Nobuo Toshida

NONFLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCE FOR CATHETER PLACEMENT INTO THE CORONARY SINUS UNDER DIRECT VISION USING A BALLOON-TIPPED CARDIOSCOPE

The right atrial posterior septum, including the coronary sinus (CS) ostium, is an important landmark in radio frequency catheter ablation therapy for supraventricular tachycardia or atrial flutter. The anatomical findings around the CS ostium would be useful to determine a target site or line during catheter ablation. The aim of the study was to test the ability of the imaging catheter to identify structures in the posterior septal area of the right atrium and to evaluate the feasibility of guidance for catheter placement in the CS using a cardiosccpe that we recently developed. In 12 anesthetized dogs, the Cardioscope, consisting of a deflectable 7 Fr fiberoptic endoscope with an inflatable and transparent balloon, was introduced into the right atrium via the femoral vein. The cardioscope was manipulated to observe the right atrial posterior septum. A deflectable electrode catheter was inserted via the jugular vein and positioned in the CS under cardioscopic guidance. In 10 of 12 dogs, the right atrial posterior septum, including the CS ostium, and the tendon of Todaro could be anatomically identified by cardioscopy. It was possible to position an electrode catheter in the CS in all 10 dogs under direct vision without fluoroscopy. But the CS ostium could not be detected in the remaining two dogs, although the cardioscope was placed at as many sites as possible. No complication occurred. The balloon‐tipped cardioscope appears to be useful in observing the right atrial posterior septum and in guiding an electrode catheter into the CS.

Coronary Sinus Pacing Initiates Counterclockwise Atrial Flutter While Pacing From the Low Lateral Right Atrium Initiates Clockwise Atrial Flutter Analysis of Episodes of Direct Initiation of Atrial Flutter

INTRODUCTION Rapid atrial pacing in sinus rhythm may directly induce atrial flutter without provoking intervening atrial fibrillation, or initiate atrial flutter indirectly, by a conversion from an episode of transient atrial fibrillation provoked by rapid atrial pacing. The present study was performed to examine whether or not the direct induction of clockwise or counterclockwise atrial flutter was pacing-site (right or left atrium) dependent. METHODS AND RESULTS We analyzed the mode of direct induction of atrial flutter by rapid atrial pacing. In 46 patients with a history of atrial flutter, rapid atrial pacing with 3 to 20 stimuli (cycle length = 500 - 170 ms) was performed in sinus rhythm to induce atrial flutter from 3 atrial sites, including the high right atrium, the low lateral right atrium, and the proximal coronary sinus, while recording multiple intracardiac electrograms of the atria. Direct induction of atrial flutter by rapid atrial pacing was a rare phenomenon and was documented only 22 times in 15 patients: 3, 11, and 8 times during stimulation, respectively, from the high right atrium, low lateral right atrium, and the proximal coronary sinus. Counterclockwise atrial flutter (12 times) was more frequently induced with stimulation from the proximal coronary sinus than from the low lateral right atrium (8 vs 1, P = .0001); clockwise atrial flutter (10 times) was induced exclusively from the low lateral right atrium (P = .0001 for low lateral right atrium vs proximal coronary sinus, P = .011 for low lateral right atrium vs high right atrium). CONCLUSIONS Direct induction of either counterclockwise or clockwise atrial flutter was definitively pacing-site dependent; low lateral right atrial pacing induced clockwise, while proximal coronary sinus pacing induced counterclockwise atrial flutter. Anatomic correlation between the flutter circuit and the atrial pacing site may play an important role in the inducibility of counterclockwise or clockwise atrial flutter.

NEW DIAGNOSTIC FINDING TO ASSESS PARA-HISIAN PACING OBSERVED IN A PATIENT WITH A PERMANENT FORM OF JUNCTIONAL RECIPROCATING TACHYCARDIA

Morphologic Change During Para‐Hisian Pacing. Para‐Hisian pacing, a useful method to differentiate conduction over an accessory pathway from conduction over the AV node, is assessed essentially by comparing the timing of local atrial electrograms between Hisbundle captured heats and His‐bundle noncaptured heats. We describe the case of a patient with a permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia, in whom an atrial double potential was recorded only during the tachycardia at the right posterior septum. During para‐Hisian pacing, a morphologic change in the atrial electrogram at the posterior septum was also identified, as well as a change in the retrograde atrial sequence. Since the morphologic change of atrial electrograms during para‐Hisian pacing cannot be demonstrated in a patient without an accessory pathway, this new finding could he considered a new additional diagnostic criterion suggesting the presence of an accessory pathway.