Nobuki Hayashi

Administration of IL-33 induces airway hyperresponsiveness and goblet cell hyperplasia in the lungs in the absence of adaptive immune system

Systemic administration of IL-18 induces polyclonal IgE responses by causing NKT cells to express CD40 ligand and to produce IL-4. Administration of IL-33 also induces IgE response, although the mechanism underlying IgE response is unclear. Here, we compared the effects of IL-18 and IL-33 on bone marrow-derived mast cells and basophils as well as non-polarized and T(h)2-polarized CD4(+) T cells in vitro. Basophils, comprising IL-18Ralpha(+) cells (14.2%) and IL-33Ralpha(+) cells (34.6%), and mast cells, comprising IL-18Ralpha(+) cells (2.0%) and IL-33Ralpha(+) cells (95.6%), produce IL-4, IL-6, IL-13, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and chemokines (RANTES, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta and MCP-1), upon stimulation with IL-18 and/or IL-33 in the presence of IL-3. Only basophils strongly produce IL-4. Furthermore, compared with mast cells, basophils produce larger amounts of the above cytokines and chemokines in response to IL-33. Level of IL-33Rbeta-mRNA expression in basophils is higher than that in mast cells. Effect of IL-33 is dependent on ST2 binding, and its signal is transduced via MyD88 in vitro. We also found that IL-2 plus IL-18 or IL-33 alone stimulates non-polarized or T(h)2-polarized CD4(+) T cells to produce IL-4 and IL-13 or IL-5 and IL-13, respectively. We finally showed that administration of IL-33 into mice ST2/MyD88 dependently induces airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and goblet cell hyperplasia by induction of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 in the lungs. Furthermore, same treatment of RAG-2(-/-) mice, lacking T and B cells, more strikingly induced AHR with marked goblet cell hyperplasia and eosinophilic infiltration in the lungs. Thus, IL-33 induces asthma-like symptom entirely independent of acquired immune system.

Critical Roles of Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88-Dependent Proinflammatory Cytokine Release in Early Phase Clearance of Listeria monocytogenes in Mice

Listeria monocytogenes (LM), a facultative intracellular Gram-positive bacterium, often causes lethal infection of the host. In this study we investigated the molecular mechanism underlying LM eradication in the early phase of infection. Upon infection with LM, both IL-12 and IL-18 were produced, and then they synergistically induced IFN-γ production, leading to normal LM clearance in the host. IFN-γ knockout (KO) mice were highly susceptible to LM infection. IL-12/IL-18 double knockout mice were also highly susceptible. Their susceptibility was less than that of IFN-γ KO mice, but more than that of single IL-12 or IL-18 KO mice. Mice deficient in myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), an essential adaptor molecule used by signal transduction pathways of all members of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family, showed an inability to produce IL-12 and IFN-γ following LM infection and were most susceptible to LM. Furthermore, MyD88-deficient, but not IFN-γ-deficient, Kupffer cells could not produce TNF-α in response to LM in vitro, indicating the importance of MyD88-dependent TNF-α production for host defense. As TLR2 KO, but not TLR4 KO, mice showed partial impairment in their capacity to produce IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, TLR2 activation partly contributed to the induction of IL-12-mediated IFN-γ production. These results indicated a critical role for TLRs/MyD88-dependent IL-12/TNF-α production and for IL-12- and IL-18-mediated IFN-γ production in early phase clearance of LM.

Caspase-1-Independent, Fas/Fas Ligand–Mediated IL-18 Secretion from Macrophages Causes Acute Liver Injury in Mice

IL-18, produced as a biologically inactive precursor, is processed by caspase-1 in LPS-activated macrophages. Here, we investigated caspase-1-independent processing of IL-18 in Fas ligand (FasL)-stimulated macrophages and its involvement in liver injury. Administration of Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) upregulated functional Fas expression on macrophages in an IFNgamma-dependent manner, and these macrophages became competent to secrete mature IL-18 upon stimulation with FasL. This was also the case for caspase-1-deficient mice. Administration of recombinant soluble FasL (rFasL) after P. acnes priming induced comparable elevation of serum IL-18 in parallel with elevated serum liver enzyme levels. However, liver injury was not induced in IL-18-deficient mice after rFasL administration. These results indicate a caspase-1-independent pathway of IL-18 secretion from FasL-stimulated macrophages and its critical involvement in FasL-induced liver injury.

Interleukin 18 Acts on Memory T Helper Cells Type 1 to Induce Airway Inflammation and Hyperresponsiveness in a Naive Host Mouse

Interleukin (IL)-18 was originally regarded to induce T helper cell (Th)1-related cytokines. In general, factors favoring interferon (IFN)-γ production are believed to abolish allergic diseases. Thus, we tested the role of IL-18 in regulation of bronchial asthma. To avoid a background response of host-derived T cells, we administered memory type Th1 or Th2 cells into unsensitized mice and examined their role in induction of bronchial asthma. Administration of antigen (Ag) induced both airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in mice receiving memory Th2 cells. In contrast, the same treatment induced only airway inflammation but not AHR in mice receiving memory Th1 cells. However, these mice developed striking AHR when they were coadministered with IL-18. Furthermore, mice having received IFN-γ–expressing Th1 cells sorted from polarized Th1 cells developed severe airway inflammation and AHR after intranasal administration of Ag and IL-18. Thus, Th1 cells become harmful when they are stimulated with Ag and IL-18. Newly polarized Th1 cells and IFN-γ–expressing Th1 cells, both of which express IL-18 receptor α chain strongly, produce IFN-γ, IL-9, IL-13, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor, tumor necrosis factor α, regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted, and macrophage inflammatory protein 1α upon stimulation with Ag, IL-2, and IL-18 in vitro. Thus, Ag and IL-18 stimulate memory Th1 cells to induce severe airway inflammation and AHR in the naive host.

T helper 1 cells stimulated with ovalbumin and IL-18 induce airway hyperresponsiveness and lung fibrosis by IFN-γ and IL-13 production

We previously reported that ovalbumin (OVA) and IL-18 nasally administered act on memory type T helper (Th)1 cells to induce airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and inflammation, which is characterized by peribronchial infiltration with neutrophils and eosinophils. Here, we report this administration also induces lung fibrosis in an IL-13-dependent manner. Th1 cells secrete several cytokines, including IFN-γ and bronchogenic cytokine IL-13, when stimulated with antigen (Ag) and IL-18. However, IL-13 blockade failed to attenuate AHR, although this treatment inhibited eosinophilic infiltration. To understand the mechanism by which Th1 cells induce AHR after Ag plus IL-18 challenge, we established “passive” and “active” Th1 mice by transferring OVA-specific Th1 cells into naïve BALB/c mice or by immunizing naïve BALB/c mice with OVA/complete Freunds adjuvant, respectively. Administration of Ag and IL-18 induced both types of Th1 mice to develop AHR, airway inflammation, and lung fibrosis. Furthermore, this treatment induced deposition of periostin, a novel component of lung fibrosis. Neutralization of IL-13 or IFN-γ during Ag plus IL-18 challenges inhibited the combination of eosinophilic infiltration, lung fibrosis, and periostin deposition or the combination of neutrophilic infiltration and AHR, respectively. We also found that coadministration of OVA and LPS into Th1 mice induced AHR and airway inflammation via endogenous IL-18. Thus, IL-18 becomes a key target molecule for the development of a therapeutic regimen for the treatment of Th1-cell-induced bronchial asthma.

Nonredundant Roles for CD1d-restricted Natural Killer T Cells and Conventional CD4+ T Cells in the Induction of Immunoglobulin E Antibodies in Response to Interleukin 18 Treatment of Mice

Interleukin (IL)-18 synergizes with IL-12 to promote T helper cell (Th)1 responses. Somewhat paradoxically, IL-18 administration alone strongly induces immunoglobulin (Ig)E production and allergic inflammation, indicating a role for IL-18 in the generation of Th2 responses. The ability of IL-18 to induce IgE is dependent on CD4+ T cells, IL-4, and signal transducer and activator of transcription (stat)6. Here, we show that IL-18 fails to induce IgE both in CD1d−/− mice that lack natural killer T (NKT) cells and in class II−/− mice that lack conventional CD4+ T cells. However, class II−/− mice reconstituted with conventional CD4+ T cells show the capacity to produce IgE in response to IL-18. NKT cells express high levels of IL-18 receptor (R)α chain and produce significant amounts of IL-4, IL-9, and IL-13, and induce CD40 ligand expression in response to IL-2 and IL-18 stimulation in vitro. In contrast, conventional CD4+ T cells express low levels of IL-18Rα and poorly respond to IL-2 and IL-18. Nevertheless, conventional CD4+ T cells are essential for B cell IgE responses after the administration of IL-18. These findings indicate that NKT cells might be the major source of IL-4 in response to IL-18 administration and that conventional CD4+ T cells demonstrate their helper function in the presence of NKT cells.

Induction of allergic inflammation by interleukin‐18 in experimental animal models

Summary:  Interleukin‐18 (IL‐18) has been regarded as a proinflammatory cytokine because of its potent interferon‐γ‐inducing activity. However, mutant mice that release excess amounts of IL‐18 spontaneously develop pruritic chronic dermatitis‐like atopic dermatitis (AD), suggesting the importance of IL‐18 for the development of AD. Intriguingly, depletion of il‐18 but not stat6, an essential transcriptional factor for IL‐4 signaling, rescues the mice from AD, indicating IL‐18‐dependent, T‐helper 2 (Th2) cell‐independent AD. This type of AD is classified as innate‐type allergy in contrast to Th2 cell‐dependent ordinary allergy. Consistent with the previous studies, mice transferred with antigen‐specific Th1 cells exhibit no airway hyperresponsiveness and respiratory eosinophilic inflammation after challenge with antigen alone. However, they suffer from asthma upon challenge with antigen plus IL‐18, with comparable levels of both the alterations as in those transferred with Th2 cells following challenge with antigen. The former type of asthma is categorized as Th1‐associated allergy. Therefore, it is definitely necessary to evaluate whether individual allergic disorders involve either of these IL‐18‐mediated pathways or a Th2‐mediated one.

Antigen challenge leads to in vivo activation and elimination of highly polarized TH1 memory T cells

TH1 memory T cells derived from T cell receptor transgenic mice, in which the T cell antigen receptor is specific for a cytochrome C peptide in association with I-Ek, were transferred into normal B10.A mice and allowed to adopt a resting phenotype. When challenged, 30–60 days after transfer, with i.v. cytochrome C, the transgenic cells rapidly became activated, expressed mRNA for IFNγ, and began to divide. However, after 48 h, the frequency of the cells fell progressively, reaching levels only slightly above the limit of detection by day 8 and thereafter remain depressed for up to 90 days. The remaining cells were anergic as shown by limitation in proliferation and IFNγ production in response to in vitro antigen stimulation. Even if challenged with antigen emulsified in complete Freunds adjuvant, the overall pattern was similar, except that in the draining lymph nodes, the surviving antigen-specific cells were not anergic, although spleen cells were still strikingly anergic. Thus, antigenic challenge of mice possessing resting memory TH1 CD4 T cells leads to the unanticipated loss of most of the specific cells and an apparent depletion rather than enhancement of immunologic memory.

Contribution of IL-18 to eosinophilic airway inflammation induced by immunization and challenge with Staphylococcus aureus proteins

We previously reported that intranasal challenge with ovalbumin (OVA) plus IL-18 induces airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and eosinophilic airway inflammation in mice with OVA-specific T(h)1 cells. These two conditions can be prevented by neutralizing anti-IFN-gamma and anti-IL-13 antibodies, respectively. The mice develop AHR and eosinophilic airway inflammation after challenge with OVA plus LPS instead of IL-18 and endogenous IL-18 is known to be involved. In contrast, IL-18 does not facilitate these changes in mice possessing OVA-specific T(h)2 cells. Here, we investigated whether IL-18 is involved in the development of asthma in mice immunized and challenged with bacterial proteins. Upon intranasal exposure to protein A (SpA) derived from Staphylococcus aureus, mice immunized with SpA exhibited AHR and peribronchial eosinophilic inflammation if IFN-gamma or IL-13 were present, respectively. The CD4(+) T cells from draining lymph nodes (DLNs) of the SpA-immunized and -challenged mice produced a robust IFN-gamma and IL-13 in response to immobilized anti-CD3 antibodies. Treatment with neutralizing anti-IL-18 antibodies prevented asthmatic inflammation concomitant with their impaired potential to express IFN-gamma and IL-13. Furthermore, naive mice that received the CD4(+) T cells from DLNs of SpA-immunized mice developed airway inflammation depending upon the presence of IL-18. Immunodeficient mice that received human PBMCs, which had been stimulated with SpA in vitro, developed dense peribronchial accumulation of human CD4(+) T cells upon SpA challenge. Neutralizing anti-human IL-18 antibodies protected against this airway inflammation. These results suggest the importance of IL-18 for the development of asthmatic inflammation associated with airway exposure to bacterial proteins.

Freshly isolated Langerhans cells negatively regulate naïve T cell activation in response to peptide antigen through cell-to-cell contact

BACKGROUND Epidermal Langerhans cells (LCs) have been believed to function as professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs). However, LC-ablated mice reportedly suffer from severer contact hypersensitivity (CHS) upon cutaneous challenge with hapten than wild-type mice, suggesting LCs as regulators of adaptive immune responses in the skin. OBJECTIVE This study was designed to address the possible regulatory roles of LCs in the balanced primary adaptive immune responses to protein antigens. METHODS LCs were freshly isolated from skin of BALB/c mice (>95% positive for MHC class II). Naïve CD4+ T cells reactive to ovalbumin (OVA) were purified by FACS-sorting from lymph node cells of DO11.10 BALB/c mice, labeled with CSFE, and incubated with OVA peptide in the presence of splenic dendritic cells (DCs) and/or LCs. Cell division frequencies were determined by the degree of serially diluted expressions of CSFE in the individual CD4+ T cells. RESULTS Approximately 70% of them underwent cell division when naïve CD4+ T cells were activated by OVA presented by splenic DCs. In contrast, LCs only very modestly induced their cell division. Furthermore, LCs inhibited the cell division induced by splenic DCs, and this regulatory action was abolished by prevention of their contact to other cells, but not by the treatment with neutralizing antibodies against IL-10 or TGF-beta, well-established regulatory cytokines. CONCLUSION LCs negatively regulate the primary adaptive T cell response, presumably allowing well-controlled immune response in the skin.