Nirmala Bhoo Pathy

Breast cancer in a multi-ethnic Asian setting: Results from the Singapore–Malaysia hospital-based breast cancer registry

Two hospital-based breast cancer databases (University Malaya Medical Center, Malaysia [n = 1513] and National University Hospital, Singapore [n = 2545]) were merged into a regional registry of breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2007. A review of the data found 51% of patients diagnosed before the age of 50 years. and 72% percent of the women were Chinese followed by Malays (16%), Indians (8%), and other races (4%). Median tumor size at presentation was 26 mm and about 25% of patients presented with TNM stage III or IV disease. Most tumors were of ductal histology (87%). Fifty-seven percent of tumors were estrogen receptor positive and 40% were poorly differentiated. Of those patients who had surgery, 70% had mastectomy while 30% had breast conserving surgery. Overall, chemotherapy was administered to 56% of patients and hormonal treatment to 60%. Five-year overall survival was 82.5% in patients with TNM stage 0 to stage II cancer, and 30.2% in those with later stages.

The Estrogen Receptor Negative-Progesterone Receptor Positive Breast Carcinoma is a Biological Entity and not a Technical Artifact

The ER-/PR+ breast tumor may be the result of a false ER negative result. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in patient and tumor characteristics of the ER-/PR+ phenotype in an Asian setting. A total of 2629 breast cancer patients were categorized on the basis of their age, ethnicity, tumor hormonal receptor phenotype, grade and histological type. There were 1230 (46.8%) ER+/PR+, 306 (11.6%) ER+/PR-, 122 (4.6%) ER-/PR+ and 972 (37%) ER-/PR-. ER-/PR+ tumors were 2.5 times more likely to be younger than 50 years at diagnosis (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.72-3.67). Compared to ER+/PR+ tumors, the ER-/ PR+ phenotype was twice more likely to be associated with grade 3 tumors (OR:2.02; 95%CI: 1.00-4.10). In contrast, compared to ER-/PR- tumors, the ER-/PR+ phenotype was 90% less likely to be associated with a grade 3 tumor (OR: 0.12; 95%CI:0.05-0.26), and more likely to have invasive lobular than invasive ductal histology (OR: 3.66; 95%CI: 1.47-9.11). These results show that the ER-/PR+ phenotype occurs in a younger age group and is associated with intermediate histopathological characteristics compared to ER+/PR+ and ER-/PR- tumors. This may imply that it is a distinct entity and not a technical artifact.

Prognostic value of axillary lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results from a multicentre study

BACKGROUND The prognostic value of lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is not straightforward. We evaluated whether lymph node involvement is associated with overall survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and whether Lymph Node Ratio (LNR--ratio of the positive to excised axillary lymph nodes) is a superior prognosticator when compared to ypN status (according to the pTNM classification). METHODS Three hundred and fourteen patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Geneva, Singapore or Kuala Lumpur were pooled for analysis. We evaluate the prognostic value of the LNR [zero, low (>0 and <0.2), intermediate (0.2-0.65) and high risk (>0.65)] and ypN staging [ypN0, ypN1, ypN2 and ypN3] with multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS When using the LNR classification, 88 patients were categorised as zero, 91 as low, 82 as intermediate and 53 as high risk. For classic ypN staging, 88 were ypN0, 126 ypN1, 58 ypN2 and 42 ypN3. Compared to the low risk category, LNR zero corresponded to an adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj] of 0.4 (95%CI, 0.2-0.9), intermediate risk LNR to a HRadj of 1.2 (0.7-2.2) and high risk LNR to a HRadj of 2.7 (1.5-5.0). Similarly, the ypN0 category corresponded to a HRadj of 0.3 (0.2-0.7), ypN2 to a HRadj 1.1 (0.6-2.0) and ypN3 to a HRadj 2.2 (1.3-3.8) compared to ypN1 patients. CONCLUSION Lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts overall survival. In patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, LNR does not seem to be superior to classic ypN staging.

Do Clinical Features and Survival of Single Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancers Differ from Double Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancers

The significance of the single hormone receptor positive phenotype of breast cancer is still poorly understood. The use of hormone therapy has been found to be less effective for this type, which has a survival outcome midway between double positive and double negative phenotypes. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in patient and tumor characteristics and survival between double-receptor positive (ER+PR+), double receptor negative (ER-PR-) and single receptor positive (ER+PR- and ER-PR+) breast cancer in an Asian setting. A total of 1,992 patients with newly diagnosed stage I to IV breast cancer between 2003 and 2008, and where information on ER and PR were available, were included in this study. The majority of patients had ER+PR+ tumors (n=903: 45.3%), followed by 741 (37.2%) ER-PR-, 247 (12.4%) ER+PR-, and 101 (5.1%) ER-PR+ tumors. Using multivariate analysis, ER+PR- tumors were 2.4 times more likely to be grade 3 compared to ER+PR+ tumors. ER+PR- and ER-PR+ tumors were 82% and 86% respectively less likely to be grade 3 compared with ER-PR- tumors. ER-PR+ tumours were associated with younger age. There were no survival differences between patients with ER+PR+ and ER-PR+ tumors. However, ER+PR- tumors have poorer survival compared with ER+PR+ tumours. ER-PR- tumours had the worst survival. Adjuvant hormonal therapy with tamoxifen was found to have identical survival advantage in patients with ER+PR+ and ER-PR+ tumors whereas impact was slightly lower in patients with ER+PR- tumors. In conclusion, we found ER+PR- tumors to be more aggressive and have poorer survival when compared to ER+PR+ tumors, while patients with ER-PR+ tumours were younger, but had a similar survival to their counterparts with ER+PR+ tumours.

Gradually implemented new biomarkers for prognostication of breast cancer: complete case analysis may introduce bias.

OBJECTIVE Many recent studies investigated the prognostic value of new biomarkers in breast cancer using data from cancer registries. Some of these studies were conducted using only patients for whom biomarker status was available (or tested). Using human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as an example, we determined whether testing for a recently introduced biomarker was associated with the outcome of women with breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We included 910 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer in a tertiary academic hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, between 2005 and 2007. Individual 2-year absolute mortality risk was estimated using Cox regression analysis. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between the absolute mortality risk and assessment of HER2 status. RESULTS There was a significant inverted U-shaped association between predicted mortality risk and HER2 status determination. Compared with patients with the lowest predicted mortality risk (quintile 1), patients with highest predicted mortality risk (last quintile) were significantly less likely to be tested for HER2 status, whereas those with intermediate predicted mortality risk (quintile 3) were more likely to be tested. CONCLUSION Breast cancer prognostication using only patients with available biomarker status may lead to invalid results.

Comparing Tea and Coffee Intake in Relation to Breast Cancer Risk

Tea and coffee are the most popular and widely consumed beverages worldwide, rendering them as relevant daily dietary exposures. Breast cancer comprises 23% of all female cancers, making it by far the commonest cancer in women. The idea that tea and coffee intake may be implicated in breast carcinogenesis was coined based on a complex body of scientific evidence. If tea and coffee intake were causally implicated in breast carcinogenesis, they would have a large potential impact on the overall burden of breast cancer around the globe. Epidemiological studies have suggested that green tea consumption may be associated with lower risk of breast cancer and recurrence. Black tea, oolong tea, and coffee intake do not seem to be associated with breast cancer incidence, although evidence to date is still considered inconclusive. Studies investigating the associations between tea and coffee intake and breast cancer should continue by employing cutting-edge methodology to deal with previous challenges in the field.