Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Oliver J. Brady is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Oliver J. Brady.


Nature | 2013

The global distribution and burden of dengue

Samir Bhatt; Peter W. Gething; Oliver J. Brady; Jane P. Messina; Andrew Farlow; Catherine L. Moyes; John M. Drake; John S. Brownstein; Anne G. Hoen; Osman Sankoh; Monica F. Myers; Dylan B. George; Thomas Jaenisch; G. R. William Wint; Cameron P. Simmons; Thomas W. Scott; Jeremy Farrar; Simon I. Hay

Dengue is a systemic viral infection transmitted between humans by Aedes mosquitoes. For some patients, dengue is a life-threatening illness. There are currently no licensed vaccines or specific therapeutics, and substantial vector control efforts have not stopped its rapid emergence and global spread. The contemporary worldwide distribution of the risk of dengue virus infection and its public health burden are poorly known. Here we undertake an exhaustive assembly of known records of dengue occurrence worldwide, and use a formal modelling framework to map the global distribution of dengue risk. We then pair the resulting risk map with detailed longitudinal information from dengue cohort studies and population surfaces to infer the public health burden of dengue in 2010. We predict dengue to be ubiquitous throughout the tropics, with local spatial variations in risk influenced strongly by rainfall, temperature and the degree of urbanization. Using cartographic approaches, we estimate there to be 390 million (95% credible interval 284–528) dengue infections per year, of which 96 million (67–136) manifest apparently (any level of disease severity). This infection total is more than three times the dengue burden estimate of the World Health Organization. Stratification of our estimates by country allows comparison with national dengue reporting, after taking into account the probability of an apparent infection being formally reported. The most notable differences are discussed. These new risk maps and infection estimates provide novel insights into the global, regional and national public health burden imposed by dengue. We anticipate that they will provide a starting point for a wider discussion about the global impact of this disease and will help to guide improvements in disease control strategies using vaccine, drug and vector control methods, and in their economic evaluation.


PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases | 2012

Refining the Global Spatial Limits of Dengue Virus Transmission by Evidence-Based Consensus

Oliver J. Brady; Peter W. Gething; Samir Bhatt; Jane P. Messina; John S. Brownstein; Anne G. Hoen; Catherine L. Moyes; Andrew Farlow; Thomas W. Scott; Simon I. Hay

Background Dengue is a growing problem both in its geographical spread and in its intensity, and yet current global distribution remains highly uncertain. Challenges in diagnosis and diagnostic methods as well as highly variable national health systems mean no single data source can reliably estimate the distribution of this disease. As such, there is a lack of agreement on national dengue status among international health organisations. Here we bring together all available information on dengue occurrence using a novel approach to produce an evidence consensus map of the disease range that highlights nations with an uncertain dengue status. Methods/Principal Findings A baseline methodology was used to assess a range of evidence for each country. In regions where dengue status was uncertain, additional evidence types were included to either clarify dengue status or confirm that it is unknown at this time. An algorithm was developed that assesses evidence quality and consistency, giving each country an evidence consensus score. Using this approach, we were able to generate a contemporary global map of national-level dengue status that assigns a relative measure of certainty and identifies gaps in the available evidence. Conclusion The map produced here provides a list of 128 countries for which there is good evidence of dengue occurrence, including 36 countries that have previously been classified as dengue-free by the World Health Organization and/or the US Centers for Disease Control. It also identifies disease surveillance needs, which we list in full. The disease extents and limits determined here using evidence consensus, marks the beginning of a five-year study to advance the mapping of dengue virus transmission and disease risk. Completion of this first step has allowed us to produce a preliminary estimate of population at risk with an upper bound of 3.97 billion people. This figure will be refined in future work.


eLife | 2015

The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus

Moritz U. G. Kraemer; Marianne E. Sinka; Kirsten A. Duda; Adrian Mylne; Freya M Shearer; Christopher M. Barker; Chester G. Moore; Roberta Gomes Carvalho; Giovanini Evelim Coelho; Wim Van Bortel; Guy Hendrickx; Francis Schaffner; Iqbal Elyazar; Hwa-Jen Teng; Oliver J. Brady; Jane P. Messina; David M Pigott; Thomas W. Scott; David L. Smith; G. R. William Wint; Nick Golding; Simon I. Hay

Dengue and chikungunya are increasing global public health concerns due to their rapid geographical spread and increasing disease burden. Knowledge of the contemporary distribution of their shared vectors, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus remains incomplete and is complicated by an ongoing range expansion fuelled by increased global trade and travel. Mapping the global distribution of these vectors and the geographical determinants of their ranges is essential for public health planning. Here we compile the largest contemporary database for both species and pair it with relevant environmental variables predicting their global distribution. We show Aedes distributions to be the widest ever recorded; now extensive in all continents, including North America and Europe. These maps will help define the spatial limits of current autochthonous transmission of dengue and chikungunya viruses. It is only with this kind of rigorous entomological baseline that we can hope to project future health impacts of these viruses. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08347.001


The Lancet | 2016

Anticipating the international spread of Zika virus from Brazil

Isaac I. Bogoch; Oliver J. Brady; Moritz U. G. Kraemer; Matthew German; Marisa I Creatore; Manisha A. Kulkarni; John S. Brownstein; Sumiko R. Mekaru; Simon I. Hay; Emily Groot; Alexander Watts; Kamran Khan

In May, 2015, locally acquired cases of Zika virus—an arbovirus found in Africa and Asia-Pacific and transmitted via Aedes mosquitoes—were confirmed in Brazil. The presence of Aedes mosquitoes across Latin America, coupled with suitable climatic conditions, have triggered a Zika virus epidemic in Brazil, currently estimated at 440 000–1 300 000 cases.1 Viraemic travellers have now introduced Zika virus into at least 13 additional countries, where susceptible Aedes mosquitoes have become infected and perpetuated local transmission cycles. In Brazil, a precipitous surge in infants born with microcephaly and the detection of Zika virus RNA in the amniotic fluid of affected newborns has been reported.1 We sought to identify high-risk international pathways for the dispersion of Zika virus and global geographies conducive to autochthonous transmission.


Trends in Microbiology | 2014

Global spread of dengue virus types: Mapping the 70 year history

Jane P. Messina; Oliver J. Brady; Thomas W. Scott; Chenting Zou; David M Pigott; Kirsten A. Duda; Samir Bhatt; Leah C. Katzelnick; Rosalind E. Howes; Katherine E. Battle; Cameron P. Simmons; Simon I. Hay

Highlights • The geography of type-specific global DENV circulation has not been well described.• We map the global distribution and co-circulation of each DENV type from 1943 to 2013.• Detection of all types has expanded worldwide together with growing hyperendemicity.• There remains a dearth of type-specific information in many parts of the world.


eLife | 2014

Mapping the zoonotic niche of Ebola virus disease in Africa

David M Pigott; Nick Golding; Adrian Mylne; Zhi Huang; Andrew J Henry; Daniel J. Weiss; Oliver J. Brady; Moritz U. G. Kraemer; David L. Smith; Catherine L. Moyes; Samir Bhatt; Peter W. Gething; Peter Horby; Isaac I. Bogoch; John S. Brownstein; Sumiko R. Mekaru; Andrew J. Tatem; Kamran Khan; Simon I. Hay

Ebola virus disease (EVD) is a complex zoonosis that is highly virulent in humans. The largest recorded outbreak of EVD is ongoing in West Africa, outside of its previously reported and predicted niche. We assembled location data on all recorded zoonotic transmission to humans and Ebola virus infection in bats and primates (1976–2014). Using species distribution models, these occurrence data were paired with environmental covariates to predict a zoonotic transmission niche covering 22 countries across Central and West Africa. Vegetation, elevation, temperature, evapotranspiration, and suspected reservoir bat distributions define this relationship. At-risk areas are inhabited by 22 million people; however, the rarity of human outbreaks emphasises the very low probability of transmission to humans. Increasing population sizes and international connectivity by air since the first detection of EVD in 1976 suggest that the dynamics of human-to-human secondary transmission in contemporary outbreaks will be very different to those of the past. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04395.001


Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2016

The global burden of dengue: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

Jeffrey D. Stanaway; Donald S. Shepard; Eduardo A. Undurraga; Yara A. Halasa; Luc E. Coffeng; Oliver J. Brady; Simon I. Hay; Neeraj Bedi; Isabela M. Benseñor; Carlos Castañeda-Orjuela; Ting Wu Chuang; Katherine B. Gibney; Ziad A. Memish; Anwar Rafay; Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja; Naohiro Yonemoto; Christopher J L Murray

BACKGROUND Dengue is the most common arbovirus infection globally, but its burden is poorly quantified. We estimated dengue mortality, incidence, and burden for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. METHODS We modelled mortality from vital registration, verbal autopsy, and surveillance data using the Cause of Death Ensemble Modelling tool. We modelled incidence from officially reported cases, and adjusted our raw estimates for under-reporting based on published estimates of expansion factors. In total, we had 1780 country-years of mortality data from 130 countries, 1636 country-years of dengue case reports from 76 countries, and expansion factor estimates for 14 countries. FINDINGS We estimated an average of 9221 dengue deaths per year between 1990 and 2013, increasing from a low of 8277 (95% uncertainty estimate 5353-10 649) in 1992, to a peak of 11 302 (6790-13 722) in 2010. This yielded a total of 576 900 (330 000-701 200) years of life lost to premature mortality attributable to dengue in 2013. The incidence of dengue increased greatly between 1990 and 2013, with the number of cases more than doubling every decade, from 8·3 million (3·3 million-17·2 million) apparent cases in 1990, to 58·4 million (23·6 million-121·9 million) apparent cases in 2013. When accounting for disability from moderate and severe acute dengue, and post-dengue chronic fatigue, 566 000 (186 000-1 415 000) years lived with disability were attributable to dengue in 2013. Considering fatal and non-fatal outcomes together, dengue was responsible for 1·14 million (0·73 million-1·98 million) disability-adjusted life-years in 2013. INTERPRETATION Although lower than other estimates, our results offer more evidence that the true symptomatic incidence of dengue probably falls within the commonly cited range of 50 million to 100 million cases per year. Our mortality estimates are lower than those presented elsewhere and should be considered in light of the totality of evidence suggesting that dengue mortality might, in fact, be substantially higher. FUNDING Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


Parasites & Vectors | 2013

Modelling adult Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus survival at different temperatures in laboratory and field settings

Oliver J. Brady; Michael A. Johansson; Carlos A. Guerra; Samir Bhatt; Nick Golding; David M Pigott; Hélène Delatte; Marta G Grech; Paul T. Leisnham; Rafael Maciel-de-Freitas; Linda M. Styer; David L. Smith; Thomas W. Scott; Peter W. Gething; Simon I. Hay

BackgroundThe survival of adult female Aedes mosquitoes is a critical component of their ability to transmit pathogens such as dengue viruses. One of the principal determinants of Aedes survival is temperature, which has been associated with seasonal changes in Aedes populations and limits their geographical distribution. The effects of temperature and other sources of mortality have been studied in the field, often via mark-release-recapture experiments, and under controlled conditions in the laboratory. Survival results differ and reconciling predictions between the two settings has been hindered by variable measurements from different experimental protocols, lack of precision in measuring survival of free-ranging mosquitoes, and uncertainty about the role of age-dependent mortality in the field.MethodsHere we apply generalised additive models to data from 351 published adult Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus survival experiments in the laboratory to create survival models for each species across their range of viable temperatures. These models are then adjusted to estimate survival at different temperatures in the field using data from 59 Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus field survivorship experiments. The uncertainty at each stage of the modelling process is propagated through to provide confidence intervals around our predictions.ResultsOur results indicate that adult Ae. albopictus has higher survival than Ae. aegypti in the laboratory and field, however, Ae. aegypti can tolerate a wider range of temperatures. A full breakdown of survival by age and temperature is given for both species. The differences between laboratory and field models also give insight into the relative contributions to mortality from temperature, other environmental factors, and senescence and over what ranges these factors can be important.ConclusionsOur results support the importance of producing site-specific mosquito survival estimates. By including fluctuating temperature regimes, our models provide insight into seasonal patterns of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus population dynamics that may be relevant to seasonal changes in dengue virus transmission. Our models can be integrated with Aedes and dengue modelling efforts to guide and evaluate vector control, better map the distribution of disease and produce early warning systems for dengue epidemics.


Parasites & Vectors | 2014

Global temperature constraints on Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus persistence and competence for dengue virus transmission

Oliver J. Brady; Nick Golding; David M Pigott; Moritz U. G. Kraemer; Jane P. Messina; Robert C. Reiner; Thomas W. Scott; David L. Smith; Peter W. Gething; Simon I. Hay

BackgroundDengue is a disease that has undergone significant expansion over the past hundred years. Understanding what factors limit the distribution of transmission can be used to predict current and future limits to further dengue expansion. While not the only factor, temperature plays an important role in defining these limits. Previous attempts to analyse the effect of temperature on the geographic distribution of dengue have not considered its dynamic intra-annual and diurnal change and its cumulative effects on mosquito and virus populations.MethodsHere we expand an existing modelling framework with new temperature-based relationships to model an index proportional to the basic reproductive number of the dengue virus. This model framework is combined with high spatial and temporal resolution global temperature data to model the effects of temperature on Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus persistence and competence for dengue virus transmission.ResultsOur model predicted areas where temperature is not expected to permit transmission and/or Aedes persistence throughout the year. By reanalysing existing experimental data our analysis indicates that Ae. albopictus, often considered a minor vector of dengue, has comparable rates of virus dissemination to its primary vector, Ae. aegypti, and when the longer lifespan of Ae. albopictus is considered its competence for dengue virus transmission far exceeds that of Ae. aegypti.ConclusionsThese results can be used to analyse the effects of temperature and other contributing factors on the expansion of dengue or its Aedes vectors. Our finding that Ae. albopictus has a greater capacity for dengue transmission than Ae. aegypti is contrary to current explanations for the comparative rarity of dengue transmission in established Ae. albopictus populations. This suggests that the limited capacity of Ae. albopictus to transmit DENV is more dependent on its ecology than vector competence. The recommendations, which we explicitly outlined here, point to clear targets for entomological investigation.


eLife | 2016

Mapping global environmental suitability for Zika virus

Jane P. Messina; Moritz U. G. Kraemer; Oliver J. Brady; David M Pigott; Freya M Shearer; Daniel J. Weiss; Nick Golding; Corrine W. Ruktanonchai; Peter W. Gething; Emily Cohn; John S. Brownstein; Kamran Khan; Andrew J. Tatem; Thomas Jaenisch; Christopher J L Murray; Fatima Marinho; Thomas W. Scott; Simon I. Hay

Zika virus was discovered in Uganda in 1947 and is transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, which also act as vectors for dengue and chikungunya viruses throughout much of the tropical world. In 2007, an outbreak in the Federated States of Micronesia sparked public health concern. In 2013, the virus began to spread across other parts of Oceania and in 2015, a large outbreak in Latin America began in Brazil. Possible associations with microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome observed in this outbreak have raised concerns about continued global spread of Zika virus, prompting its declaration as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by the World Health Organization. We conducted species distribution modelling to map environmental suitability for Zika. We show a large portion of tropical and sub-tropical regions globally have suitable environmental conditions with over 2.17 billion people inhabiting these areas. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15272.001

Collaboration


Dive into the Oliver J. Brady's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Simon I. Hay

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David M Pigott

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nick Golding

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David L. Smith

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge