Obi Okoye

Hyperfibrinolysis Elicited via Thromboelastography Predicts Mortality in Trauma

BACKGROUND The acute coagulopathy of trauma has been identified as a critical determinant of outcomes. Antifibrinolytic agents have recently been demonstrated to improve outcomes. This prospective study was designed to assess coagulopathy in trauma patients using thromboelastography. STUDY DESIGN Trauma patients meeting our institutions highest tier of trauma team activation criteria were prospectively enrolled during a 5-month period ending April 1, 2011. Thromboelastography was performed at admission, +1 hour, +2 hours, and +6 hours using citrated blood. Hyperfibrinolysis was defined as estimated percent lysis ≥15%. Patients were followed throughout their hospital course to collect clinical data and outcomes. RESULTS One hundred and eighteen patients were enrolled (77.1% were male, 51.7% had penetrating trauma, 7.6% had systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, 47.5% had Injury Severity Score >16, and 23.7% had Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8). Hyperfibrinolysis was present in 13 patients (11.0%), with a mean time to detection of 13 minutes (range 2 to 60 minutes). By the 6-hour sampling, 8 (61.5%) of the hyperfibrinolytic patients had expired from hemorrhage. Survivors at this point demonstrated correction of coagulopathy, however, 12 patients (92.3%) ultimately expired (75% hemorrhage, 25% head injury). On stepwise logistic regression, hyperfibrinolysis was a strong predictor of early (24 hours) mortality (odds ratio = 25.0; 95% CI, 2.8-221.4; p = 0.004), predicting 53% of early deaths. Compared with patients without hyperfibrinolysis, patients with hyperfibrinolysis had a greater need for massive transfusion (76.9% vs 8.7%; adjusted odds ratio = 19.1; 95% CI, 3.6-101.3; p < 0.001) and had a greater early mortality (69.2% vs 1.9%; adjusted odds ratio = 55.8; 95% CI, 7.2-432.3; p < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (92.3% vs 9.5%; adjusted odds ratio = 55.5; 95% CI, 4.8-649.7; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this prospective analysis, hyperfibrinolysis on thromboelastography developed in approximately 10% of patients and was considerably more likely to require massive transfusion. Hyperfibrinolysis was a strong independent predictor of mortality. Additional evaluation of the role of thromboelastography-directed antifibrinolytic therapies is warranted.

Open abdominal management after damage-control laparotomy for trauma: A prospective observational American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study

BACKGROUND We conducted a prospective observational multi-institutional study to examine the natural history of the open abdomen (OA) after trauma and identify risk factors for failure to achieve definitive primary fascial closure (DPC) after OA use in trauma. METHODS Adults requiring OA for trauma were enrolled during a 2-year period. Demographics, presentation, and management variables were used to compare primary fascial closure and non–primary fascial closure patients, with logistic regression used to identify independent risk factors for failure to achieve primary fascial closure. RESULTS A total of 572 patients from 14 American College of Surgeons–verified Level I trauma centers were enrolled. The majority were male (79%), mean (SD) age 39 (17) years. Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 15 or greater in 85% of patients and 84% had an abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of 3 or greater. Overall mortality was 23%. Initial primary fascial closure with unaltered native fascia was achieved in 379 patients (66%). Patients surviving at least 48 hours were grouped into those achieving DPC and those who did not achieve DPC after OA use. After logistic regression, independent risk factors for failure to achieve DPC included the number of reexplorations required (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2–1.6; p < 0.001) the development of intra-abdominal abscess/sepsis (AOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2–4.8; p = 0.011) bloodstream infection (AOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2–5.7; p = 0.017), acute renal failure (AOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2–5.7; p = 0.007), enteric fistula (AOR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.2–32.8; p = 0.010) and ISS of greater than 15 (AOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1–5.9; p = 0.037). CONCLUSION Our study identifies independent risk factors associated with failure to achieve primary fascial closure during initial hospitalization after OA use for trauma. Additional study is required to validate appropriate algorithms that optimize the opportunity to achieve primary fascial closure and outcomes in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level III.

A prospective multicenter comparison of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for early posttraumatic seizure prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines recommend seizure prophylaxis for preventing early posttraumatic seizure (PTS). Phenytoin (PHE) is commonly used. Despite a paucity of data in traumatic brain injury, levetiracetam (LEV) has been introduced as a potential replacement, which is more costly but does not require serum monitoring. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of PHE with that of LEV for preventing early PTS. METHODS Consecutive blunt traumatic brain injury patients undergoing seizure prophylaxis were prospectively enrolled at two Level 1 trauma centers during a 33-month period. Seizure prophylaxis was administered according to local protocol. Patients were monitored prospectively throughout their hospital stay for clinical evidence of seizure activity. PHE was compared with LEV with clinical early PTS as the primary outcome measure, defined as a seizure diagnosed clinically, occurring within 7 days of admission. RESULTS A total of 1,191 patients were screened for enrollment, after excluding 378 (31.7%) who did not meet inclusion criteria; 813 (68.3%) were analyzed (406 LEV and 407 PHE). There were no significant differences between LEV and PHE in age (51.7 [21.3] vs. 53.6 [22.5], p = 0.205), male (73.9% vs. 68.8%, p = 0.108), Injury Severity Score (ISS) (20.0 [10.0] vs. 21.0 [10.6], p = 0.175), Marshall score of 3 or greater (18.5% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.153), or craniectomy (8.4% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.106). There was no difference in seizure rate (1.5% vs.1.5%, p = 0.997), adverse drug reactions (7.9% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.227), or mortality (5.4% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.236). CONCLUSION In this prospective evaluation of early PTS prophylaxis, LEV did not outperform PHE. Cost and need for serum monitoring should be considered in guiding the choice of prophylactic agent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level III.

Independent Predictors of Enteric Fistula and Abdominal Sepsis After Damage Control Laparotomy: Results From the Prospective AAST Open Abdomen Registry

IMPORTANCE Enterocutaneous fistula (ECF), enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF), and intra-abdominal sepsis/abscess (IAS) are major challenges for surgeons caring for patients undergoing damage control laparotomy after trauma. OBJECTIVE To determine independent predictors of ECF, EAF, or IAS in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy after trauma, using the AAST Open Abdomen Registry. DESIGN The AAST Open Abdomen registry of patients with an open abdomen following damage control laparotomy was used to identify patients who developed ECF, EAF, or IAS and to compare these patients with those without these complications. Univariate analyses were performed to compare these groups of patients. Variables from univariate analyses differing at P < .20 were entered into a stepwise logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors for ECF, EAF, or IAS. SETTING Fourteen level I trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS A total of 517 patients with an open abdomen following damage control laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Complication of ECF, EAF, or IAS. RESULTS More patients in the ECF/EAF/IAS group than in the group without these complications underwent bowel resection (63 of 111 patients [57%] vs 133 of 406 patients [33%]; P < .001). Within the first 48 hours after surgery, the ECF/EAF/IAS group received more colloids (P < .03) and total fluids (P < .03) than did the group without these complications. The ECF/EAF/IAS group underwent almost twice as many abdominal reexplorations as did the group without these complications (mean [SD] number, 4.1 [4.1] vs 2.2 [3.4]; P < .001). After multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of ECF/EAF/IAS were a large bowel resection (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.56 [95% CI, 1.88-6.76]; P < .001), a total fluid intake at 48 hours of between 5 and 10 L (AOR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.15-3.88]; P = .02) or more than 10 L (AOR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.04-3.57]; P = .04), and an increasing number of reexplorations (AOR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.06-1.21]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Large bowel resection, large-volume fluid resuscitation, and an increasing number of abdominal reexplorations were statistically significant predictors of ECF, EAF, or IAS in patients with an open abdomen after damage control laparotomy.

Falls in the elderly: a modern look at an old problem

BACKGROUND Falls are a leading cause of unintentional injury among adults, especially those over 65 years of age. With increasing longevity and improving access to health care, falls are affecting a more mobile senior citizen population that does not fit the typical profile. We set out to evaluate the current nature of these falls in the elderly. METHODS This is a 2-year retrospective chart review of all falls in patients 65 years or older at an urban Level I trauma center. Demographics, location and height of fall, associated injuries, and outcomes were obtained from chart review. RESULTS There were 400 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The cohort had a mean age of 78.3 ± 8.8 years, 50% were male, and 72.5% had at least 1 comorbidity. Non-ground level falls (Non-GLF) were recorded in 56 patients (14%). These patients suffered a significantly higher injury burden. Non-GLF were associated with significantly higher intensive care unit length of stay (2.6 ± 5.6 vs 4.6 ± 6.7 days, P = .016) and a trend toward higher mortality than GLF. CONCLUSIONS Falls remain a source of considerable healthcare expenditure, especially among the elderly. Non-GLF account for 14% of cases and are associated with a significantly higher burden of injury and morbidity. Fall prevention strategies should include these active older individuals at risk of high-level falls.

Venovenous extracorporeal life support improves survival in adult trauma patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND Venovenous extracorporeal life support (VV ECLS) has been reported in adult trauma patients with severe respiratory failure; however, ECLS is not available in many trauma centers, few trauma surgeons have experience initiating ECLS and managing ECLS patients, and there is currently little evidence supporting its use in severely injured patients. This study seeks to determine if VV ECLS improves survival in such patients. METHODS Data from two American College of Surgeons–verified Level 1 trauma centers, which maintain detailed records of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), were evaluated retrospectively. The study population included trauma patients between 16 years and 55 years of age treated for AHRF between January 2001 and December 2009. These patients were divided into two cohorts as follows: patients who received VV ECLS after an incomplete or no response to other rescue therapies (ECLS) versus patients who were managed with mechanical ventilation (CONV). The primary outcome was survival to discharge, and secondary outcomes were intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS), total ventilator days, and rate of complications requiring intervention. RESULTS Twenty-six ECLS patients and 76 CONV patients were compared. Adjusted survival was greater in the ECLS group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.193; 95% confidence interval, 0.042–0.884; p = 0.034). Ventilator days, intensive care unit LOS, and hospital LOS did not differ between the groups. ECLS patients received more blood transfusions and had more bleeding complications, while the CONV patients had more pulmonary complications. A cohort of 17 ECLS and 17 CONV patients matched for age and lung injury severity also demonstrated a significantly greater survival in the ECLS group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.038; 95% confidence interval, 0.004–0.407; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION VV ECLS is independently associated with survival in adult trauma patients with AHRF. ECLS should be considered in trauma patients with AHRF when conventional therapies prove ineffective; if ECLS is not readily available, transfer to an ECLS center should be pursued. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level III.

THROMBOELASTOGRAM EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF HYPERCOAGULABILITY IN TRAUMA PATIENTS

ABSTRACT Introduction: Admission hypocoagulability has been associated with negative outcomes after trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of hypercoagulability after trauma on the need for blood product transfusion and mortality. Methods: Injured patients meeting our level I trauma center’s highest activation criteria had a thromboelastography (TEG) performed at admission, +1 h, +2 h, and +6 h using citrated blood. Hypercoagulability was defined as any TEG parameter in the hypercoagulable range, and hypocoagulability as any parameter in the hypocoagulable range. Patients were followed up prospectively throughout their hospital course. Results: A total of 118 patients were enrolled: 26.3% (n = 31) were hypercoagulable, 55.9% (n = 66) had a normal TEG profile, and 17.8% (n = 21) were hypocoagulable. After adjusting for differences in demographics and clinical data, hypercoagulable patients were less likely to require un–cross-matched blood (11.1% for hypercoagulable vs. 20.4% for normal vs. 45.7% for hypocoagulable, adjusted P = 0.004). Hypercoagulable patients required less total blood products, in particular, plasma at 6 h (0.1 [SD, 0.4] U for hypercoagulable vs. 0.7 [SD, 1.9] U for normal vs. 4.3 [SD, 6.3] U for hypocoagulable, adjusted P < 0.001) and 24 h (0.2 [SD, 0.6] U for hypercoagulable vs. 1.1 [SD, 2.9] U for normal vs. 8.2 [SD, 19.3] U for hypocoagulable, adjusted P < 0.001). Hypercoagulable patients had lower 24-h mortality (0.0% vs. 5.5% vs. 27.8%, adjusted P < 0.001) and 7-day mortality (0.0% vs. 5.5% vs. 36.1%, adjusted P < 0.001). Bleeding-related deaths were less likely in the hypercoagulable group (0.0% vs. 1.8% vs. 25.0%, adjusted P < 0.001). Conclusions: Approximately a quarter of trauma patients presented in a hypercoagulable state. Hypercoagulable patients required less blood products, in particular plasma. They also had a lower 24-h and 7-day mortality and lower rates of bleeding-related deaths. Further evaluation of the mechanism responsible for the hypercoagulable state and its implications on outcome is warranted.

The impact of blood product ratios in massively transfused pediatric trauma patients

BACKGROUND Few studies have examined the impact of balanced resuscitation in pediatric trauma patients requiring massive transfusions. Adult data may not be generalizable to children. METHODS Retrospective analysis assessed patients seen at a level I trauma center between 2003 and 2010 aged ≤18 years requiring massive packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, defined as transfusion of ≥50% total blood volume. After excluding mortalities in the first 24 hours, the impact of plasma and platelet ratios on mortality was evaluated. RESULTS Of 6,675 pediatric trauma patients, 105 were massively transfused (mean age, 12.4 ± 6.3 years; mean Injury Severity Score, 25.8 ± 11.4; mortality rate, 18.1%). All deceased patients sustained severe head injuries. Plasma/PRBC and platelet/PRBC ratios were not significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS In this study, higher plasma/PRBC and platelet/PRBC ratios were not associated with increased survival in children. The value of aggressive blood product transfusion for injured pediatric patients requires further prospective validation.

Pneumatosis Intestinalis Predictive Evaluation Study: A multicenter epidemiologic study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

BACKGROUND Our group has previously published a retrospective review defining variables predictive of transmural bowel ischemia in the setting of pneumatosis intestinalis (PI). We hypothesize this prospective study will confirm the findings of the retrospective review, enhancing legitimacy to the predictive factors for pathologic PI previously highlighted. METHODS Data were collected using the Research Electronic Data Capture. Forward logistic regression was utilized to identify independent predictors for pathologic PI. Statistical significance was defined as p ⩽ 0.05. RESULTS During the 3-year study period, 127 patients with PI were identified. Of these, 79 had benign disease, and 49 pathologic PI defined by the presence of transmural ischemia during surgical exploration or autopsy. Laboratory values such as elevated international normalized ratio (INR), decreased hemoglobin, and a lactate value of greater than 2.0 mmol/L were predictive of pathologic PI, as well as clinical factors including adynamic ileus, peritoneal signs on physical examination, sepsis, and hypotension. The location was also a significant factor, as patients with small bowel PI had a higher incidence of transmural ischemia than colonic PI. On multiple logistic regression, lactate value of greater than 2.0 mmol/L (odds ratio, 5.1, 1.3–19.5; p = 0.018), elevated INR (odds ratio, 3.2, 1.1–9.6; p = 0.031), peritonitis (15.0, 2.9–78; p = 0.001), and decreased hemoglobin (0.70, 0.50–0.97, 0.031) remained significant predictors of transmural ischemia (area under the curve, 0.90; 0.83–0.97). A lactate value of 2.0 mmol/L or greater and peritonitis are common factors between the retrospective review and this prospective study. CONCLUSIONS We recommend surgical exploration to be strongly considered for those PI patients presenting also with a lactate greater than 2 mmol/L and/or peritonitis. We suggest strong suspicion for necrosis in those patient with PI and small bowel involvement, ascites on computed tomography scan, adynamic ileus, anemia, and a high INR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level II; therapeutic study, level II.

Risk factors for post-traumatic pneumonia in patients with retained haemothorax: Results of a prospective, observational AAST study

INTRODUCTION Retained haemothorax (RH) is a problematic sequela of thoracic trauma, reported in up to 20% of patients following chest injury. RH is associated with a higher severity of thoracic trauma and may portend the onset of other serious post-traumatic complications, including pneumonia. The development of pneumonia has previously been reported to be as high as 19.5% in the setting of traumatic RH. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of pneumonia as a complication in RH. METHODS We utilized the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Post-Traumatic Retained Haemothorax database. Patients with post-traumatic RH were prospectively enrolled from 2009 to 2011. Inclusion criteria were placement of a thoracostomy tube within 24h of admission for the evacuation of pneumothorax or haemothorax and subsequent chest computed tomography scan chest showing RH. Patients treated with thoracotomy before placement of tube thoracostomy were excluded. For univariate analysis, the Chi-square test with Yates correction was used for comparison of categorical risk factors and the Students t-test or the Mann-Whitney test for comparison of continuous risk factors. To identify independent risk factors for the development of pneumonia, variables from the univariate analysis significant at p<0.2 were entered into a forward logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived. RESULTS 328 patients with post-traumatic RH from 20 United States centres were enrolled. After stepwise regression analysis, ISS>25 (adjusted OR: 7.1; 95% CI: 3.1, 16.4; p<0.001), blunt mechanism of injury (adjusted OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.7, 7.2; p=0.001), and failure to administer peri-procedural antibiotics on the initial thoracostomy tube placement (adjusted OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.30, 5.4; p=0.01) were found to be independent predictors of the pneumonia in patients with post-traumatic RH. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, our current study is the largest attempt to identify the independent predictors for pneumonia in this population. Our data show that elevated ISS, blunt thoracic trauma, and failure to administer peri-procedural antibiotics on tube thoracostomy placement are the statistically significant independent risk factors.