Nurhan Seyahi
Istanbul University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nurhan Seyahi.
Nephrology | 2004
Ekrem Erek; Mehmet Şükrü Sever; Emel Akoglu; Muzaffer Sariyar; Semra Bozfakioglu; Suheyla Apaydin; Rezzan Ataman; Nedim Sarsmaz; Mehmet Riza Altiparmak; Nurhan Seyahi; Kamil Serdengecti
Background and Results: By the end 2000, 22 224 patients were on renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Turkey. We investigated the cost of RRT in three medical faculties and one private dialysis centre. Yearly expenses were US
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2012
Nurhan Seyahi; Deniz Cebi; Mehmet Riza Altiparmak; Canan Akman; Rezzan Ataman; Salih Pekmezci; Kamil Serdengecti
22 759 for haemodialysis (HD), US
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2011
Nurhan Seyahi; Arzu Kahveci; Deniz Cebi; Mehmet Riza Altiparmak; Canan Akman; Ilhami Uslu; Rezzan Ataman; Hasan Tasci; Kamil Serdengecti
22 350 for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and US
Nephrology | 2004
Nurhan Seyahi; Suheyla Apaydin; Muzaffer Sariyar; Kamil Serdengecti; Ekrem Erek
23 393 and US
American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2011
Gultekin Suleymanlar; Kamil Serdengecti; Mehmet Riza Altiparmak; Kitty J. Jager; Nurhan Seyahi; Ekrem Erek
10 028, respectively, for the first and second years of transplantation (Tx). In the first year, renal Tx was significantly more expensive than CAPD. However, after the first year of renal transplantation, Tx became significantly more economical than both CAPD and HD. The sum of all yearly RRT expenses for the country was US
Ndt Plus | 2017
Maria Pippias; Anneke Kramer; Marlies Noordzij; Nikolaos Afentakis; Ramón Alonso de la Torre; Patrice M. Ambühl; Manuel I. Aparicio Madre; Felipe Arribas Monzón; Anders Åsberg; Marjolein Bonthuis; Encarnación Bouzas Caamaño; Ivan Bubić; Fergus Caskey; Harijs Cernevskis; Maria de los Ángeles García Bazaga; Jean-Marin des Grottes; Raquel Fernández González; Manuel Ferrer-Alamar; Patrik Finne; Liliana Garneata; Eliezer Golan; James G. Heaf; Marc Hemmelder; Alma Idrizi; Kyriakos Ioannou; Faiçal Jarraya; Nino Kantaria; Mykola Kolesnyk; Reinhard Kramar; Mathilde Lassalle
488 958 709, which corresponds to nearly 5.5% of Turkeys total health expenditure.
Renal Failure | 2007
Nurhan Seyahi; Mehmet Riza Altiparmak; Koray Tascilar; Meltem Pekpak; Kamil Serdengecti; Ekrem Erek
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality among renal transplant recipients. In the general population, coronary artery calcification (CAC) and progression of CAC are predictors of future cardiac risk. We conducted a study to determine the progression of CAC in renal transplant recipients; we also examined the factors associated with progression and the impact of the analytic methods used to determine CAC progression. METHODS We used multi-detector computed tomography to examine CAC in 150 prevalent renal transplant recipients, who did not have a documented cardiovascular disease. A baseline and a follow-up scan were performed and changes in CAC scores were evaluated in each patient individually, to calculate the incidence of CAC progression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the determinants of CAC progression. RESULTS Baseline CAC prevalence was 35.3% and the mean CAC score was 60.0 ± 174.8. At follow-up scan that was performed after an average of 2.8 ± 0.4 years, CAC prevalence increased to 64.6% and the mean CAC score to 94.9 ± 245.7. Progression of individual CAC score was found between 28.0 and 38.0%, depending on the method used to define progression. In patients with baseline CAC, median annualized rate of CAC progression was 11.1. Baseline CAC, high triglyceride and bisphosphonate use were the independent determinants of CAC progression. CONCLUSIONS Renal transplantation does not stop or reverse CAC. Progression of CAC is the usual evolution pattern of CAC in renal transplant recipients. Beside baseline CAC, high triglyceride level and bisphosphonate use were associated with progression of CAC.
Renal Failure | 2015
Bennur Esen; Serdar Kahvecioglu; Ahmet Engin Atay; Gulten Ozgen; Muhammed Masuk Okumus; Nurhan Seyahi; Dede Sit; Pinar Kadioglu
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality among renal transplant recipients. Data on the relationship between coronary artery calcification (CAC) and coronary ischaemia in renal transplantation patients are scant. We conducted a study to determine the prevalence and determinants of CAC in these patients; we also examined the frequency of coronary ischaemia in patients with moderate and severe CAC. METHODS We used multi-detector spiral computed tomography to examine CAC in 178 consecutive renal transplant recipients. Angina pectoris was sought with the Rose questionnaire. The extent of calcification was measured by Agatston score. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy was performed in patients with moderate and severe CAC. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the determinants of CAC presence and CAC score, respectively. RESULTS CAC was present in 72 patients (40.4%), mean CAC score was 113.7±275.5 (median: 0 and range: 0-1712). Age, time on transplantation and Rose angina pectoris were the independent determinants of both CAC presence and high CAC scores in all multivariate models. Coronary ischaemia was detected in 17.1% of the patients with moderate-to-severe CAC. CONCLUSIONS CAC is highly prevalent in renal transplant recipients; it is associated with symptoms of coronary ischaemia. Time on transplantation is an independent determinant of CAC. Future studies to evaluate the prognostic significance of CAC in these patients are necessary.
Transplantation proceedings | 2015
Hikmet Soylu; Meric Oruc; O.K. Demirkol; E.S. Saygili; Rezzan Ataman; Mehmet Riza Altiparmak; Salih Pekmezci; Nurhan Seyahi
SUMMARY: Extraskeletal calcifications are frequently observed in patients with chronic renal failure. However, clinically, they usually remain silent. In this report, we describe two patients with massive extraskeletal calcifications that caused significant morbidity. The first patient had tumoural calcification located on the shoulder and the second patient had severe neurological symptoms caused by intracranial calcifications. High calcium phosphorus product and severe secondary hyperparathyroidism were present in both patients. Furthermore, they both received inappropriately high doses of active vitamin D, even though they failed to respond to this therapy. We suggest to monitor closely the calcium, phosphorus and parathyroid hormone levels during calcitriol therapy and to perform parathyroidectomy, without delay, in patients who were resistant to calcitriol.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2011
B. Aptaramanov; Nurhan Seyahi; Selma Alagoz; Salih Pekmezci; Rezzan Ataman; H. Tasci; Kamil Serdengecti
BACKGROUND National renal registry studies providing data for incidence, prevalence, and characteristics of end-stage renal disease and renal replacement therapy (RRT) serve as a basis to determine national strategies for the prevention and treatment of these diseases and identify new areas for special studies. STUDY DESIGN Since 1990, the Turkish Society of Nephrology has been coordinating a national renal registry that collects data on patients receiving RRT. This report focuses on data collected from 1996-2008. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Data were collected in dialysis centers for patients on RRT. PREDICTOR Year. OUTCOMES Point prevalence and incidence of RRT, RRT modalities, demographic and clinical characteristics of patients on RRT. RESULTS From 1996 to 2008, the number of centers (199 and 760) and response rates to the registry (76% and 99.4%) increased. In 2008, the point prevalence of RRT was 756 per million population (pmp) and incidence was 188 pmp, including pediatric patients. In prevalent patients, the most common RRT modality was hemodialysis (77.0% of patients), followed by peritoneal dialysis (10.1%) and transplant (12.9%). The age of hemodialysis and transplant patients increased, with a predominance of male patients. Percentages of diabetes mellitus and hypertension as causes of ESRD increased, whereas those of chronic glomerulonephritis and urologic disease decreased. Infection and crude death rates decreased in all treatment modalities. LIMITATIONS The main study limitations were registry design and low number of kidney transplants. CONCLUSION With increasing numbers of dialysis centers and RRT patients during the last 12 years, the need for RRT in Turkey has been better met. The quality of RRT care has improved, especially regarding prevention and treatment of infections.