O. Aberle
CERN
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by O. Aberle.
Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference | 2005
A. Bertarelli; O. Aberle; R. Assmann; S. Calatroni; Alessandro Dallocchio; Tadeusz Kurtyka; M. Mayer; R. Perret; Stefano Redaelli; G. Robert-Demolaize
The functional specification of the LHC Collimators requires, for the start-up of the machine and the initial luminosity runs (Phase 1), a collimation system with maximum robustness against abnormal beam operating conditions. The most severe cases to be considered in the mechanical design are the asynchronous beam dump at 7TeV and the 450GeV injection error. To ensure that the collimator jaws survive such accident scenarios, low-Z materials were chosen, driving the design towards Graphite or Carbon reinforced Carbon composites. Furthermore, in-depth thermo-mechanical simulations, both static and dynamic, were necessary. This paper presents the results of the numerical analyses performed for the 450GeV accident case, along with the experimental results of the tests conducted on a collimator prototype in CERN TT40 transfer line, impacted by a 450GeV beam of 3.2e13 protons, with impact transverse offsets from 1 to 5 mm.
Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference | 2003
R. Abmann; O. Aberle; M. Brugger; L. Bruno; Helmut Burkhardt; E. Chiaveri; B. Dehning; A. Ferrari; B. Goddard; Jean Bernard Jeanneret; M. Jimenez; V. Kain; M. Lamont; F. Ruggiero; R. Schmidt; Peter Sievers; J. Uythoven; Vasilis Vlachoudis; L. Vos; J. Wenninger; I. Baishev; D. Kaltchev
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will collide proton beams at 14 TeV c.m. with unprecedented stored intensities. The transverse energy density in the beam will be about three orders of magnitude larger than previously handled in the Tevatron or in HERA, if compared at the locations of the betatron collimators. In particular, the population in the beam halo is much above the quench level of the superconducting magnets. Two LHC insertions are dedicated to collimation with the design goals of preventing magnet quenches in regular operation and preventing damage to accelerator components in case of irregular beam loss. We discuss the challenges for designing and building a collimation system that withstands the high power LHC beam and provides the required high cleaning efficiency. Plans for future work are outlined.
ieee particle accelerator conference | 2007
T Weiler; O. Aberle; R. Assmann; R. Chamizo; Y Kadi; J. Lettry; R Losito; Stefano Redaelli
The stored energy and intensity of the LHC beam exceed the damage level of the machine and the quench level of the magnets by far. Therefore a robust and reliable collimation system is required which prevents the quenching of the magnets during regular operation and protects the accelerator components from damage in the event of beam loss. To assure that the installed collimators will protect the machine and permit the required performance of the collider, an appropriate hardware commissioning has to be implemented. In this contribution we describe the procedures for the hardware commissioning of the LHC collimation system. These procedures will establish the required precision and reliability of collimator movements and settings before the start of beam operation.
Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference | 2005
Stefano Redaelli; O. Aberle; R. Assmann; Alessandro Masi; G. Spiezia
The 360 MJ stored energy of the 7 TeV LHC beams can seriously damage the beam line elements in case of accidental beam losses. Notably, the collimators will sit at 6 to 7 sigmas from the beam centre (1.2 to 1.4 mm) and will be hit and possibly damaged in case of failures, with a consequent degradation of the cleaning performance of the overall collimation system. The experience from operating machines shows that an a-posteriori identification of the damaged collimators from the observed performance degradation is extremely challenging. Collimator tests with beam at the SPS have shown that the impact of 450 GeV proton beams at intensities from 1010to 3 × 1013could be detected by measuring sound and vibrations induced by the impacting beams.
EPJ Web of Conferences, vol. 146 (2017); ND 2016: International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Bruges, Belgium: 11-16 September 2016 | 2017
E. Chiaveri; O. Aberle; J. Andrzejewski; Francisco Calviño Tavares; Adrià Casanovas Hoste; Guillem Pere Cortés Rossell; Ariel Esteban Tarifeño Saldivia
The CERN n_TOF neutron beam facility is characterized by a very high instantaneous neutron flux, excellent TOF resolution at the 185 m long flight path (EAR-1), low intrinsic background and coverage of a wide range of neutron energies, from thermal to a few GeV. These characteristics provide a unique possibility to perform high-accuracy measurements of neutron-induced reaction cross-sections and angular distributions of interest for fundamental and applied Nuclear Physics. Since 2001, the n_TOF Collaboration has collected a wealth of high quality nuclear data relevant for nuclear astrophysics, nuclear reactor technology, nuclear medicine, etc. The overall efficiency of the experimental program and the range of possible measurements has been expanded with the construction of a second experimental area (EAR-2), located 20 m on the vertical of the n_TOF spallation target. This upgrade, which benefits from a neutron flux 30 times higher than in EAR-1, provides a substantial extension in measurement capabilities, opening the possibility to collect data on neutron cross-section of isotopes with short half-lives or available in very small amounts. This contribution will outline the main characteristics of the n_TOF facility, with special emphasis on the new experimental area. In particular, we will discuss the innovative features of the EAR-2 neutron beam that make possible to perform very challenging measurements on short-lived radioisotopes or sub-mg samples, out of reach up to now at other neutron facilities around the world. Finally, the future perspectives of the facility will be presented.
Prepared for | 2006
R. Assmann; M. Sobczak; F. Ruggiero; M. Magistris; T Weiler; J. Lettry; M. Santana; A. Masi; V. Vlachoudis; J. Lendaro; G. Bellodi; M. Jonker; C. Rathjen; Chiara Bracco; Stefano Redaelli; G. Robert-Demolaize; M. Brugger; K. Tsoulou; O. Aberle; R. Losito; R. Perret; A. Bertarelli; M. Mayer; Peter Sievers; P. Gander; S. Chamizo; K. Kershaw; E. Métral; J.B. Jeanneret; J.M. Jimenez
Archive | 2004
A. Bertarelli; O. Aberle; R. Assmann; E. Chiaveri; Tadeusz Kurtyka; R. Perret; Peter Sievers
Archive | 2010
D Wollmann; M Magistris; O. Aberle; M Mayer; J. P. Bacher; R de Morais Amaral; M Malabaila; A Nordt; S Mathot; L Lari; F Caspers; I. Baishev; M Donze; E Chiaveri; S. Calatroni; A. Ferrari; Delphine Jacquet; G. Bellodi; D. Kaltchev; A Cherif; John M. Jowett; J M Geisser; I. Kurochkin; Chiara Bracco; J Lendaro; P Francon; Alessandro Masi; Vlachoudis; Aurelien Marsili; Nicolas Mounet
Archive | 2006
A. Bertarelli; O. Aberle; R. Assmann; Alessandro Dallocchio; Tadeusz Kurtyka; Matteo Magistris; Manfred Mayer; Mario Santana-Leitner
Archive | 2004
O. Aberle; A. Bertarelli; H. Braun; M. Brugger; O. Br; L. Bruno; S. Calatroni; E. Chiaveri; B. Dehning; A. Ferrari; B. Goddard; M. Jimenez; V. Kain; M. Lamont; M. Mayer; R. Perret; Stefano Redaelli; T. Risselada; G. Robert-Demolaize; S. Roesler; F. Ruggiero; R. Schmidt; D. Schulte; P. Sievers; V. Vlachoudis; L. Vos; E. Vossenberg; J. Wenninger; I. Baishev; I. Kurochkin