Olga Pontes

A concerted DNA methylation/histone methylation switch regulates rRNA gene dosage control and nucleolar dominance

Eukaryotes regulate the effective dosage of their ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, expressing fewer than half of the genes at any one time. Likewise, genetic hybrids displaying nucleolar dominance transcribe rRNA genes inherited from one parent but silence the other parental set. We show that rRNA gene dosage control and nucleolar dominance utilize a common mechanism. Central to the mechanism is an epigenetic switch in which concerted changes in promoter cytosine methylation density and specific histone modifications dictate the on and off states of the rRNA genes. A key component of the off switch is HDT1, a plant-specific histone deacetylase that localizes to the nucleolus and is required for H3 lysine 9 deacetylation and subsequent H3 lysine 9 methylation. Collectively, the data support a model in which cytosine methylation and histone deacetylation are each upstream of one another in a self-reinforcing repression cycle.

A Histone Acetyltransferase Regulates Active DNA Demethylation in Arabidopsis

To Silence or Not to Silence Repressed genes commonly have methylated DNA, and/or covalent histone modifications associated with silent chromatin, and/or associated small interfering (si)RNAs. All three features are components of gene-silencing systems (see the Perspective by Jacob and Martienssen). In a screen for components of DNA methylation gene-silencing systems in the flowering plant, Moissiard et al. (p. 1448, published online 3 May) identified the genes AtMoRC1 and AtMORC6, which are homologs of the mouse Microrchidia1 gene. AtMORC1 and AtMORC6 are involved in silencing transposable elements and genes corresponding to DNA-methylated loci, and yet neither gene is required for maintenance of DNA methylation. Instead, AtMoRC1 and AtMORC6 are related to proteins that remodel chromatin superstructure, and they seem to control gene-silencing through the higher-order compaction of methylated and silent chromatin. Qian et al. (p. 1445) identified an Arabidopsis gene, IDM1 (increased DNA methylation 1), that is involved in regulating DNA methylation at loci enriched for repeats and multigene families containing highly homologous genes. IDM1 protects target genes from DNA silencing and recognizes both histone H3 and methylated DNA at target loci and is able to acetylate histone H3. A plant epigenetic regulator recognizes both histones and methylated DNA and prevents gene silencing. Active DNA demethylation is an important part of epigenetic regulation in plants and animals. How active DNA demethylation is regulated and its relationship with histone modification patterns are unclear. Here, we report the discovery of IDM1, a regulator of DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis. IDM1 is required for preventing DNA hypermethylation of highly homologous multicopy genes and other repetitive sequences that are normally targeted for active DNA demethylation by Repressor of Silencing 1 and related 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylases. IDM1 binds methylated DNA at chromatin sites lacking histone H3K4 di- or trimethylation and acetylates H3 to create a chromatin environment permissible for 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylases to function. Our study reveals how some genes are indicated by multiple epigenetic marks for active DNA demethylation and protection from silencing.

Subnuclear partitioning of rRNA genes between the nucleolus and nucleoplasm reflects alternative epiallelic states

Eukaryotes can have thousands of 45S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, many of which are silenced during development. Using fluorescence-activated sorting techniques, we show that active rRNA genes in Arabidopsis thaliana are present within sorted nucleoli, whereas silenced rRNA genes are excluded. DNA methyltransferase (met1), histone deacetylase (hda6), or chromatin assembly (caf1) mutants that disrupt silencing abrogate this nucleoplasmic-nucleolar partitioning. Bisulfite sequencing data indicate that active nucleolar rRNA genes are nearly completely demethylated at promoter CGs, whereas silenced genes are nearly fully methylated. Collectively, the data reveal that rRNA genes occupy distinct but changeable nuclear territories according to their epigenetic state.

A Transcription Fork Model for Pol IV and Pol V–Dependent RNA-Directed DNA Methylation

In Arabidopsis thaliana, nuclear multisubunit RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) and RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 (RDR2) are required for the biogenesis of 24-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that direct DNA methylation and transcriptional silencing at target loci transcribed by nuclear multisubunit RNA polymerase V (Pol V). Pol IV and RDR2 physically associate and RDR2s polymerase activity in vitro is dependent on Pol IV. RDR2 transcription of nascent Pol IV transcripts might result in discontinuous second strands, analogous to lagging-strand Okazaki fragments generated during DNA replication. In vitro, Pol V is unable to displace nontemplate DNA during transcriptional elongation. This suggests a need for DNA duplex unwinding by helper proteins, perhaps analogous to the helicase-mediated duplex unwinding that occurs at replication forks to enable leading strand synthesis by DNA polymerase ε. A multiprotein complex (DRD1, DMS3, DMS11, RDM1) known to enable Pol V transcription might facilitate duplex unwinding via ATP-dependent DNA translocase, single-stranded DNA binding, and cohesin-like strand capture activities. These considerations are discussed and incorporated into a transcription fork model for Pol IV and Pol V-dependent RNA-directed DNA methylation.

DNA topoisomerase 1α promotes transcriptional silencing of transposable elements through DNA methylation and histone lysine 9 dimethylation in Arabidopsis.

RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) and histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylation (H3K9me2) are related transcriptional silencing mechanisms that target transposable elements (TEs) and repeats to maintain genome stability in plants. RdDM is mediated by small and long noncoding RNAs produced by the plant-specific RNA polymerases Pol IV and Pol V, respectively. Through a chemical genetics screen with a luciferase-based DNA methylation reporter, LUCL, we found that camptothecin, a compound with anti-cancer properties that targets DNA topoisomerase 1α (TOP1α) was able to de-repress LUCL by reducing its DNA methylation and H3K9me2 levels. Further studies with Arabidopsis top1α mutants showed that TOP1α silences endogenous RdDM loci by facilitating the production of Pol V-dependent long non-coding RNAs, AGONAUTE4 recruitment and H3K9me2 deposition at TEs and repeats. This study assigned a new role in epigenetic silencing to an enzyme that affects DNA topology.

The AtRAD21.1 and AtRAD21.3 Arabidopsis cohesins play a synergistic role in somatic DNA double strand break damage repair

BackgroundThe RAD21 cohesin plays, besides its well-recognised role in chromatid cohesion, a role in DNA double strand break (dsb) repair. In Arabidopsis there are three RAD21 paralog genes (AtRAD21.1, AtRAD21.2 and AtRAD21.3), yet only AtRAD21.1 has been shown to be required for DNA dsb damage repair. Further investigation of the role of cohesins in DNA dsb repair was carried out and is here reported.ResultsWe show for the first time that not only AtRAD21.1 but also AtRAD21.3 play a role in somatic DNA dsb repair. Comet data shows that the lack of either cohesins induces a similar high basal level of DNA dsb in the nuclei and a slower DNA dsb repair kinetics in both cohesin mutants. The observed AtRAD21.3 transcriptional response to DNA dsb induction reinforces further the role of this cohesin in DNA dsb repair. The importance of AtRAD21.3 in DNA dsb damage repair, after exposure to DNA dsb damage inducing agents, is notorious and recognisably evident at the phenotypical level, particularly when the AtRAD21.1 gene is also disrupted.Data on the kinetics of DNA dsb damage repair and DNA damage sensitivity assays, of single and double atrad21 mutants, as well as the transcription dynamics of the AtRAD21 cohesins over a period of 48xa0hours after the induction of DNA dsb damage is also shown.ConclusionsOur data demonstrates that both Arabidopsis cohesin (AtRAD21.1 and AtRAD21.3) play a role in somatic DNA dsb repair. Furthermore, the phenotypical data from the atrad21.1 atrad21.3 double mutant indicates that these two cohesins function synergistically in DNA dsb repair. The implications of this data are discussed.

Physical mapping, expression patterns and interphase organisation of rDNA loci in Portuguese endemic Silene cintrana and Silene rothmaleri.

Double target in situ hybridization to root tip metaphase and interphase cells of Silene cintrana and Silene rothmaleri was used to allocate the position of 18S-5.8S-25S and 5S rRNA genes. In both species, the 18S-5.8S-25S rDNA probe labelled four sites located on the short arms of two submetacentric chromosomes. Only one locus for 5S rDNA was mapped adjacent to 18S-5.8S-25S genes in a subterminal position on the centromere side: in S. rothmaleri the 5S rDNA locus was adjacent to the small 18S-5.8S-25S locus while in S. cintrana it was near the large one. The NOR activity analysed by Ag-staining in metaphase cells revealed proportionality between in situ labelling dimensions and Ag-NORs. In both species all rDNA loci were potentially active, although in S. rothmaleri a tendency for the expression of only one locus was observed. Interphase organisation analysis of rDNA showed some differences between both species that were correlated with NOR activity.

The cytological and molecular role of DOMAINS REARRANGED METHYLTRANSFERASE3 in RNA-dependent DNA methylation of Arabidopsis thaliana

BackgroundPlants have evolved a unique epigenetic process to target DNA cytosine methylation: RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM). During RdDM, small RNAs (smRNAs) guide methylation of homologous DNA loci. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the de novo DNA methyltransferase that ultimately methylates cytosines guided by smRNAs in all sequence contexts is DOMAINS REARRANGED METHYLTRANSFERASE 2 (DRM2). Recent reports have shown that DRM2 requires the catalytic mutated paralog DRM3 to exert its function through a still largely unknown process. To shed light on how DRM3 affects RdDM, we have further characterized its role at the molecular and cytological levels.FindingsAlthough DRM3 is not required for RdDM loci transcriptional silencing, it specifically affects loci’s DNA methylation. Interestingly, DRM3 and DRM2 regulate the DNA methylation in a subset of loci differently.Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and immunolocalization analyses showed that DRM3 is not required for the large-scale nuclear organization of heterochromatin during interphase, with the notable exception of the 45S ribosomal RNA loci. DRM3 localizes exclusively to the nucleus and is enriched in a round-shaped domain located in the nucleolar periphery, in which it colocalizes with components of the RdDM pathway.ConclusionsOur analyses reinforce the previously proposed chaperone role of DRM3 in RdDM. Overall, our work further demonstrates that DRM3 most likely functions exclusively with DRM2 in RdDM and not with other A. thaliana DNA methyltransferases. However, DRM3’s regulation of DNA methylation is likely target- or chromatin context-dependent. DRM3 hypothetically acts in RdDM either upstream of DRM2, or in a parallel step.

Connecting the dots of RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana

Noncoding RNAs are the rising stars of genome regulation and are crucial to an organism’s metabolism, development, and defense. One of their most notable functions is its ability to direct epigenetic modifications through small RNA molecules to specific genomic regions, ensuring transcriptional regulation, proper genome organization, and maintenance of genome integrity. Here, we review the current knowledge of the spatial organization of the Arabidopsis thaliana RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway within the cell nucleus, which, while known to be essential for the proper establishment of epigenetic modifications, remains poorly understood. We will also discuss possible future cytological approaches that have the potential of unveiling functional insights into how small RNA-directed epigenetics is regulated through the spatiotemporal regulation of its major components within the cell.