Norman F. Weeden
Montana State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Norman F. Weeden.
Plant Physiology | 2005
Paul Gepts; William D. Beavis; E. Charles Brummer; Randy C. Shoemaker; H. Thomas Stalker; Norman F. Weeden; Nevin D. Young
On December 14 to 15, 2004, some 50 legume researchers and funding agency representatives (the latter as observers) met in Santa Fe, New Mexico, to develop a plan for cross-legume genomics research. This conference was one of the outcomes of the Legume Crops Genome Initiative (LCGI), an organization
Annals of Botany | 2007
Norman F. Weeden
Background and Aims The changes that occur during the domestication of crops such as maize and common bean appear to be controlled by relatively few genes. This study investigates the genetic basis of domestication in pea (Pisum sativum) and compares the genes involved with those determined to be important in common bean domestication. Methods Quantitative trait loci and classical genetic analysis are used to investigate and identify the genes modified at three stages of the domestication process. Five recombinant inbred populations involving crosses between different lines representing different stages are examined. Key Results A minimum of 15 known genes, in addition to a relatively few major quantitative trait loci, are identified as being critical to the domestication process. These genes control traits such as pod dehiscence, seed dormancy, seed size and other seed quality characters, stem height, root mass, and harvest index. Several of the genes have pleiotropic effects that in species possessing a more rudimentary genetic characterization might have been interpreted as clusters of genes. Very little evidence for gene clustering was found in pea. When compared with common bean, pea has used a different set of genes to produce the same or similar phenotypic changes. Conclusions Similar to results for common bean, relatively few genes appear to have been modified during the domestication of pea. However, the genes involved are different, and there does not appear to be a common genetic basis to ‘domestication syndrome’ in the Fabaceae.
Frontiers in Plant Science | 2018
Norman F. Weeden
Phylogenetic relationships of the Abyssinian pea (Pisum sativum ssp. abyssinicum) to other subspecies and species in the genus were investigated to test between different hypotheses regarding its origin and domestication. An extensive sample of the Pisum sativum ssp. sativum germplasm was investigated, including groups a-1, a-2, b, c, and d as identified by Kwon et al. (2012). A broad sample of P. fulvum but relatively few P. s. ssp. elatius accessions were analyzed. Partial sequences of 18 genes were compared and these results combined with comparisons of additional genes done by others and available in the literature. In total, 54 genes or gene fragment sequences were involved in the study. The observed affinities between alleles in P. ssp. sativum, P. s. ssp. abyssinicum, P. s. ssp. elatius, and P. fulvum clearly demonstrated a close relationship among the three P. sativum subspecies and rejected the hypothesis that the Abyssinian pea was formed by hybridization between one of the P. sativum subspecies and P. fulvum. If hybridization were involved in the generation of the Abyssinian pea, it must have been between P. s. ssp. sativum and P. s. ssp. elatius, although the Abyssinian pea possesses a considerable number of highly unique alleles, implying that the actual P. s. ssp. elatius germplasm involved in such a hybridization has yet to be tested or that the hybridization occurred much longer ago than the postulated 4000 years bp. Analysis of the P. s. ssp. abyssinicum alleles in genomic regions thought to contain genes critical for domestication indicated that the indehiscent pod trait was independently developed in the Abyssinian pea, whereas the loss of seed dormancy was either derived from P. s. ssp. sativum or at least partially developed before the P. s. ssp. abyssinicum lineage diverged from that leading to P. s. ssp. sativum.
International Journal of Agronomy | 2018
Jamin Smitchger; Norman F. Weeden
Seed size plays a large role in determining productivity of large seeded legumes. In many large seeded legumes such as pea and bean, actual yield, defined here as grain yield at harvest minus the weight of seed planted, is often a better measure of actual productivity than grain yield at harvest, because the weight of planted seed varies with seed size. In many grain legumes, the weight of planted seed can be equal to 10% of the total grain yield, and minimizing the weight of planted seed could significantly impact actual yield. This study produced an algorithm to examine the relationship between seed size, yield, and actual yield in silico. The output of this algorithm predicted the ideotype for seed size in peas to be much lower (12.5 g./100 seeds) than the seed size of nearly all commercial varieties, indicating that efficiency in pea cropping systems could be increased by reducing seed size. Modifications to the algorithm would allow the prediction of the ideal seed size in other legumes. The algorithm predicts that there is likely very little correlation between seed size and grain yield, although larger seeded legumes will likely have a higher harvest index. Plant breeders can use the ideotype predicted by this function to create varieties of peas and other large seeded legumes that have higher actual yield. The ideotype for seed size was defined in pea.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 1982
Csaba Cséke; Norman F. Weeden; Bob B. Buchanan; Kosaku Uyeda
Science | 2007
Ian P. Armstead; Iain S. Donnison; Sylvain Aubry; John Harper; Stefan Hörtensteiner; Caron James; Jan Mani; Matt Moffet; Helen J. Ougham; Luned Roberts; Ann Thomas; Norman F. Weeden; Howard Thomas; I. P. King
New Phytologist | 2006
Ian P. Armstead; Iain S. Donnison; Sylvain Aubry; John Harper; Stefan Hörtensteiner; Caron James; Jan Mani; Matt Moffet; Helen J. Ougham; Luned Roberts; Ann Thomas; Norman F. Weeden; Howard Thomas; I. P. King
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 1985
Neil O. Polans; Norman F. Weeden; William Forde Thompson
Plant Science | 2005
Fang Bai; John C. Watson; Jason Walling; Norman F. Weeden; Aaron A. Santner; Darleen A. DeMason
Plant Physiology | 1983
Norman F. Weeden; Bob B. Buchanan