O. J. Roberts
University College Dublin
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by O. J. Roberts.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
V. Connaughton; E. Burns; Adam Goldstein; L. Blackburn; M. S. Briggs; Bin-Bin Zhang; J. B. Camp; N. Christensen; C. M. Hui; P. Jenke; T. Littenberg; J. E. McEnery; Judith Lea Racusin; P. Shawhan; L. P. Singer; J. Veitch; C. Wilson-Hodge; P. N. Bhat; E. Bissaldi; W. Cleveland; G. Fitzpatrick; M. H. Gibby; A. von Kienlin; R. M. Kippen; S. McBreen; B. Mailyan; Charles A. Meegan; W. S. Paciesas; Robert D. Preece; O. J. Roberts
With an instantaneous view of 70% of the sky, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is an excellent partner in the search for electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational-wave (GW) events. GBM observations at the time of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) event GW150914 reveal the presence of a weak transient above 50 keV, 0.4 s after the GW event, with a false-alarm probability of 0.0022 (2.9(sigma)). This weak transient lasting 1 s was not detected by any other instrument and does not appear to be connected with other previously known astrophysical, solar, terrestrial, or magnetospheric activity. Its localization is ill-constrained but consistent with the direction of GW150914. The duration and spectrum of the transient event are consistent with a weak short gamma-ray burst (GRB) arriving at a large angle to the direction in which Fermi was pointing where the GBM detector response is not optimal. If the GBM transient is associated with GW150914, then this electromagnetic signal from a stellar mass black hole binary merger is unexpected. We calculate a luminosity in hard X-ray emission between 1 keV and 10 MeV of 1.8(sup +1.5, sub -1.0) x 10(exp 49) erg/s. Future joint observations of GW events by LIGO/Virgo and Fermi GBM could reveal whether the weak transient reported here is a plausible counterpart to GW150914 or a chance coincidence, and will further probe the connection between compact binary mergers and short GRBs.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2015
Steven A. Cummer; Fanchao Lyu; M. S. Briggs; G. Fitzpatrick; O. J. Roberts; Joseph R. Dwyer
Radio emissions continue to provide insight into the production of terrestrial gamma ray flashes (TGFs) by thunderstorms, including the critical question of the conditions under which they are generated. We have identified several TGF-associated lightning radio emissions in which the altitudes of in-cloud lightning leader pulses that precede and follow the TGF can be measured. We combine these with high absolute timing accuracy TGF observations from the Fermi satellite to determine the development of the lightning channel before, during, and after the TGF production. All of these TGFs were produced several milliseconds after the leader had initiated and when the leaders reached 1–2 km in length. After the TGFs, the leaders all continued to ascend for several more kilometers with no dramatic change in their characteristics, although they all exhibited high average velocities of 0.8–1.0 × 106 m/s. Implications in the context of TGF models are discussed. These results paint the first clear picture of the lightning processes that occur before, during, and after TGF production.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
George Younes; C. Kouveliotou; Oleg Kargaltsev; Ramandeep Gill; Jonathan Granot; Anna L. Watts; Joseph D. Gelfand; Matthew G. Baring; A. K. Harding; George G. Pavlov; A. J. van der Horst; Daniela Huppenkothen; Ersin Gogus; Lin Lin; O. J. Roberts
We report on the analysis of two deep XMM-Newton observations of the magnetar Swift J1834.9-0846 and its surrounding extended emission taken in March 2014 and October 2014, 2.5 and 3.1 years after the source went into outburst. The magnetar is only weakly detected in the first observation with an absorption corrected flux
Physical Review D | 2014
G. Fitzpatrick; E. S. Cramer; Sheila McBreen; M. S. Briggs; S. Foley; D. Tierney; Vandiver Chaplin; V. Connaughton; M. Stanbro; S. Xiong; Joseph Dwyer; G. J. Fishman; O. J. Roberts; Andreas von Kienlin
F_{\rm 0.5-10 keV}\approx4\times10^{-14}
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Ersin Gogus; Lin Lin; Yuki Kaneko; C. Kouveliotou; Anna L. Watts; Manoneeta Chakraborty; M. Ali Alpar; Daniela Huppenkothen; O. J. Roberts; George Younes; Alexander Jonathan Van Der Horst
erg s
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2016
Hoi-Fung Yu; Robert D. Preece; J. Greiner; P. Narayana Bhat; E. Bissaldi; M. S. Briggs; W. Cleveland; V. Connaughton; Adam Goldstein; Andreas von Kienlin; C. Kouveliotou; B. Mailyan; Charles A. Meegan; W. S. Paciesas; O. J. Roberts; P. Veres; C. Wilson-Hodge; Bin-Bin Zhang; Hendrik van Eerten
^{-1}
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
B. Mailyan; M. S. Briggs; E. S. Cramer; G. Fitzpatrick; O. J. Roberts; M. Stanbro; V. Connaughton; S. McBreen; P. N. Bhat; Joseph R. Dwyer
cm
Physical Review Letters | 2017
J. Wu; S. Nishimura; G. Lorusso; Peter Möller; E. Ideguchi; P. H. Regan; G. S. Simpson; P.-A. Söderström; P. M. Walker; Hiroshi Watanabe; Z. Y. Xu; H. Baba; F. Browne; R. Daido; P. Doornenbal; Y. F. Fang; G. Gey; T. Isobe; P. Lee; J. J. Liu; Z. Li; Z. Korkulu; Z. Patel; V. H. Phong; S. Rice; H. Sakurai; Laura C. Sinclair; T. Sumikama; M. Tanaka; A. Yagi
^{-2}
Applications of Novel Scintillators for Research and Industry (ANSRI 2015), Dublin, Ireland,#R##N#12–14 January 2015 | 2015
Daithí de Faoite; L. Hanlon; O. J. Roberts; Alexei Ulyanov; Sheila McBreen; Isaac Tobin; Kenneth T. Stanton
, and a
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
V. Connaughton; E. Burns; Adam Goldstein; L. Blackburn; M. S. Briggs; N. Christensen; C. M. Hui; D. Kocevski; T. B. Littenberg; J. E. McEnery; Judith Lea Racusin; P. Shawhan; J. Veitch; Colleen Anne Wilson-Hodge; P. N. Bhat; E. Bissaldi; W. Cleveland; M. H. Gibby; A. von Kienlin; R. M. Kippen; S. McBreen; Charles A. Meegan; W. S. Paciesas; Robert D. Preece; O. J. Roberts; M. Stanbro; P. Veres
3\sigma