O. Zenker

Efficacy and safety of Hizentra(®) in patients with primary immunodeficiency after a dose-equivalent switch from intravenous or subcutaneous replacement therapy.

A prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Hizentra(®), a 20% human IgG for subcutaneous administration, in 51 primary immunodeficiency patients over 40 weeks. Patients previously on intravenous or subcutaneous IgG were switched to weekly subcutaneous infusions of Hizentra(®) at doses equivalent to their previous treatment. IgG levels achieved with Hizentra(®) were similar to pre-study levels with subcutaneous, and higher by 17.7% than pre-study levels with intravenous IgG. No serious bacterial infections were reported in the efficacy period. The rate of all infections was 5.18/year/patient, the rates of days missed from work/school, and days spent in hospital were 8.00/year/patient and 3.48/year/patient, respectively. Local reactions (rate 0.060/infusion) were mostly mild (87.3%). No serious, Hizentra(®)-related adverse events were reported. Individual median infusion durations ranged between 1.14 and 1.27 h. Hizentra(®) maintained or improved serum IgG levels without dose increases and effectively protected patients against infections.

Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous immunoglobulin and their use in dosing of replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiencies

Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous IgG (SCIG) and intravenous IgG (IVIG) differ. It is not clear if and/or how the dose should be adjusted when switching from IVIG to SCIG. Area under the curve (AUC) of serum IgG versus time and trough level ratios (TLRs) on SCIG/IVIG were evaluated as guides for adjusting the dose. The mean dose adjustments required for non-inferior AUCs with 2 different SCIG preparations were 137% (± 12%) and 153% (± 16%). However, there were wide variations between adjustments required by different subjects, and in the resulting TLRs. In contrast, combined data from multiple studies allow estimation of the ratio of IgG levels with different dose adjustments, and of the steady state serum levels with different SCIG doses. When switching a patient from IVIG to SCIG, individualizing the dosage based on measured serum IgG levels and the clinical response is preferable to using mean pharmacokinetic parameters.

Efficacy and safety of Privigen® in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: results of a prospective, single-arm, open-label Phase III study (the PRIMA study)

This prospective, multicenter, single‐arm, open‐label Phase III study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Privigen® (10% liquid human intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIG], stabilized with l‐proline) in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Patients received one induction dose of Privigen (2 g/kg body weight [bw]) and up to seven maintenance doses (1 g/kg bw) at 3‐week intervals. The primary efficacy endpoint was the responder rate at completion, defined as improvement of ≥1 point on the adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scale. The preset success criterion was the responder rate being ≥35%. Of the 31 screened patients, 28 patients were enrolled including 13 (46.4%) IVIG‐pretreated patients. The overall responder rate at completion was 60.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.41%–76.43%). IVIG‐pretreated patients demonstrated a higher responder rate than IVIG‐naïve patients (76.9% vs. 46.7%). The median (25%–75% quantile) INCAT score improved from 3.5 (3.0–4.5) points at baseline to 2.5 (1.0–3.0) points at completion, as did the mean (standard deviation [SD]) maximum grip strength (66.7 [37.24] kPa vs. 80.9 [31.06] kPa) and the median Medical Research Council sum score (67.0 [61.5–72.0] points vs. 75.5 [71.5–79.5] points). Of 108 adverse events (AEs; 0.417 AEs per infusion), 95 AEs (88.0%) were mild or moderate in intensity and resolved by the end of study. Two serious AEs of hemolysis were reported that resolved after discontinuation of treatment. Thus, Privigen provided efficacious and well‐tolerated induction and maintenance treatment in patients with CIDP.