Noman Khasati

Early donor management increases the retrieval rate of hearts for transplantation in marginal donors

OBJECTIVES Organ donations continue to fall, failing to meet the clinical requirements for heart transplantation. Furthermore, the pathophysiology of brain stem death including hormonal and inflammatory changes may lead to significant donor heart injury. Early donor management may potentially alleviate these changes and therefore increase the number of available hearts for transplantation. We aimed to investigate whether early management of borderline donors can increase the heart retrieval rate. METHODS Between September 2011 and February 2013, we performed early donor management of 26 potential heart donors in the intensive care units of the respective donor hospitals. At the time of referral donors were considered as borderline based on high-dose inotrope requirements, history of hypertension and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Our management protocol included insertion of a pulmonary artery catheter and performance of cardiac output studies, weaning noradrenaline and commencing arginine vasopressin, and administration of tri-iodothyronine, methylprednisolone and insulin. Our primary end-point was donor heart acceptance, depending collectively on the results of cardiac output studies, cardiac contractility and coronary artery patency at the time of retrieval operation. RESULTS We retrieved 14 (56%) borderline hearts after donor management (Group A) with a 30-day survival rate of 86%. Twelve (44%) organs were declined due to poor heart function (n=8; 66.7%; P<0.001) and/or palpable coronary artery disease (n=4; 33.3%; P=0.018) (Group B). The mean age of Groups A and B was 42.77 and 47.78 years, respectively (P=0.19). Most of the female donors, i.e. 10 (83%), were declined, and only 4 (27%) were accepted (P=0.005). Majority of patients in both groups (Group A: 71.4%; n=10; and Group B: 66.7%; n=8) were on high-dose noradrenaline (>0.08 μg kg(-1) min(-2)) at the time of donor offer. Group A had a mean cardiac output of 6.29 and 3.09 l/min for Group B (P=0.01). A positive smoking history was present in 28.6% (n=4) and 33.5% (n=4) in Groups A and B, respectively (P=0.793). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed on 3 (21.4%) patients in Group A and 2 (16.7%) in Group B (P=0.759). A history of hypertension was present in 7.1% (n=1) of the Group A and 33.3% (n=4) of the Group B donors. CONCLUSIONS In our study, we were able to retrieve more than half of the potential heart donors as a result of early active donor management without impacting on the post-transplant recipient outcome. Early active donor management may assist in increasing the number of heart transplantations, thus warranting further investigation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator as a bridge to successful surgical repair of bronchopleural fistula following bilateral sequential lung transplantation: a case report and review of literature

BackgroundLung transplantation (LTx) is widely accepted as a therapeutic option for end-stage respiratory failure in cystic fibrosis. However, airway complications remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients, serious airway complications like bronchopleural fistula (BPF) are rare, and their management is very difficult.Case presentationA 47-year-old man with end-stage respiratory failure due to cystic fibrosis underwent bilateral sequential lung transplantation. Severe post-operative bleeding occurred due to dense intrapleural adhesions of the native lungs. He was re-explored and packed leading to satisfactory haemostasis. He developed a bronchopleural fistula on the 14th post-operative day. The fistula was successfully repaired using pericardial and intercostal vascular flaps with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VV-ECMO) support. Subsequently his recovery was uneventful.ConclusionThe combination of pedicled intercostal and pericardial flaps provide adequate vascular tissue for sealing a large BPF following LTx. Veno-venous ECMO allows a feasible bridge to recovery.

Low dose (renal dose) dopamine in the critically ill patient

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether low dose (renal dose) dopamine in the critically ill patient prevents acute renal failure. Altogether 141 papers were found using the reported search, of which three presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that there is no evidence to support the use of low-dose dopamine to treat acute renal failure in critically ill patients.

Donor heart selection: the outcome of "unacceptable" donors

BackgroundThe decline in the number of suitable donor hearts has led to an increasing interest in the use of previously unacceptable donors. In the United Kingdom, if one centre declines a donor heart on medical grounds it may be offered to other centres. This multi-centre study aimed to evaluate the outcome of recipients of donor hearts considered medically unsuitable for transplantation by one centre that were used in other centres.MethodsBetween April 1998 and March 2003, ninety-three donor hearts (group A) were transplanted, after being considered medically unsuitable for transplantation by another centre. During the same period, 723 hearts (group B) were transplanted in the UK using donors not previously rejected. Data on the donors and recipients was obtained from the UK transplant database. Comparative analysis on the two groups was performed using SPSS 11.5 for Windows.ResultsThe characteristics of recipients were similar in both groups. The main reasons for refusal of hearts are listed below. In most cases there was more than one reason for refusing the donor heart. We did not find significant differences in the post-operative mortality (up to 30 days), ICU and hospital stay and cardiac cause of death between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed no significant difference in the long-term survival, with Log Rank test = 0.30.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that some hearts declined on medical grounds by one centre can safely be transplanted and should be offered out nationally. The use of these hearts was useful to expand the scarce donor pool and there does not seem to be a justification for denying recipients this extra source of organs.

Interleukin-4 C-590T Polymorphism Has No Role in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery:

Interleukin-4 exerts anti-inflammatory effects through decreased macrophage production of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1ß. We investigated genetic predisposition in the interleukin-4 response to coronary revascularization and studied the association between C-590T polymorphism, interleukin-4 levels, and outcome of surgery. DNA was obtained from 96 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary revascularization. Patients were genotyped for interleukin-4 C-590T polymorphism using a sequence-specific primer polymerase chain reaction. Interleukin-4 levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum samples taken 3 hr postoperatively. The frequency of interleukin-4 C-590T genotypes CC, CT, and TT was 33.3%, 27.1%, and 39.6%, respectively. Patients with the TT genotype had significantly higher circulating levels of interleukin-4 (3.4 ± 4.6 pg·mL−1) postoperatively compared to CC (2.5 ± 0.1 pg·mL−1) and CT (2.7 ± 0.5 pg·mL−1) genotypes. Interleukin-4 C-590T polymorphism is the main determinant of postoperative interleukin-4 levels. The TT genotype is the highest producer of interleukin-4. Neither the genotype nor the serum levels seem to play any role in recovery from coronary artery bypass surgery.

DONOR HEART SELECTION: WYTHENSHAWE EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND The decline in the number of suitable donor hearts has led to an increasing interest in the use of previously unacceptable donors. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of recipients of donor hearts considered medically unsuitable for transplantation at this center that were used in other centers in the United Kingdom. METHODS Forty donor hearts (group 1) were declined by Wythenshawe Hospital and used in other units in the United Kingdom in the period extending from April 1998 to March 2003. One hundred four hearts (group 2) were transplanted at Wythenshawe Hospital during the same period. Donors and recipient data were obtained from the United Kingdom Cardiothoracic Transplant Audit database. Mortality in both groups was analyzed using SPSS software. RESULTS Mortality in patients receiving grafts from group 1 donors was significantly higher than in group 2 (P < .0009). Of the early deaths in this group 50% (6 of 12) were the result of graft failure. These donors were receiving high doses of inotropes, had ischemic time exceeding 3.5 hours, and the grafts were transplanted into high-risk patients. CONCLUSION Hearts declined on medical grounds by one center should be evaluated with caution before being considered suitable for transplantation, especially when more than one adverse factor is present.