Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where O. Kardaun is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by O. Kardaun.


Nuclear Fusion | 1990

Scalings for tokamak energy confinement

P.N. Yushmanov; O. Kardaun; J.G. Cordey; S.M. Kaye; D.E. Post

On the basis of an analysis of the ITER L-mode energy confinement database, two new scaling expressions for tokamak L-mode energy confinement are proposed, namely a power law scaling and an offset-linear scaling. The analysis indicates that the present multiplicity of scaling expressions for the energy confinement time τE in tokamaks (Goldston, Kaye, Odajima-Shimomura, Rebut-Lallia, etc.) is due both to the lack of variation of a key parameter combination in the database, fs = 0.32 R a−0.75 k0.5 ~ A a0.25k0.5, and to variations in the dependence of τE on the physical parameters among the different tokamaks in the database. By combining multiples of fs and another factor, fq = 1.56 a2 kB/RIp = qeng/3.2, which partially reflects the tokamak to tokamak variation of the dependence of τE on q and therefore implicitly the dependence of τE on Ip and ne, the two proposed confinement scaling expressions can be transformed to forms very close to most of the common scaling expressions. To reduce the multiplicity of the scalings for energy confinement, the database must be improved by adding new data with significant variations in fs, and the physical reasons for the tokamak to tokamak variation of some of the dependences of the energy confinement time on tokamak parameters must be clarified.


Nuclear Fusion | 2013

Scaling of the tokamak near the scrape-off layer H-mode power width and implications for ITER

T. Eich; A.W. Leonard; R.A. Pitts; W. Fundamenski; R.J. Goldston; T.K. Gray; A. Herrmann; A. Kirk; A. Kallenbach; O. Kardaun; A.S. Kukushkin; B. LaBombard; R. Maingi; M. A. Makowski; A. Scarabosio; B. Sieglin; J. Terry; A. Thornton; Jet-Efda Contributors

A multi-machine database for the H-mode scrape-off layer power fall-off length, λq in JET, DIII-D, ASDEX Upgrade, C-Mod, NSTX and MAST has been assembled under the auspices of the International Tokamak Physics Activity. Regression inside the database finds that the most important scaling parameter is the poloidal magnetic field (or equivalently the plasma current), with λq decreasing linearly with increasing Bpol. For the conventional aspect ratio tokamaks, the regression finds , yielding λq,ITER 1 mm for the baseline inductive H-mode burning plasma scenario at Ip = 15 MA. The experimental divertor target heat flux profile data, from which λq is derived, also yield a divertor power spreading factor (S) which, together with λq, allows an integral power decay length on the target to be estimated. There are no differences in the λq scaling obtained from all-metal or carbon dominated machines and the inclusion of spherical tokamaks has no significant influence on the regression parameters. Comparison of the measured λq with the values expected from a recently published heuristic drift based model shows satisfactory agreement for all tokamaks.


Nuclear Fusion | 1997

ITER L mode confinement database

S. Kaye; M. Greenwald; U. Stroth; O. Kardaun; A. Kus; D. Schissel; J. DeBoo; G. Bracco; K. Thomsen; J. G. Cordey; Y. Miura; T. Matsuda; H. Tamai; T. Takizuka; T. Hirayama; H. Kikuchi; O. Naito; A. Chudnovskij; J. Ongena; G. T. Hoang

This special topic describes the contents of an L mode database that has been compiled with data from Alcator C-Mod, ASDEX, DIII, DIII-D, FTU, JET, JFT-2M, JT-60, PBX-M, PDX, T-10, TEXTOR, TFTR and Tore Supra. The database consists of a total of 2938 entries, 1881 of which are in the L phase while 922 are ohmically heated only (ohmic). Each entry contains up to 95 descriptive parameters, including global and kinetic information, machine conditioning and configuration. The special topic presents a description of the database and the variables contained therein, and it also presents global and thermal scalings along with predictions for ITER. The L mode thermal confinement time scaling, determined from a subset of 1312 entries for which the τE,th are provided, is τE,th = 0.023Ip0.96BT0.03R1.83(R/a)0.06 κ0.64ne0.40Meff0.20P-0.73 in units of seconds, megamps, teslas, metres, -, -, 10-9 m-1


Nuclear Fusion | 1992

Global energy confinement H-mode database for ITER

J.P. Christiansen; J. G. Cordey; K. Thomsen; A. Tanga; J. C. Deboo; D.P. Schissel; T.S. Taylor; O. Kardaun; F. Wagner; F. Ryter; S.M. Kaye; Y. Miura; N. Suzuki; Masahiro Mori; T. Matsuda; H. Tamai; S.-I. Itoh; K. Itoh

Describes the content of an H-mode confinement database that has been assembled for the ITER project. Data were collected from six machines of different sizes and shapes: ASDEX, DIII-D, JET, JFT-2M, PBX-M and PDX. A detailed description of the criteria used in the selection of the data and the definition of each of the variables is given. The authors also present an analysis of the conditions of the database, the scalings (power law and offset linear) of the data with both dimensional and dimensionless variables, and predictions of the expected confinement time for ITER


Nuclear Fusion | 1994

ITER H mode confinement database update

K. Thomsen; D.J. Campbell; J.G. Cordey; O. Kardaun; F. Ryter; U. Stroth; A. Kus; J. C. Deboo; D.P. Schissel; Y. Miura; N. Suzuki; Masahiro Mori; T. Matsuda; H. Tamai; S-I Itoh; Kimitaka Itoh; S.M. Kaye

This paper describes an update of the H mode confinement database that has been assembled for the ITER project. Data were collected from six machines of different sizes and shapes: ASDEX, DIII-D, JET, JFT-2M, PBX-M and PDX. The updated database contains better estimates of fast ion energy content and thermal energy confinement times, discharges with RF heating, data using boronization, beryllium and pellets, more systematic parameter scans, and other features. The list of variables in the database has been expanded, and the selection criteria for the standard dataset have been modified. We also present simple scalings of the total and thermal energy confinement time to the new dataset


Physics of Plasmas | 2007

Particle and impurity transport in the Axial Symmetric Divertor Experiment Upgrade and the Joint European Torus, experimental observations and theoretical understanding

C. Angioni; L. Carraro; T. Dannert; N. Dubuit; R. Dux; C. Fuchs; X. Garbet; L. Garzotti; C. Giroud; R. Guirlet; F. Jenko; O. Kardaun; L. Lauro-Taroni; P. Mantica; M. Maslov; V. Naulin; R. Neu; A. G. Peeters; G. Pereverzev; M. E. Puiatti; T. Pütterich; J. Stober; M. Valovič; M. Valisa; H. Weisen; A. Zabolotsky; Jet-Efda Contributors

Experimental observations on core particle and impurity transport from the Axial Symmetric Divertor Experiment Upgrade [O. Gruber, H.-S. Bosch, S. Gunter , Nucl Fusion 39, 1321 (1999)] and the Joint European Torus [J. Pamela, E. R. Solano, and JET EFDA Contributors, Nucl. Fusion 43, 1540 (2003)] tokamaks are reviewed and compared. Robust general experimental behaviors observed in both the devices and related parametric dependences are identified. The experimental observations are compared with the most recent theoretical results in the field of core particle transport


Nuclear Fusion | 1996

H mode power threshold database for ITER

F. Ryter; J. A. Snipes; R. Granetz; M. Greenwald; O. Kardaun; A. Kus; U. Stroth; J. Köllermeyer; S. J. Fielding; M. Valovic; J. C. Deboo; T. N. Carlstrom; D.P. Schissel; K. Thomsen; S. J. Campbell; J. P. Christiansen; J.G. Cordey; E. Righi; Y. Miura; N. Suzuki; Masahiro Mori; T. Matsuda; H. Tamai; T. Fukuda; Y. Kamada; M. Sato; K. Tsuchiya; S.M. Kaye

The ITER Threshold Database, which at present comprises data from nine divertor tokamaks, is described. The main results are presented and discussed. The properties and dependences of the power threshold in individual devices are reviewed. In particular, the analysis shows a rather general linear dependence on magnetic field, but a non-monotonic density dependence that varies from device to device. Investigation of the combined database suggests that the threshold dependence Pthres approximately=0.3neBT2.5 shows reasonable agreement with the data. This expression yields Pthres approximately=150 MW at a density of 0.5*1020 m-3 for ITER. Other expressions with weaker size dependence, and therefore lower threshold power for ITER, are also discussed. Their agreement with the present data is poorer than that of the above expression. In addition, the database is investigated by statistical discriminant analysis. The edge data included at present are described and discussed. Finally, there is a discussion of the implications of the results for ITER


Nuclear Fusion | 2003

Comparison of ITER performance predicted by semi-empirical and theory-based transport models

V. Mukhovatov; Y. Shimomura; A. Polevoi; M. Shimada; M. Sugihara; G. Bateman; J. G. Cordey; O. Kardaun; G. Pereverzev; I. Voitsekhovich; J Weiland; O. Zolotukhin; A. Chudnovskiy; A. Kritz; A. Kukushkin; T. Onjun; A. Pankin; F. W. Perkins

The values of Q = (fusion power)/(auxiliary heating power) predicted for ITER by three different methods are compared. The first method utilizes an empirical confinement-time scaling and prescribed radial profiles of transport coefficients; the second approach extrapolates from specially designed ITER similarity experiments, and the third approach is based on partly theory-based transport models. The energy confinement time given by the ITERH-98(y, 2) scaling for an inductive scenario with a plasma current of 15 MA and a plasma density 15% below the Greenwald density is 3.7 s with one estimated technical standard deviation of ±14%. This translates, in the first approach, for levels of helium removal, and impurity concentration, that, albeit rather stringent, are expected to be attainable, into an interval for Q of [6–15] at the auxiliary heating power, Paux = 40 MW, and [6–30] at the minimum heating power satisfying a good confinement ELMy H-mode. All theoretical transport-model calculations have been performed for the plasma core only, whereas the pedestal temperatures were taken as estimated from empirical scalings. Predictions of similarity experiments from JET and of theory-based transport models that we have considered—Weiland, MMM, and IFS/PPPL—overlap with the prediction using the empirical confinement-time scaling within its estimated margin of uncertainty.


Nuclear Fusion | 2014

ELM pacing and high-density operation using pellet injection in the ASDEX Upgrade all-metal-wall tokamak

P. T. Lang; A. Burckhart; M. Bernert; L. Casali; R. Fischer; O. Kardaun; G. Kocsis; M. Maraschek; A. Mlynek; B. Plöckl; M. Reich; F. Ryter; J. Schweinzer; B. Sieglin; W. Suttrop; T. Szepesi; G. Tardini; E. Wolfrum; D. Zasche; H. Zohm

Edge-localized mode (ELM) triggering and pacing in an all-metal wall environment shows significant differences to a first-wall configuration containing carbon. Here we report on experiments performed at ASDEX Upgrade revisiting the issue with all plasma-facing surfaces now fully replaced by tungsten. This investigation was motivated by experimental findings indicating that ELM triggering becomes more intricate when the carbon is replaced by a metal wall. ELM pacing could no longer be achieved by magnetic triggering in ASDEX Upgrade under conditions that previously showed a positive response. Also, recent investigations at JET indicate that a lag time occurs in pellet ELM triggering when operating with the new ITER-like wall. The ASDEX Upgrade centrifuge-based launching system was revitalized and upgraded for this study, now allowing detailed analysis of the ELM trigger response. The appearance of a lag time for pellet ELM triggering in an all-metal wall environment was confirmed. While different lag time durations were found for several type-I ELMy H-mode scenarios, the magnitude of the pellet perturbation was found to cause no difference. Reducing the auxiliary heating power for ELM triggering clearly makes the pellet tool less efficient for ELM control purposes; however, this affords a major benefit when applied for fuelling. Plasma operation with benign ELM behaviour at core densities far beyond the Greenwald limit was demonstrated, this being fully reversible and not affecting the energy confinement.


Nuclear Fusion | 2012

High-density H-mode operation by pellet injection and ELM mitigation with the new active in-vessel saddle coils in ASDEX Upgrade

P. T. Lang; W. Suttrop; E. Belonohy; M. Bernert; R. M. Mc Dermott; R. Fischer; J. Hobirk; O. Kardaun; G. Kocsis; B. Kurzan; M. Maraschek; P. de Marné; A. Mlynek; P. A. Schneider; J. Schweinzer; J. Stober; T. Szepesi; K. Thomsen; W. Treutterer; E. Wolfrum

Recent experiments at ASDEX Upgrade demonstrate the compatibility of ELM mitigation by magnetic perturbations with efficient particle fuelling by inboard pellet injection. ELM mitigation persists in a high-density, high-collisionality regime even with the strongest applied pellet perturbations. Pellets injected into mitigation phases trigger no type-I ELM-like events unlike when launched into unmitigated type-I ELMy plasmas. Furthermore, the absence of ELMs results in improved fuelling efficiency and persistent density build-up. Pellet injection is helpful to access the ELM-mitigation regime by raising the edge density beyond the required threshold level, mostly eliminating the need for strong gas puff. Finally, strong pellet fuelling can be applied to access high densities beyond the density limit encountered with pure gas puffing. Core densities of up to 1.6 times the Greenwald density have been reached while maintaining ELM mitigation. No upper density limit for the ELM-mitigated regime has been encountered so far; limitations were set solely by technical restrictions of the pellet launcher. Reliable and reproducible operation at line-averaged densities from 0.75 up to 1.5 times the Greenwald density is demonstrated using pellets. However, in this density range there is no indication of the positive confinement dependence on density implied by the ITERH98P(y,2) scaling.

Collaboration


Dive into the O. Kardaun's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S.M. Kaye

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge