Norman Tepley

Magnetoencephalographic fields from patients with spontaneous and induced migraine aura.

We investigate and characterize the magnetoencephalographic waveforms from patients during spontaneous and visually induced migraine aura. Direct current neuromagnetic fields were measured during spontaneous onset of migraine auras in 4 migraine patients, and compared with recordings from 8 migraine‐with‐aura patients and 6 normal controls during visual stimulation of the occipital cortex. Complex direct current magnetoencephalographic shifts, similar in waveform, were observed in spontaneous and visually induced migraine patients, but not in controls. Two‐dimensional inverse imaging showed multiple cortical areas activated in spontaneous and visually induced migraine aura patients. In normal subjects, activation was only observed in the primary visual cortex. Results support a spreading, depression‐like neuroelectric event occurring during migraine aura that can arise spontaneously or be visually triggered in widespread regions of hyperexcitable occipital cortex.

Magnetoencephalographic studies of migraine

SYNOPSIS

Analysis of MEG signals of spreading cortical depression with propagation constrained to a rectangular cortical strip: I. Lissencephalic rabbit model

Magnetic fields arising from the rabbit cortex during spreading cortical depression (SCD) were measured in order to study the currents in the neocortex during SCD. SCD was constrained to propagate in a rectangular cortical strip perpendicular to the midline. This simplified in vivo cortical preparation enabled us to correlate magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signals to their underlying currents within the cortical strip. The propagation of SCD was monitored with an array of electrodes placed along the strip. The propagation speed for SCD in the lissencephalic rabbit brain was 3. 5+/-0.3 mm/min (mean+/-S.E.M., n=14). Slow, quasi-dc, MEG signals were observed as the SCD entered into the longitudinal fissure. The currents giving rise to the MEG signals were perpendicular to the cortical surface and directed from the surface to deeper layers of the cortex. A distributed dipolar source model was used to relate the data to the underlying cortical current. The moment of the single equivalent current dipole source was 38+/-9 nA-m (n=17). This study clarified the nature of the cortical currents during SCD in a lissencephalic in vivo preparation.

Language laterality determined by MEG mapping with MR-FOCUSS

Magnetoencephalography recordings were made on 27 patients with localization related epilepsy during two different language tasks involving semantic and phonological processing (verb generation and picture naming). These patients underwent the semi-invasive intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP), also referred to as the Wada test, to determine the language-dominant hemisphere. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) data were analyzed by MR-FOCUSS, a current density imaging technique. A laterality index (LI) was calculated from this solution to determine which hemisphere had more neural activation during these language tasks. The LIs for three separate latencies, within each language task, were calculated to determine the latency that correlated best with each patients IAP result. The LI for all language processing was calculated for the interval 150-550 ms, the second LI was calculated for the interval 230-290 ms (Wernickes activation), and the third LI was calculated for the interval 396-460 ms (Brocas activation). In 23 of 24 epilepsy patients with a successful IAP, the LIs for Brocas activation, during the picture naming task, were in agreement with the results of the IAP (96% agreement). One of three patients who had an undetermined or bilateral IAP had an LI calculated for Brocas activation (396-460 ms) that agreed with intracranial mapping and clinical testing. These results indicate an 89% agreement rate (24 of 27) for magnetoencephalographic LI determination of the hemisphere of language dominance.

Auditory evoked cortical magnetic field (M100—M200) measurements in tinnitus and normal groups

Recently, Hoke et al. (1989) and Pantev et al. (1989) demonstrated that the auditory evoked cortical magnetic field (AECMF) M100 component was larger, and M200 was smaller and occurred later in subjects with unilateral tinnitus compared with normal subjects. These group amplitude differences resulted in an M200/M100 amplitude ratio that was smaller for the subjects with tinnitus. The purposes of the present investigation were to: 1) extend the observations of Hoke et al. (1989), and, 2) determine whether contralateral AECMF differences existed following stimulation of the non-tinnitus and tinnitus ears of patients with tinnitus. Neuromagnetic AECMF recordings were recorded from 25 young normal hearing and 14 patients with unilateral tinnitus and hearing loss. The results failed to support the findings of Hoke et al. (1989). Specifically, there is no evidence suggesting that the M100 amplitude is larger, the M200 latency later, or, the M200/M100 amplitude ratios smaller, when the two samples are compared. Additionally, there were no differences in the amplitudes or latencies of M100 or M200 when results from stimulation of the tinnitus and non-tinnitus ears of tinnitus subjects were compared.

Neuromagnetic Fields in Migraine: Preliminary Findings

Neuromagnetic signals consistent with spreading cortical depression have been observed in 9 of 12 migraine patients studied, but not in normal controls (out of 8 studied) or in patients with non-migrainous headache (4 studied). These signals consist of large amplitude, usually biphasic waveforms presumably arising from the onset or offset of spreading cortical depression in a sulcus, and prolonged attenuation of magnetic amplitudes, associated with suppressed neuronal activity. Techniques are described which recognize various kinds of artefacts and which distinguish changes in state of arousal of the patient from the presumed spreading cortical depression signals.

Magnetoencephalographic localization of the basal temporal language area.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings were made on 25 native English-speaking patients with localization-related epilepsy during a semantic language task (verb generation). Eighteen right-handed subjects with normal reading ability had MEG scans performed during the same language task. MEG data was analyzed by MR-FOCUSS, a current density imaging technique. Detectable MEG signals arising from activation in the left fusiform gyrus, also known as the basal temporal language area (BTLA), occurred at 167 +/- 18 ms (n = 43) in all subjects. The BTLA has been associated with a variety of language production and comprehension tasks involving processing of semantic, orthographic, and phonologic information. MEG may become an important tool in efforts to further define the linguistic operations of specific regions within this language area.

Techniques for DC Magnetoencephalography

DC shifts are known to occur in association with a number of physiologic phenomena including spreading depression, hypoxia, epilepsy, and hypercapnia and possibly in migraine, closed head injury, and ischemia. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) makes it possible to record these shifts by prolonged DC monitoring of brain activity and offers several advantages over DC EEG and DC electrocorticography. Among the advantages of MEG is its non-invasive nature and the lack of impedance changes at the electrode-tissue interface that produce baseline shifts in DC EEG. In DC MEG measurements, great care must be taken in dealing with a variety of artifactual signals. Environmental noise can be reduced by magnetic shielding and recognized by use of reference magnetometers. Patient-generated artifacts are numerous and can be recognized and limited by a variety of methods.

Magnetic fields associated with anoxic depolarization in anesthetized rats.

We have performed simultaneous measurements of the DC-magnetoencephalogram (DC-MEG) and DC-electrocorticogram (DC-ECoG) in rats (n = 6) subjected to 90 s of reversible anoxia. The onset of major shifts of electric and magnetic signals occurred at 52 +/- 18 (S.D.) and 68 +/- 14 (S.D.), respectively, and reached a peak at 83 +/- 27 and 102 +/- 19 (S.D.) s, respectively, after termination of mechanical ventilation. DC-ECoG signal deflections were always associated with DC-MEG deflections. The time of onset and peak signals in both DC-MEG and DC-ECoG changes caused by asphyxia were highly correlated (r + 0.83, 0.94; P less than 0.05, 0.001; respectively). Our observations suggest that the non-invasive technique of DC-MEG is reliable and may provide insight into the mechanisms of anoxic cerebral depolarization.

A dipole model for spreading cortical depression.

SummarySpreading Cortical Depression (SCD) is the hyper-excitation, followed by extreme suppression of spontaneous electrical activity in the cortex. This work models SCD propagation using current dipoles to represent excitable pyramidal cells. An area of cortex, either gyrus or sulcus, supporting SCD is represented by surface dipoles oriented perpendicular to the surface. Magnetic fields created by these individual surface dipoles are calculated using the Biot-Savart law. We have assumed a plane volume conductor to represent the sulcus to simplify the mathematical derivation. The sources included in cortical surface area of 10−4mm2 is represented by a signal dipole. The magnetic field arising from the entire excited area of the cortex is obtained by summing the fields due to these individual dipoles. The simulated waveforms suggest that the shapes, amplitudes, and durations of the SCD signals depend on the size of the active area of cortex involved in SCD, as well as the location and orientation of the detector. Using this dipole model, we are able to simulate the Large Amplitude Waves (LAWs) similar to those observed by Barkley et al. (1990) while measuring spontaneous activity from migraine headache patients using the assumption that these LAWs arise from propagation of SCD across a sulcus. The shape of the simulated LAW waveform is strongly influenced by the relationships between the detector location and orientation, the propagation direction of the SCD wave, and the orientation of the sulcus.