Norbert Grzasko

Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor that is currently being studied for the treatment of multiple myeloma. METHODS In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 722 patients who had relapsed, refractory, or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma to receive ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib group) or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (placebo group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ixazomib group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 14.7 months (median progression-free survival, 20.6 months vs. 14.7 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the ixazomib group, 0.74; P=0.01); a benefit with respect to progression-free survival was observed with the ixazomib regimen, as compared with the placebo regimen, in all prespecified patient subgroups, including in patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. The overall rates of response were 78% in the ixazomib group and 72% in the placebo group, and the corresponding rates of complete response plus very good partial response were 48% and 39%. The median time to response was 1.1 months in the ixazomib group and 1.9 months in the placebo group, and the corresponding median duration of response was 20.5 months and 15.0 months. At a median follow-up of approximately 23 months, the median overall survival has not been reached in either study group, and follow-up is ongoing. The rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two study groups (47% in the ixazomib group and 49% in the placebo group), as were the rates of death during the study period (4% and 6%, respectively); adverse events of at least grade 3 severity occurred in 74% and 69% of the patients, respectively. Thrombocytopenia of grade 3 and grade 4 severity occurred more frequently in the ixazomib group (12% and 7% of the patients, respectively) than in the placebo group (5% and 4% of the patients, respectively). Rash occurred more frequently in the ixazomib group than in the placebo group (36% vs. 23% of the patients), as did gastrointestinal adverse events, which were predominantly low grade. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy was 27% in the ixazomib group and 22% in the placebo group (grade 3 events occurred in 2% of the patients in each study group). Patient-reported quality of life was similar in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS The addition of ixazomib to a regimen of lenalidomide and dexamethasone was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival; the additional toxic effects with this all-oral regimen were limited. (Funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals; TOURMALINE-MM1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01564537.).

Therapy-related peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients

This review discusses the most common issues concerning multiple myeloma (MM)‐related peripheral neuropathy (PN). This is an important MM complication, observed in up to 54% of newly diagnosed patients, caused by the disease itself or its treatment. Although its aetiology is largely unknown, a number of mechanisms are suspected. It is important to know the neurological status of a patient, as many new antimyeloma medicines can trigger or exacerbate any pre‐existing neuropathy. Examples include thalidomide‐induced and bortezomib‐induced PN (TiPN and BiTN, respectively), which are key MM treatment options. TiPN is usually sensory and sensorimotor, whereas BiPN is typically sensory. The mechanisms of chemotherapy‐induced neurotoxicity in MM are well known; thalidomide seems to induce PN through its antiangiogenic properties, whereas bortezomib neurotoxicity is connected with disrupted calcium homeostasis. TiPN incidence ranges from 25% to 75%, and its prevalence and severity appears to be dose‐dependent. BiPN incidence is almost 40% and is dose‐related as well. Poor (25%) reversibility of TiPN prompted the recommendations for dose and exposure reduction, whereas BiPN cases are mostly reversible (64%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy is very rare in patients receiving bendamustine monotherapy. Because of this favourable toxicity profile, bendamustine may be considered a promising option for combination therapies in pre‐existing PN in myeloma patients. Considering the lack of curative therapy for treatment‐emergent PN, prevention is a key management strategy in MM patients. All patients should be evaluated for PN before the administration of a neurotoxic drug, and those under treatment should be closely monitored by a neurologist. Copyright

Additional genetic abnormalities significantly worsen poor prognosis associated with 1q21 amplification in multiple myeloma patients

We investigated the prognostic value of amp(1q21) alone and in combination with other abnormalities in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. The study group consisted of 104 patients treated with various induction regimens, mostly thalidomide based (87 patients). Amp(1q21) was detected in 49 (47.1%) of patients; in 26 (25.0%) cases, it was combined with del(13q14), in 7 (6.7%) with del(17p13) and in 15 (14.4%) with t(4;14)(p16;q32). The response rate was significantly better in amp(1q21)‐negative than in amp(1q21)‐positive patients (74.5% vs 55.1%, p = 0.025; complete response 18.2% vs 4.1%, p = 0.024). The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 33.9 months in patients without amp(1q21) and 10.3 months with this aberration (p = 0.002). The presence of additional abnormalities resulted in significantly shortened PFS when compared with patients with isolated amp(1q21): coexisting del(13q14) resulted in 7.8 vs 29.0 months of PFS (p = 0.024) and del(17p13) resulted in 4.0 vs 24.9 months of PFS (p = 0.034). The presence of amp(1q21) significantly influenced overall survival (OS) as well as PFS resulting in the median OS of 26.6 vs 62.4 months (p = 0.018) in patients without amp(1q21). The presence of additional genetic abnormalities significantly affected OS when compared with patients carrying isolated amp(1q21): for del(13q14) 18.9 vs 58.4 months (p = 0.004) and for del(17p13) 12.0 vs 46.5 months (p = 0.036). On multivariate analysis amp(1q21), del(13q14) and del(17p13) were found to be an independent adverse predictors of shorter PFS and OS. Our results showed that the presence of amp(1q21) was associated with poor prognosis. Moreover additional genetic abnormalities made PFS and OS further shortened. Copyright

A clinical comparison of the efficacy and safety of biosimilar G-CSF and originator G-CSF in haematopoietic stem cell mobilization

BACKGROUND Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used to mobilize haematopoietic stem cells. We compared the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio(®), Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals) with the originator G-CSF (Neupogen(®), Amgen) in patients with haematological malignancies. METHODS A total of 108 patients were included in this study, 59 of whom were female (49 male), with an overall median age of 51 years (range 19-69). Patients had multiple myeloma (n=46), non-Hodgkins lymphoma (n=28), Hodgkins lymphoma (n=26), or other diagnosis (n=8). After administration of mobilizing regimens (primarily high-dose etoposide, high-dose cyclophosphamide, intermediate-dose Ara-C or ESHAP), patients were randomized to a standard daily 10 μg/kg dose of biosimilar G-CSF (n=54) or originator G-CSF (n=54). RESULTS Median duration of G-CSF administration was 8 days with both biosimilar G-CSF (range 4-17) and originator G-CSF (range 4-14). Both groups had a median of one apheresis with a median time until first apheresis of 11 days. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the mean ± SD number of mobilized CD34+ cells/μL in peripheral blood or the number of CD34+ cells/kg body weight. Five patients (9%) in the originator G-CSF group and six patients in the biosimilar G-CSF group (11%) did not mobilize sufficient CD34+ cells. The adverse event profile was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS A biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio(®)) demonstrated similar efficacy and safety as the reference originator G-CSF (Neupogen(®)) in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with haematological malignancies.

Thalidomide, dexamethasone and lovastatin with autologous stem cell transplantation as a salvage immunomodulatory therapy in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

The treatment of patients with multiple myeloma usually includes many drugs including thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib. Lovastatin and other inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase demonstrated to exhibit antineoplasmatic and proapoptotic properties in numerous in vitro studies involving myeloma cell lines. We treated 91 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with thalidomide, dexamethasone and lovastatin (TDL group, 49 patients) or thalidomide and dexamethasone (TD group, 42 patients). A clinical response defined of at least 50% reduction of monoclonal band has been observed in 32% of TD patients and 44% of TDL patients. Prolongation of overall survival and progression-free survival in the TDL group as compared with the TD group has been documented. The TDL regimen was safe and well tolerated. The incidence of side effects was comparable in both groups. Plasma cells have been cultured in vitro with thalidomide and lovastatin to assess the impact of both drugs on the apoptosis rate of plasma cells. In vitro experiments revealed that the combination of thalidomide and lovastatin induced higher apoptosis rate than apoptosis induced by each drug alone. Our results suggest that the addition of lovastatin to the TD regimen may improve the response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma.

The efficacy and safety of the low-thalidomide dose CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone) regimen in patients with multiple myeloma--a report by the Polish Myeloma Study Group.

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, but response rates to new drugs are promising, offering the majority of patients a significant prolongation of overall survival. The objective of this study was to evaluate time to progression (TTP), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in MM patients treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide (CY), thalidomide (THAL) and dexamethasone (DEX). This study included 132 untreated and relapsing/resistant patients treated with the low-thalidomide dose CTD regimen. The patients received CY 500 mg/m(2)i.v. or 625 mg/m(2) orally at day 1, THAL 100mg/day á la longue and DEX 20mg/day at days 1-4 and 8-11, every 28 days. Patients received 6-9 cycles; ORR by 3 months was 59.1%, by 6 months 65.6% and by 9 months 75.6%. In patients responding to CTD therapy (CR, nCR, PR), the probability of survival for 20 months was 89.3%. The outpatient low-thalidomide dose CTD regimen is well tolerated and produces a significant response rate both in untreated and relapsing/resistant MM patients.

Impact of prior therapy on the efficacy and safety of oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in TOURMALINE-MM1

Prior treatment exposure in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma may affect outcomes with subsequent therapies. We analyzed efficacy and safety according to prior treatment in the phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib-Rd) versus placebo-Rd. Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma received ixazomib-Rd or placebo-Rd. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in subgroups defined according to type (proteasome inhibitor [PI] and immunomodulatory drug) and number (1 vs. 2 or 3) of prior therapies received. Of 722 patients, 503 (70%) had received a prior PI, and 397 (55%) prior lenalidomide/thalidomide; 425 patients had received 1 prior therapy, and 297 received 2 or 3 prior therapies. At a median follow up of ~15 months, PFS was prolonged with ixazomib-Rd vs. placebo-Rd regardless of type of prior therapy received; HR 0.739 and 0.749 in PI-exposed and –naïve patients, HR 0.744 and 0.700 in immunomodulatory-drug-exposed and -naïve patients, respectively. PFS benefit with ixazomib-Rd vs. placebo-Rd appeared greater in patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies (HR 0.58) and in those with 1 prior therapy without prior transplant (HR 0.60) versus those with 1 prior therapy and transplant (HR 1.23). Across all subgroups, toxicity was consistent with that seen in the intent-to-treat population. In patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, ixazomib-Rd was associated with a consistent clinical benefit vs. placebo-Rd regardless of prior treatment with bortezomib or immunomodulatory drugs. Patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies, or 1 prior therapy without transplant seemed to have greater benefit than patients with 1 prior therapy and transplant. TOURMALINE-MM1 registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01564537.

Comparative proteomic profiling of refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma reveals biomarkers involved in resistance to bortezomib-based therapy

Identifying biomarkers of the resistance in multiple myeloma (MM) is a key research challenge. We aimed to identify proteins that differentiate plasma cells in patients with refractory/relapsed MM (RRMM) who achieved at least very good partial response (VGPR) and in those with reduced response to PAD chemotherapy (bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone). Comparative proteomic analysis was conducted on pretreatment plasma cells from 77 proteasome inhibitor naïve patients treated subsequently with PAD due to RRMM. To increase data confidence we used two independent proteomic platforms: isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) and label free (LF). Proteins were considered as differentially expressed when their accumulation between groups differed by at least 50% in iTRAQ and LF. The proteomic signature revealed 118 proteins (35 up-regulated and 83 down-regulated in ≥ VGPR group). Proteins were classified into four classes: (1) involved in proteasome function; (2) involved in the response to oxidative stress; (3) related to defense response; and (4) regulating the apoptotic process. We confirmed the differential expression of proteasome activator complex subunit 1 (PSME1) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Increased expression of proteasomes and proteins involved in protection from oxidative stress (eg., TXN, TXNDC5) plays a major role in bortezomib resistance.

1q21 amplification with additional genetic abnormalities but not isolated 1q21 gain is a negative prognostic factor in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide-based regimens

In this study we assessed the prognostic value of amp(1q21) alone and in combination with del(17p13), del(13q14) and t(4,14)(p16;q32) detected by fl uorescence in situ hybridization(FISH) in newly diagnosed patients with MM treated with thalidomide-based induction regimens. Th e primary endpoints were response rate after fi rst-line therapy, PFS and OS.

Case-adjusted bortezomib-based strategy in routine therapy of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma shown to be highly effective—A report by Polish Myeloma Study Group

The observational study was aimed at evaluating response, survival and toxicity of bortezomib-based, case-adjusted regimens in real-life therapy of 708 relapsed/refractory MM patients. Bortezomib was combined with anthracyclines, steroids, thalidomide, alkylators or given in monotherapy. The ORR was 67.9% for refractory and 69.9% for relapsed MM. The median PFS was 14 months and OS 57 months. Patients responding to the therapy had the probability of a 4-year OS at 67.0%. No toxicity was noted in 33.1% of patients. Severe events (grade 3/4) were reported in 35.9% of patients: neurotoxicity (16.7%), neutropenia (9.2%), thrombocytopenia (8.5%), and infections (6.5%). Bortezomib-based, case-adjusted regimens are in real-life practice effective in salvage therapy offering reliable survival with acceptable toxicity for relapsed/refractory MM patients.