Ole Kudsk Jensen

An open study comparing manual therapy with the use of cold packs in the treatment of post‐traumatic headache

One year after head trauma, 23 patients with post-traumatic headache entered a prospective clinical controlled trial to find out if specific manual therapy on the neck could reduce the headache. The study was completed by 19 patients (83%). Ten patients were treated twice with manual therapy and nine patients were treated twice with cold packs on the neck. The pain index was calculated blindly. Two weeks after the last treatment the mean pain index was significantly reduced to 43% in the group treated with manual therapy compared with the pretreatment level. At follow-up five weeks later, the pain index was still lower in this group compared with the group treated with cold packs, but this difference was not statistically significant. The pain index for all 19 patients was significantly correlated to the use of analgesics as well as to the frequency of associated symptoms (number of days per week with dizziness, visual disturbances and ear symptoms). It is concluded that the type of manual therapy used in this study seems to have a specific effect in reducing post-traumatic headache. The result supports the hypothesis of a cervical mechanism causing post-traumatic headache and suggests that post-traumatic dizziness, visual disturbances and ear symptoms could be part of a cervical syndrome.

The influence of sex and pre‐traumatic headache on the incidence and severity of headache after head injury

Pre- and post-traumatic headache of 168 individuals aged 18–60 years was registered 9–12 months after a head trauma. Headache before the trauma was reported by 39.9%, women being in the majority. After the trauma 64.3% were suffering from headache. Post-traumatic headache was reported by 64 patients (38.1%), of whom 22 patients experienced an increase of already existing headache and 42 patients complained of new headache. Patients suffering from headache before the trauma were not more at risk of having post-traumatic headache than patients who did not suffer from headache before the trauma. Patients who experienced an increase of already-existing pre-traumatic headache used more analgesics than patients first suffering from headache after the trauma. Post-traumatic headache was reported by more women than men (p < 0.02), the corresponding relative risk being 1.6. Both the use of analgesics and the frequency of headache showed a significant increase for patients with post-traumatic headache when compared with a “control group” of 41 patients with unchanged headache and when compared with all patients with headache before the trauma. There was no significant difference in the location of pain between the groups analysed.

One-Year Follow-Up in Employees Sick-Listed Because of Low Back Pain: Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Multidisciplinary and Brief Intervention

Study Design. Randomized clinical trial comparing two interventions in employees sick-listed 3 to 16 weeks because of low back pain (LBP). Objective. To compare 1-year return to work (RTW), pain, disability and physical and mental health dimensions in subjects offered a hospital-based multidisciplinary intervention or a brief intervention. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies in sick-listed employees with LBP have indicated efficacy of both brief and more comprehensive multidisciplinary interventions. However, it remains unknown, which is the more effective, and which elements are instrumental in furthering RTW, and improving health. Methods. The brief intervention comprised clinical examination and advice offered by a rehabilitation physician and a physiotherapist. In the multidisciplinary intervention, this intervention was supplemented with the expertise of a team and the assignment of a case manager who drew up a rehabilitation plan in collaboration with the patient and the multidisciplinary team. One-year RTW was estimated by data from a comprehensive national database of social transfer payments. Questionnaires were used to obtain baseline and 1-year data on Roland Morris disability score, LBP Rating Scale, SF36, and fear-avoidance. Results. A total of 351 patients were included and randomized and 344 (98%) patients participated in all the consultations according to the study protocol. RTW was achieved by 125 (71.0%) participants in the multidisciplinary and 133 (76.0%) participants in the brief intervention group. The hazard ratio was 0.84 after adjustment for sex, age, smoking, compensation claims, disability score, and diagnosis (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65–1.08,P = 0.18). Multiple linear regression analysis displayed no differences in secondary outcomes, except for the mental health score (SF36), which was a little higher in the multidisciplinary intervention group than in the brief intervention group. Conclusion. Hospital-based multidisciplinary intervention may be no better than brief intervention to increase RTW and improve health in sick-listed employees with low back pain.

One-year prognosis in sick-listed low back pain patients with and without radiculopathy. Prognostic factors influencing pain and disability

BACKGROUND CONTEXTnPrevious research has documented various psychosocial risk factors with influence on outcome in low back pain (LBP) patients, but the value of clinical predictors has been less well documented.nnnPURPOSEnTo identify clinical and psychosocial risk factors at baseline influencing disability and pain at 1 year in LBP patients sick-listed 3 to 16 weeks, and to look for differences between nonspecific LBP and radiculopathy.nnnSTUDY DESIGNnCohort study with 1-year follow-up based on a randomized clinical trial.nnnOUTCOME MEASURESnDisability and change of disability, pain and change in pain at 1 year.nnnMETHODSnIn a randomized clinical study evaluating multidisciplinary versus brief intervention, 325 patients were followed for 1 year. At baseline, they completed a questionnaire and went through a clinical low back examination, including measure of forward flexion and side flexion as well as tender point examination, a method to estimate diffuse tenderness. Furthermore, degenerative changes on plain X-rays of the lumbar spine were quantified, and sciatica was investigated by magnetic resonance imaging.nnnRESULTSnRadiculopathy was verified by magnetic resonance imaging in 111 (34%) patients. At 1 year, questions of disability in daily life activities and pain were answered by 60% and 67%, respectively. The intensity of back+leg pain and disability was closely correlated. Statistically significant predictors for both disability and back+leg pain at 1 year were intensity of back+leg pain, worrying and health anxiety, many tender points, and little or moderate exercise in leisure time. Two additional risk factors were identified in patients with radiculopathy: older age and drinking alcohol less than once per month. Furthermore, disability at 1 year was associated with initial disability and compensation claim, and back+leg pain at 1 year was associated with fear avoidance about physical activity and the duration of pain. Change in disability was more closely associated with return to work than change in pain. Disc degeneration was not associated with disability or pain at 1 year. General health was not statistically significantly associated with outcome when adjusted for back+leg pain, disability, and worrying and health anxiety.nnnCONCLUSIONSnDisability and pain at 1 year were associated with baseline disability and pain, diffuse tenderness, worrying and health anxiety, compensation claim, fear avoidance, and baseline exercise habits. Only in patients with verified nerve root affection, older age, and restrained alcohol seemed to play a role. The multivariate models were insufficient in predicting disability and pain, partly because disability and pain were also strongly associated with return to work.

Rates of Lumbar Disc Surgery Before and After Implementation of Multidisciplinary Nonsurgical Spine Clinics

Study Design. Correlation study. Objectives. To assess the rates of lumbar disc surgery in North Jutland County, Denmark, before and after implementation of two nonsurgical spine clinics, and to compare the observed rates with those for the rest of Denmark in the same time periods. Summary of Background Data. Few studies have addressed initiatives to reduce high rates of lumbar disc surgery by improving nonsurgical care offered to patients with sciatica and low back pain. Methods. The study was conducted in North Jutland County, Denmark with 500,000 inhabitants (10% of the Danish population). In 1997, two nonsurgical spine clinics were established, along with an educational program for general practitioners. The clinics targeted patients with sciatica of 1 to 3 months’ duration, with or without low back pain. Data on rates of lumbar disc surgery were obtained from the National Registry of Patients. Results. The annual rate of lumbar disc operations for patients in North Jutland County decreased from approximately 60 to 80 per 100,000 before 1997 to 40 per 100,000 in 2001 (P = 0.00), and the rate of elective, first-time disc surgeries decreased by approximately two thirds (P = 0.00). In contrast, the annual rate of lumbar disc operations for patients in the rest of Denmark remained unchanged during the same period. Conclusions. The implementation of multidisciplinary, nonsurgical spine clinics coincided closely with a significant reduction in the rate of lumbar disc surgery. The observed reduction seems most likely to be causally associated with educational activities and improved patient care provided by the clinics.

Subgroup analyses on return to work in sick- listed employees with low back pain in a randomised trial comparing brief and multidisciplinary intervention

BackgroundMultidisciplinary intervention is recommended for rehabilitation of employees sick-listed for 4-12 weeks due to low back pain (LBP). However, comparison of a brief and a multidisciplinary intervention in a randomised comparative trial of sick-listed employees showed similar return to work (RTW) rates in the two groups. The aim of the present study was to identify subgroups, primarily defined by work-related baseline factors that would benefit more from the multidisciplinary intervention than from the brief intervention.MethodsA total of 351 employees sick-listed for 3-16 weeks due to LBP were recruited from their general practitioners. They received a brief or a multidisciplinary intervention. Both interventions comprised clinical examination and advice by a rehabilitation doctor and a physiotherapist. The multidisciplinary intervention also comprised assignment of a case manager, who made a rehabilitation plan in collaboration with the patient and a multidisciplinary team. Using data from a national database, we defined RTW as no sickness compensation benefit disbursement for four consecutive weeks within the first year after the intervention. At the first interview in the clinic, it was ensured that sick leave was primarily due to low back problems.Questionnaires were used to obtain data on health, disability, demographic and workplace-related factors. Cox hazard regression analyses were used with RTW as outcome measure and hazard rate ratios (HRR = HRmultidisciplinary/HRbrief) were adjusted for demographic and health-related variables. An interaction term consisting of a baseline variable*intervention group was added to the multivariable regression model to analyse whether the effects of the interventions were moderated by the baseline factor. Subsequently, a new study was performed that included 120 patients who followed the same protocol. This group was analyzed in the same way to verify the findings from the original study group.ResultsThe multidisciplinary intervention group ensured a quicker RTW than the brief intervention group in a subgroup with low job satisfaction, notably when claimants were excluded. The opposite effect was seen in the subgroup with high job satisfaction. When claimants were excluded, the effect was also in favour of the multidisciplinary intervention in subgroups characterised by no influence on work planning and groups at risk of losing their job. Inversely, the effect was in favour of the brief intervention in the subgroups who were able to influence the planning of their work and who had no risk of losing their job due to current sick leave. Interaction analysis of the data in the new study displayed similar or even more pronounced differences between subgroups in relation to intervention type.ConclusionsMultidisciplinary intervention seemed more effective than brief intervention in subgroups of patients with low job satisfaction, no influence on work planning and feeling at risk of losing their jobs due to their sick leave as compared with subgroups not fulfilling these criteria.

Type 1 Modic changes was a significant risk factor for 1-year outcome in sick-listed low back pain patients: a nested cohort study using magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine.

BACKGROUND CONTEXTnIt is not clear whether Modic changes (MC) is associated with low back pain (LBP) outcome.nnnPURPOSEnTo study associations between baseline degenerative manifestations and outcome in sick-listed LBP patients.nnnSTUDY DESIGNnProspective nested cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial.nnnPATIENT SAMPLEnOut of 325 sick-listed LBP patients, 141 were consecutively examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and included and 140 completed the study.nnnOUTCOME MEASURESnDegenerative manifestations of the lumbar spine were quantified; associations were studied in relation to the three primary outcomes: change of back+leg pain, change of function as measured by Roland-Morris questionnaire, and 1-year unsuccessful return to work (U-RTW).nnnMETHODSnBy using a previously validated MRI protocol, a specialist in radiology, who had no access to clinical data, described the images. Associations were studied by linear and logistic regression with adjustment for previously identified prognostic factors for 1-year pain and function and for U-RTW.nnnRESULTSnClinically, 43% of the patients had radiculopathy. Degenerative changes were prevalent with altered disc contours in 84%, high-intensity zones in 70%, and nerve root touch or impingement in 63% of the patients. MC was identified in 60% of the patients, 18% with Type 1 changes and 42% with Type 2 changes, Type 1 including both Type 1 and Type 1 in combination with Type 2. Patients with Type 1 changes reported more back pain and did not improve in pain or disability. They increased to include 30% of the patients with U-RTW at 1 year. Patients with Type 2 changes did not differ significantly from patients without MC but differed significantly from patients with Type 1 changes in all three outcomes. Other degenerative manifestations were not significantly associated with any of the three outcomes.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe only degenerative manifestation negatively associated with outcome was Type 1 MC that affected 18% of the cohort at baseline and implied an increased risk for no improvement in pain and function and for U-RTW, even after adjustment for other prognostic factors.

Prediction model for unsuccessful return to work after hospital-based intervention in low back pain patients

BackgroundMany studies on low back pain (LBP) have identified prognostic factors, but prediction models for use in secondary health care are not available. The purpose of this cohort study, based on a randomised clinical study, was to identify risk factors for unsuccessful return to work (U-RTW) in sick-listed LBP patients with or without radiculopathy and to validate a prediction model for U-RTW.Methods325 sick-listed LBP patients with or without radiculopathy were included in an intervention study and followed for one year. Afterwards, 117 other LBP patients were recruited similarly, included in a validation study and also followed for one year. All patients were subjected to identical procedures and interventions and received a brief intervention by the same rehabilitation doctor and physiotherapist. Half of them received case manager guidance within a multidisciplinary setting. At baseline, they completed a questionnaire and went through a clinical low-back examination. Sciatica was investigated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). U-RTW was registered in a national database both initially and at 1-year.ResultsNeither initial U-RTW (24.0%) nor one-year U-RTW (38.2%) were statistically significantly different in the two intervention groups nor in patients with and without radiculopathy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified two clinical and five psychosocial baseline predictors for one-year U-RTW (primary outcome). The clinical predictors included pain score (back+leg pain) and side-flexion. The five psychosocial predictors included ‘bodily distress’ ‘low expectations of RTW’, ‘blaming the work for pain’, ‘no home ownership’ and ‘drinking alcohol less than once/month’. These predictors were not statistically significantly different in patients with and without radiculopathy, and they also predicted initial U-RTW (secondary outcome). Obesity and older age were only supplementary predictors in patients with radiculopathy. A prediction model was established and tested in the validation study group. The model predicted one-year U-RWT in patients with intermediate and high risk, but only partially in patients with low risk. The model predicted all three risk categories in initial U-RTW.ConclusionsA prediction model combining baseline clinical and psychosocial risk factors predicted patients with low, intermediate and high risk for unsuccessful return to work, both initially and at 1-year.

Low back pain may be caused by disturbed pain regulation: A cross-sectional study in low back pain patients using tender point examination

Background: Widespread pain has negative influence on outcome in low back pain (LBP) patients. Tender point (TP) examination is a standardized examination method to estimate diffuse tenderness.

The LABEREX chamber for studying the critical shear stress for fine-grained sediment

Abstract Geografisk Tidsskrift, Danish Journal of Geography 99: 1–7, 1999 A new portable instrument, the Laberex chamber—LAB oratory ERosional EXperiments—for studies of the “fluff layer” and sediment critical shear stress is described. The chamber consists of a cylindric plexiglass tube with an inner diameter of 84 mm. A four-bladed impeller connected to a motor is placed in the centre of the chamber. Rotation of the impeller induces resuspension. Light attenuation is measured across the centre line in the chamber at a wave length of 633 nm (red light). A PC automatically controls both the stirring voltage that is increased at predetermined time-intervals and collects data from the light attenuation meter every second. Velocity distributions in the chamber and the relation between stirring voltages and critical shear stress are known from laser doppler measurements in the chamber.