Ninni Sernert

Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up.

Background The aim of the study was to compare the results after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using central-third bone—patellar tendon—bone (BTB) autografts and triple/quadruple semitendinosus (ST) autografts. Hypothesis In the long-term, ACL reconstruction using BTB autografts will render more donor-site problems than ST autografts. Study Design Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods A randomized series of 71 patients (22 women and 49 men) with a unilateral ACL rupture who underwent reconstructive surgery were included in the study. The BTB graft was used in 34 patients (BTB group) and the ST-tendon graft was used in 37 patients (ST group). The patients were examined a median of 86 months (range, 68 to 114 months) after the reconstruction. Results Sixty-eight of 71 patients (96%) were examined at follow-up. The clinical assessments at follow-up revealed no significant differences between the BTB group and the ST group in terms of the Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation system, 1-legged hop test, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, manual Lachman test, and range of motion. A significant improvement was seen in both groups compared with the preoperative values in terms of most clinical assessments. Donor-site morbidity in the form of knee-walking ability, kneeling ability, and area of disturbed anterior knee sensitivity revealed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion Seven years after ACL reconstruction, the subjective and objective outcomes were similar after using the central-third BTB autograft and triple/quadruple ST autograft. Furthermore, no difference in terms of donor-site morbidity was found between the 2 groups.

The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register A Report on Baseline Variables and Outcomes of Surgery for Almost 18,000 Patients

Background: The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register provides an opportunity for quality surveillance and research. Purpose: The primary objective was to recognize factors associated with a poorer outcome at an early stage. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Registrations are made using a web-based protocol with 2 parts: a patient-based section with self-reported outcome scores and a surgeon-based section, where factors such as cause of injury, previous surgery, time between injury and reconstruction, graft selection, fixation technique, and concomitant injuries are reported. The self-reported outcome scores are registered preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 5 years. Results: Approximately 90% of all anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions performed annually in Sweden are reported in the register. Registrations during the period 2005-2010 were included (n = 17,794). After excluding multiligament reconstructions and reoperations, the male:female ratio was 57.5:42.5 for both primary (n = 15,387) and revision (n = 964) surgery. The cause of injury was soccer in approximately half the male patients and in one third of the female patients. All subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were significantly improved 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively in patients undergoing primary reconstructions. In terms of the KOOS, revisions did significantly less well than primary reconstructions on all follow-up occasions, and smokers fared significantly less well than nonsmokers both preoperatively and at 2 years. Patients who had concomitant meniscal or chondral injuries at reconstruction did significantly less well preoperatively and at 1 year in terms of most KOOS subscales compared with patients with no such injuries. At 5 years, a significant difference was only found in terms of the sport/recreation subscale. Double-bundle reconstructions revealed no significant differences in terms of all the KOOS subscales at 2 years compared with single-bundle reconstructions (114 double-bundle vs 5109 single-bundle). During a 5-year period, 9.1% (contralateral, 5.0%; revision, 4.1%) of the patients underwent a contralateral ACL reconstruction or revision reconstruction of the index knee. The corresponding figure for 15- to 18-year-old female soccer players was 22.0%. Conclusion: Primary ACL reconstruction significantly improves all the subscales of the KOOS. Young female soccer players run a major risk of reinjuring their ACL or injuring the contralateral ACL; revision ACL reconstructions do less well than primary reconstructions, and smokers do less well than nonsmokers.

Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients.

Abstract This study included 527 patients (178 female and 349 male) with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and interference screw fixation. The follow-up examination was performed by independent observers at a median of 38 (21–68) months after the index operation. At the follow-up, the Lysholm score was 86 (14–100) points, the Lysholm instability subscore was 22 (0–25) points and the Lysholm pain subscore was 19 (0–25) points. The Tegner activity level was 6 (1–10). The one-leg-hop test was 91 (0–167)% of the non-injured knee. The difference in the anterior side-to-side laxity as measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer at 89 Newton (N) was 1.5 (–5–13) mm and the total KT-1000 side-to-side difference at 89 N was 2 (–7–11) mm. Using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation system, 177 (33.6%) patients were classified as normal (group A), 211 (40%) as nearly normal (group B), 109 (20.7%) as abnormal (group C) and 30 (5.7%) as severely abnormal (group D). The highest correlation coefficients were recorded between the IKDC evaluation system and the Lysholm score (ρ = 0.66), the patients’ subjective evaluation (ρ = 0.53), the Tegner activity level (ρ = 0.34), all the laxity tests (ρ≥ 0.34) and the one-leg-hop test (ρ = 0.28). The resumption of sporting activities and work as evaluated by the Tegner activity level correlated with the patients’ subjective evaluation (ρ = 0.34) but did not correlate with the laxity tests, i.e., the manual Lachman test (ρ = –0.06) and the total and anterior KT-1000 tests (ρ = –0.06). Furthermore, none of the laxity tests correlated with the functional tests or the patients’ subjective evaluation. We conclude that the IKDC evaluation system is a reliable and useful tool for evaluating the post-operative outcome after an ACL reconstruction.

Osteoarthritic Changes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone or Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Retrospective, 7-Year Radiographic and Clinical Follow-up Study

PURPOSE This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term radiographic appearance and clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by use of either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring tendon (HT) autografts and to evaluate how associated meniscal injuries affect the prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS ACL reconstruction was performed in 124 consecutive patients. Of these patients, 113 (91%) (72 BPTB and 41 HT) returned for a follow-up examination at a median of 86 months (range, 67 to 111 months) after reconstruction. The patients underwent standard weight-bearing radiographic examinations and clinical evaluation. RESULTS The radiographic assessments showed no significant differences between the graft types in terms of OA classified according to the Ahlbäck and Fairbank rating systems. Overall, 23% of the patients had degenerative changes according to the Ahlbäck system, and 74% had degenerative changes according to the Fairbank system. Associated meniscal injuries increased the prevalence of OA. Clinically, no significant differences were found between the graft types in terms of the Tegner activity test, 1-leg hop test, International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation system, disturbed area of sensitivity, manual Lachman test, KT-1000 laxity test (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), and knee-walking test. The Lysholm score (P = .02) and knee-walking ability (P = .02) were significantly better in the HT group. CONCLUSIONS At a median of 7 years after ACL reconstruction with either BPTB or HT autografts, the prevalence of OA as seen on standard weight-bearing radiographs and the clinical outcome were comparable. The presence of meniscal injuries increased the prevalence of OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic, retrospective comparative study.

Comparison of Traditional and Subcutaneous Patellar Tendon Harvest A Prospective Study of Donor Site-Related Problems After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Different Graft Harvesting Techniques

Our goal was to compare the results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either the traditional one-incision or the subcutaneous two-incision technique to harvest the central third of the patellar tendon, particularly concerning disturbances in anterior knee sensitivity and the patients ability to walk on his or her knees. One surgeon performed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on 124 patients with unilateral ruptures and no history of previous incisions in the anterior knee region. The traditional one-incision graft harvesting technique was used in 58 patients and the subcutaneous two-incision technique was used in 66 patients. At 2 years, the International Knee Documentation Committee classification, Lysholm score, arthrometry side-to-side difference, and single-legged hop test showed no significant differences between groups. The area of insensitivity was a median of 24 cm2 in the traditional harvest group and 0 cm2 in the subcutaneous harvest group. The patients with subcutaneous harvest had a tendency toward fewer problems during walking on their knees than did the patients with traditional harvest. Our conclusion is that the subcutaneous two-incision graft harvesting technique caused less disturbance in anterior knee sensitivity and a tendency of less discomfort during walking on ones knees than the traditional one-incision technique.

Arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization using absorbable implants. A clinical and radiographic comparison of two methods.

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results in patients with recurrent unidirectional, post-traumatic shoulder instability (dislocations/subluxations). All the patients had a Bankart lesion and underwent reconstruction using either an open or an arthroscopic technique and absorbable implants. Thirty-three consecutive patients (36 shoulders) were operated on by one surgeon. Group A comprised 18 shoulders which underwent an open Bankart reconstruction using absorbable 3.7-mm TAG suture anchors. Group B comprised 18 shoulders which underwent a combination of an intra- and extra-articular arthroscopic stabilization using 8-mm Suretac fixators. The median number of dislocations before the reconstruction was 5 (0–45) in group A and 4 (0–30) in group B (NS). The follow-up examination was performed by an independent observer after a median of 31 (range 25–38) months in group A and 28 (range 18–46) months in group B (NS). An independent radiologist without any knowledge of the surgical procedure evaluated all the radiographs. There were no re-dislocations in either group. In group A, the Rowe and Constant scores were 86 (range 61–98) and 89 (range 73–99), respectively. The corresponding values in group B were 92 (range 83– 98; P = 0.05) and 96 (range 75– 100; NS). The external rotation in abduction was 65° (range 20°–90°) in group A and 83° (range 65°–105°) in group B (P = 0.0017). The radiographs revealed that 10/18 (56%) in group A and 4/18 (23%) in group B had visible drill-holes or cystic formations in conjunction with the drill-holes (P = 0.002). In this study the open procedure resulted in a restriction in external rotation more frequently than the arthroscopic procedure. The radiographs revealed visible drill-holes or cystic formations in conjunction with the drill-holes more frequently when TAG suture anchors were used than when Suretac fixators were used. The radiographic changes did, not appear to affect the clinical outcome, however.

Is bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction necessary? A 2-year follow-up of 78 consecutive patients rehabilitated with or without a brace.

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a standard postoperative rehabilitation knee brace on function, stability and postoperative complications at the 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery. Seventy-eight consecutive patients with a unilateral chronic ACL rupture reconstructed by the same surgeon using the endoscopic “all-inside” technique, patellar tendon autograft and interference screw fixation were included in the study. The rehabilitation followed a standard protocol. Group A included 39 patients who were supplied postoperatively with a knee brace for 4 (range 3–6) weeks. Group B included 39 patients for whom a brace was not used. The median age was 27 (range 16–48) years in group A and 26 (range 14–51) years in group B. The median time period between the injury and the index operation was 24 (range 3–150) months in group A and 18 (range 3–360) months in group B. All 78 patients were re-examined by two independent observers after a median follow-up period of 25 (range 23–28) months in group A and 24 (range 22– 27) months in group B. The median KT-1000 total side-to-side difference between the reconstructed and the uninjured knees at 89 N was 3 (range –5.5–11) mm in group A and 3 (range –7–10) mm in group B (NS). When the anterior translation was tested separately at 89 N, the corresponding values were 3 (range –4–13) mm in group A and 3 (range –5–10) mm in group B (NS). The median one-leg hop quotient was 95% (range 50%–167%) of the uninjured leg in group A and 92% (range 64%–119%) in group B (NS). The median Lysholm score was 89 (range 39–100) points in group A and 85 (range 37–100) points in group B (NS). In group A, 27/39 (69%) patients and in group B 21/39 (54%) patients were classified as excellent or good (NS). The median Tegner activity level was 7 (range 3–9) in group A and 6 (range 3–9) in group B (NS). Using the IKDC scale, 27/39 (69%) in group A and 24/39 (62%) in group B were classified as normal or nearly normal (NS). The median sick leave in group A was 62 (range 0–357) days and 59 (range 0–243) days in group B (NS). No serious complications occurred during the first 6 postoperative weeks. Two serious complications were, however, registered after the 6th postoperative week. One patient in group A sustained a rupture of the reconstructed ACL 8 weeks postoperatively (3 weeks after removing the brace), and one patient in group B sustained an undislocated patellar fracture during the 7th postoperative week after a fall. This study indicates that the use of a postoperative rehabilitation brace after an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction did not appear to influence either objective stability or subjective function by the 2-year follow-up.

A prospective comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in female patients.

The aim of the study is to compare the results after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using central-third, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB group) (n=28) and four-strand semitendinosus/gracilis (ST/G group) (n=31) autografts in female patients. The type of study was non-randomised prospective consecutive series. A consecutive series of 61 female patients, all with unilateral ACL ruptures, was included in the study. In both groups, interference screw fixation of the graft was used at both ends, and 59/61 (97%) of the patients returned for the follow-up examination after a period of 26 (23–31) months. The pre-operative assessments in both groups were similar in terms of the Lysholm score, KT−1000 measurements, one-leg-hop test, and knee-walking test. At the 2-year follow-up, the knee-walking test was significantly worse in the BTB group than in the ST/G group (P=0.003). Furthermore, the knee-walking test was significantly worse at follow-up than pre-operatively in the BTB group (P<0.005). The corresponding finding was not made in the ST/G group. A reduction in knee laxity compared with the pre-operative assessments was found in both groups. No significant difference in the post-operative knee laxity measurement was found between the groups. A significant increase in activity level and subjective scores was found in both groups compared with pre-operative values, without any significant differences between the groups. Two years after ACL reconstruction, the groups displayed no significant differences in terms of functional outcome and knee laxity. However, the use of ST/G autografts rendered significantly less discomfort during the knee-walking test than the use of BTB autografts.

Biodegradable and Metallic Interference Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Using Hamstring Tendon Grafts Prospective Randomized Study of Radiographic Results and Clinical Outcome

Background The use of biodegradable screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has grown in popularity. Purpose To compare the clinical and radiographic results in arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 4-strand hamstring tendon grafts and either metallic (metal group) or biodegradable (PLLA group) interference screw fixation. Study Design Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods A randomized series of 77 patients, all with a unilateral anterior cruciate ligament rupture, was included in the study. The preoperative assessments in both groups were similar in gender, Tegner activity level, Lysholm score, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, and single-legged hop test results. In both groups, interference screw fixation of the graft was used at both ends, and 68 of 77 (88%) patients returned for a radiographic examination at 6 and 24 months, respectively. Results At follow-up, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, Tegner activity level, or Lysholm score. The PLLA group had a significantly better outcome in the single-legged hop test and the final International Knee Documentation Committee classification (P=. 007 and P=. 03,respectively). At 6 and 24 months after the index operation, the PLLA group displayed significantly larger drill holes on the radiographs than did the metal group on both the tibial (8.1 vs 6.6 mm at 6 months [P=.0007]; 6.0 vs 3.2 mm at 24 months [.0001]) and femoral sides (7.8 vs 5.6 mm at 6 months [P <.0001]; 6.3 vs 1.9 mm at 24 months [P <.0001]). Conclusion There were significantly larger radiographically visible drill holes on both the tibial and femoral sides in the PLLA group compared with the metal group at 6 and 24 months. Clinical examination at 2 years revealed no major differences between the groups. The larger drill holes in the PLLA group did not correlate with inferior clinical results.

Revisiting the Open Bankart Experience A Four- to Nine-Year Follow-up

Background The open Bankart technique for posttraumatic recurrent anterior instability has become the procedure of choice for patients who do not respond to nonoperative treatment. Hypothesis The open Bankart procedure renders stable and well-functioning shoulders in the long term in a large proportion of patients. Study Design Retrospective follow-up study with independent reexaminers. Methods Fifty-four patients (54 shoulders) with symptomatic, posttraumatic, recurrent anterior shoulder instability underwent an open Bankart reconstruction procedure with suture anchors. All of the patients had a Bankart lesion. Forty-seven patients (87%) were reexamined by independent observers at a mean follow-up period of 69 months (range, 48 to 114). Results The recurrence rate, including both dislocations and subluxations, was 17% (8 of 47). The median Rowe score was 90 points (range, 24 to 100) at the follow-up, and the median Constant score was 88.5 points (range, 41 to 100). External rotation in abduction was a median of 90° (range, 25° to 125°) in the involved shoulders, as compared with 97.5° (80° to 125°) in the noninjured shoulders (P < 0.0001). Conclusions We conclude that, in the long term, the open Bankart procedure resulted in an unexpectedly high number of patients with failure in terms of stability. These results emphasize the importance of performing long-term follow-up studies after surgical reconstruction for unidirectional, posttraumatic, anterior shoulder instability using any type of technique.