Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Núria Prim is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Núria Prim.


Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2017

Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort study

Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Elena Salamanca; Marina de Cueto; Po-Ren Hsueh; Pierluigi Viale; José Ramón Paño-Pardo; Mario Venditti; Mario Tumbarello; George L. Daikos; Rafael Cantón; Yohei Doi; Felipe Francisco Tuon; Ilias Karaiskos; Elena Pérez-Nadales; Mitchell J. Schwaber; Özlem Kurt Azap; Maria Souli; Emmanuel Roilides; Spyros Pournaras; Murat Akova; Federico Perez; Joaquín Bermejo; Antonio Oliver; Manel Almela; Warren Lowman; Benito Almirante; Robert A. Bonomo; Yehuda Carmeli; David L. Paterson; Álvaro Pascual

BACKGROUND The best available treatment against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of appropriate therapy and of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to CPE. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with clinically significant monomicrobial BSIs due to CPE from the INCREMENT cohort, recruited from 26 tertiary hospitals in ten countries. Exclusion criteria were missing key data, death sooner than 24 h after the index date, therapy with an active antibiotic for at least 2 days when blood cultures were taken, and subsequent episodes in the same patient. We compared 30 day all-cause mortality between patients receiving appropriate (including an active drug against the blood isolate and started in the first 5 days after infection) or inappropriate therapy, and for patients receiving appropriate therapy, between those receiving active monotherapy (only one active drug) or combination therapy (more than one). We used a propensity score for receiving combination therapy and a validated mortality score (INCREMENT-CPE mortality score) to control for confounders in Cox regression analyses. We stratified analyses of combination therapy according to INCREMENT-CPE mortality score (0-7 [low mortality score] vs 8-15 [high mortality score]). INCREMENT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01764490. FINDINGS Between Jan 1, 2004, and Dec 31, 2013, 480 patients with BSIs due to CPE were enrolled in the INCREMENT cohort, of whom we included 437 (91%) in this study. 343 (78%) patients received appropriate therapy compared with 94 (22%) who received inappropriate therapy. The most frequent organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (375 [86%] of 437; 291 [85%] of 343 patients receiving appropriate therapy vs 84 [89%] of 94 receiving inappropriate therapy) and the most frequent carbapenemase was K pneumoniae carbapenemase (329 [75%]; 253 [74%] vs 76 [81%]). Appropriate therapy was associated with lower mortality than was inappropriate therapy (132 [38·5%] of 343 patients died vs 57 [60·6%] of 94; absolute difference 22·1% [95% CI 11·0-33·3]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·45 [95% CI 0·33-0·62]; p<0·0001). Among those receiving appropriate therapy, 135 (39%) received combination therapy and 208 (61%) received monotherapy. Overall mortality was not different between those receiving combination therapy or monotherapy (47 [35%] of 135 vs 85 [41%] of 208; adjusted HR 1·63 [95% CI 0·67-3·91]; p=0·28). However, combination therapy was associated with lower mortality than was monotherapy in the high-mortality-score stratum (30 [48%] of 63 vs 64 [62%] of 103; adjusted HR 0·56 [0·34-0·91]; p=0·02), but not in the low-mortality-score stratum (17 [24%] of 72 vs 21 [20%] of 105; adjusted odds ratio 1·21 [0·56-2·56]; p=0·62). INTERPRETATION Appropriate therapy was associated with a protective effect on mortality among patients with BSIs due to CPE. Combination therapy was associated with improved survival only in patients with a high mortality score. Patients with BSIs due to CPE should receive active therapy as soon as they are diagnosed, and monotherapy should be considered for those in the low-mortality-score stratum. FUNDING Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases, European Development Regional Fund, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and Innovative Medicines Initiative.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2016

A Multinational, Preregistered Cohort Study of β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Due to Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Salvador Pérez-Galera; Elena Salamanca; Marina de Cueto; Esther Calbo; Benito Almirante; Pierluigi Viale; Antonio Oliver; Vicente Pintado; Oriol Gasch; Luis Martínez-Martínez; Johann D. D. Pitout; Murat Akova; Carmen Peña; José Molina; Alicia Hernández; Mario Venditti; Núria Prim; Julia Origüen; Germán Bou; Evelina Tacconelli; Mario Tumbarello; Axel Hamprecht; Helen Giamarellou; Manel Almela; Federico Perez; Mitchell J. Schwaber; Joaquín Bermejo; Warren Lowman; Po-Ren Hsueh

ABSTRACT The spread of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is leading to increased carbapenem consumption. Alternatives to carbapenems need to be investigated. We investigated whether β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) combinations are as effective as carbapenems in the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to ESBL-E. A multinational, retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with monomicrobial BSI due to ESBL-E were studied; specific criteria were applied for inclusion of patients in the empirical-therapy (ET) cohort (ETC; 365 patients), targeted-therapy (TT) cohort (TTC; 601 patients), and global cohort (GC; 627 patients). The main outcome variables were cure/improvement rate at day 14 and all-cause 30-day mortality. Multivariate analysis, propensity scores (PS), and sensitivity analyses were used to control for confounding. The cure/improvement rates with BLBLIs and carbapenems were 80.0% and 78.9% in the ETC and 90.2% and 85.5% in the TTC, respectively. The 30-day mortality rates were 17.6% and 20% in the ETC and 9.8% and 13.9% in the TTC, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) values for cure/improvement rate with ET with BLBLIs were 1.37 (0.69 to 2.76); for TT, they were 1.61 (0.58 to 4.86). Regarding 30-day mortality, the adjusted OR (95% CI) values were 0.55 (0.25 to 1.18) for ET and 0.59 (0.19 to 1.71) for TT. The results were consistent in all subgroups studied, in a stratified analysis according to quartiles of PS, in PS-matched cases, and in the GC. BLBLIs, if active in vitro, appear to be as effective as carbapenems for ET and TT of BSI due to ESLB-E regardless of the source and specific species. These data may help to avoid the overuse of carbapenems. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01764490.)


Eurosurveillance | 2016

Detection of mcr-1 colistin resistance gene in polyclonal Escherichia coli isolates in Barcelona, Spain, 2012 to 2015

Núria Prim; Judith Rodríguez-Navarro; Montserrat Español; Miquel Turbau; Pere Coll; Beatriz Mirelis

Colistin resistance was detected in 53 of 10,011 Escherichia coli (0.5%) by prospective phenotypic testing of consecutive clinical isolates in a single hospital in Barcelona, Spain (2012-15). The mcr-1 gene was retrospectively identified by PCR and sequencing in 15 of 50 available isolates. Each isolate had a unique PFGE pattern except for two. This clonal diversity supports the hypothesis of horizontal dissemination of the mcr-1 gene in the local study population.


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy | 2016

Ertapenem for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a multinational pre-registered cohort study

Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Robert A. Bonomo; Yehuda Carmeli; David L. Paterson; Benito Almirante; Luis Martínez-Martínez; Antonio Oliver; Esther Calbo; Carmen Peña; Murat Akova; Johann D. D. Pitout; Julia Origüen; Vicente Pintado; Elisa Garcia-Vazquez; Oriol Gasch; Axel Hamprecht; Núria Prim; Mario Tumbarello; Germán Bou; Pierluigi Viale; Evelina Tacconelli; Manel Almela; Federico Perez; Helen Giamarellou; José Miguel Cisneros; Mitchell J. Schwaber; Mario Venditti; Warren Lowman; Joaquín Bermejo; Po-Ren Hsueh

OBJECTIVES Data about the efficacy of ertapenem for the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) are limited. We compared the clinical efficacy of ertapenem and other carbapenems in monomicrobial BSI due to ESBL-E. METHODS A multinational retrospective cohort study (INCREMENT project) was performed (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01764490). Patients given monotherapy with ertapenem or other carbapenems were compared. Empirical and targeted therapies were analysed. Propensity scores were used to control for confounding; sensitivity analyses were performed in subgroups. The outcome variables were cure/improvement rate at day 14 and all-cause 30 day mortality. RESULTS The empirical therapy cohort (ETC) and the targeted therapy cohort (TTC) included 195 and 509 patients, respectively. Cure/improvement rates were 90.6% with ertapenem and 75.5% with other carbapenems (P = 0.06) in the ETC and 89.8% and 82.6% (P = 0.02) in the TTC, respectively; 30 day mortality rates were 3.1% and 23.3% (P = 0.01) in the ETC and 9.3% and 17.1% (P = 0.01) in the TTC, respectively. Adjusted ORs (95% CI) for cure/improvement with empirical and targeted ertapenem were 1.87 (0.24-20.08; P = 0.58) and 1.04 (0.44-2.50; P = 0.92), respectively. For the propensity-matched cohorts it was 1.18 (0.43-3.29; P = 0.74). Regarding 30 day mortality, the adjusted HR (95% CI) for targeted ertapenem was 0.93 (0.43-2.03; P = 0.86) and for the propensity-matched cohorts it was 1.05 (0.46-2.44; P = 0.90). Sensitivity analyses were consistent except for patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, which showed a non-significant trend favouring other carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS Ertapenem appears as effective as other carbapenems for empirical and targeted therapy of BSI due to ESBL-E, but further studies are needed for patients with severe sepsis/septic shock.


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy | 2017

Development and validation of the INCREMENT-ESBL predictive score for mortality in patients with bloodstream infections due to extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Zaira Raquel Palacios-Baena; Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Marina de Cueto; Pierluigi Viale; Mario Venditti; Alicia Hernández-Torres; Antonio Oliver; Luis Martínez-Martínez; Esther Calbo; Vicente Pintado; Oriol Gasch; Benito Almirante; José Antonio Lepe; Johann D. D. Pitout; Murat Akova; Carmen Peña-Miralles; Mitchell J. Schwaber; Mario Tumbarello; Evelina Tacconelli; Julia Origüen; Núria Prim; Germán Bou; Helen Giamarellou; Joaquín Bermejo; Axel Hamprecht; Federico Perez; M. Almela; Warren Lowman; Po-Ren Hsueh; Carolina Navarro-San Francisco

Background. Bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) are frequent yet outcome prediction rules for clinical use have not been developed. The objective was to define and validate a predictive risk score for 30 day mortality. Methods. A multinational retrospective cohort study including consecutive episodes of BSI due to ESBL-E was performed; cases were randomly assigned to a derivation cohort (DC) or a validation cohort (VC). The main outcome variable was all-cause 30 day mortality. A predictive score was developed using logistic regression coefficients for the DC, then tested in the VC. Results. The DC and VC included 622 and 328 episodes, respectively. The final multivariate logistic regression model for mortality in the DC included age >50 years (OR = 2.63; 95% CI: 1.18–5.85; 3 points), infection due to Klebsiella spp. (OR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.21–3.58; 2 points), source other than urinary tract (OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 2.02–6.44; 3 points), fatal underlying disease (OR = 3.91; 95% CI: 2.24–6.80; 4 points), Pitt score >3 (OR = 3.04; 95 CI: 1.69–5.47; 3 points), severe sepsis or septic shock at presentation (OR = 4.8; 95% CI: 2.72–8.46; 4 points) and inappropriate early targeted therapy (OR = 2.47; 95% CI: 1.58–4.63; 2 points). The score showed an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.85 in the DC and 0.82 in the VC. Mortality rates for patients with scores of < 11 and ≥11 were 5.6% and 45.9%, respectively, in the DC, and 5.4% and 34.8% in the VC. Conclusions. We developed and validated an easy-to-collect predictive scoring model for all-cause 30 day mortality useful for identifying patients at high and low risk of mortality.


Journal of Infection | 2017

Prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae: A four-year cross-sectional study

Núria Prim; Miquel Turbau; Judith Rodríguez-Navarro; Pere Coll; Beatriz Mirelis

OBJECTIVES The objectives were to determine the prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, and to gain knowledge on the epidemiological and clinical features of the patients. METHODS All colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae consecutively isolated from clinical samples in our institution from 2012 to 2015, were included in this cross-sectional study. Intrinsic-resistant species were excluded. Minimum inhibitory concentration was performed by gradient diffusion. Detection of plasmid-encoded colistin resistance genes mcr-1 and mcr-2 was performed by amplification. Epidemiological and clinical features were reviewed. RESULTS Of 13579 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 91 were colistin-resistant. The overall prevalence of colistin resistance was 0.67%. The rates were higher in Enterobacter cloacae (4.2%) than Escherichia coli (0.5%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (0.4%). One third of the isolates were multi-drug resistant (MDR). While mcr-2 was not detected, mcr-1 was detected only in E. coli. Regarding these infections, 23% were community-acquired. 89% of the patients had not received colistin previously. There were no significant differences between infections caused by mcr-1 and non-mcr-1-carrying isolates. CONCLUSIONS Colistin resistance was not restricted to MDR isolates and to clinical settings. Most patients had no record of previous administration of colistin.


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2018

Comparison of predictors and mortality between bloodstream infections caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Oded Scheuerman; Vered Schechner; Yehuda Carmeli; Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Esther Calbo; Benito Almirante; Pier-Luigy Viale; Antonio Oliver; Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa; Oriol Gasch; Mónica Gozalo; Johann D. D. Pitout; Murat Akova; Carmen Peña; José Molina; Alicia Hernández-Torres; Mario Venditti; Núria Prim; Julia Origüen; Germán Bou; Evelina Tacconelli; Maria Tumbarello; Axel Hamprecht; Ilias Karaiskos; Cristina de la Calle; Federico Perez; Mitchell J. Schwaber; Joaquín Bermejo; Warren Lowman; Po-Ren Hsueh

OBJECTIVETo compare the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and mortality of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) versus ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP) and to examine the differences in clinical characteristics and outcome between BSIs caused by isolates with CTX-M versus other ESBL genotypesMETHODSAs part of the INCREMENT project, 33 tertiary hospitals in 12 countries retrospectively collected data on adult patients diagnosed with ESBL-EC BSI or ESBL-KP BSI between 2004 and 2013. Risk factors for ESBL-EC versus ESBL-KP BSI and for 30-day mortality were examined by bivariate analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression.RESULTSThe study included 909 patients: 687 with ESBL-EC BSI and 222 with ESBL-KP BSI. ESBL genotype by polymerase chain reaction amplification of 286 isolates was available. ESBL-KP BSI was associated with intensive care unit admission, cardiovascular and neurological comorbidities, length of stay to bacteremia >14 days from admission, and a nonurinary source. Overall, 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with ESBL-KP BSI than ESBL-EC BSI (33.7% vs 17.4%; odds ratio, 1.64; P=.016). CTX-M was the most prevalent ESBL subtype identified (218 of 286 polymerase chain reaction-tested isolates, 76%). No differences in clinical characteristics or in mortality between CTX-M and non-CTX-M ESBLs were detected.CONCLUSIONSClinical characteristics and risk of mortality differ significantly between ESBL-EC and ESBL-KP BSI. Therefore, all ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae should not be considered a homogeneous group. No differences in outcomes between genotypes were detected.CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIERClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01764490.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:660-667.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2017

Empiric Therapy With Carbapenem-Sparing Regimens for Bloodstream Infections due to Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Results From the INCREMENT Cohort

Zaira Raquel Palacios-Baena; Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Esther Calbo; Benito Almirante; Pierluigi Viale; Antonio Oliver; Vicente Pintado; Oriol Gasch; Luis Martínez-Martínez; Johann D. D. Pitout; Murat Akova; Carmen Peña; José Molina Gil-Bermejo; Alicia Hernández; Mario Venditti; Núria Prim; Germán Bou; Evelina Tacconelli; Mario Tumbarello; Axel Hamprecht; Helen Giamarellou; Manel Almela; Federico Perez; Mitchell J. Schwaber; Joaquín Bermejo; Warren Lowman; Po-Ren Hsueh; José Ramón Paño-Pardo; Julián Torre-Cisneros; Maria Souli

Background There is little information about the efficacy of active alternative drugs to carbapenems except β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors for the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E). The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients with BSI due to ESBL-E who received empiric therapy with such drugs (other active drugs [OADs]) or carbapenems. Methods A multinational retrospective cohort study of patients with BSI due to ESBL-E who received empiric treatment with OADs or carbapenems was performed. Cox regression including a propensity score for receiving OADs was performed to analyze 30-day all-cause mortality as main outcome. Clinical failure and length of stay were also analyzed. Results Overall, 335 patients were included; 249 received empiric carbapenems and 86 OADs. The most frequent OADs were aminoglycosides (43 patients) and fluoroquinolones (20 patients). Empiric therapy with OADs was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], .38-1.48) in the Cox regression analysis. Propensity score-matched pairs, subgroups, and sensitivity analyses did not show different trends; specifically, the adjusted HR for aminoglycosides was 1.05 (95% CI, .51-2.16). OADs were neither associated with 14-day clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, .29-1.36) nor length of hospital stay. Conclusions We were unable to show that empiric treatment with OAD was associated with a worse outcome compared with carbapenems. This information allows more options to be considered for empiric therapy, at least for some patients, depending on local susceptibility patterns of ESBL-E.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2015

In Vivo Adaptive Resistance to Colistin in Escherichia coli Isolates

Núria Prim; Montserrat Español; Beatriz Mirelis; Pere Coll


International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents | 2018

Predictors of outcome in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Alessandro Russo; Marco Falcone; Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Esther Calbo; Benito Almirante; Pierluigi Viale; Antonio Oliver; Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa; Oriol Gasch; Mónica Gozalo; Johann D. D. Pitout; Murat Akova; Carmen Peña; José Miguel Cisneros; Alicia Hernández-Torres; Farcomeni A; Núria Prim; Julia Origüen; Germán Bou; Evelina Tacconelli; Mario Tumbarello; Axel Hamprecht; Ilias Karaiskos; de la Calle C; Federico Perez; Mitchell J. Schwaber; Joaquín Bermejo; Warren Lowman; Po-Ren Hsueh; Marta Mora-Rillo

Collaboration


Dive into the Núria Prim's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benito Almirante

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Federico Perez

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonio Oliver

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Warren Lowman

University of the Witwatersrand

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Po-Ren Hsueh

National Taiwan University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Esther Calbo

University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Oriol Gasch

University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge