Noshir Contractor
Northwestern University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Noshir Contractor.
Science | 2009
David Lazer; Alex Pentland; Lada A. Adamic; Sinan Aral; Albert-László Barabási; Devon Brewer; Nicholas A. Christakis; Noshir Contractor; James H. Fowler; Myron P. Gutmann; Tony Jebara; Gary King; Michael W. Macy; Deb Roy; Marshall W. Van Alstyne
A field is emerging that leverages the capacity to collect and analyze data at a scale that may reveal patterns of individual and group behaviors.
Science | 2009
David Lazer; Alex Pentland; Lada A. Adamic; Sinan Aral; Albert-László Barabási; Devon Brewer; Nicholas A. Christakis; Noshir Contractor; James H. Fowler; Myron P. Gutmann; Tony Jebara; Gary King; Michael W. Macy; Deb Roy; Marshall W. Van Alstyne
A field is emerging that leverages the capacity to collect and analyze data at a scale that may reveal patterns of individual and group behaviors.
Small Group Research | 2004
Nancy Katz; David Lazer; Holly Arrow; Noshir Contractor
This article describes the network approach to small groups. First, the core constructs that compose social network research are explained. The primary theories that provide the intellectual underpinning of the network approach are described, including theories of self-interest, theories of social exchange or dependency, theories of mutual or collective interest, cognitive theories, and theories of homophily. Highlights of the empirical work examining the internal and external networks of small groups is summarized. Finally, the primary challenges researchers face when applying the network perspective to small groups, and the primary benefits that can accrue to researchers who adopt that perspective, are enumerated.
Science | 2009
David Lazer; Alex Pentland; Lada A. Adamic; Sinan Aral; Albert-László Barabási; Devon Brewer; Nicholas A. Christakis; Noshir Contractor; James H. Fowler; Myron P. Gutmann; Tony Jebara; Gary King; Michael W. Macy; Deb Roy; Van Alstyne M
A field is emerging that leverages the capacity to collect and analyze data at a scale that may reveal patterns of individual and group behaviors.
Science Translational Medicine | 2010
Katy Börner; Noshir Contractor; Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski; Stephen M. Fiore; Kara L. Hall; Joann Keyton; Bonnie Spring; Daniel Stokols; William M. K. Trochim; Brian Uzzi
Understanding how teams function is vital because they are increasingly dominating the production of high-impact science. This Commentary describes recent research progress and professional developments in the study of scientific teamwork, an area of inquiry termed the “science of team science” (SciTS, pronounced “sahyts”). It proposes a systems perspective that incorporates a mixed-methods approach to SciTS that is commensurate with the conceptual, methodological, and translational complexities addressed within the SciTS field. The theoretically grounded and practically useful framework is intended to integrate existing and future lines of SciTS research to facilitate the field’s evolution as it addresses key challenges spanning macro, meso, and micro levels of analysis.
Clinical and Translational Science | 2010
Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski; Katy Börner; Noshir Contractor; Stephen M. Fiore; Kara L. Hall; Joann Keyton; Bonnie Spring; Daniel Stokols; William M. K. Trochim; Brian Uzzi
The First Annual International Science of Team Science (SciTS) Conference was held in Chicago, IL April 22–24, 2010. This article presents a summary of the Conference proceedings. Clin Trans Sci 2010; Volume 3: 263–266.
Communication Research | 2010
Y. Connie Yuan; Janet Fulk; Peter R. Monge; Noshir Contractor
Building on Kozlwoski and Klein’s emergence framework, this research developed and tested a set of multilevel hypotheses regarding individual and team transactive memory processes in work teams. Literature from social psychology suggested hypotheses on how shared task interdependence influences individual expertise exchange. Social network theory suggested hypotheses that individual expertise exchange is channeled according to communication tie strength. Using data collected from 218 individuals from 18 organizational teams, the proposed hypotheses were tested using hierarchical linear modeling techniques. The results showed that at the individual level the relationship between directory development and expertise exchange was mediated by communication tie strength and moderated by shared task interdependence.Team-level variables also were significantly related to individual-level outcomes such that individual expertise exchange happened more frequently in teams with well-developed team-level expertise directories, as well as with higher team communication tie strength and shared task interdependence.
Research Evaluation | 2011
Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski; Noshir Contractor; Stephen M. Fiore; Kara L. Hall; Cathleen Kane; Joann Keyton; Julie Thompson Klein; Bonnie Spring; Daniel Stokols; William M. K. Trochim
An increase in cross-disciplinary, collaborative team science initiatives over the last few decades has spurred interest by multiple stakeholder groups in empirical research on scientific teams, giving rise to an emergent field referred to as the science of team science (SciTS). This study employed a collaborative team science concept-mapping evaluation methodology to develop a comprehensive research agenda for the SciTS field. Its integrative mixed-methods approach combined group process with statistical analysis to derive a conceptual framework that identifies research areas of team science and their relative importance to the emerging SciTS field. The findings from this concept-mapping project constitute a lever for moving SciTS forward at theoretical, empirical, and translational levels.
American Behavioral Scientist | 2013
Brian Keegan; Darren Gergle; Noshir Contractor
Wikipedia’s coverage of breaking news and current events dominates editor contributions and reader attention in any given month. Collaborators on breaking news articles rapidly synthesize content to produce timely information in spite of steep coordination demands. Wikipedia’s coverage of breaking news events thus presents a case to test theories about how open collaborations coordinate complex, time-sensitive, and knowledge-intensive work in the absence of central authority, stable membership, clear roles, or reliable information. Using the revision history from Wikipedia articles about over 3,000 breaking news events, we investigate the structure of interactions between editors and articles. Because breaking article collaborations unfold more rapidly and involve more editors than most Wikipedia articles, they potentially regenerate prior forms of organizing. We analyze whether the structures of breaking and nonbreaking article networks are (a) similarly structured over time, (b) exhibit features of organizational regeneration, and (c) have similar collaboration dynamics over time. Breaking and nonbreaking article exhibit similarities in their structural characteristics over the long run, and there is less evidence of organizational regeneration on breaking articles than nonbreaking articles. However, breaking articles emerge into well-connected collaborations more rapidly than nonbreaking articles, suggesting early contributors play a crucial role in supporting these high-tempo collaborations.
international conference on social computing | 2010
Brian Keegan; Muhammad Aurangzeb Ahmed; Dmitri Williams; Jaideep Srivastava; Noshir Contractor
Gold farming is a set of illicit practices in which players in massively multiplayer online games gather and distribute virtual goods for real money. Using anonymized data from a popular online game to construct networks of characters involved in gold farming, we examine the trade networks of gold farmers, their trading affiliates, and uninvolved characters at large. Our analysis of these complex networks’ connectivity, assortativity, and attack tolerance indicate that farmers exhibit distinctive behavioral signatures which are masked by brokering affiliates. Our findings are compared against a real world drug trafficking network and suggest similarities in both organizations’ network structures which reflect similar effects of secrecy, resilience, and efficiency.