3 or higher leukopenia (p < 0.01) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia (p < 0.09). Morbidity due to infectious complications in the IP group was minimal. It seems that IP CBP is equally effective to IV administration in terms of response and survival with less myelotoxicity. The favorable results on survival demonstrated in studies with IP C administration in patients with small volume disease [Alberts et al: N Engl J Med 1996;335:1950–1965] could not be repeated in the present study applying CBP in patients with variable tumor size and a relatively small number of patients. The likelihood that patients with large volume disease would benefit from a regional approach compared to systemic administration is small and this explains the inability to detect a difference between the two arms.

Weekly Gemcitabine for the Treatment of Biliary Tract and Gallbladder Cancer

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly administration of gemcitabine treatment in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced biliary tract and gallbladder cancer. Patients and methods: Gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m2 was administered weekly as a 30-min infusion to patients with previously operated, histologically confirmed, metastatic, or unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Results: A total of 30 patients (median age 66 years; range 54–72 years) were included in the study. A median of 14 (range, 4–33) weekly doses was administered. Out of 30 patients evaluable for response, nine partial responses were observed (30.0%), while a further 11 patients demonstrated stable disease (36.7%). The median time to disease progression was 7 months (range, 5–34). Overall response rate was superior in patients with cancer of the gallbladder (ORR=35.7%) compared with those patients with biliary duct cancer (ORR=27.3%). This correlated to a significantly longer time to progression of 6.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6–7.1 months) versus 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.9–4.3 months; p=0.03) and a significantly better overall survival of 17.1 months (95% CI, 15.8–18.5 months) versus 11.4 months (95% CI, 10.2–12.6 months, p=0.021). Toxicities were generally mild with only one case of grade 3 neutropenia. There were no cases of febrile neutropenia and no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Weekly administration of gemcitabine provides a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for chemotherapy naïve patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma, particularly with a gallbladder origin.

Clinical Features of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Oxaliplatin: A 10-Year Experience

Background: Oxaliplatin has become one of the major cytotoxic agents for the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors. As a result, several cases of the so-called oxaliplatin-associated hypersensitivity reaction have been documented. Patients and Methods: We have retrospectively evaluated and characterized these reactions in our patient group by reviewing the files of 1,224 patients exposed to an oxaliplatin-containing regimen in order to provide useful clinical information for diagnosis and management. Results: Three hundred and eight (308) patients who have never been exposed to platinum compounds developed symptoms compatible with a reaction to oxaliplatin that was verified by manifestation of at least similar symptoms on rechallenging. The reactions occurred after the first 5 courses, with a median course number of 9 (range 1–24). These reactions could be distinguished as (1) mild reactions occurring in 195 (63%) patients manifesting with itching and small area erythema either during treatment or within the next hours, and (2) severe reactions occurring in 113 (37%) patients within minutes of drug infusion manifesting with diffuse erythroderma, facial swelling, chest tightness, bronchospasm and changes in blood pressure. Oxaliplatin withdrawal was not required in patients with a mild reaction. Forty-eight (42%) patients having a severe reaction with appropriate premedication and prolongation of the infusion duration could tolerate 2–4 subsequent courses. For the remaining 65 (58%) patients, oxaliplatin withdrawal was inevitable because of the very severe reactions occurring on rechallenging. In addition, 3 patients presented with thrombocytopenia and 3 others with hemolytic anemia, all reversible upon oxaliplatin discontinuation. Conclusions: Hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin are underestimated. Although the reactions are not frequent during first courses, in extensively pretreated patients, they may become a serious problem. In the majority of patients, drug discontinuation might not be necessary. In patients manifesting a severe reaction, re-exposure to oxaliplatin should be considered only if the patient can tolerate the reaction and there has been clinical benefit from this therapy. Physicians and nursing staff should be aware of the risk and be well prepared.

Digital gangrene and Raynaud's phenomenon as complications of lung adenocarcinoma.

Her2/neu positivity in pancreatic cancer. Proc 2004 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium; abstr 134. 71 Safran H, Ramanathan RK, Schwartz J, et al. Herceptin and gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancers that overexpress her2/neu. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001; abstr 517. 72 Waterhouse DM, Rinehart J, Adjei AA, et al. A phase 2 study of an oral MEK inhibitor CI-1040 in patients with advanced non-small cell, breast, colon or pancreatic cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003; abstr 816. 73 Johnston SRD. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors: a novel targeted therapy for cancer. Lancet Oncol 2001; 2: 18–26. 74 Cohen SJ, Ho L, Ranganathan S, et al. Phase II and pharmacodynamic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 as initial therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1301–06. 75 Van Cutsem E, Karasek P, Oettle H, et al. Phase III trial comparing gemcitabine + R115777 (Zarnestra) versus gemcitabine + placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; abstr 517. 76 Ito H, Gardner-Thorpe J, Zinner MJ, et al. Inhibition of tyrosine kinase SRC suppresses pancreatic cancer invasiveness. Surgery 2003; 134: 221–26. 77 Yezhelev M, Wagner C, Kohl G, et al. In vivo and in vitro effects of a novel Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor on human pancreatic cancer in a nude mouse model. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 2003; abstr 1718.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Patients with Advanced Colon Carcinoma Relapsing after 5-Fluorouracil-Leucovorin Combination

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association between performance status (PS) and mean dose of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with recurrent advanced colorectal cancer relapsing after 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin chemotherapy. Patients who had completed their last chemotherapy course with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for at least 6 weeks and progressed were included. Based on PS, we administered a starting dose of 250 mg/m2 in patients with a PS 70–80 (group A), and 350 mg/m2 for those with a PS > 80 (group B). Of a total of 90 treated patients, all were evaluable, 18 had a partial response (PR) (20%), 39 stable disease (43%), and 15 progressed (37%). No significant difference was noticed between patients with PS ≧ 90 or ≤ 80 (p = 0.925), or between those who received a mean dose of CPT-11 ≧300 or ≤300 (p = 0.602), for response, survival and time to progression. Toxicity was increased in group B as expected, with significant differences for acute cholinergic syndrome (p = 0.02), diarrhea after the first 24 h (p = 0.03) and severe diarrhea (p = 0.03). According to these results, we conclude that response to CPT-11 is independent of its dose, and that a dose of 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks might be a cost-effective and less toxic alternative in this setting. However, further adequately powered phase II or III randomized studies might be required in order to confirm this observation.

Survival in patients with stage IV noncardia gastric cancer - the influence of DNA ploidy and Helicobacter Pylori infection

BackgroundPalliative surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy is a challenging approach in the treatment of stage IV gastric cancer yet patients must be carefully selected on the basis of likely clinical benefit.MethodsThe records of 218 patients with histological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent palliative surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve potential prognostic variables including tumour DNA index and serum IgG anti- Helicobacter pylori (HP) antibodies were evaluated for their influence on overall survival by multivariate analysis.ResultsThe median survival was 13.25 months [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 12.00, 14.50]. Three factors were found to have an independent effect on survival: performance status (PS) [PS 60–70 vs. 90–100 Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.676; CI 1.171-2.398, p = 0.005], liver metastases (HR 1.745; CI 1.318-2.310, p < 0.001), and DNA Index as assessed by Image cytometry (2.2-3.6 vs. >3.6 HR 3.059; CI 2.185-4.283, p < 0.001 and <2.2 vs. >3.6 HR; 4.207 CI 2.751-6.433 <0.001). HP infection had no statistically significant effect on survival by either univariate or multivariate analysis.ConclusionPoor pre-treatment PS, the presence of liver metastasis and high DNA Index were identified factors associated with adverse survival outcome in patients with Stage IV gastric cancer treated with palliative gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy. HP infection had no influence on survival of these patients.

Isolated Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis (Carcinomatous Meningitis) after Taxane-Induced Major Remission in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer

Objectives: To identify the incidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC), as the first site of systemic progression, in breast cancer patients after having obtained a major response (CR or near CR) to first-line taxane-based chemotherapy and compare these findings in retrospect with a matched-pair group of historical control patients from our database treated with nontaxane regimens. Patients and Methods: Patients with histologically proven breast cancer having either metastatic disease or high-risk locoregional disease that were entered into treatment protocols with first-line taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) plus anthracyclines or mitoxantrone combinations and developed LMC as the first evidence of progression after major response (CR or >80% PR) were analyzed in the present study (n = 155), and compared, as regards the incidence of LMC, to a matched-pair retrospective group of 155 patients treated with nontaxane regimens in our unit. Results: Seven patients with a median age of 54 years (range 40–70) developed LMC as their first evidence of progression after taxane-based regimens with a median interval of 6 months (range 2–18) from start of treatment to diagnosis of LMC. Five patients received intrathecal (i.t.) methotrexate treatment and whole brain radiotherapy (RT), while 1 patient received i.t. methotrexate and RT to the lumbar spine. Two patients responded to treatment for LMC, while 2 achieved stable disease and 3 progressed. Two patients had elevated cerebrospinal fluid tumor markers (more than serum marker levels) that proved useful in monitoring response to treatment. Median survival after LMC was 3.6 months (range 1–17+) and correlated positively to the interval from the initiation of taxane-based therapy to LMC (r = 0.84, p = 0.019). Seven out of 86 responders (8.13%) in the taxane group versus 1 out of 72 responders (1.4%) in the non-taxane-treated group developed LMC as the first sign of progression after a major response to first-line chemotherapy (p < 0.1). Conclusions: LMC after a major response to front-line taxane-based regimens represents a grave disease manifestation and its incidence appears increased, but not significantly so, when compared retrospectively to non-taxane-treated patients. Prospective evaluation of the incidence of LMC after taxane versus non-taxane-based treatment from large randomized multi-institutional trials is warranted and identification of potential prognostic factors might help to identify patients requiring appropriate prophylactic therapy.

A feasibility study of 1-h paclitaxel infusion in patients with solid tumors.

Abstract The optimal schedule for paclitaxel administration has not yet been determined. This phase I/II study was carried out to evaluate the safety of paclitaxel administration by 1-h infusion in the outpatient setting. A total of 43 patients with advanced pretreated malignancies (18 breast, 18 ovarian, and 7 non-small-cell lung cancers) received at least 2 cycles of paclitaxel given at 175 mg/m2 in a single dose by 1-h i. v. infusion. This protocol was repeated every 21 days. All patients were premedicated as follows: promethazine given i. m. at 50 mg, dexamethasone given at 16 mg in 250 ml normal saline by i. v. infusion for 20 min and ranitidine given i. v. at 50 mg in 250 ml normal saline over 15 min, all premedication being carried out 1 h before the paclitaxel infusion. In a total of 156 cycles, only 1 patient presented with a hypersensitivity reaction (grade 2 urticaria in 1 cycle) and another patient developed transient facial flushing (in 1 cycle; this was resolved by slowing of the infusion rate) on this schedule of paclitaxel administration. Other adverse side effects were usually mild and well tolerated. Alopecia was universal; myelosuppression was uncommon because our patients were supported with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, lenograstim) given at 34 IU/day in the presence of a neutrophil count of <500 μl; neutropenia was seen in 50/156 (32%) cycles and was mild. Neurotoxicity was the most serious adverse effect, and all patients experienced mild to severe neuromuscular toxicity, mainly in the form of peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy and myalgias. In conclusion, 1-h paclitaxel administration is safe and reduces the duration of treatment, making its use more convenient and easy in the outpatient setting. A prospective comparison of 1-h versus 3-h paclitaxel infusion in terms of efficacy and toxicity is the subject of our current randomized study.

Chemotherapy ± Cetuximab Modulates Peripheral Immune Responses in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Objective: To identify changes in peripheral immune responses in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (IFL) alone or in combination with cetuximab (C-IFL). Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from healthy donors (n = 20) and patients with mCRC receiving treatment with either IFL (n = 30) or C-IFL (n = 30) were tested for cytokine production upon polyclonal stimulation with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, T cell proliferation in the autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction (auto-MLR) and T regulatory cell (Treg) frequency. The respective results were evaluated over two treatment cycles and further assessed in relation to response to treatment. Results: PBMCs prior to treatment exhibited significantly lower production of IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-12 and IL-18 cytokines and lower auto-MLR responses, whereas Treg frequency, IL-4, IL-10 cytokines were increased compared to healthy donors. During treatment, IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-18 and auto-MLR responses increased, while Treg frequency and IL-10 secretion decreased significantly compared to the baseline. Responders to treatment exhibited a significantly higher increase in IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-12 and IL-18 production and auto-MLR responses, and higher decrease in IL-4, IL-10 secretion and Treg frequency. Among all patient subgroups analysed, responders to C-IFL demonstrated significantly higher increase in auto-MLR responses, IL-12 and IL-18 secretion and higher decrease in Treg frequency. Conclusion: The disturbed immune parameters observed in patients with mCRC at presentation can be significantly improved during treatment with IFL and this effect can be potentiated by the addition of cetuximab. Monitoring of the peripheral immune system function could be used as surrogate marker in predicting treatment-related outcome.

Factors Influencing Survival in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: The Influence of DNA Ploidy

Objective. To evaluate the prognostic significance of microscopically assessed DNA ploidy and other clinical and laboratory parameters in stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods. 541 patients with histologically proven stage IV CRC treated with palliative chemotherapy at our institution were included in this retrospective analysis, and 9 variables (gender, age, performance status, carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 19-9, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), anaemia, hypoalbuminaemia, and ploidy (DNA Index)) were assessed for their potential relationship to survival. Results. Mean survival time was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.0–13.5). Multivariate analysis revealed that DNA indexes of 2.2–3.6 and >3.6 were associated with 2.94 and 4.98 times higher probability of death, respectively, compared to DNA index <2.2. CRP levels of >15 mg/dL and 5–15 mg/dL were associated with 2.52 and 1.72 times higher risk of death, respectively. Hazard ratios ranged from 1.29 in patients mild anaemia (Hb 12–13.5 g/dL) to 1.88 in patients with severe anaemia (Hb < 8.5 g/dL). Similarly, the presence of hypoalbuminaemia (albumin < 5 g/dL) was found to confer 1.41 times inferior survival capability. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that patients with stage IV CRC with low ploidy score and CRP levels, absent or mild anaemia, and normal albumin levels might derive greatest benefit from palliative chemotherapy.