Norman D Radtke
University of Louisville
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Norman D Radtke.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2008
Norman D Radtke; Robert B. Aramant; Heywood M. Petry; Parke T. Green; Diane J. Pidwell; Magdalene J. Seiler
PURPOSE To demonstrate efficacy and safety of the implantation of neural retinal progenitor cell layers (sheets) with its retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients with 20/200 or worse vision in the surgery eye. DESIGN Interventional nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS Ten patients (six RP, four AMD) received retinal implants in one eye and were followed in a phase II trial conducted in a clinical practice setting. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) was the primary outcome measure. All implant recipients and nine of 10 tissue donors were deoxyribonucleic acids typed. RESULTS Seven patients (three RP, four AMD) showed improved EDTRS visual acuity (VA) scores. Three of these patients (one RP, two AMD) showed improvement in both eyes to the same extent. Vision in one RP patient remained the same, while vision in two RP patients decreased. One RP patient has maintained an improvement in vision from 20/800 to 20/200 ETDRS for more than five years; at the six-year examination, it was still maintained at 20/320 while the nonsurgery eye had deteriorated to hand motion vision. This patient also showed a 22.72% increase in light sensitivity at five years compared to microperimetry results at two years; the other patients showed no improved sensitivity. Although no match was found between donors and recipients, no rejection of the implanted tissue was observed clinically. CONCLUSIONS Seven (70%) of 10 patients showed improved VA. This outcome provides clinical evidence of the safety and beneficial effect of retinal implants and corroborates results in animal models of retinal degeneration.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2002
Norman D Radtke; Magdalene J. Seiler; Robert B. Aramant; Heywood M. Petry; Diane J. Pidwell
PURPOSE To show the safety of transplanting sheets of fetal neural retina together with its retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) to patients with retinitis pigmentosa. DESIGN Interventional case series. METHODS Sheets of fetal neural retina and RPE were transplanted together into the subretinal space near the fovea unilaterally in the eyes of five patients with retinitis pigmentosa who had only light perception in both eyes. The patients were followed for 6 months. The main outcome measures were tissue typing of both donors and recipients, fluorescein angiography, multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) testing, and clinical examination. No immunosuppressive medications were given. RESULTS No evidence of rejection was observed. Up to 6 months there was no evidence of tissue disintegration, retinal edema, or scarring. There was no change in vision both by Snellen acuity and with mfERGs. Growth of the transplant was noted in two of five patients at 6 months vs. 2 weeks. All patients typed were HLA mismatched with donor tissue. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that fetal retina can be transplanted together with its RPE and survive for at least 6 months without evidence of rejection. However, no improvements in vision were observed, possibly due to the severe retinal degeneration of the patients.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 1999
Norman D Radtke; Robert B. Aramant; Magdalene J. Seiler; Heywood M. Petry
PURPOSE To report indications of new visual function after retinal transplantation in two blind patients with retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS Intact sheets of fetal retina (15 and 17 weeks gestational age) were transplanted subretinally (between the neurosensory retina and the retinal pigment epithelium) near the fovea in the left eye of a 23-year-old white man (Patient A) and in the left eye of a 72-year-old white woman (Patient B), both with autosomal-recessive retinitis pigmentosa. RESULTS Postoperatively, at 6 and 5 months, respectively, both patients reported new visual sensation in the visual field corresponding to the transplant. In both patients, the visual sensation continued to be present after transplantation, at 12 and 8 months, respectively. In Patient A, a transient multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) response was observed in the transplant area 4 months postoperatively but was not detectable in Patient A at 6.0 and 9.5 months post-retinal transplantation. In Patient B, no positive mfERG responses were seen up to 5 months postoperatively. No rejection (presenting as cystoid macular edema, macular pucker, and extensive intraretinal edema with disrupted retinal pigment epithelium) to the transplanted tissue was seen up to 13 months in Patient A and 9 months in Patient B by fluorescein angiography. CONCLUSION Transplantation of intact sheets of fetal human retina in two patients with retinitis pigmentosa was not associated with evidence of transplant rejection. Subjective improvement and an indication of objective improvement 4 months postoperatively were seen in Patient A, and subjective improvement only was seen in Patient B.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 1999
Norman D Radtke; Robert B. Aramant; Magdalene J. Seiler; Heywood M. Petry
PURPOSE To report indications of new visual function after retinal transplantation in two blind patients with retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS Intact sheets of fetal retina (15 and 17 weeks gestational age) were transplanted subretinally (between the neurosensory retina and the retinal pigment epithelium) near the fovea in the left eye of a 23-year-old white man (Patient A) and in the left eye of a 72-year-old white woman (Patient B), both with autosomal-recessive retinitis pigmentosa. RESULTS Postoperatively, at 6 and 5 months, respectively, both patients reported new visual sensation in the visual field corresponding to the transplant. In both patients, the visual sensation continued to be present after transplantation, at 12 and 8 months, respectively. In Patient A, a transient multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) response was observed in the transplant area 4 months postoperatively but was not detectable in Patient A at 6.0 and 9.5 months post-retinal transplantation. In Patient B, no positive mfERG responses were seen up to 5 months postoperatively. No rejection (presenting as cystoid macular edema, macular pucker, and extensive intraretinal edema with disrupted retinal pigment epithelium) to the transplanted tissue was seen up to 13 months in Patient A and 9 months in Patient B by fluorescein angiography. CONCLUSION Transplantation of intact sheets of fetal human retina in two patients with retinitis pigmentosa was not associated with evidence of transplant rejection. Subjective improvement and an indication of objective improvement 4 months postoperatively were seen in Patient A, and subjective improvement only was seen in Patient B.
Archive | 2007
Robert B. Aramant; Norman D Radtke; Magdalene J. Seiler
Transplanting sheets of fetal retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) together with its neuronal retina offers potential as a viable technique to prevent blindness and restore vision. This chapter presents results of the first promising FDA-approved clinical trial with a limited number of patients, bringing cautious optimism to the evaluation of the results. The basic research with several rodent degeneration models shows that transplants restore visually evoked responses in the brain, in an area of the superior colliculus corresponding to the placement of the transplant in the retina. Retinal transplants can preserve vision in an optokinetic acuity test. The mechanism of functional restoration is still unclear, but research results indicate that likely both synaptic connectivity between transplant and host and rescue of host photoreceptors are involved. The conclusion can be drawn that cotransplants of RPE together with retinal sheets have a beneficial functional effect in several animal retinal degeneration models as well as in patients in the recent clinical trial.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 1999
Norman D Radtke; Robert B. Aramant; Magdalene J. Seiler; Heywood M. Petry
PURPOSE To report indications of new visual function after retinal transplantation in two blind patients with retinitis pigmentosa. METHODS Intact sheets of fetal retina (15 and 17 weeks gestational age) were transplanted subretinally (between the neurosensory retina and the retinal pigment epithelium) near the fovea in the left eye of a 23-year-old white man (Patient A) and in the left eye of a 72-year-old white woman (Patient B), both with autosomal-recessive retinitis pigmentosa. RESULTS Postoperatively, at 6 and 5 months, respectively, both patients reported new visual sensation in the visual field corresponding to the transplant. In both patients, the visual sensation continued to be present after transplantation, at 12 and 8 months, respectively. In Patient A, a transient multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) response was observed in the transplant area 4 months postoperatively but was not detectable in Patient A at 6.0 and 9.5 months post-retinal transplantation. In Patient B, no positive mfERG responses were seen up to 5 months postoperatively. No rejection (presenting as cystoid macular edema, macular pucker, and extensive intraretinal edema with disrupted retinal pigment epithelium) to the transplanted tissue was seen up to 13 months in Patient A and 9 months in Patient B by fluorescein angiography. CONCLUSION Transplantation of intact sheets of fetal human retina in two patients with retinitis pigmentosa was not associated with evidence of transplant rejection. Subjective improvement and an indication of objective improvement 4 months postoperatively were seen in Patient A, and subjective improvement only was seen in Patient B.
Archives of Ophthalmology | 2004
Norman D Radtke; Robert B. Aramant; Magdalene J. Seiler; Heywood M. Petry; Diane J. Pidwell
Archives of Ophthalmology | 1978
Norman D Radtke; Sanford M. Meyers; Herbert E. Kaufman
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 1991
Norman D Radtke; James J. Augsburger; Schmitt Timothy
Archive | 2012
Dyson Hickingbotham; Norman D Radtke