Obaid S. Shaikh

Recurrent disease following liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis

Recurrence of the original disease following liver transplantation is not uncommon and can lead to graft failure. There are limited data on recurrent fatty liver disease following liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of recurrent fatty liver disease in patients with biopsy‐proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, its effect on survival, and whether there are any predictive factors for recurrence. We analyzed patients undergoing liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis from 1997 to 2008 at a single center. Patients undergoing transplantation for cholestatic disease, alcohol, hepatitis C, or cryptogenic cirrhosis were controls. Ninety‐eight patients underwent transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis. Recurrent fatty liver disease was seen in 70%, 25% had recurrent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and 18% had stage II/IV or greater fibrosis at a mean of 18 months. No patients with recurrent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis developed graft failure or required retransplantation at a follow‐up of 3 years. No recipient or donor factors were associated with disease recurrence, although patients with recurrent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis had a higher incidence of diabetes, weight gain, and dyslipidemia at the time of diagnosis of recurrence. One‐third of patients with recurrent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis had normal liver enzymes at the time of diagnosis post‐transplantation. In conclusion, recurrent fatty liver disease is common following liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis but does not lead to early allograft failure. Recurrent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis can occur despite normal liver enzymes, and features of metabolic syndrome are associated with disease recurrence. Liver Transpl 15:1843–1851, 2009.

Long‐term clearance of hepatitis C virus following interferon α‐2b or peginterferon α‐2b, alone or in combination with ribavirin

Sustained virologic response (SVR) is the standard measure for evaluating response to therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the durability of SVR in the pivotal studies of peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) α‐2b or IFN α‐2b. We conducted two phase 3b long‐term follow‐up studies of patients previously treated for CHC in eight prospective randomized studies of IFN α‐2b and/or PEG‐IFN α‐2b. Patients who achieved SVR [undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA 24 weeks after completion of treatment] were eligible for inclusion in these follow‐up studies. In total, 636 patients with SVR following treatment with IFN α‐2b and 366 with SVR following treatment with PEG‐IFN α‐2b were enrolled. Definite relapse (quantifiable serum HCV RNA with no subsequent undetectable HCV RNA) was reported in six patients treated with IFN α‐2b and three patients treated with PEG‐IFN α‐2b. Based on these relapses, the point estimate for the likelihood of maintaining response after 5 years was 99.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 98.1–99.7%] for IFN α‐2b and 99.4% (95% CI, 97.7–99.9%) for PEG‐IFN α‐2b. Successful treatment of hepatitis C with PEG‐IFN α‐2b or IFN α‐2b leads to clinical cure of hepatitis C in the vast majority of cases.

Detection and diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infection in adults with acute liver failure.

Disseminated herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection may lead to acute liver failure (ALF) and the need for emergency liver transplantation (LT). The primary aim of this study was to determine the utility of HSV serological testing and HSV DNA testing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the diagnosis and management of indeterminate, pregnancy‐related, and known HSV‐related ALF. Stored sera obtained on study day 1 or 2 from patients enrolled in the United States ALF Study Group with indeterminate (n = 51), pregnancy‐related (n = 12), and HSV‐related (n = 4) ALF were screened for HSV DNA by PCR and serology. While 7 of the indeterminate and pregnant patients had positive anti‐HSV immunoglobulin M, none had detectable HSV DNA. The 4 known HSV cases all had high‐titer HSV DNA on presentation (range: 3.5 to 36 × 108 copies/mL). Two HSV patients underwent LT but developed posttransplant extrahepatic HSV infection despite suppression of HSV DNA with acyclovir treatment, and one of them eventually died. The 2 other fulminant HSV patients died within 48 hours of presentation. In conclusion, serum HSV DNA indicative of occult HSV infection was not detected in 51 indeterminate and 12 pregnancy‐related ALF patients. The 4 patients with known HSV‐related ALF all had high HSV DNA levels at presentation, and despite the rapid use of antiviral therapy and emergency LT, substantial morbidity and mortality were encountered, highlighting the poor prognosis with severe disseminated HSV infection. Liver Transpl 14:1498–1504, 2008.

Outcomes in Adults With Acute Liver Failure Between 1998 and 2013: An Observational Cohort Study.

Context Whether changes have occurred in the causes of acute liver failure (ALF), its management, or the survival of patients with the condition (with or without liver transplantation) is not known. Contribution This large cohort study found that despite similar causes and severity of ALF among patients referred to specialty centers from 1998 to 2013, the proportion of patients listed for liver transplantation decreased and survival improved among those who did not receive a transplant as well as those who did. Implication More study is warranted to better understand the specific changes in care that may have led to improved survival of patients with ALF. Acute liver failure (ALF) is defined as severe liver injury with rapid onset that results in hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and coagulopathy in persons without preexisting liver disease. The principal causes of ALF include acetaminophen (N-acetyl-p-aminophenol [APAP]) overdose, ischemic and pregnancy-associated liver injury, acute infection with hepatitis A or B virus, drug-induced liver injury, autoimmune hepatitis, BuddChiari syndrome, and Wilson disease (1, 2). For some causes, such as APAP toxicity, outcomes are favorable and transplant-free survival (TFS) approaches 70%, whereas other causes have unfavorable outcomes, including a much lower likelihood (<30%) of recovery without liver transplantation (2). One-year survival after emergency liver transplantation in patients with ALF in the United States and Europe is reportedly good but is lower than among patients with cirrhosis who receive a transplant (3). Patients with ALF often deteriorate rapidly and therefore receive the most urgent ranking (status 1) in the United Network for Organ Sharing transplantation system. Treatment of ALF in the intensive care unit is largely supportive and includes ventilator and vasopressor support for respiratory and/or circulatory failure, renal replacement therapy, plasma and blood transfusions, antibiotics, and measures to decrease intracranial pressure (46). N-acetylcysteine is used to treat APAP overdose and has shown efficacy in patients with ALF not due to APAP toxicity, particularly those referred early and having only mild HE (7). However, few disease-specific or general treatments are available that yield improved outcomes. In this study, our aim was to update the U.S. experience with ALF at specialized liver disease and transplant centers since the last published overview by the Acute Liver Failure Study Group (ALFSG) in 2002 (2). This group initiated its registry in January 1998 to better characterize the causes, clinical features, and outcomes of this super-orphan condition and aimed to enroll cases prospectively from participating liver transplant centers across North America. Accordingly, we analyzed data on all patients with ALF enrolled between 1998 and 2013, focusing on whether clinical features or outcomes of the ALF syndrome have changed over time. In addition, we sought to determine the relationship between ALF causes and rates of TFS and whether utilization of liver transplantation changed in the 16-year observation period. Methods Study Population From 1 January 1998 through 31 December 2013, adult patients were consecutively enrolled in the ALFSG registry (2) from 31 U.S. academic liver centers (of which only 5 legacy sites participated continuously throughout the 16-year period). All enrolled patients had both coagulopathy (international normalized ratio [INR] 1.5) and any grade of HE (as clinically defined by the classic West Haven criteria [8]) within 26 weeks of the first symptoms and had no evidence of significant chronic liver disease, especially cirrhosis. Patients for whom prior liver transplantation failed (due to primary graft nonfunction or other causes) were excluded. During the 16-year period, the number of sites participating, their geographic locations, and the number of cases contributed per site varied depending on each sites ability to continually identify and enroll patients over time (Appendix Figure 1). Appendix Figure 1. Site enrollment over time. Patients were usually admitted to intensive care units; 82.4% were hospitalized before transfer to the referral tertiary care study site, and the remainder were admitted directly to the study site. All were screened for inclusion according to the ALF criteria defined earlier. Written informed consent was obtained from the legal next of kin. A log of screen failures and consent refusal was maintained. All centers complied with local institutional review board requirements. Data Management and Integrity At enrollment into the study, we prospectively collected patient demographic characteristics (age, sex, race, and ethnicity); a complete medical history, including the timing of the first symptom of ill health, onset of jaundice and HE, and the number of days between the first symptom, hospital admission, transfer to the study site (where relevant), and enrollment in the study; and clinical features, including blood pressure and need for vasopressor support, mechanical ventilation, and renal replacement therapy, which allowed calculation of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score (9). We also collected standard liver and metabolic test results and clinical data daily for up to 7 days, as well as serologic and other tests to determine the cause. All data were managed and housed on a central server at the Medical University of South Carolina. A data query system and periodic monitoring are in place to manage data integrity. In addition, ALFSG leadership conducted annual visits to clinical sites to verify data and ensure compliance with study procedures. Statistical Analysis Statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute). Missing values were not replaced or estimated. Patients with missing data were excluded from the respective analyses for those variables, and patients who were lost to follow-up before 21 days were excluded from the study. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the demographic and other clinical variables. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test (the latter when expected cell counts were <5). Medians were reported with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and were compared with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Survival and transplant outcomes at 21 days after study enrollment were classified as TFS (survival without liver transplantation), liver transplantation, or death (2). Outcomes were also determined at 1 and 2 years after study enrollment, but these data were less complete than the 21-day outcome data. Survival rates over time were assessed descriptively at the individual-site level to verify that changes in TFS were not affected by varying accrual of patients from different sites. Treatment utilization and survival and transplant outcomes were analyzed over time annually for trends and were also stratified into two 8-year periods: early (1998 to 2005) and later (2006 to 2013). Trends over time were analyzed using the CochranArmitage test. A significance level of less than 0.05 was used for all comparisons. Role of the Funding Source This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health. The funding source had no direct role in the design, conduct, or reporting of the study. Results Demographic Characteristics and Comorbidities During the 16-year study, 2070 patients (median age, 39.0 years [IQR, 29.0 to 52.0 years]) were enrolled in the ALFSG registry. Over the same interval, there were 660 confirmed ALF screen failures (286 due to failure to meet inclusion criteria, 212 for whom consent could not be obtained, and 162 for other reasons). Among enrolled patients, 69.3% were women and 76.4% were white (Table 1). Patients did not differ in sex, race, or ethnicity between the two 8-year periods but were significantly older and heavier in the later period. Prevalence of hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, psychiatric illness, and substance dependency all increased significantly between the early and later periods, whereas prevalence of renal disease did not. Table 1. Demographic Characteristics, Comorbidities, Clinical Severity, and Causes at Admission Causes and Clinical Severity of ALF The percentage of enrollment as a reflection of the most common causes of ALF did not change during the two 8-year periods. Hepatotoxicity due to APAP accounted for almost half the cases of ALF for the entire 16-year period (Table 1), with the highest annual prevalence (53.0%) occurring in 2013. Unintentional APAP overdoses (those in which patients took excessive medication over several days for such ailments as pain, malaise, or fever [10, 11]) were more common than intentional (suicidal) overdoses. Hepatitis A virus infection was significantly less evident during the later period (9 cases [0.8%]) than the early period (28 cases [2.8%]) (P< 0.001). Hepatic ischemia and autoimmune hepatitis increased modestly, whereas hepatitis B virus infection, drug-induced liver injury, Wilson disease, and BuddChiari syndrome were less frequently noted. Patients entered either the primary or the referral (study) site more rapidly after initial symptom onset in the later period (2.0 days [IQR, 0.0 to 8.0 days]) than the early period (3.0 days [IQR, 1.0 to 14.0 days]) (P< 0.001) (Table 1). However, the corresponding interval between symptom onset and HE onset was 4.0 days in both the early (IQR, 1.0 to 15.0 days) and later (IQR, 1.0 to 12.0 days) periods, and time from onset of jaundice to enrollment also was unchanged (3.0 days in each period [IQRs, 1.0 to 12.0 and 1.0 to 10.0 days, respectively]). Most patients with ALF were severely ill at study enrollment, with nearly 50% having grade 3 or 4 (that is, deep) HE throughout. Biochemical liver test results varied widely but indicated severe illness in most patients (Appendix Table 1). Appendix Table 1. Laboratory Values at Study Enrollment Laboratory Tests fo

Effect of addition of statins to antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus-infected persons: Results from ERCHIVES.

3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have been variably noted to affect hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment response, fibrosis progression, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence, with some having a more potent effect than others. We sought to determine the impact of adding statins to antiviral therapy upon sustained virological response (SVR) rates, fibrosis progression, and HCC development among HCV‐infected persons using the Electronically Retrieved Cohort of HCV Infected Veterans (ERCHIVES), an established, longitudinal, national cohort of HCV‐infected veterans. Within ERCHIVES, we identified those who received HCV treatment and a follow‐up of >24 months after treatment completion. We excluded those with human immunodeficiency virus coinfection, hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, cirrhosis, and HCC at baseline. Our main outcomes were liver fibrosis progression measured by FIB‐4 scores, SVR rates, and incident HCC (iHCC). Among 7,248 eligible subjects, 46% received statin therapy. Statin use was significantly associated with attaining SVR (39.2% vs. 33.3%; P < 0.01), decreased cirrhosis development (17.3% vs. 25.2%; P < 0.001), and decreased iHCC (1.2% vs. 2.6%; P < 0.01). Statins remained significantly associated with increased odds of SVR (odds ratio = 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29, 1.61), but lower fibrosis progression rate, lower risk of progression to cirrhosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56; 95% CI = −0.50, 0.63), and of incident HCC (HR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.34, 0.76) after adjusting for other relevant clinical factors. Conclusions: Statin use was associated with improved virological response (VR) rates to antiviral therapy and decreased progression of liver fibrosis and incidence of HCC among a large cohort of HCV‐positive Veterans. These data support the use of statins in patients with HCV. (Hepatology 2015) Hepatology 2015;62:365–374

Hepatic encephalopathy: pathophysiology and emerging therapies.

Hepatic encephalopathy is characterized by neuropsychiatric abnormalities in patients with liver failure. Severe hepatic encephalopathy is an indication for liver transplantation as it portends poor outcome. Treatment of hepatic encephalopathy involves correction of precipitating factors such as sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding, medications, and electrolyte imbalance. Effective therapies include lactulose and antibiotics such as neomycin, metronidazole, and rifaximin.

Hepatitis C recurrence is not adversely affected by the use of donation after cardiac death liver allografts

Many factors can worsen a recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT). We sought to determine whether the use of donation after cardiac death (DCD) livers affects HCV recurrence. From January 2000 to June 2008, 37 HCV patients underwent LT with DCD allografts. The outcomes and severity of HCV recurrence were analyzed along with those for 74 matched control patients with HCV who received donation after brain death (DBD) livers. The 2 groups had similar donor and recipient characteristics, immunosuppression regimens, rates of acute cellular rejection (ACR), and HCV profiles. DCD patients had a higher incidence of primary nonfunction (19% versus 3%, P = 0.006) and significantly higher peak aspartate aminotransferase levels in comparison with DBD subjects, suggesting a greater degree of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Although the survival rates were not significantly different, DCD recipients had lower 1‐ and 5‐year patient survival rates (83% and 69% versus 84% and 78%, respectively, P = 0.75) and graft survival rates (70% and 61% versus 82% and 74%, respectively, P = 0.24). Three hundred fourteen protocol and clinically indicated liver biopsy procedures were performed within 6 years after transplantation, and mixed modeling analysis showed that fibrosis progression rates were similar for the 2 groups (0.6 fibrosis units/year according to the Ishak modified staging system). The rates of severe HCV recurrence (retransplantation or death due to recurrent hepatitis C and/or the development of stage 4/6 fibrosis or worse within 2 years) were similar [3 DCD patients (8%) versus 11 DBD patients (15%), P = 0.38], and cytomegalovirus infection (hazard ratio = 7.9, P = 0.002, 95% confidence interval = 2.1‐28.9) and ACR (hazard ratio = 6.2, P = 0.002, 95% confidence interval = 2.0‐19.7) were the only independent risk factors for severe recurrence. In summary, although there was a trend of poorer overall outcomes in DCD patients, the use of DCD livers did not appear to adversely affect HCV recurrence after LT. Liver Transpl 16:1288‐1295, 2010.

Idiopathic posttransplantation hepatitis

In this issue of Liver Transplantation, 2 papers from the liver transplant group at Birmingham, United Kingdom, describe recipients with idiopathic inflammation in liver allografts (idiopathic posttransplantation hepatitis [IPTH]) that, in some cases, resulted in marked fibrosis and cirrhosis. Syn performed a retrospective study of liver allograft recipients who survived for at least 6 months, had chronic hepatitis at initial biopsy and underwent at least one other later biopsy, and in whom recurrent disease was excluded. Among 1,968 patients transplanted over a 20-year period, 288 required transplantation for either alcoholic cirrhosis or for fulminant hepatic failure due to drug hepatotoxicity. Liver biopsy samples were obtained when clinically indicated or per protocol at 1to 3-year intervals. Thirty recipients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were studied further. Chronic hepatitis was diagnosed at 6-72 months after transplantation, and 22 patients were found to have hepatitis during the first 2 years. Most initial biopsies showed mild inflammatory activity and mild to moderate fibrosis was noted in 12 of the 30 recipients. Two of the patients with increased fibrosis fulfilled criteria for de novo autoimmune hepatitis, and 3 had increased steatosis or steatohepatitis. Five of the 12 recipients developed marked graft dysfunction. Female sex and serum alkaline phosphatase levels correlated with progressive fibrosis. In a separate study, Seyam identified transplant recipients with histologically proven graft cirrhosis from their liver unit database. Biopsy samples obtained from those recipients 12 months after transplantation were reviewed by a semiquantitative protocol. Among 1,287 patients transplanted over a period of 11 years, 48 (3.7%) were found to have graft cirrhosis. In 29 recipients, cirrhosis was attributed to recurrent disease, and in 9, other causes could be identified. The remaining 10 patients, at a median of 7 years after transplantation, had no apparent etiology of graft cirrhosis. In all 10 of those cases, however, biopsy samples obtained before the onset of cirrhosis showed features of chronic hepatitis without an apparent etiology (IPTH). The authors concluded that almost 40% of patients with graft cirrhosis had cirrhosis of an indeterminate etiology. The Birmingham group also recently reported a high incidence ( 50%) of idiopathic chronic hepatitis in longterm protocol biopsy samples from pediatric recipients. Among the many recipient factors that influence long-term posttransplantation outcome, age, comorbid conditions, and original disease etiology are clearly important. Donor factors such as age, cardiac status, cold ischemia time, degree of steatosis, and severity of preservation injury primarily exert their effects on outcome early after transplantation. However, with the use of extended-criteria organs, donor factors and the early postoperative course are likely to exert increasingly important influences on long-term patient and graft survival. One example is repeat transplants that fare worse compared with first transplants. Between 1997 and 2004, 1-year graft and patient survival rate averaged 83% and 88% for the primary transplantation. However, for repeat transplants, it averaged 66% and 73%, respectively. Five-year graft and patient survival averaged 67% and 74% for primary transplants compared with 46% and 55% for repeat transplants, respectively. These results emphasize the importance of applying strategies that would ensure optimal graft and patient survival after transplantation.

Rates of HCV Treatment Eligibility Among HCV-Monoinfected and HCV/HIV-Coinfected Patients in Tertiary Care Referral Centers

Abstract Background: Treatment eligibility rates in patients with HCV monoinfection have not been directly compared with patients with HCV/HIV coinfection. These data are important for planning interventions to optimize HCV management. Method: We enrolled consecutive HCV-monoinfected and HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects presenting to hepatology and HIV clinics at three academic medical centers. Data were obtained through structured subject and provider interviews and a review of medical records. Results: Of the 399 subjects enrolled, 241 (60%) were HCV monoinfected and 158 (40%) were HCV/HIV coinfected. HCV/HIV-coinfected subjects were less likely to have indications for treatment based on HCV RNA positivity (70.9% vs. 81.3%, p = .04) but were more likely to have at least one contraindication to treatment (81.6% vs. 64.9%, p < .004). Depression and ongoing alcohol and injection drug abuse were more common in the HCV/HIV-coinfected persons. HCV/HIVcoinfected persons were less likely to undergo liver biopsy or to ever get treatment for HCV. Conclusions: HCV/HIV-coinfected persons are less likely to undergo a liver biopsy or be eligible for HCV therapy and are more likely to have treatment contraindications compared with HCV-monoinfected subjects. Strategies to address modifiable factors (e.g., depression, substance abuse) may enhance treatment eligibility in HCV-infected populations.

Sofosbuvir-based regimens in clinical practice achieve SVR rates closer to clinical trials: results from ERCHIVES.

Sofosbuvir is widely prescribed for treatment of HCV infection. We compared the sustained virologic response rates (SVR12) and the haematologic toxicity of various sofosbuvir‐based regimens in routine clinical practice.