Nobuhiro Haruki

γ-Secretase Inhibitor Prevents Notch3 Activation and Reduces Proliferation in Human Lung Cancers

Notch receptors are key regulators of development by controlling cell-fate determination in many multicellular organisms. Genes that are important for normal differentiation play a role in cancer when their normal functions became dysregulated. Notch signaling has been shown to promote and maintain survival of many types of cancers, and we previously have shown that Notch3 plays an important role in lung cancer. In this study, we showed that a high percentage of lung cancer lines expressed Jagged1, Notch receptors, and their transcriptional target genes (HES1, Hey1), suggesting that the Notch pathway plays an important role in lung cancer biology. Thus, inhibition of Notch receptor activation represents a compelling treatment strategy. Notch activation requires proteolytic cleavage of the receptor by gamma-secretase protein complex. In this study, we determined the ability of MRK-003, a gamma-secretase inhibitor, to inhibit Notch3 signaling, growth, and apoptosis of lung cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo using mouse xenograft models. We also found that MRK-003 inhibited Notch3 signaling, reduced tumor cell proliferation, inhibited serum independence, and induced apoptosis. This drug had no effect when Notch3 expression was knocked down using small interfering RNA (siRNA), suggesting that the observed effects were mediated by specific action on this receptor. In conclusion, these results support the hypothesis that inhibition of Notch activation using a gamma-secretase inhibitor represents a potential new approach for the targeted therapy of lung cancer.

Dominant-negative notch3 receptor inhibits mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and the growth of human lung cancers

Notch3 is a member of an evolutionarily conserved family of cell surface receptors important in cell-fate determination in both vertebrates and invertebrates. Significant data support the role of Notch pathway in cancer development, although the conflicting role of Notch signaling pathways in tumorigenesis suggests that its action is highly context-dependent. Furthermore, although Notch receptors signal primarily through the regulation of hairy enhancer of split (HES) and HES-related (HRT) genes, they are known to crosstalk with other signaling pathways, including the epidermal growth factor (EGF) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Whereas much is known about the role of Notch1 in human cancer, the role of Notch3 in epithelial tumors, such as lung carcinomas, has not been well established. In this study, we show that Notch3 is expressed in 80 of 207 (39%) resected human lung tumors and that its expression is positively correlated with EGF receptor expression. Inhibition of the Notch3 pathway using a dominant-negative receptor dramatically reduces growth in soft agar and increases growth factor dependence. We also find that Notch inhibition increases sensitivity to EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition and decrease in phosphorylation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase. These observations support a role for Notch3 signaling in lung cancer, and one potential mechanism of maintaining the neoplastic phenotype is through the modulation of the EGF pathway.

Identification of frequent impairment of the mitotic checkpoint and molecular analysis of the mitotic checkpoint genes, hsMAD2 and p55CDC, in human lung cancers.

The mitotic checkpoint is thought to be essential for ensuring accurate chromosome segregation by implementing mitotic delay in response to a spindle defect. To date, however, very little data has become available on the defects of the mitotic checkpoint in human cancer cells. In the present study, impaired mitotic checkpoint was found in four (44%) of nine human lung cancer cell lines. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of frequent impairment of the mitotic checkpoint in this leading cause of cancer deaths. As an initial step towards elucidation of the underlying mechanism, we further undertook a search for mutations in a key component of the mitotic checkpoint, known as hsMAD2, and its immediate downstream molecule, p55CDC. No such mutations were found, however, in either 21 lung cancer cell lines or 25 primary lung cancer cases, although we could identify silent polymorphisms and the transcribed and processed hsMAD2 pseudogene that was subsequently mapped at 14q21-q23. The present observations appear to warrant further investigations, such as search for alterations in other components, to better understand the molecular pathogenesis of this fatal disease, and warn against potential misinterpretation when performing mutational analyses for other cancer types based on cDNA templates.

Molecular analysis of the mitotic checkpoint genes BUB1, BUBR1 and BUB3 in human lung cancers

Our previous studies showed that mitotic checkpoint impairment is present in about 40% of human lung cancer cell lines but that mutations in the MAD mitotic checkpoint genes are infrequent. In the present study, we examined 44 lung cancer cases for the potential involvement of the other gene family involved in the mitotic checkpoint, i.e. BUB. We found that the BUB gene family members including BUB1, BUBR1 and BUB3 are not frequent targets for mitotic checkpoint defects in lung cancers, if present at all. Further studies are thus warranted to elucidate the molecular basis for the acquisition of mitotic checkpoint defects in order to better understand the molecular pathogenesis of lung cancers.

Search for in vivo somatic mutations in the mitotic checkpoint gene, hMAD1, in human lung cancers

We previously reported the presence of mitotic checkpoint impairment in about 40% of lung cancer cell lines. To gain an insight into the molecular basis of this impairment, we examined 49 lung cancer specimens for alterations in the hMAD1 mitotic checkpoint gene and identified a somatic, non-conservative missense mutation, which substitutes alanine (GCG) for threonine (ACG) at codon 299, together with a number of amino acid substituting, single nucleotide polymorphisms. This is the first demonstration of hMAD1 mutation in any type of human cancers. The present finding marks hMAD1 as a potential target, although with low frequency, for genetic alterations in lung cancer. Thus, further studies of hMAD1 dysfunction caused by other mechanisms appear to be warranted, as well as potential involvement of other components of the mitotic checkpoint.

Persistent Increase in Chromosome Instability in Lung Cancer : Possible Indirect Involvement of p53 Inactivation

Karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses have demonstrated the frequent presence of an altered static state of the number of chromosomes (ie, aneuploidy) in lung cancer, but it has not been directly established whether aneuploidy is in fact associated with a persistent increase in the rate of chromosomal losses and gains (ie, chromosome instability, or CIN). The study presented here used a panel of 10 lung cancer cell lines to provide for the first time direct evidence that CIN is a common feature in lung cancer cell lines in association with the presence of significant aneuploidy. In addition, we found that the CIN phenotype correlates well with the presence of p53 mutations. However, human papilloma virus 16-E6-directed inactivation of p53 in a representative non-CIN lung cancer cell line did not result in the induction of CIN, at least up to the 25th generation, suggesting that inactivation of p53 itself is unlikely to directly induce CIN in lung cancer cells. Interestingly, however, significant CIN could be induced in conjunction with the generation of aneuploid populations when the mitotic spindle formation was transiently abrogated in p53-inactivated cells. These results suggest that inactivation of p53 may allow lung cancer cells to go through an inappropriate second division cycle under certain forms of mitotic stresses, which would result in the induction of the CIN phenotype in conjunction with the generation of aneuploidy.

Expression of human telomerase subunit genes in primary lung cancer and its clinical significance

BACKGROUND Three major components of human telomerase, RNA component (hTERC), telomerase-associated protein (TEP1), and catalytic subunit (hTERT) have been cloned recently. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of these genes and to search for clinical usefulness. METHODS Expression of these genes was evaluated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in 92 human lung cancers and in 32 non-neoplastic lung tissues. In 15 patients, both telomerase activity by telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay and expression were evaluated. RESULTS hTERT expression was best associated with telomerase activity with a concordance of 77%. In 92 lung cancer tissues, hTERC, TEP1, and hTERT were expressed in 100%, 93%, and 89%, respectively. Whereas most adjacent non-neoplastic lung tissues expressed hTERC and TEP1 (94% and 100%, respectively), hTERT was detected in only 1 of 32 normal lungs. However, there was no relationship between hTERT expression and clinicopathologic features. CONCLUSIONS hTERT expression can be a surrogate for telomerase activity that may serve as a novel biomarker of lung cancer with high specificity and sensitivity.

Frequent allelic imbalance suggests involvement of a tumor suppressor gene at 1p36 in the pathogenesis of human lung cancers

The short arm of chromosome 1 is among the most frequently affected regions in various types of common adult cancers as well as in neuroblastoma. In a previous study of ours, frequent allelic imbalance at the TP73 locus at 1p36 was noted in lung cancer despite the absence of TP73 mutations. This suggested the possible existence of an as yet unidentified tumor suppressor gene on 1p. Our initial attempt using the candidate gene approach did not yield any somatic mutations in the 14‐3‐3σ gene (official gene symbol, SFN), a mediator of G2 arrest by TP53. Detailed deletion mapping of the telomeric region of 1p was thus carried out as an initial step toward positional cloning. We used seven polymorphic markers in addition to TP73 to examine 61 primary lung cancers. Allelic imbalance at one or more loci of 1p36 was observed in 30 of the 61 cases, whereas D1S508 at 1p36.2 exhibited the highest frequency (45%) of allelic imbalance among the 1p36 markers examined. In contrast, two proximal markers at 1p32–34 showed significantly less frequent (11–14%) allelic imbalance. Consequently, the present study identified the shortest region of overlap between D1S507 and TP73, which included the most frequently affected marker, D1S508. In addition, several cases exhibited allelic imbalance confined to a subtelomeric region distal to D1S2845 at 1p36.3. The present findings warrant future studies to identify the putative tumor suppressor gene(s) at 1p36 to gain a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 28:342–346, 2000.

Cloned fusion product from a rare t(15;19)(q13.2;p13.1) inhibit S phase in vitro

Background: Somatically acquired chromosomal translocation is a common mechanism of oncogene activation in many haematopoietic tumours and sarcomas. However, very few recurrent chromosomal translocations have been reported in more common epithelial tumours such as lung carcinomas. Methods: We established a cell line HCC2429 from an aggressive, metastatic lung cancer arising in a young, non-smoking woman, demonstrating a t(15;19)(q13.2;p13.1). The breakpoints on chromosomes 15 and 19 were cloned using long distance inverse PCR and we determined by RT-PCR that the translocation results in a novel fusion transcript in which the 3′ end Brd4 on chromosome 19p is fused to the 5′ end of NUT on chromosome 15q. Results: In total, 128 lung cancer tissues were screened using fluorescent in situ hybridisation, but none of the tumours screened demonstrated t(15;19), suggesting that this translocation is not commonly found in lung cancer. Consistent with previous literature, ectopic expression of wild type Brd4 was shown to inhibit G1 to S progression. However, we also found that the Brd4-NUT fusion augments the inhibition of progression to S phase compared with wild type Brd4. Conclusion: Alteration in cell cycle kinetics is important in tumorigenesis, although the exact role of Brd4-NUT fusion protein in the pathogenesis of lung cancers remains unclear and need to be further elucidated.

Aberrant nuclear localization of β-catenin without genetic alterations in β-catenin or Axin genes in esophageal cancer

Backgroundβ-catenin is a multifunctional protein involved in two apparently independent processes: cell-cell adhesion and signal transduction. β-catenin is involved in Wnt signaling pathway that regulates cellular differentiation and proliferation. In this study, we investigated the expression pattern of β-catenin and cyclin D1 using immunohistochemistry and searched for mutations in exon 3 of the β-catenin gene and Axin gene in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Materials and methodsSamples were obtained from 50 esophageal cancer patients. Immunohistochemical staining for β-catenin and cyclin D1 was done. Mutational analyses of the exon3 of the β-catenin gene and Axin gene were performed on tumors with nuclear β-catenin expression.ResultsFour (8%) esophageal cancer tissues showed high nuclear β-catenin staining. Overexpression of cyclin D1 was observed in 27 out of 50 (54%) patients. All four cases that showed nuclear β-catenin staining overexpressed cyclin D1. No relationship was observed between the expression pattern of β-catenin and cyclin D1 and age, sex, tumor size, stage, differentiation grade, lymph node metastasis, response to chemotherapy, or survival. No mutational change was found in β-catenin exon 3 in the four cases with nuclear β-catenin staining. Sequencing analysis of the Axin cDNA revealed only a splicing variant (108 bp deletion, position 2302–2409) which was present in the paired normal mucosa.ConclusionA fraction of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas have abnormal nuclear accumulation of β-catenin accompanied with increased cyclin D1 expression. Mutations in β-catenin or axin genes are not responsible for this abnormal localization of β-catenin.