Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nora M. Navone is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nora M. Navone.


Science Translational Medicine | 2011

Personalized Oncology Through Integrative High-Throughput Sequencing: A Pilot Study

Sameek Roychowdhury; Matthew K. Iyer; Dan R. Robinson; Robert J. Lonigro; Yi Mi Wu; Xuhong Cao; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Lee Sam; O. Alejandro Balbin; Michael J. Quist; Terrence R. Barrette; Jessica Everett; Javed Siddiqui; Lakshmi P. Kunju; Nora M. Navone; John C. Araujo; Patricia Troncoso; Christopher J. Logothetis; Jeffrey W. Innis; David C. Smith; Christopher D. Lao; Scott Y. H. Kim; J. Scott Roberts; Stephen B. Gruber; Kenneth J. Pienta; Moshe Talpaz; Arul M. Chinnaiyan

The mutations present in advanced cancers can be identified by integrative high-throughput sequencing to enable biomarker-driven clinical trials and, ultimately, treatment. First Steps to Personalized Cancer Treatment In an optimistic vision of personalized medicine, each cancer patient is treated with drugs tailored for their particular tumor. This sounds appealing, but is it even possible? Roychowdhury and his colleagues tested this approach by extensively characterizing cancers in several patients and then convening a Sequencing Tumor Board of experts to determine the appropriate treatment. With a combination of whole genome and exome sequencing plus sequencing of transcribed RNA, the authors were able to find informative mutations within 3 to 4 weeks, a short enough time to be useful clinically. To verify that their sequencing strategy would work before testing it on actual patients, they assessed two xenografts established from patients with metastatic prostate cancer. They found that one of these carried the common prostate cancer–specific gene fusion of TMPRSS2 and ERG and another, previously undescribed, gene fusion. Also, the androgen receptor gene was amplified and two tumor suppressors were inactivated. The Board concluded that this pattern of mutations could in theory be treated by combined block of the PI3K and androgen receptor signaling pathways. The authors then turned to an actual patient, a 46 year old with colorectal cancer, who had been unsuccessfully treated. Characterization of his metastatic tumor showed mutations in the oncogene NRAS, the tumor suppressor TP53, aurora kinase A, a myosin heavy chain and the FAS death receptor, plus amplification of CDK8. Of these, the Sequencing Tumor Board concluded that the NRAS and CDK8 aberrations could potentially be matched to clinical trials, although none were available at the time. Similar analysis of another patient with metastatic melanoma revealed a structural rearrangement in CDKN2C and HRas. Although the HRAS mutation has not been described before in melanoma, the Sequencing Tumor Board suggested that combined treatment with PI3K and MEK inhibitors would be suitable for this patient. The good news resulting from these studies was that the patients’ tumors were analyzed with in 24 days for ~


Nature Medicine | 2000

Glucocorticoids can promote androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells through a mutated androgen receptor.

Xiao Yan Zhao; Peter J. Malloy; Aruna V. Krishnan; Srilatha Swami; Nora M. Navone; Donna M. Peehl; David Feldman

3600, well within the cost of routine clinical tests. But aspects need improvement: Additional testing for epigenetic and small RNA variants will allow more informative characterization. Sequencing at higher depth or enrichment methods will be needed for tumors of lower purity. And perhaps most important, we need a broader array of clinical trials, as highlighted by the fact that none was available for these two patients. Individual cancers harbor a set of genetic aberrations that can be informative for identifying rational therapies currently available or in clinical trials. We implemented a pilot study to explore the practical challenges of applying high-throughput sequencing in clinical oncology. We enrolled patients with advanced or refractory cancer who were eligible for clinical trials. For each patient, we performed whole-genome sequencing of the tumor, targeted whole-exome sequencing of tumor and normal DNA, and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) of the tumor to identify potentially informative mutations in a clinically relevant time frame of 3 to 4 weeks. With this approach, we detected several classes of cancer mutations including structural rearrangements, copy number alterations, point mutations, and gene expression alterations. A multidisciplinary Sequencing Tumor Board (STB) deliberated on the clinical interpretation of the sequencing results obtained. We tested our sequencing strategy on human prostate cancer xenografts. Next, we enrolled two patients into the clinical protocol and were able to review the results at our STB within 24 days of biopsy. The first patient had metastatic colorectal cancer in which we identified somatic point mutations in NRAS, TP53, AURKA, FAS, and MYH11, plus amplification and overexpression of cyclin-dependent kinase 8 (CDK8). The second patient had malignant melanoma, in which we identified a somatic point mutation in HRAS and a structural rearrangement affecting CDKN2C. The STB identified the CDK8 amplification and Ras mutation as providing a rationale for clinical trials with CDK inhibitors or MEK (mitogen-activated or extracellular signal–regulated protein kinase kinase) and PI3K (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase) inhibitors, respectively. Integrative high-throughput sequencing of patients with advanced cancer generates a comprehensive, individual mutational landscape to facilitate biomarker-driven clinical trials in oncology.


Cancer Cell | 2011

Mechanistic Rationale for Inhibition of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in ETS Gene Fusion-Positive Prostate Cancer

J. Chad Brenner; Bushra Ateeq; Yong Li; Anastasia K. Yocum; Qi Cao; Irfan A. Asangani; Sonam Patel; Xiaoju Wang; Hallie Liang; Jindan Yu; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Javed Siddiqui; Wei Yan; Xuhong Cao; Rohit Mehra; Aaron Sabolch; Venkatesha Basrur; Robert J. Lonigro; Jun Yang; Scott A. Tomlins; Christopher A. Maher; Kojo S.J. Elenitoba-Johnson; Maha Hussain; Nora M. Navone; Kenneth J. Pienta; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Felix Y. Feng; Arul M. Chinnaiyan

The androgen receptor (AR) is involved in the development, growth and progression of prostate cancer (CaP). CaP often progresses from an androgen-dependent to an androgen-independent tumor, making androgen ablation therapy ineffective. However, the mechanisms for the development of androgen-independent CaP are unclear. More than 80% of clinically androgen-independent prostate tumors show high levels of AR expression. In some CaPs, AR levels are increased because of gene amplification and/or overexpression, whereas in others, the AR is mutated. Nonetheless, the involvement of the AR in the transition of CaP to androgen-independent growth and the subsequent failure of endocrine therapy are not fully understood. Here we show that in CaP cells from a patient who failed androgen ablation therapy, a doubly mutated AR functioned as a high-affinity cortisol/cortisone receptor (ARccr). Cortisol, the main circulating glucocorticoid, and its metabolite, cortisone, both equally stimulate the growth of these CaP cells and increase the secretion of prostate-specific antigen in the absence of androgens. The physiological concentrations of free cortisol and total cortisone in men greatly exceed the binding affinity of the ARccr and would activate the receptor, promoting CaP cell proliferation. Our data demonstrate a previously unknown mechanism for the androgen-independent growth of advanced CaP. Understanding this mechanism and recognizing the presence of glucocorticoid-responsive AR mutants are important for the development of new forms of therapy for the treatment of this subset of CaP.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2002

In vitro and in vivo studies of a VEGF121/rGelonin chimeric fusion toxin targeting the neovasculature of solid tumors

Liesbeth M. Veenendaal; Hangqing Jin; Sophia Ran; Lawrence Cheung; Nora M. Navone; John W. Marks; Johannes Waltenberger; Philip E. Thorpe; Michael G. Rosenblum

Recurrent fusions of ETS genes are considered driving mutations in a diverse array of cancers, including Ewings sarcoma, acute myeloid leukemia, and prostate cancer. We investigate the mechanisms by which ETS fusions mediate their effects, and find that the product of the predominant ETS gene fusion, TMPRSS2:ERG, interacts in a DNA-independent manner with the enzyme poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) and the catalytic subunit of DNA protein kinase (DNA-PKcs). ETS gene-mediated transcription and cell invasion require PARP1 and DNA-PKcs expression and activity. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of PARP1 inhibits ETS-positive, but not ETS-negative, prostate cancer xenograft growth. Finally, overexpression of the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion induces DNA damage, which is potentiated by PARP1 inhibition in a manner similar to that of BRCA1/2 deficiency.


The Journal of Urology | 1997

Expression of BCL-2 Oncoprotein and P53 Protein Accumulation in Bone Marrow Metastases of Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer

Timothy J. McDonnel; Nora M. Navone; Patricia Troncoso; Louis L. Pisters; Claudio J. Conti; Andrew C. von Eschenbach; Shawn Brisbay; Christopher J. Logothetis

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a key role in the growth and metastasis of solid tumors. We generated a fusion protein containing VEGF121 linked by a flexible G4S tether to the toxin gelonin (rGel) and expressed this as a soluble protein in bacteria. Purified VEGF121/rGel migrated as an 84-kDa homodimer under nonreducing conditions. VEGF121/rGel bound to purified, immobilized Flk-1, and the binding was competed by VEGF121. Both VEGF121/rGel and VEGF121 stimulated cellular kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) phosphorylation. The VEGF121/rGel fusion construct was highly cytotoxic to endothelial cells overexpressing the KDR/Flk-1 receptor. The IC50 of the construct on dividing endothelial cells expressing 105 or more KDR/Flk-1 receptors per cell was 0.5–1 nM, as compared with 300 nM for rGel itself. Dividing endothelial cells overexpressing KDR were approximately 60-fold more sensitive to VEGF121/rGel than were nondividing cells. Endothelial cells overexpressing FLT-1 were not sensitive to the fusion protein. Human melanoma (A-375) or human prostate (PC-3) xenografts treated with the fusion construct demonstrated a reduction in tumor volume to 16% of untreated controls. The fusion construct localized selectively to PC-3 tumor vessels and caused thrombotic damage to tumor vessels with extravasation of red blood cells into the tumor bed. These studies demonstrate the successful use of VEGF121/rGel fusion construct for the targeted destruction of tumor vasculature in vivo.


Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2008

Androgen receptor-negative human prostate cancer cells induce osteogenesis in mice through FGF9-mediated mechanisms.

Zhi Gang Li; Paul Mathew; Jun Yang; Michael W. Starbuck; Amado J. Zurita; Jie Liu; Charles Sikes; Asha S. Multani; Adriana Lopez; Jing Wang; Tina V. Fanning; Victor G. Prieto; Vikas Kundra; Elba Vazquez; Patricia Troncoso; Austin K. Raymond; Christopher J. Logothetis; Sue-Hwa Lin; Sankar N. Maity; Nora M. Navone

PURPOSE We correlated the expression of bcl-2 with accumulation of p53 protein in bone marrow metastases from patients with androgen independent prostate cancer and a history of hormonal ablation therapy. These results were correlated with clinical parameters, including the extent of bone marrow metastases and patient survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS All 43 patients studied had evidence of prostate cancer progression following androgen deprivation therapy and histologically confirmed bone marrow metastases. Decalcified tissue sections were used for immunohistochemical evaluation of bcl-2 protein and p53 protein accumulation. RESULTS We previously established that p53 protein accumulation as detected by immunohistochemistry is a reliable indicator of p53 gene mutation in prostate cancer. Immunoreactivity was demonstrated for p53 protein in 22 of 43 cases and for bcl-2 protein in 14. A total of 28 cases (65%) exhibited immunohistochemical evidence of p53 and/or bcl-2 expression, and 15 (35%) were negative for p53 and bcl-2. The expression of bcl-2 and accumulation of p53 were independent events (p < 0.01). The expression of bcl-2 or accumulation of p53 protein in prostate cancer metastases did not significantly influence patient survival or the extent of metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS The presence or absence of p53 protein accumulation and/or bcl-2 expression did not correlate with tumor burden or patient survival in stage D androgen independent prostate cancer bone marrow metastases. The expression of bcl-2 protein occurs independently of and is inversely correlated with p53 mutations in advanced prostate cancer.


The Prostate | 2008

The current state of preclinical prostate cancer animal models.

Kenneth J. Pienta; Cory Abate-Shen; David B. Agus; Ricardo M. Attar; Leland W.K. Chung; Norman M. Greenberg; William C. Hahn; John T. Isaacs; Nora M. Navone; Donna M. Peehl; Jonathon W. Simons; David B. Solit; Howard R. Soule; Terry A. VanDyke; Michael J. Weber; Lily Wu; Robert L. Vessella

In prostate cancer, androgen blockade strategies are commonly used to treat osteoblastic bone metastases. However, responses to these therapies are typically brief, and the mechanism underlying androgen-independent progression is not clear. Here, we established what we believe to be the first human androgen receptor-negative prostate cancer xenografts whose cells induced an osteoblastic reaction in bone and in the subcutis of immunodeficient mice. Accordingly, these cells grew in castrated as well as intact male mice. We identified FGF9 as being overexpressed in the xenografts relative to other bone-derived prostate cancer cells and discovered that FGF9 induced osteoblast proliferation and new bone formation in a bone organ assay. Mice treated with FGF9-neutralizing antibody developed smaller bone tumors and reduced bone formation. Finally, we found positive FGF9 immunostaining in prostate cancer cells in 24 of 56 primary tumors derived from human organ-confined prostate cancer and in 25 of 25 bone metastasis cases studied. Collectively, these results suggest that FGF9 contributes to prostate cancer-induced new bone formation and may participate in the osteoblastic progression of prostate cancer in bone. Androgen receptor-null cells may contribute to the castration-resistant osteoblastic progression of prostate cancer cells in bone and provide a preclinical model for studying therapies that target these cells.


The Prostate | 2010

Adipose tissue-derived stem cells promote prostate tumor growth

L. Prantl; Fabian Muehlberg; Nora M. Navone; Yao-Hua Song; Jody Vykoukal; Christopher J. Logothetis; Eckhard Alt

Prostate cancer continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in men around the world. The field of prostate cancer research continues to be hindered by the lack of relevant preclinical models to study tumorigenesis and to further development of effective prevention and therapeutic strategies. The Prostate Cancer Foundation held a Prostate Cancer Models Working Group (PCMWG) Summit on August 6th and 7th, 2007 to address these issues. The PCMWG reviewed the state of prostate cancer preclinical models and identified the current limitations of cell line, xenograft and genetically engineered mouse models that have hampered the transition of scientific findings from these models to human clinical trials. In addition the PCMWG identified administrative issues that inhibit the exchange of models and impede greater interactions between academic centers and these centers with industry. The PCMWG identified potential solutions for discovery bottlenecks that include: (1) insufficient number of models with insufficient molecular and biologic diversity to reflect human cancer, (2) a lack of understanding of the molecular events that define tumorigenesis, (3) a lack of tools for studying tumor–host interactions, (4) difficulty in accessing model systems across institutions, and (5) addressing why preclinical studies appear not to be predictive of human clinical trials. It should be possible to apply the knowledge gained molecular and epigenetic studies to develop new cell lines and models that mimic progressive and fatal prostate cancer and ultimately improve interventions. Prostate 68: 629–639, 2008.


Cancer and Metastasis Reviews | 1998

Model systems of prostate cancer: uses and limitations.

Nora M. Navone; Christopher J. Logothetis; Andrew C. von Eschenbach; Patricia Troncoso

Recent evidence indicates that cancer stem cells play an important role in tumor initiation and maintenance. Additionally, the effect of tissue‐resident stem cells located in the surrounding healthy tissue on tumor progression has been demonstrated. While most knowledge has been derived from studies of breast cancer cells, little is known regarding the influence of tissue resident stem cells on the tumor biology of prostate cancer.


Endocrinology | 2000

1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits prostate cancer cell growth by androgen-dependent and androgen-independent mechanisms.

Xiao Yan Zhao; Donna M. Peehl; Nora M. Navone; David Feldman

A valid experimental model system reflects the system under study and is reproducible. Model systems of prostate cancer that accurately reflect the different disease stages are necessary to ensure a proper experimental design aimed at increasing our understanding of the biology of the disease and such models are essential tools to accelerate development of new therapies for prostate cancer. Until recently, a limited number of experimental systems were available and more suitable models derived from human specimens have only recently been developed and become available for use. In addition, transgenic techniques have also permitted the development of unique mouse models. The difficulty in establishing model systems may reflect the complex requirements necessary for cancer progression and should lead us to interpret results from model systems with caution. It is unlikely that a single model system that faithfully reflects the whole process of cancer development and progression will be developed. However, thoughtful use of the available model systems will permit the study of a significant portion of prostate cancer progression. In this review we summarize the properties of the prostate cancer model systems in use and defined their utility and limitations. This review will guide the investigator seeking models with which to test specific hypotheses pertaining to prostate cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Nora M. Navone's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher J. Logothetis

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patricia Troncoso

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jun Yang

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elba Vazquez

University of Buenos Aires

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xinhai Wan

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Geraldine Gueron

University of Buenos Aires

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Estefania Labanca

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ana Aparicio

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sankar N. Maity

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge