Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa
University of Ilorin
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa.
The Nigerian postgraduate medical journal | 2015
Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa
The importance of measuring the accuracy and consistency of research instruments (especially questionnaires) known as validity and reliability, respectively, have been documented in several studies, but their measure is not commonly carried out among health and social science researchers in developing countries. This has been linked to the dearth of knowledge of these tests. This is a review article which comprehensively explores and describes the validity and reliability of a research instrument (with special reference to questionnaire). It further discusses various forms of validity and reliability tests with concise examples and finally explains various methods of analysing these tests with scientific principles guiding such analysis.
Global Health Action | 2014
Marleen E. Hendriks; Piyali Kundu; Alexander C. Boers; Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa; Mark J. te Pas; Tanimola M. Akande; Kayode Agbede; Gabriella B. Gomez; William K. Redekop; Constance Schultsz; Siok Swan Tan
Background Disease-specific costing studies can be used as input into cost-effectiveness analyses and provide important information for efficient resource allocation. However, limited data availability and limited expertise constrain such studies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Objective To describe a step-by-step guideline for conducting disease-specific costing studies in LMICs where data availability is limited and to illustrate how the guideline was applied in a costing study of cardiovascular disease prevention care in rural Nigeria. Design The step-by-step guideline provides practical recommendations on methods and data requirements for six sequential steps: 1) definition of the study perspective, 2) characterization of the unit of analysis, 3) identification of cost items, 4) measurement of cost items, 5) valuation of cost items, and 6) uncertainty analyses. Results We discuss the necessary tradeoffs between the accuracy of estimates and data availability constraints at each step and illustrate how a mixed methodology of accurate bottom-up micro-costing and more feasible approaches can be used to make optimal use of all available data. An illustrative example from Nigeria is provided. Conclusions An innovative, user-friendly guideline for disease-specific costing in LMICs is presented, using a mixed methodology to account for limited data availability. The illustrative example showed that the step-by-step guideline can be used by healthcare professionals in LMICs to conduct feasible and accurate disease-specific cost analyses.Background Disease-specific costing studies can be used as input into cost-effectiveness analyses and provide important information for efficient resource allocation. However, limited data availability and limited expertise constrain such studies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Objective To describe a step-by-step guideline for conducting disease-specific costing studies in LMICs where data availability is limited and to illustrate how the guideline was applied in a costing study of cardiovascular disease prevention care in rural Nigeria. Design The step-by-step guideline provides practical recommendations on methods and data requirements for six sequential steps: 1) definition of the study perspective, 2) characterization of the unit of analysis, 3) identification of cost items, 4) measurement of cost items, 5) valuation of cost items, and 6) uncertainty analyses. Results We discuss the necessary tradeoffs between the accuracy of estimates and data availability constraints at each step and illustrate how a mixed methodology of accurate bottom-up micro-costing and more feasible approaches can be used to make optimal use of all available data. An illustrative example from Nigeria is provided. Conclusions An innovative, user-friendly guideline for disease-specific costing in LMICs is presented, using a mixed methodology to account for limited data availability. The illustrative example showed that the step-by-step guideline can be used by healthcare professionals in LMICs to conduct feasible and accurate disease-specific cost analyses.
PLOS ONE | 2015
Gabriela B. Gomez; Nicola L. Foster; Daniëlla Brals; Heleen E. Nelissen; Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa; Marleen E. Hendriks; Alexander C. Boers; Diederik van Eck; Nicole T. A. Rosendaal; Peju Adenusi; Kayode Agbede; Tanimola M. Akande; Michael Boele van Hensbroek; Ferdinand W. N. M. Wit; Catherine Hankins; Constance Schultsz
Background While the Nigerian government has made progress towards the Millennium Development Goals, further investments are needed to achieve the targets of post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals, including Universal Health Coverage. Economic evaluations of innovative interventions can help inform investment decisions in resource-constrained settings. We aim to assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of maternal care provided within the new Kwara State Health Insurance program (KSHI) in rural Nigeria. Methods and Findings We used a decision analytic model to simulate a cohort of pregnant women. The primary outcome is the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the KSHI scenario compared to the current standard of care. Intervention cost from a healthcare provider perspective included service delivery costs and above-service level costs; these were evaluated in a participating hospital and using financial records from the managing organisations, respectively. Standard of care costs from a provider perspective were derived from the literature using an ingredient approach. We generated 95% credibility intervals around the primary outcome through probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) based on a Monte Carlo simulation. We conducted one-way sensitivity analyses across key model parameters and assessed the sensitivity of our results to the performance of the base case separately through a scenario analysis. Finally, we assessed the sustainability and feasibility of this program’s scale up within the State’s healthcare financing structure through a budget impact analysis. The KSHI scenario results in a health benefit to patients at a higher cost compared to the base case. The mean ICER (US
Journal of Hypertension | 2015
Marleen E. Hendriks; Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa; Heleen E. Nelissen; Alexander C. Boers; Gabriela B. Gomez; Siok Swan Tan; William K. Redekop; Peju Adenusi; Joep M. A. Lange; Kayode Agbede; Tanimola M. Akande; Constance Schultsz
46.4/disability-adjusted life year averted) is considered very cost-effective compared to a willingness-to-pay threshold of one gross domestic product per capita (Nigeria, US
The Pan African medical journal | 2014
Sunday Adedeji Aderibigbe; Foluke Adenike Olatona; Gafar Alawode; Oluwole Adeyemi Babatunde; Ambrose Itopa Onipe; Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa; Hafsat Abolore Ameen; Gordon K. Osagbemi; Eo Sanya; Adebunmi Oyeladun Olarinoye; Tanimola M. Akande
2012, 2,730). Our conclusion was robust to uncertainty in parameters estimates (PSA: median US
Journal of Hypertension | 2014
Heleen E. Nelissen; Marleen E. Hendriks; Ferdinand W. N. M. Wit; Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa; Gordon K. Osagbemi; Navin R. Bindraban; Joep M. A. Lange; Tanimola M. Akande; Constance Schultsz; Lizzy M. Brewster
49.1, 95% credible interval 21.9–152.3), during one-way sensitivity analyses, and when cost, quality, cost and utilization parameters of the base case scenario were changed. The sustainability of this program’s scale up by the State is dependent on further investments in healthcare. Conclusions This study provides evidence that the investment made by the KSHI program in rural Nigeria is likely to have been cost-effective; however, further healthcare investments are needed for this program to be successfully expanded within Kwara State. Policy makers should consider supporting financial initiatives to reduce maternal mortality tackling both supply and demand issues in the access to care.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2016
Marleen E. Hendriks; Nicole T.A. Rosendaal; Ferdinand W. N. M. Wit; Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa; Berber Kramer; Daniëlla Brals; Emily Gustafsson-Wright; Peju Adenusi; Lizzy M. Brewster; Gordon K. Osagbemi; Tanimola M. Akande; Constance Schultsz
Objective: To assess the costs of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention care according to international guidelines, in a primary healthcare clinic in rural Nigeria, participating in a health insurance programme. Methods: A micro-costing study was conducted from a healthcare provider perspective. Activities per patient per year (e.g. consultations, diagnostic tests) were based on clinical practice in the study clinic. Direct (e.g. staff, drugs) and indirect cost items (overheads) for each activity were measured. A cohort study, patient and staff observations, and interviews in the study clinic provided patient resource utilization data. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. Scenario analyses evaluated cost-saving options. The main outcome was the costs of CVD prevention care per patient per year. Results: The costs of CVD prevention care were United States dollars (USD) 144 (range 130–158) per patient per year. Direct costs were USD 82 and indirect costs were USD 62. The main cost drivers were drugs (USD 39) and diagnostic tests (USD 36). The costs of hypertension care were USD 118 (107–132) and that of diabetes care USD 263 (236–289) per patient per year. A combination of task-shifting from doctors to nurses, reduction of appointment frequencies, and minimal organ damage screening would result in a direct cost reduction of 42%. Conclusion: This is the first study to report the costs of CVD prevention care in sub-Saharan Africa, based on prospectively collected operational data. The costs observed in our study are unaffordable in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, highlighting the need for innovative financing mechanisms to fund CVD prevention care.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Nicole T. A. Rosendaal; Marleen E. Hendriks; Mark D. Verhagen; Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa; Eo Sanya; Pm Kolo; Peju Adenusi; Kayode Agbede; Diederik van Eck; Siok Swan Tan; Tanimola M. Akande; William K. Redekop; Constance Schultsz; Gabriela B. Gomez
Introduction Malaria has proven to be the most horrendous and intractable amongst the health problems confronting countries in the sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to determine the ownership and utilisation of long lasting insecticide treated nets following free distribution campaign in a state in South West Nigeria. Methods Multi-stage sampling technique was used to recruit 2560 households spread across the 16 LGAs of the state. Interviewer administered standardized questionnaire was used for the survey. Data analysis was done using Stata 10 software. Results Sixty eight point six percent (68.6%) of the households had at least one under-five child living in the household while 32.6% had at least one pregnant woman living in the household. A total of 2440 (95.3%) households received LLIN during the campaign. Overall, the utilization rate for all respondents was 58.5%. Despite the fact that 2440 households received LLINs during the campaign, only 84.3% of them were seen to have hung theirs during the survey. Conclusion Coverage and ownership of LLINs increased significantly following the free distribution campaign. There was a discrepancy between net possession and net use with rate of use lower than possession. Post distribution educational campaign should be incorporated into future distribution campaigns to help increase net utilisation.
Journal of Hypertension | 2015
Marleen E. Hendriks; Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa; Ferdinand W. N. W. Wit; Lizzy M. Brewster; Aina Olufemi Odusola; Nicole T. A. Rosendaal; Navin R. Bindraban; Peju Adenusi; Kayode Agbede; Joep M. A. Lange; Tanimola M. Akande; Constance Schultsz
Objectives: To study the prevalence of target organ damage (TOD) in hypertensive adults in a general population in rural Nigeria, to assess determinants of TOD and the contribution of TOD screening to assess eligibility for antihypertensive treatment. Methods: All adults diagnosed with hypertension (n = 387) and a random sample (n = 540) out of all nonhypertensive adults, classified during a household survey in 2009, had a blood pressure measurement and were invited for TOD (myocardial infarction, left ventricular hypertrophy, angina pectoris, kidney disease) screening in 2011. Results: Participation in TOD screening was 51% (n = 196) in respondents with hypertension and 33% (n = 179) in those without hypertension. TOD prevalence in hypertensive and nonhypertensive adults was 32 and 15%, respectively. Hypertension severity was a strong determinant for TOD [grade 1 odds ratio (OR) 2.66, 95% confidence interval (CI)1.04–6.84; grade 2 OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.41–10.36]. Out of 196 hypertensive patients, 151 were untreated, of whom all grade 2 hypertensive patients (n = 71) were eligible for treatment. Screening revealed TOD in 19 out of 80 grade 1 hypertensive respondents (24%), therefore also classifying them as eligible for treatment. TOD screening hypertensive nonrespondents had more severe hypertension than hypertensive respondents, which may have resulted in an underestimation of the true prevalence of TOD among adults with hypertension. Conclusion: A high prevalence of 32% TOD in hypertensive adults in rural Nigeria was observed. Almost a quarter of respondents with grade 1 hypertension were eligible for antihypertensive treatment based on TOD screening findings. As TOD screening is mostly unavailable in sub-Saharan Africa, we propose antihypertensive treatment for all patients with hypertension.
The Pan African medical journal | 2014
Oladimeji Akeem Bolarinwa; Hafsat Abolore Ameen; Kabir Adekunle Durowade; Tanimola M. Akande
BACKGROUND Hypertension is a leading risk factor for death in sub-Saharan Africa. Quality treatment is often not available nor affordable. We assessed the effect of a voluntary health insurance program, including quality improvement of healthcare facilities, on blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive adults in rural Nigeria. METHODS We compared changes in outcomes from baseline (2009) to midline (2011) and endline (2013) between non-pregnant hypertensive adults in the insurance program area (PA) and a control area (CA), through household surveys. The primary outcome was the difference between the PA and CA in change in BP, using difference-in-differences analysis. RESULTS Of 1500 eligible households, 1450 (96.7%) participated, including 559 (20.8%) hypertensive individuals, of which 332 (59.4%) had follow-up data. Insurance coverage increased from 0% at baseline to 41.8% at endline in the PA and remained under 1% in the CA. The PA showed a 4.97 mm Hg (95% CI: -0.76 to +10.71 mm Hg) greater decrease in systolic BP and a 1.81 mm Hg (-1.06 to +4.68 mm Hg) greater decrease in diastolic BP from baseline to endline compared to the CA. Respondents with stage 2 hypertension showed an 11.43 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.62 to 21.23 mm Hg) greater reduction in systolic BP and 3.15 mm Hg (-1.22 to +7.53 mm Hg) greater reduction in diastolic BP in the PA compared to the CA. Attrition did not affect the results. CONCLUSION Access to improved quality healthcare through an insurance program in rural Nigeria was associated with a significant longer-term reduction in systolic BP in subjects with moderate or severe hypertension.